Performance improvements in Firefox 3

By Azmodan
in Back Page News

 Share

Recommended Posts

Community Regular

Azmodan

Posted
Posted

Interesting article that reveals the current work on Firefox 3's performance.

... I’ve compiled the results of the SunSpider JavaScript Benchmark test for each of the different browsers. All of the tests below were performed on the same Windows machine, and the Firefox 3 nightly builds definitely came out on top. Here are the results sorted from best to worst (each one is hyperlinked to the full stats):

1. Firefox 3 Nightly (PGO Optimized): 7263.8ms

2. Firefox 3 Nightly (02/25/2008 build): 8219.4ms

3. Opera 9.5.9807 Beta: 10824.0ms

4. Firefox 3 Beta 3: 16080.6ms

5. Safari 3.0.4 Beta: 18012.6ms

6. Firefox 2.0.0.12: 29376.4ms

7. Internet Explorer 7: 72375.0ms

Very interesting, however I haven't compiled the latest nightly build to check it's performance. My results elaborate that Opera champs over Firefox 3 Beta 3. What about you guys?

Source: Cybernetnews.com

Community Regular

Azmodan

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Has memory usage improved?

Yes, in Beta 3 you can see the improvement on memory management, usually the browser used (2.x) to sit on larger memory but now's very humble and eats less resources. Haven't tested Safari because it won't install on Vista (throws an error while loading), but Opera beats Firefox 3 Beta 3 in memory usage and loading rates.

Here's another benchmark list,

http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/001023.html

Experienced

bigmehdi

Posted
Posted

According to the benchmark , there's less motivations for using opera (No more the "fastest browser on earth").

Also safari is boasting its superior speed...

Great to see how far is Firefox is improved.

Also Firefox is almost the same under linux, so if one day you want to make the switch..

Grand Master

+Mystic MVC

Posted
  • MVC
Posted
According to http://wiki.mozilla.org/Releases, Firefox 3 Beta 4 launches March 10-14.

Hmm, so not a clear actual public release date in sight for a while then? I am hesitant to use betas because of all the plugins I am currently using. I would hate having to go back to about zero plugins/add-ons working.

Community Regular

Azmodan

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Hmm, so not a clear actual public release date in sight for a while then?

Just this: "Early 2008 (TBD): Firefox 3 released, Firefox 2.0.x.y supported for next six months" on: http://wiki.mozilla.org/ReleaseRoadmap . Not every clear but according to this, they're mentioning it's launching in the first half of 2008. ;)

Grand Master

+Mystic MVC

Posted
  • MVC
Posted
Just this: "Early 2008 (TBD): Firefox 3 released, Firefox 2.0.x.y supported for next six months" on: http://wiki.mozilla.org/ReleaseRoadmap . Not every clear but according to this, they're mentioning it's launching in the first half of 2008. ;)

Great, I can't wait!

Grand Master

PyX

Posted
Posted

I don't know if it's been reported, but Webkit pawns this test with 3804.2 ms

I tested this on my 24-inch iMac though, so I have good specs, and don't have Windows. I don't know if it's really significant though. Maybe I should have tried Safari before posting this here haha.

Wow, this test is on webkit.org, now call me stupid x_x Sorry!

But Safari is MUCH slower. Like 5 times.

Grand Master

+Mystic MVC

Posted
  • MVC
Posted
Memory usage will be greatly improved when jemalloc is intergrated, it is already included in the Linux trunk builds.

http://blog.pavlov.net/2008/02/27/jemalloc...-linux-edition/

Ha, they could have just implemented that in FF 3 and that would have been good enough for me. :D I don't know how many times I can post about how happy the reduced memory usage will work out for me!

Grand Master

The_Decryptor Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted
Memory usage will be greatly improved when jemalloc is intergrated, it is already included in the Linux trunk builds.

http://blog.pavlov.net/2008/02/27/jemalloc...-linux-edition/

Within certain limits, it can't magically stop storing things it needs in memory (images take up a crap load of memory, a 1MB jpeg can take up 70MB of RAM)

Edit: I read somewhere about storing the compressed form in memory, and only keeping the uncompressed form around for a small amount of time, should help.

Grand Master

x-byte

Posted
Posted
According to the benchmark , there's less motivations for using opera (No more the "fastest browser on earth").

Also safari is boasting its superior speed...

Great to see how far is Firefox is improved.

Also Firefox is almost the same under linux, so if one day you want to make the switch..

This is one test ... How can you tell a browser is "the fastet" overall when it's just with java script.

Experienced

+Cryton Subscriber²

Posted
  • Subscriber²
Posted
Memory usage will be greatly improved when jemalloc is intergrated, it is already included in the Linux trunk builds.

http://blog.pavlov.net/2008/02/27/jemalloc...-linux-edition/

Jemalloc got turned on for windows nightly trunk builds just after Beta 3 was released.

Grand Master

The_Decryptor Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted (edited)

Just tried the latest nightly on my system, got 5149.8ms

I'll try the latest WebKit nightly soon.

Edit: I've tried 3 times, the test just randomly stops working in the latest available nightly for WebKit (I'm not compiling it myself)

Edited by The_Decryptor
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Microsoft is making Windows 11's context menus faster, simpler, and configurable

      By thartist · Posted

      Dude, it's a .reg away from a permanent modification. If you're a power user, look it up and keep the .reg and stop being a crybaby expecting MS to include customization for everything on a generalist OS. The default is what's the best UX for the majority of the userbase, non techie people.
    • Logitech MX Creative Console is down to the lowest price

      By TarasBuria · Posted

      Logitech MX Creative Console is down to the lowest price by Taras Buria Having a Stream Deck-like device next to your keyboard could be a massive productivity boost. It lets you map specific actions and shortcuts to speed things up, and Logitech has such a device for you with a big 20% discount. Right now, you can save $40 on the Logitech MX Creative Console. The MX Creative Console is an unconventional accessory that consists of two modules. One module has nine customizable buttons, with each having a built-in display for mapping. You can assign apps, shortcuts, actions, or something else. There are nine buttons, plus two more for switching between "pages" of actions. The second module has no displays. Instead, there is a big twisting knob and a small roller for precise adjustments in creative apps like Photoshop, Illustrator, Affinity, and more. There are four additional buttons as well. The MX Creative Console is available in two colors: Graphite and Pale Gray. Both are now 20% off, saving you $40. Just keep in mind that the MX Creative Console requires the Logitech Options+ app, which is only available on Windows and macOS. By the way, each unit comes with three months of Adobe Creative Cloud. Logitech MX Creative Console Graphite - $159.99 | 20% off on Amazon Logitech MX Creative Console Pale Gray - $159.99 | 20% off on Amazon This Amazon deal is US-specific and not available in other regions unless specified. This is a first-party seller link (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you also purchase from a first-party seller link only. If you don't like it or want to look at more options, check out the previous deals that we have covered, OR you can also visit Amazon US deals page. Get Prime (SNAP), Prime Video, Audible Plus or Kindle / Music Unlimited. Free for 30 days. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Creative launches flagship Sound Blaster AE-X internal sound card for audiophiles

      By MarkTay · Posted

      Because someone else reported theirs was unusable, genius. But being a Linux user you should be used to that. Next time you think you have a "gotcha", check first.
    • Studio MDHR reveals Cuphead sequel and an 8-bit platformer spin-off

      By LoneWolfSL · Posted

      Studio MDHR reveals Cuphead sequel and an 8-bit platformer spin-off by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Studio MDHR has been rather silent about its next major gaming project since the release of Cuphead back in 2017. However, that ended today during the Summer Game Fest presentation, with the studio revealing not one but two project announcements. First, the studio confirmed that it is currently in the middle of developing a brand-new Cuphead game, bringing back the iconic characters for another adventure. Just like the last game, this is slated to be a fully hand-animated endeavor. This also means there isn't a release date attached to it yet. “Craftsmanship is at the heart of everything we do here at Studio MDHR,” says co-founder Chad Moldenhauer. “When it came time to peel back the curtain and share a little bit about what we’ve been up to, we couldn’t imagine a more fun way to do so than with today’s Special Bulletin. The studio is working on this new Cuphead with help from Toronto’s Stop Motion Department and Continue Agency. At the same time, Studio MDHR also revealed that another part of the team has been working on a different Cuphead installment. Dubbed the Mighty Cuphead Adventure, this is taking a different art direction to the original. "In true Studio MDHR fashion, this game goes beyond just taking inspiration from the classics of the 1980s… it is actually built with technology of the era," the studio explained. "That's right: Mighty Cuphead Adventure is programmed in assembly language and designed with the exacting specifications of the Sega Master System home gaming console in mind." Aside from releasing on PC and modern consoles, Mighty Cuphead Adventure will even be playable on the 1985-released Sega Master System. A release date has not been announced just yet.
    • Still using Classic Outlook? Microsoft highlights 15 reasons to switch to New Outlook

      By grunger106 · Posted

      Any decent ITSM will A) have a web form that allows a user to raise a ticket, if you're writing an email you can write a ticket. B) Monitor a mailbox and auto-generate tickets based on inbound mails for those users that really can't get their heads around the concept that if you have an issue you go to support.mycompany.com and fill in the box. From your description you're having users email the desk, and then having a human read each one and manually raise a ticket on behalf of the user.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Mentor
      grik went up a rank
      Mentor
    • Dedicated
      JKR earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Year In
      CHUNWEI earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Week One Done
      I2D earned a badge
      Week One Done

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      481
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      272
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      78
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      67
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      61
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!