Student Suspended For Opening High School Deli


Recommended Posts

LA JOLLA, Calif. -- A La Jolla high school student is in hot water for opening a deli on campus.

Matt Wong, 17, loves making sandwiches, so he took his pastime from his kitchen to his school's quad.

On his first day, he had 14 orders before lunchtime.

However, his operation left a sour taste in his principal's mouth.

Wong was ordered to shut down his deli because of health concerns and permit issues.

"He was quite serious about making sure no one got a sandwich. But I managed to get them all out," said Wong.

While the principal suspended Wong for two days for not following orders, students said they enjoyed the gourmet sandwiches.

post-37120-1204224878.jpg

source & video

Because there's no telling what this kid will have in his food. There are protocols in place for food to come in; it's not as if anyone and everyone is bringing food in for everyone to consume. They're looking out for the safety of the students more than anything else because it is a health risk. The food he's bringing in could be poisoned, contaminated, blah blah blah. Even though it could be completely legit, it's a safety concern.

Can you imagine what a parent would be like if they found out that their child got food poisoning from some random kid's sandwiches at lunch time? What's to stop him from putting rat poison or other chemicals in them, and then passing them off as healthy sandwiches?

I agree there was probably nothing wrong, but there's a reason that the principal was concerned.

I doubt he'd poison them intentionally, but its very likely that someone would be unintentionally poisoned. Unless, of course, he has better hygiene practices than restaurants, which is highly unlikely.

higher chance of getting poisoned by the cafeteria or some local fast food joint than from him id believe.....

we live in a day and age where for some reason, no one will trust each other. Keep this attitude up that anyone can and will hurt you, and we are all in for a horrible future.

Alright shakey, what if he snaps and instead of going through the route of bringing a gun to the school, he takes people out with his food? If he has established a daily deli at the school, this would be so simple for him. It's because of those who have abused trust that trust is hard to earn and gain.

It would be a completely different situation if he goes through a process of selling the food with some kind of license. It's no different than some guy walking up to me with food that he wants to sell me; I don't know him or what is in the stuff he's trying to sell me. I believe this kid would do no harm with selling the food, but if something happens, not only is he in trouble, but so are the people who run the school.

Alright shakey, what if he snaps and instead of going through the route of bringing a gun to the school, he takes people out with his food? If he has established a daily deli at the school, this would be so simple for him. It's because of those who have abused trust that trust is hard to earn and gain.

oh please, if we are going to throw in what ifs, we could say the same for any restraunt, mall, postal office, and school.

you either turst them and eat it, or you dont.

I doubt he'd poison them intentionally, but its very likely that someone would be unintentionally poisoned. Unless, of course, he has better hygiene practices than restaurants, which is highly unlikely.

This comment made me laugh. You've never worked in a restaurant have you?

oh please, if we are going to throw in what ifs, we could say the same for any restraunt, mall, postal office, and school.

you either turst them and eat it, or you dont.

He isn't the only person who's butt is on the line if something were to happen, don't forget that.

For some reason this reminds me of the pic that shows a run down van and mentions something about "Get in, I've got candy." Yes, let's trust him, he's got candy after all, right? Doesn't completely apply here, but again, more than one person is responsible if something happens or if the kid decides to go postal.

This comment made me laugh. You've never worked in a restaurant have you?

I have and restaurants have to obey certain codes . wether they do or not is their problem and they risdk getting shut down .

Unless this kid broughta cooler with him then all it takes is for the mayo he was using to go bad and you would have alot of sick high school kids.

I think you do need a permit for selling food. I would say the school could get into deep trouble if someone found out a kid was making and selling food.

Yes he was wrong for disobeying orders, but why forbid him in the first place?

It wouldn't surprise me at all if the cafeteria was behind this.

How can they stop this anyways? If he's making them at home and bringing them to school, how is this illegal? I believe the "safety concern" is bull. If that's the case, then ban people from trading sandwiches and food with their friends.

It wouldn't surprise me at all if the cafeteria was behind this.

How can they stop this anyways? If he's making them at home and bringing them to school, how is this illegal? I believe the "safety concern" is bull. If that's the case, then ban people from trading sandwiches and food with their friends.

Is it now?

Trading between students at any given time: uncontrollable.

Selling food to students in secret: uncontrollable.

Having a stand for students to line up at and buy food: controllable and liable.

^ I was unaware he actually set up a stand. After reading your comment, I watched the video (which doesn't work in Firefox :( ) and then I realized that he actually set up a stand.

I just figured he got orders and made them at home.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Just the price of doing business. The scamble to pull as much from the web as possible is happening, and it's happening before a case like this changes how or what is legal do to with AI in terms of data harvesting. But even then as we've seen with the likes of Google who ignore cookie requests and just accept the fact they'll get fined, it's built into their business price model now. AI is here, its not going away. Their reward if any from the court case would be best suited to trying to incorprate AI or licence their end points as authentic human verified content. The problem is, as we've seen these same news papers are using AI themselves.
    • Which finger's fingernail are we talking about? I can see how not having this info can lead to massive differences in interpretation.
    • This Chinese company is reportedly developing a feature Apple and Samsung can only dream of by Hamid Ganji While companies like Apple and Samsung have been relatively conservative with their devices’ battery capacities in recent years, Chinese manufacturers have taken the competition to the next level by introducing significantly larger batteries. However, the latest report from China suggests that a local company may already be developing a smartphone with a whopping 14,000mAh battery. Chinese leaker Digital Chat Station claimed on Weibo that a smartphone maker is developing a device with a 14,000mAh battery. If true, it would be the largest battery ever used in a smartphone and could, in theory, provide up to a week of battery life on a single charge. The leaker did not reveal the name of the company behind the device, but there are some clues. This week, HONOR unveiled the X80 Pro Max in China with an 11,000mAh battery and 90W wired charging support. The company also launched the Honor Win in January, which packs a 10,000mAh battery. HONOR, a former subsidiary of Huawei, has a proven track record of developing smartphones with unusually large batteries. However, other Chinese brands, including Xiaomi, have also launched devices such as the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max with 7,500mAh batteries. Though Chinese users on Weibo also believe the company behind the new battery is HONOR. Interestingly, Digital Chat Station said the device with the 14,000mAh battery weighs around 220 grams, making it lighter than the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (233 grams) and slightly heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (214 grams). The iPhone 17 Pro Max currently packs a 5,088mAh battery in eSIM-only versions, while the Galaxy S26 Ultra features a 5,000mAh battery. Neither device is expected to see a dramatic increase in battery capacity in its next-generation successor. So when it comes to battery comparison, Chinese brands are unbeaten. HONOR smartphones are currently available in the EU, but the Chinese brand has no official presence in the United States due to restrictions imposed by the U.S. government.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      137
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!