Student Suspended For Opening High School Deli


Recommended Posts

LA JOLLA, Calif. -- A La Jolla high school student is in hot water for opening a deli on campus.

Matt Wong, 17, loves making sandwiches, so he took his pastime from his kitchen to his school's quad.

On his first day, he had 14 orders before lunchtime.

However, his operation left a sour taste in his principal's mouth.

Wong was ordered to shut down his deli because of health concerns and permit issues.

"He was quite serious about making sure no one got a sandwich. But I managed to get them all out," said Wong.

While the principal suspended Wong for two days for not following orders, students said they enjoyed the gourmet sandwiches.

post-37120-1204224878.jpg

source & video

Because there's no telling what this kid will have in his food. There are protocols in place for food to come in; it's not as if anyone and everyone is bringing food in for everyone to consume. They're looking out for the safety of the students more than anything else because it is a health risk. The food he's bringing in could be poisoned, contaminated, blah blah blah. Even though it could be completely legit, it's a safety concern.

Can you imagine what a parent would be like if they found out that their child got food poisoning from some random kid's sandwiches at lunch time? What's to stop him from putting rat poison or other chemicals in them, and then passing them off as healthy sandwiches?

I agree there was probably nothing wrong, but there's a reason that the principal was concerned.

I doubt he'd poison them intentionally, but its very likely that someone would be unintentionally poisoned. Unless, of course, he has better hygiene practices than restaurants, which is highly unlikely.

higher chance of getting poisoned by the cafeteria or some local fast food joint than from him id believe.....

we live in a day and age where for some reason, no one will trust each other. Keep this attitude up that anyone can and will hurt you, and we are all in for a horrible future.

Alright shakey, what if he snaps and instead of going through the route of bringing a gun to the school, he takes people out with his food? If he has established a daily deli at the school, this would be so simple for him. It's because of those who have abused trust that trust is hard to earn and gain.

It would be a completely different situation if he goes through a process of selling the food with some kind of license. It's no different than some guy walking up to me with food that he wants to sell me; I don't know him or what is in the stuff he's trying to sell me. I believe this kid would do no harm with selling the food, but if something happens, not only is he in trouble, but so are the people who run the school.

Alright shakey, what if he snaps and instead of going through the route of bringing a gun to the school, he takes people out with his food? If he has established a daily deli at the school, this would be so simple for him. It's because of those who have abused trust that trust is hard to earn and gain.

oh please, if we are going to throw in what ifs, we could say the same for any restraunt, mall, postal office, and school.

you either turst them and eat it, or you dont.

I doubt he'd poison them intentionally, but its very likely that someone would be unintentionally poisoned. Unless, of course, he has better hygiene practices than restaurants, which is highly unlikely.

This comment made me laugh. You've never worked in a restaurant have you?

oh please, if we are going to throw in what ifs, we could say the same for any restraunt, mall, postal office, and school.

you either turst them and eat it, or you dont.

He isn't the only person who's butt is on the line if something were to happen, don't forget that.

For some reason this reminds me of the pic that shows a run down van and mentions something about "Get in, I've got candy." Yes, let's trust him, he's got candy after all, right? Doesn't completely apply here, but again, more than one person is responsible if something happens or if the kid decides to go postal.

This comment made me laugh. You've never worked in a restaurant have you?

I have and restaurants have to obey certain codes . wether they do or not is their problem and they risdk getting shut down .

Unless this kid broughta cooler with him then all it takes is for the mayo he was using to go bad and you would have alot of sick high school kids.

I think you do need a permit for selling food. I would say the school could get into deep trouble if someone found out a kid was making and selling food.

Yes he was wrong for disobeying orders, but why forbid him in the first place?

It wouldn't surprise me at all if the cafeteria was behind this.

How can they stop this anyways? If he's making them at home and bringing them to school, how is this illegal? I believe the "safety concern" is bull. If that's the case, then ban people from trading sandwiches and food with their friends.

It wouldn't surprise me at all if the cafeteria was behind this.

How can they stop this anyways? If he's making them at home and bringing them to school, how is this illegal? I believe the "safety concern" is bull. If that's the case, then ban people from trading sandwiches and food with their friends.

Is it now?

Trading between students at any given time: uncontrollable.

Selling food to students in secret: uncontrollable.

Having a stand for students to line up at and buy food: controllable and liable.

^ I was unaware he actually set up a stand. After reading your comment, I watched the video (which doesn't work in Firefox :( ) and then I realized that he actually set up a stand.

I just figured he got orders and made them at home.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My ice blue precision 3550 laptop
    • A coalition of publishers sued OpenAI and Microsoft over scraping content without consent by Hamid Ganji Image via Depositphotos.com AI companies often rely on readily available internet content to train their chatbots and provide users with instant answers. This method of AI training is fast and relatively inexpensive, but using a website’s content without permission or compensation is not something publishers like to see, and this is exactly why Microsoft and OpenAI are now being sued. As reported by Bloomberg, a group of publishers that collectively own nearly 400 newspapers has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft. The coalition argues that the two companies scraped their content to build AI chatbots like ChatGPT and Copilot without paying any compensation. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, argues that while AI products have generated billions of dollars in market value using publishers’ work, none of that value has been shared with the publishers. The plaintiffs are seeking statutory damages and injunctive relief for alleged copyright infringement and violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. “Defendants systematically and secretly crawled the Publishers’ websites—including content behind paywalls and other access restrictions—and copied the Publishers’ articles, stories, and other original works onto their own servers without authorization,” the complaint states. The publishers also described the AI boom as a “death knell for local journalism” if AI companies that scrape content for free are not held accountable. Former New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin and his law firm, Platkin LLP, are representing the publishers. “Our models empower innovation, are trained on publicly available data, and are grounded in fair use,” OpenAI spokesperson Drew Pusateri told Bloomberg. This is not the first lawsuit involving the unauthorized use of publishers’ content by AI firms, but it is one of the largest coalitions ever formed against the free use of content by AI chatbots. In 2024, OpenAI and Microsoft also faced a similar lawsuit from eight newspapers that claimed AI products were benefiting from their content without permission.
    • Rufus alternative Ventoy now supports Windows 11's mandatory update, fixes major boot bug by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has its own official Media Creation Tool used for making bootable USB media, there are some popular third-party utilities as well which offer additional options like bypassing system requirements, Microsoft Account creation, and more. One of these is Ventoy, and the software has received its latest update today. In fact, the app actually got a slew of updates over the last couple of days, three version releases in total, to be specific. The first release, version 1.1.13, was pulled as there was some unspecified error in the update, and as such, the corrected version 1.1.14 was pushed out. Following that on very short notice, 1.1.15 was published as well. For those unfamiliar, Ventoy is an open-source utility that lets users create a bootable USB drive once and then simply copy ISO, WIM, IMG, VHD, or EFI files onto it without repeatedly formatting the drive. It supports both legacy BIOS and UEFI boot modes, Secure Boot, and a wide range of operating systems, making it one of the most versatile tools in the category. The biggest change in version 1.1.14 is an updated Secure Boot shim file aimed at resolving the UEFI CA 2023 issue, which is basically a compatibility problem that has affected Secure Boot environments on some systems. If you recall, we reported about severe boot issues on HP devices following the release of updated Secure Boot 2023 keys. For anyone who may not be aware, back in early 2024, Microsoft announced that it was updating Secure Boot keys as they were going to become 15 years old in 2026, which is also when they are set to expire. As such, the new 2023 certificates have been rolling out with the newest Windows 11 updates. Updated boot manager and Secure Boot certificates are crucial for protection against malware like bootkits. These are mandatory updates. Alongside that, the VentoyPlugson graphical plugin configurator was updated in sync with the release. The update also introduces a new VTOY_SECURE_BOOT_POLICY option within the Global Control plugin, giving users more flexibility in managing Secure Boot behavior. Ventoy has also received a fix for a startup issue when Secure Boot was disabled. Microsoft does officially allow users to boot systems without Secure Boot as long as the PC is Secure Boot capable. The full changelog is given below: Update secure boot shim file to solve the UEFI CA 2023 issue. The new release use a new CA, so you need to enroll the new key for the first boot time. VentoyPlugson update synchronously. Global control plugin add a VTOY_SECURE_BOOT_POLICY option. Fix the boot issue when Secure Boot is disabled in the UEFI firmware. You can download the latest version of the app here on Ventoy's official GitHub repo or from Neowin software stories.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      441
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!