Wal-Mart: Microsoft should kill Vista Home Basic


Recommended Posts

http://blogs.computerworld.com/wal_mart_mi...ista_home_basic

You may think of Wal-Mart as a down-market PC seller, but as emails in the Vista "junk PC" case show, Wal-Mart was furious at Microsoft's Vista Capable scheme, and thought that Vista Home Basic never should have been developed, much less released. They're not alone. Other retailers, notably Office Depot, thought Vista Home Basic should have been killed.

The Basic version did not make sense especially since they were pushing Aero and Flip 3D.

Well i honestly don't think theres anything wrong with vistas marketing.

Capable does not mean it can run every feature. It means that something will run but without any optional features.

Ready means that it can run every feature. [Though this is slightly ambiguous]

---

I really do not see how people expect capable to mean it can run everything....for the "Vista Ready" thing maybe if they wrote windows vista home premium ready or something i guess.

And once again - why was there so many versions of Vista. They should've just sold 2 versions, one for business users and one for home/gamers.

Bring on the "oh but it's cheaper for the customer.." no, they should've kept the prices low in the first place but good old greed has priority.

And once again - why was there so many versions of Vista. They should've just sold 2 versions, one for business users and one for home/gamers.

Bring on the "oh but it's cheaper for the customer.." no, they should've kept the prices low in the first place but good old greed has priority.

Three versions would have even been fine even, Ultimate still has a place I think. Combining the home and business features into one edition.

Well i honestly don't think theres anything wrong with vistas marketing.

Capable does not mean it can run every feature. It means that something will run but without any optional features.

Ready means that it can run every feature. [Though this is slightly ambiguous]

---

I really do not see how people expect capable to mean it can run everything....for the "Vista Ready" thing maybe if they wrote windows vista home premium ready or something i guess.

actually?...some might have gotten the computer with XP..and 'Capable' meant it could run Vista, if you decide to purchase it or upgrade.....however, it seems MS meant 'Capable' meant after you spend another 800.00 for hardware upgrades....

Gates dethroned; Buffett is richest (thats what happens when you leave MS with shysters)..I'm sure the EU will be adding another Billion to its Revised Fine....LOL

Edited by jwjw1
Well i honestly don't think theres anything wrong with vistas marketing.

Capable does not mean it can run every feature. It means that something will run but without any optional features.

Ready means that it can run every feature. [Though this is slightly ambiguous]

---

I really do not see how people expect capable to mean it can run everything....for the "Vista Ready" thing maybe if they wrote windows vista home premium ready or something i guess.

The problem is the average Joe doesn't want to (and shouldn't have to, for that matter) go shopping for a computer and wade through the pile of crap that this has led to. If Microsoft is going to force Vista onto computers sold in Wal-Mart, Best Buy, etc. then they should make sure the damn thing runs at it's fullest. Period.

By the way, where did you come up with the definitions of capable and ready? As far as I know, Microsoft never defined it in those terms. You can't just assume thousands of other people look at something the way you do.

So if they didn't want Home Basic, why didn't they just refuse to sell it?

Probably because they didn't realise how rubbish it is at the time "ooh! new interface! more secure! runs merrily on 1GB RAM... oh wait"

Gates dethroned; Buffett is richest (thats what happens when you leave MS with shysters)..I'm sure the EU will be adding another Billion to its Revised Fine....LOL

Yeah, he's practically a pauper, only 58 billion and ONLY 2 billion more than last year.

Considering this is just his personal wealth, the EU fine is basically the change that drops out of his pocket in between the cushions on the couch. Add another 2 billion to the fine, ultimately it'll just be the EU consumer's who pay it.

The problem is the average Joe doesn't want to (and shouldn't have to, for that matter) go shopping for a computer and wade through the pile of crap that this has led to. If Microsoft is going to force Vista onto computers sold in Wal-Mart, Best Buy, etc. then they should make sure the damn thing runs at it's fullest. Period.

By the way, where did you come up with the definitions of capable and ready? As far as I know, Microsoft never defined it in those terms. You can't just assume thousands of other people look at something the way you do.

It's called english lol. and also heres from microsoft's website:

What is a Windows Vista Capable PC?

A new PC running Windows XP that carries the Windows Vista Capable PC logo can run Windows Vista. All editions of Windows Vista will deliver core experiences such as innovations in organizing and finding information, security, and reliability. All Windows Vista Capable PCs will run these core experiences at a minimum. Some features available in the premium editions of Windows Vista?like the new Windows Aero user experience?may require advanced or additional hardwareWindows Vista Premium Ready PCs

Some Windows Vista Capable PCs have been designated Premium Ready. These PCs will provide an even better Windows Vista experience, including the Windows Aero user experience. Features available in specific premium editions of Windows Vista, such as the ability to watch and record live TV, may require additional hardware.

---

All Windows Vista Capable PCs will be able to run at least the core experiences of Windows Vista.

All Windows Vista Premium Ready PCs can deliver even better Windows Vista experiences, including the new Windows Aero user experience.

---

Source: http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/...de/capable.mspx

The Home Basic version should have replaced the Starter Edition and be used only in emerging markets such as China and India. The well established markets should have had only one edition (maybe two to separate home and business), with all capabilities functional and may be deactivated by the user at its discretion.

So if they didn't want Home Basic, why didn't they just refuse to sell it?

Because their competitors would still be able to sell lower-spec computers with the (presumably) less expensive Vista version.

In short, they would be placing their products at a higher price point then their competitors. Bad for them, so they want to "force" the others to also stop selling less expensive PCs.

The real question should be what idiot or idiots actually BOUGHT home basic.
Me. I'm not an idiot. The PC was purchased as an inexpensive PC for our 7 year old's birthday.

There is a market for less expensive OSes, you know. Not everyone wanting one is an "idiot".

The real question should be what idiot or idiots actually BOUGHT home basic

Quite a lot. Businesses don't need computers that can run Aero for one. So theres no point in buying an OS that is designed for entertainment, even though there is Vista Business that seems to be more aimed towards laptops. Therefore, Home basic is generally what an office user would need.

It's called english lol. and also heres from microsoft's website:

What is a Windows Vista Capable PC?

A new PC running Windows XP that carries the Windows Vista Capable PC logo can run Windows Vista. All editions of Windows Vista will deliver core experiences such as innovations in organizing and finding information, security, and reliability. All Windows Vista Capable PCs will run these core experiences at a minimum. Some features available in the premium editions of Windows Vista?like the new Windows Aero user experience?may require advanced or additional hardware.

I understand English, too. What does that last sentence say? Nothing. It uses the word "may" which is ambiguous. It may mean that Aero will run. It may mean Aero won't?

What can you conclude from that? Nada.

Quite a lot. Businesses don't need computers that can run Aero for one. So theres no point in buying an OS that is designed for entertainment, even though there is Vista Business that seems to be more aimed towards laptops. Therefore, Home basic is generally what an office user would need.

Home can't connect to a domain. It's useless in a business enviornment.

It's called english lol. and also heres from microsoft's website:

What is a Windows Vista Capable PC?

A new PC running Windows XP that carries the Windows Vista Capable PC logo can run Windows Vista. All editions of Windows Vista will deliver core experiences such as innovations in organizing and finding information, security, and reliability. All Windows Vista Capable PCs will run these core experiences at a minimum. Some features available in the premium editions of Windows Vista—like the new Windows Aero user experience—may require advanced or additional hardware.

Windows Vista Premium Ready PCs

Some Windows Vista Capable PCs have been designated Premium Ready. These PCs will provide an even better Windows Vista experience, including the Windows Aero user experience. Features available in specific premium editions of Windows Vista, such as the ability to watch and record live TV, may require additional hardware.

My understanding is that the information now available was only added after all the confusion. It's all very well saying it's very clear now but it wasn't back when the initiative was first launched. Also, Aero was pretty much THE main feature of Vista and to find it wasn't available on Home Basic annoyed a lot of people. The Home Basic package was completely unnecessary and should never have been released.

There is only one version of Vista that doesn't match up to XP and that is Ultimate.

XP Home = Vista Home Basic

XP MCE = Vista Home Premium

XP Pro = Vista Business

Has there ever been a push by Wal-Mart to not sell XP Home NO. Nor any other company for that matter. Vista Home Basic is equal to XP Home.

Vista Home Basic is not stipped down, but rather MSFT starts will Home Basic and adds to it to make Home Premium, Business, and Ultimate. They all use the same Kernel.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It STILL has horrid theme support. Hard to look at for me. The white is too bright, and the black too dark. I'm using classic outlook for the Dark Grey theme. It's just right for me.
    • inb4 someone leaves the usual "what an unfortunate name" comment
    • Cuktech 10 Ultra charger review: big display, four ports, 110W total power by Taras Buria Cuktech recently announced a couple of Ultra-branded chargers, including a desktop 300W charger, which I reviewed a few weeks ago. For those who do need that much (or who do not want to spend that much on a charger), Cuktech also offers the 10 Ultra, a traditional wall charger with similar features. Four ports, a big display, and up to 110W of power output. After using it for a few weeks, here are my impressions. Disclaimer: Cuktech provided the review unit without any editorial input or pre-approval. Like the 30 Ultra, the 10 Ultra arrived in a box made of nice cardboard with quality print all over it. Inside, besides the charger, you will find a 240W 6A charger, which, this time, is fully braided. While Cuktech always bundles high-power cables with its chargers and power banks, they are usually regular and unassuming. This time, the cable is much nicer, matching the charger's $59.99 price tag. The charger itself measures 67 x 76 x 33 mm or 2.6 x 3.0 x 1.3 inches and weighs about 250 grams. Considering the charger has four ports and a big display, I would say the compact size is quite impressive, albeit a little hefty. The overall design is similar to other chargers from the manufacturer, minus the chrome Cuktech logo next to the four ports. The Cuktech 10 Ultra has retractable prongs for better portability. Its front side is covered with piano black plastic housing two elements: a capacitive button with backlight and a quite large display for various charging stats. Ports are downward-facing, and I have mixed feelings about such a design. It is not the most convenient when you frequently connect and disconnect cables. It makes you bend over to find the right port to connect, and it is a no-go with outlets mounted closer to the floor. On the bright side, design like this eliminates clutter and sagging, especially when using four cables at once. Plus, you get plenty of space for a big display. Ports include two high-speed USB Type-C ports, one Type-C for less demanding devices, and one classic USB Type-A. The first two ports deliver full 100W, while the third is capped at 45W. As for the Type-A port, its maximum output is 18W. In total, the charger delivers 110W of power, but in my testing, I managed to squeeze 117W when charging two power banks and a tablet. Quite impressive. Type-C1 Type-C2 Type-C3 Type-A Single-port 100W 100W 45W 18W Two ports 80W 20W - - Three ports 65W 20W 20W - Four ports 65W 20W 10W 10W The charger can detect handshake protocols and balance power across all four ports according to each device's needs. As such, power is not limited to the values in the table above. You can have two ports charging at 55W, three ports at 45W + 20W, and more. For some reason, Cuktech is not listing the supported protocols, but a quick test showed that it is compatible with PD3.0, PPS, QC5, DCP, and UFCS. When you connect a compatible device, the charger automatically detects its charging standard and displays it on the screen, for example, Apple 6A or Samsung 3A. Speaking of the screen. The main highlight of the 10 Ultra is its 1.57-inch display with a maximum brightness of 700 nits and 160-degree viewing angles. The display takes up most of the front, and it shows various charging-related information, including total output power, current temperature, power distribution across ports with watts, volts, and amps, a screensaver, and more. You can toggle between the different views by tapping the button, and holding it changes the screen orientation (portrait or horizontal, plus flipped) according to your socket position. The screen is very nice. It is sharp, vivid, and the fonts are easy to read. As for settings, you can change the following: Keep the screen on or off Lock the screen orientation (hold the button to change the screen orientation) Keep the USB Type-A port on Toggle power modes The charger has three power modes: AI: standard mode that automatically allocates power to each connected device. Power Priority: prioritizes power for high-demand devices, such as laptops or power banks. Balanced: splits power evenly across connected devices according to their needs I was skeptical at first, but after testing a few devices in different modes, I can see the benefit of these three modes. The most useful is power priority, which gives the first Type-C port more power. When I was charging a 100W power bank (port 1) alongside a 140W power bank (port 2), Power Priority split the total output about 75-30. Balanced mode, as the name suggests, splits the total output between the two ports more or less equally. As for AI mode, the charger uses its brain to detect which device needs more power. In my testing, it figured out that the 140W power needs a bit more juice. As I said, I expected this to be more of a gimmick, but the three built-in modes turned out quite useful. For example, you can prioritize your laptop while giving other ports a little less power, but still enough to charge at acceptable speeds. Unfortunately, unlike the 30 Ultra, this charger cannot display the battery level of the device being charged. This small feature turned out to be very useful when I was testing the 30 Ultra, as it allowed me to see my phone's battery level without picking it up. Like other Cuktech chargers I tested, the 10 Ultra one proved itself reliable and well-made. It uses Gallium nitride semiconductor technology to reduce the charger's size and improve efficiency. It is also better at dissipating heat, but I have to say that when charging two power banks at 117W total, the charger got hotter than what I would call comfortable (hold it for a few seconds, and you start feeling a burning sensation at your fingertips). However, the built-in thermal indicator remained below the temperature threshold, with the screen reassuring that the device operated at "High performance" (I tested it in a 21 °C / 69 °F room). Overall, the Cuktech 10 Ultra is a solid choice. If you need four ports and you like to nerd out on various stats, it is a very easy recommendation. It will take care of your laptop, phone, tablet, and power bank without breaking a sweat, plus the build, material, and cable quality are top-notch. The mode switcher is handy when charging different devices with different power needs, too. I cannot say a display is a must-have in a charger, especially when it makes you more conscious about where to plug it, but it is a neat addition if you have a socket at your table or bed level, so that you can actually use the display and its features. The more important fact is that despite its size and quality, the display does not make the charger that much more expensive than similarly powerful chargers from competitors. Plus, you can save 10% on the 10 Ultra with a promo code on Amazon. Buy Cuktech 10 Ultra charger - $53.99 on Amazon with a promo code As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Last week I was investigating an issue with contacts and tried using the new Outlook. In the real (Classic) Outlook, you can easily go to any Outlook folder and present it in a Table View, then customize the columns to show/sort any field, which was exactly what I needed. But of course, the new Outlook doesn't have this feature at all. I gave up. Oh, and can we possibly stop claiming the new Outlook has PST support? What it really has is the ability to use the real Outlook in the background to pretend to have PST support. There is no PST support without the real Outlook installed.
    • Honestly just before Panos left it started to feel like MS just wasnt interested in them so they were being less innovative with them, and then when he DID leave for Amazon its kind of clear the direction is gone. It felt like Panos had both goals and drive, and a vision, but it felt like no matter what his title/department was the Surface devices never had the full interest of the rest of management and he was just pushing a bolder up a hill that MS was adding dirt to as he went.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      477
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!