• 0

[C/C++] What is the quickest/most efficient way to clear an array?


Question

So far I've been using:

memset(myarray, 0, sizeof(myarray));

Most of the time, myarray is just a character array, so I fill it full of null characters. However, is there a better way to do this? (It almost seems this is more suited to clearing structures or objects.)

Should I be using a string function? Or, should I use strlen() instead of sizeof()?

Or, at the very least is memset any more or any less efficient that a standard for loop to clear an array? I ask this because I might want to set myarray to a value other than null within the program.

Thanks in advance!

Edit: And yes, performance is quite important for my application.

10 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

The only way to be sure is to try both and compare benchmarks. If these strings are ridiculously huge then memset should always win, because memset is usually optimized (it doesn't do it one byte at a time). It depends on a lot of things like whether the compiler you're using inlines memset or not.

BTW: if these character arrays are strictly null terminated strings, then setting only the first character to null should be enough and much faster.

Edited by Sterling Christensen
  • 0
  XerXis said:
oh forgot: if you need to fill a static array with some value i would use std::fill instead of memset

With gcc's standard library, std::fill reduces to the alternatives he's already considering anyway - either a for loop or memset:

  Quote
* This function fills a range with copies of the same value. For one-byte

* types filling contiguous areas of memory, this becomes an inline call to

* @c memset.

See http://www.cs.brown.edu/~jwicks/libstdc++/...rce.html#l00516

It's probably similar with other compilers like Microsoft's.

  • 0
  Brandon Live said:
Do you explicitly need to zero out the buffer? Or is it enough to simply free it?

surely to free it, it would have to have been malloc/calloc/realloc'd and so would just be a simple point and so his current method using sizeof() wouldn't work

  • 0
  dev said:
if its a char array, why clear it all?

if you're going to be keeping "strings" in it, you'd be add a null terminating character after the string anyway so I normally just set the first byte to null.

Uhh, that doesn't work if you allocated the array on the heap... and it doesn't actually free anything up on the stack, since that entire memory block is still allocated on the stack until it goes out of scope. The only reason to do that is if you have a null-terminated string on the stack that you want to make "empty." It neither frees it nor zeros it out.

  dev said:
surely to free it, it would have to have been malloc/calloc/realloc'd and so would just be a simple point and so his current method using sizeof() wouldn't work

If freeing it is all that you care about...

If it's allocated on the heap, you need to free it using whatever allocator you allocated it with. If you used new, you need to use delete[].

If it's allocated on the stack, it's there until it goes out of scope...

In either case, if you want to explicitly zero it out, that's another matter (since free'ing it doesn't actually reset the bits until somebody else allocated that memory and uses it).

  • 0
  Brandon Live said:
Uhh, that doesn't work if you allocated the array on the heap... and it doesn't actually free anything up on the stack, since that entire memory block is still allocated on the stack until it goes out of scope. The only reason to do that is if you have a null-terminated string on the stack that you want to make "empty." It neither frees it nor zeros it out.

He didn't ask about freeing it, he wants to clear it. He wants the memory allocation there, just not the contents. What i said will work for a null terminated string. When working with a string you'd be using strlen and so setting the first byte to null will make strlen return 0 and be no different to if the whole char array was full of 0s.

  Brandon Live said:
If freeing it is all that you care about...

If it's allocated on the heap, you need to free it using whatever allocator you allocated it with. If you used new, you need to use delete[].

If it's allocated on the stack, it's there until it goes out of scope...

In either case, if you want to explicitly zero it out, that's another matter (since free'ing it doesn't actually reset the bits until somebody else allocated that memory and uses it).

I know that, when you use *alloc to allocate memory on the heap you only get a pointer back which, when used with sizeof(), won't give you how much memory is allocated. Seeing as he is using that method to get the size, it is more likely to be a simple char[] on the stack and so won't be able to free it (if that is even what he wanted, which I don't think it is...)

  • 0
  dev said:
He didn't ask about freeing it, he wants to clear it. He wants the memory allocation there, just not the contents. What i said will work for a null terminated string. When working with a string you'd be using strlen and so setting the first byte to null will make strlen return 0 and be no different to if the whole char array was full of 0s.

But it is different, and that's why I asked about his usage. If he believed there was sensitive data there that he wanted to clear our of memory as soon as possible (encryption keys / passwords, or who knows what else) then he may in fact desire to zero the entire buffer.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • they should have just made the cans look like speaker drivers. these are kind of off putting
    • Sounds like a tool is needed to backup drivers from Win Update for older devices. Anyone got a rough idea besides doing a manual backup of driverstore?
    • Stylish Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge gets 20% discount sending it to lowest price by Paul Hill If you’re in the market for a powerful, stylish phone, then you may be interested in the Galaxy S25 Edge, which is now reduced to $969.99, down 20% from the $1,219.99 list price. This is the lowest price that the device has been at on Amazon. You can get the device at this price if you go for the Titanium Icyblue or Titanium Silver editions. These models are the top-end S25 Edge variants with 512GB of storage. While this Samsung device may be about as thick as a pencil, it’s constructed from titanium and uses Corning Gorilla Glass Ceramic 2 on the display. This should ensure durability, despite its thin design. The thickness of this phone is just 5.8mm, and it weighs 163g. Camera capabilities and AI enhancements The Galaxy S25 Edge's camera system is impressive. It has a 200MP main camera with optical image stabilization and a 2x optical quality zoom. This feature magnifies the image using optical mechanisms in the camera lens so that the zoomed image retains its original clarity, detail, and resolution of the scene. On the back, there is also a 12MP ultrawide camera with autofocus and on the front, there’s a 12MP camera. Like many phones coming out now, there are AI-powered camera features such as Night Video, Best Face for group shots, Portrait Selfie, and Gallery Search by description. Notably, there is no dedicated telephoto lens like in the S25+ and S25 Ultra. This is a tradeoff that the company decided to make to achieve its ultrathin design. Telephoto lenses are camera lenses that are designed to make distant objects appear closer and larger in your photos and videos. The absence of this telephoto lens may be a deal breaker for those looking to use this camera for professional shots; otherwise, it’s still very impressive, especially with that 200MP main camera. Performance, display, and integrated AI features The S25 Edge is powered by the Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset, specifically the 3-nanometer Qualcomm SM8750-AB. It has an octa-core CPU (2x4.47 GHz Oryon V Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) and an Adreno 830 GPU. This model's display is a 6.7-inch QHD+ Dynamic AMOLED 2X with a 120Hz adaptive refresh rate and high brightness. This device has plenty of other AI features too, outside of the camera, including Cross App Action, Audio Eraser for videos, Now Brief/Now Bar for personalized information, and of course, Google Gemini. With 12GB of RAM, the specs on this phone are really very good. It should be capable of doing most tasks you throw at it, including gaming. You may wonder if it will handle games well, given that the thin design means it could overheat. Samsung has already thought about this and included a reconfigured vapor chamber that helps to keep the phone cool. Battery life and charging speed: The main compromise Aside from the removal of the telephoto lens, this phone also has a drawback in terms of battery life. Its 3,900 mAh battery capacity means it’s smaller than many other devices, even compared to budget phones. Another disappointing aspect is the charging, where the wired charging speed is limited to 25W—that’s lower than what you find on very affordable Xiaomi POCO devices. This battery limitation might make this device a bad choice if you’re away from a charger for long periods. One affordable way to mitigate this downside is by carrying a portable charger, but still, it’s ironic that you buy a thin phone to be lighter and then end up carrying a brick-sized charger around with you. You could also just bring your charger and plug it into an outlet. Is the Galaxy S25 Edge the smart buy for you? If you’re someone who wants a sleek, lightweight phone that has a premium build and can easily slice through tasks you throw at it, then the Galaxy S25 Edge is very likely for you. It’s also great for anyone looking for a standout camera that doesn’t need a telephoto lens. However, if you need a device with all-day battery life because you’re going camping or to the middle of nowhere, then you could probably find a better fit with a longer battery life. If this device is for you, check out the links below. Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (Titanium Icyblue): $969.99 (Amazon US) / MSRP $1,219.99 Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (Titanium Silver): $969.99 (Amazon US) / MSRP $1,219.99 This Amazon deal is US-specific and not available in other regions unless specified. If you don't like it or want to look at more options, check out the Amazon US deals page here. Get Prime (SNAP), Prime Video, Audible Plus or Kindle / Music Unlimited. Free for 30 days. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I got too many apps I use actively. Theres been too often I completely blank on the name of the application and had to manually look through the list for it. Now I'm using Start11 and got my apps sorted in the Start menu by categories so that if I'm looking for Krita i can find it under "Art editors". If MS are going to change it, they should consider making automated categories. Seen some Linux distros do that. But if they do, theres probably gonna be a lot of wrongly categorized apps though, unfortunately.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      emptyother earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Crunchy6 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      KynanSEIT earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      gowtham07 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Collaborator
      lethalman went up a rank
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      675
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      276
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      219
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      167
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      162
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!