Recommended Posts

No offense Ayepecks but once again you have trouble reading/understanding my posts for an unapparent reason.

What I was trying to say was, before the concept art even came out, the rumors going around were all saying that B2 was going to be a prequel. That said, those same rumors could have inspired the concept art.

If more explanation is needed please ask, I just hate when people get offended because they misread something I post.

Whoa, chill out, I'm not getting offended.

"I know thats what was in the fake art, but wasn't that the hint in the first place where B2 was going?"

That's what you said. The concept art wasn't a hint as it was fan-made, and there was no rumor of it being a prequel really until the concept art came out. Fans have said they hope its a prequel, but no real rumors. That was the gist of my response. Am I missing some part of your post?

Whoa, chill out, I'm not getting offended.

"I know thats what was in the fake art, but wasn't that the hint in the first place where B2 was going?"

That's what you said. The concept art wasn't a hint as it was fan-made, and there was no rumor of it being a prequel really until the concept art came out. Fans have said they hope its a prequel, but no real rumors. That was the gist of my response. Am I missing some part of your post?

I only mentioned offending because last time we tried to discuss something it got out of hand so I'm not sure who needs to chill out. :pinch:

I know that's what I said and I'm not sure what you don't understand. What I wrote means exactly what I said. Not sure what you consider a real rumor, so its going to be pretty hard to debate what that one means. So, you believe what you want is a real rumor, but it was seen weeks before the "art".

I only mentioned offending because last time we tried to discuss something it got out of hand so I'm not sure who needs to chill out. :pinch:

I know that's what I said and I'm not sure what you don't understand. What I wrote means exactly what I said. Not sure what you consider a real rumor, so its going to be pretty hard to debate what that one means. So, you believe what you want is a real rumor, but it was seen weeks before the "art".

Allow me to clear this up...

I know thats what was in the fake art, but wasn't that the hint in the first place where B2 was going?

I know what you meant to say, but if you look at the highlighted "that", it seems as though you were referring to the fake art, not the things IN the fake art. So to me (as well as Ayepecks), it looked like you were saying "the fake art was the hint in the first place where B2 was going".

What you said means what you want it to say, but it also means something else depending on how you interpret the construction of that sentence. It's not a big deal now that you've clarified what you meant.

Allow me to clear this up...

I know what you meant to say, but if you look at the highlighted "that", it seems as though you were referring to the fake art, not the things IN the fake art. So to me (as well as Ayepecks), it looked like you were saying "the fake art was the hint in the first place where B2 was going".

What you said means what you want it to say, but it also means something else depending on how you interpret the construction of that sentence. It's not a big deal now that you've clarified what you meant.

Exactly, and now that I clarified it up, Aye was still having trouble understanding it like before which just left me a little confused. I could see how my original post was left open to a little interpretation, but Aye always seems like he has to be right when I post any sort of opinion. Thanks Kush.

You know what I dis-like most about BioShock?

The copy protection.

I heard it allows 5 installs, and supposedly the way it does it - it counts a single install, but used in a dual-boot environment or a situation where you re-install Windows each as separate game installations. In fact, I don't know if its copy protection would allow the game install to even survive moving from different installations of Windows, as the registry entries and system files it installed would require a re-installation.

Not only that, but the Steam version requires both user authentication in addition to the layer of redundant, intrusive, and unnecessary copy protection.

All that to play a shooting game that I can download off any torrent site and play without any of that headache.

I just got "Neverwinter Nights 2". It installs off its DVD and requires a CD-key during install. When I go to play, it loads its "SecuROM"or whatever copy-protection and checks the DVD. It doesn't need the DVD to play (it installs almost 7 gigs of data), but the copy protection requires the disc. Not only that, but many times it complains that it cant "read" the disc, and the game refuses to run. So I eject and re-insert the disc.

Next comes "The Sims 2". I install, put in my key, and when I got to play it requires the CD be in the drive. Not only that, but the game launcher disables stuff like Daemon tools. I go to play a game and next thing I know all my virtual drives empty themselves.

And again, anyone who downloaded those games from a torrent site doesn't have to deal with that. I hate being punished for buying PC games.

Copy protection is one of those things PC gamers love to hate. Unfortunately the state of piracy with PC gaming means a lot of companies see it as a necessity.

Personally, I think that if they just gave users an easy way to pay for a legit download at a REASONABLE price (hear me, Steam? I said REASONABLE, not MORE expensive than the BOXED retail version!), then it wouldn't be much of a problem.

I always crack every game I own because I hate having to swap the disks for the games I want to play.

Exactly, and now that I clarified it up, Aye was still having trouble understanding it like before which just left me a little confused. I could see how my original post was left open to a little interpretation, but Aye always seems like he has to be right when I post any sort of opinion. Thanks Kush.

I don't think Ayepecks is doing anything of the sort, I think you're misinterpreting what he's saying as much as he's misinterpreting what you meant to say.

So, if EA does complete the takeover of Take Two, we'll see Bioshock 3 in '10, Bioshock: Underground in '11, a DS version of Bioshock, and Bioshock: The Movie: The Videogame featuring a soundtrack by crappy Nu-Metal bands, right?

So, if EA does complete the takeover of Take Two, we'll see Bioshock 3 in '10, Bioshock: Underground in '11, a DS version of Bioshock, and Bioshock: The Movie: The Videogame featuring a soundtrack by crappy Nu-Metal bands, right?

I'd love to see a DS version of Bioshock!!

So, if EA does complete the takeover of Take Two, we'll see Bioshock 3 in '10, Bioshock: Underground in '11, a DS version of Bioshock, and Bioshock: The Movie: The Videogame featuring a soundtrack by crappy Nu-Metal bands, right?

Here's a nice little tidbit for you...

EA owns the rights to System Shock. Now imagine what would happen if the Bioshock developers got ahold of that...

Here's a nice little tidbit for you...

EA owns the rights to System Shock. Now imagine what would happen if the Bioshock developers got ahold of that...

looks good on paper, but what i think will happen in practice is EA will push the new system shock game out before its even half done, and do it in such a way that ****es off the 10+ years of playerbase

I've finished it two times :D Looong time ago.

Once with good and once with bad. I've heard there's three different endings, but with third attempt it was a lil hard to balance the good and evil :pinch: :p

The Game was/is awesome ! Can't wait for the second one :D

Long Live Bioshock !

looks good on paper, but what i think will happen in practice is EA will push the new system shock game out before its even half done, and do it in such a way that ****es off the 10+ years of playerbase

That's very true, but it seems to be that lately EA is trying not to **** up as much because they know how bad their reputation is. I get the feeling that half of the management team is desperately trying to change that, while the other half just wants more money. It wouldn't be the first time EA has promised to change it's ways and make better games, but we'll see what happens. Fingers crossed!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • They thought value of their goods would forever only drop like it used to and didn't account for sudden increase in price because of all the Ai hype. Tough luck Samsung, don't try to weasel this one out. Also American customer protection laws are a**. In Europe, you need to be compensated for a functioning product of same or better characteristics (not same price point as when it was originally bought!) if it can't be repaired and when you receive a replacement product your warranty starts from scratch because you received a different item than you previously had and old warranty thus cannot apply to it anymore. If your actual item was successfully repaired, warranty gets extended for the period the item was in service. If item is repaired to a significant extent, warranty also starts over from scratch because major part of it was replaced. Americans need to fight to get this kind of consumer protections because they are constantly getting screwed over.
    • Microsoft releases new Windows 11 Media Creation Tool with the latest updates by Taras Buria Patch Tuesday updates arrive every month, bringing users new features and security updates. To make sure customers have access to the most recent images, Microsoft also releases updates to the Media Creation Tool app, its official utility for Windows 11 installation. Today, the company pushed new ISOs to Media Creation Tool, allowing you to create images with the June 2026 Patch Tuesday updates. With the latest update, the Media Creation Tool now downloads KB5094126. It is Windows 11 version 25H2, build 26200.8655, which is also available via Windows Update. Note that the app itself remains on the previous version, which you can check in Properties > Details. The only change is that it now downloads a more recent Windows 11 build, so the only way to check is to download an ISO. The June 2026 Patch Tuesday update is a special release for Windows 11, as it brings a new performance profile to make the operating system more responsive and snappier when rendering various user interface surfaces, including the Start menu, quick settings, and more. It does so by spiking processor speeds for a brief moment, resulting in higher loads for a second or two. The so-called “Low latency profile” is rolling out gradually, but you can force-enable it with the ViVeTool app. Other changes include webcam improvements, Task Manager updates, shared audio support, and more. You can download the Media Creation Tool app from the official Microsoft website using this link. Besides MCT, Microsoft lets you download Windows 11 ISO as a file directly from the official Windows 11 website. However, you will need a third-party app to write it to your USB drive. Check out this guide if you want to know how to do that.
    • Louis Rossmann suing Samsung over "990 Pro SSD warranty scam" by Sayan Sen Back in 2023, if you recall, Neowin reviewer Robbie Khan had a dispute with Samsung over his 990 Pro SSD, which was rapidly losing its health. After significant back and forth, the tech giant had finally released firmware to "stop" the issue. Interestingly, its previous flagship at the time, the 980 Pro was also facing problems leading to two consecutive sets of firmware fixes. Three years later, it looks like a similar conflict has now broken out between tech repair entrepreneur YouTuber Louis Rossmann and Samsung, as it has escalated into a threatened lawsuit after the company allegedly refused to appropriately replace a failing 990 Pro SSD that remained under warranty. According to Rossmann, a 4TB Samsung 990 Pro NVMe SSD purchased for approximately $330 less than two years ago, began experiencing major hiccups and issues, even though he claims it had been operated under ideal cooling conditions. It was installed in a RAID 1 array and cooled by a heatsink and dual high-speed fans. However the drive reportedly started dropping out of the array, exhibiting controller-level failures that eventually became not useable in any meaningful way. Rossmann said Samsung’s support process was marked by delays and confusion from the very start. After initially contacting the wrong regional support channel, he was redirected to Samsung’s memory support division where he submitted detailed diagnostics, logs, and proof of purchase. Rossmann runs a repair company and owns an ACE Lab PC-3000 machine, which is a professional-grade data recovery equipment. As such, he had been confident in his diagnostics. Samsung even seemingly acknowledged that later. Regardless, Rossmann claims that his initial support ticket was automatically closed before a full 24-hour response window had elapsed, forcing him to reopen the case and resubmit documentation. The controversy however intensified further from here after Samsung accepted the drive for warranty evaluation but later returned it with a repair report stating that the drive had passed its testing and that the SSD had been verified as functional. Rossmann strongly disputed those claims citing that his own independent testing on PC-3000 showed write speeds reducing to as low as 40–60 MB/s before the drive failed entirely. Samsung subsequently informed him that the SSD had been reset and reflashed, passing internal stress tests. However, the company also stated that replacement units were unavailable due to an industry-wide memory shortage and suggested that a refund process could be initiated if further testing confirmed the fault. Thus, to settle, the company offered a refund of $330, the amount that was initially paid by him to make the purchase. Here, Rossmann pointed out the seeming hypocrisy of the tech giant as in how no Samsung drive was apparently allocated for warranty replacements, but they were abundantly available for retail sales especially when using business accounts. As you can see, Rossmann is indeed right, there are Samsung 990 Pro 4TB SSDs on Amazon currently for $950 (shipped and sold by first-party Amazon US itself), and they are also available on Samsung's own store too, albeit for an even higher price of $1100. Thus Rossmann argues that Samsung’s inability or unwillingness to provide a replacement while the same model remains available for purchase at significantly higher market prices reflects a failure to honor its warranty obligations. He has issued a formal 60-day notice and says he intends to file suit in Texas small claims court, asserting that companies should face greater costs for denying legitimate warranty claims than for fulfilling them. You can check out the full video titled "Samsung's 990 Pro SSD warranty policy is a scam; I'm taking them to court," at the link below. Source and image: Louis Rossmann (YouTube) As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases
    • Was it too much to ask to show the icon in this article?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      185
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!