• 0

Who actually uses Antivirus?

Asked by KeeperOfThePizza,

 Share

Question

242 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Mentor

S_Herbie

Posted
Posted

I currently use NOD32, although in the past I have used Norton AV (going back to 2000), Norton 360 (Beta), AVG and no protection at all.

My license is due tp be renewed soon, so I am still undecided about what to use - I am not confident enough to go without as I am not the only user on the machine... Although, I do think that AV software in it's current format is not going to be around for a lot longer.

  • 0
Mentor

YaZoR

Posted
Posted
I have norton anti virus corporate running on my server, and i've got client AV on all my PC's just as peice of mind to be honest., and the good thing about the corportate is that there isn't really a GUI or uses loads of resources, it uses about 28k of memory.

28k?! Screenshot or lie. :p

  • 0
Grand Master

Ricardo Gil

Posted
Posted
Not if you use a decent AV - that's exactly what they're meant to stop. I think it is foolish for people to use computers without an antivirus - even if it's only one of the free ones. It's ridiculous to think you'll be able to know if you've got a virus by simply looking at your process list occasionally. It's also ridiculous to think that "safe" practices will protect as even trusted sources like websites and new products (iPods, flash drives) can be infected. Heck, Neowin was compromised and pushed malware onto people's systems a while back. Still, I couldn't care less whether people want to stick their heads in the sand and pretend they know what they're doing - just don't come to me for sympathy / assistance.

I think you're twisting what I said. I never said it's 100% secure, nothing is. But I can tell you that using a good set of "Best Practices" is better than using any kind of AV on the market.

  • 0
Grand Master

+Ryster Subscriber²

Posted
  • Subscriber²
Posted

I don't use AV on my main gaming PC, however I do have AV on my file server box.

Anything I download gets put over the my file server and is therefore scanned before I launch it. And if some virus infects my PC, theres nothing terribly important on there and I just restore my Ghost image take when I built the machine.

  • 0
Grand Master

markwolfe Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted
I think you're twisting what I said. I never said it's 100% secure, nothing is. But I can tell you that using a good set of "Best Practices" is better than using any kind of AV on the market.

Don't you think that using an anti-virus would be among the "best practices" you hold so dear? :ermm:

  • 0
Grand Master

+allan MVC

Posted
  • MVC
Posted

As far as I'm concerned there is no reason NOT to use an AV. If you don't want to use one that's your business, but my recommendation is that everyone should use a top notch AV utility and make sure the definitions are always up to date. I've literally seen instances of systems being infected within 30 seconds of going online after the OS was installed

  • 0
Rising Star

s3pHiX

Posted
Posted

I personally prefer an AV solution of some type, since in today's world you have no idea how Virus, Ad/Spyware infections will harm your PC, so you definitely need some sort of protection from that.

I've always used AVG, but really prefer Eset NOD32 now.

Thanks,

  • 0
Grand Master

Ricardo Gil

Posted
Posted
Don't you think that using an anti-virus would be among the "best practices" you hold so dear? :ermm:

That would create a paradox... having the AV as part of "best practices" for not needing an AV.

But I get your point, it should be used as an added security. It's just that for me in specific, that added security doesn't make up for the downside of having one installed.

  • 0
Rising Star

Burned

Posted
Posted
I never use anti virus at all, I dont feel it's necessary. I mean if you know what your doing and what your downloading I think your safe.

LOL! I have come across viruses just browsing web pages. These weren't shady pages either. The viruses were coming from the advertisers they were using.

I use NOD32 for X64

  • 0
Grand Master

Ricardo Gil

Posted
Posted
Please.

Mock all you want but back in the day I actually used AV's the perfomance hit was HUGE, and still I got burned.

Why buy a new computer and have it perform like it's 2+ years old? I'll take higher level security anyday.

And from what I see nowadays in other people's PC's, things haven't changed a bit performance wise.

  • 0
Grand Master

SnowRanger13

Posted
Posted
What possible downside can there be to having a good AV installed?

Paying for a good AV. When you use another OS then windows for most stuff and only use Windows for a few games it seems like a waste of money yearly. I probably won't use Windows at all with Crossover Games (built on Wine witch is a re-implementation of the Windows API, letting you run Windows applications in Linux/Mac OSX with very little overhead) is coming out and looks promising.

  • 0
Grand Master

markwolfe Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted
Mock all you want...
While I was making a joke, I wasn't mocking.

I'm OK with people preferring not to use one, as long as they understand the potential risks and accept the possible consequences (which may or may not ever happen).

I recommend using one, and think it is silly not to, but your PC is your PC, and you can run it any way you please. :)

  • 0
Grand Master

inactive

Posted
Posted
i do use av(i always have)i prefer to play it safe.

thats pretty much the bottom line right there! ;)

on a side note... im fairly careful myself although there's always once in a great while that a virus does attempt to get into my pc.

it's just not smart if you ask me, no matter how good you are with PC's to not run a anti-virus program.

  • 0
Grand Master

+allan MVC

Posted
  • MVC
Posted
While I was making a joke, I wasn't mocking.

I'm OK with people preferring not to use one, as long as they understand the potential risks and accept the possible consequences (which may or may not ever happen).

I recommend using one, and think it is silly not to, but your PC is your PC, and you can run it any way you please. :)

Actually I think he was talking to me :) - and I misinterpreted your post as being your actual feeling - sorry, I didn't go back and read the entire thread.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to question listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Amazon Prime Day slashes Samsung's newest Galaxy Watch Ultra by 45 percent

      By Karthik Mudaliar · Posted

      Amazon Prime Day slashes Samsung's newest Galaxy Watch Ultra by 45 percent by Karthik Mudaliar Samsung’s flagship Android smartwatch has received one of its steepest Prime Day cuts. Amazon has dropped the 2025 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra in Titanium Blue to $357.24, saving buyers around $292 from its $649.99 list price. That's a 45 percent discount (purchase link below). The 47mm Galaxy Watch Ultra uses a titanium casing and a 1.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 480 x 480 and peak brightness of 3,000 nits. It includes LTE connectivity, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, NFC, and dual-frequency L1+L5 GPS for more accurate outdoor route tracking. The 2025 model has 64GB of storage, a 590mAh battery, sapphire crystal glass, 10ATM water resistance, IP68 protection, and MIL-STD-810H durability testing. Its health and fitness tools include heart rate monitoring, sleep coaching, Energy Score, Running Coach, body composition analysis, temperature sensing, and ECG support, where available. This model is best suited to Android users who regularly run, hike, cycle, or train outdoors and want cellular access without carrying a phone. The larger battery, rugged construction, bright display, and dedicated Quick Button also make it a stronger option than Samsung’s regular Galaxy Watch models for extended workouts and demanding environments. Grab the Titanium Blue Galaxy Watch Ultra before the Prime Day price resets: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) [Sold and Shipped by Amazon] Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Google begins rolling out its post-Epic Play Store billing model next week

      By Karthik Mudaliar · Posted

      Google begins rolling out its post-Epic Play Store billing model next week by Karthik Mudaliar Google has confirmed that its redesigned Play Store billing and fee structure will take effect on June 30, 2026, in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Economic Area. The changes will let eligible developers offer their own payment systems or send users to an external website for purchases, while separating Google’s platform service fee from the cost of using Google Play Billing. The rollout puts concrete dates and detailed rate cards behind the broader Android policy overhaul Google announced in March. That announcement followed a proposed settlement with Epic Games intended to resolve their long-running disputes over app distribution and payments, although the U.S. portion of the agreement still requires court approval. Under the new billing choice program, developers selling digital content or services can display an alternative payment option alongside Google Play Billing. They may also direct users to their own websites to complete a purchase. Developers can use Google’s standard payment-choice screen or design one that complies with the company’s user-interface rules. Choosing another payment processor does not eliminate Google’s cut altogether. The company will continue charging a service fee for transactions associated with apps distributed through Google Play, regardless of whether payment is handled by Google, an alternative provider, or a developer’s website. Google argues that this fee covers the value and infrastructure provided by Android and the Play Store. For developers earning up to $1 million annually, the service fee will generally be 10 percent. That rate also applies to auto-renewing subscriptions. When Google Play Billing is used in the U.S., U.K., or EEA, Google will add a separate 5 percent billing fee, and developers processing payments elsewhere will not pay that additional charge. This means Google’s familiar flat 30 percent commission is disappearing, but developers will not necessarily see a dramatic reduction on every transaction. An in-app purchase from an existing user processed through Google Play Billing can still reach a combined 30 percent. The biggest savings are likely to come from subscriptions, smaller developers covered by the $1 million tier, and companies able to move customers to their own payment infrastructure. Google is also offering lower rates through its Apps Experience and revamped Games Level Up programs. Apps and games that satisfy the company’s requirements can qualify for 15 percent service fees on new-install transactions and 20 percent on existing-install transactions. The criteria include performance and reliability standards, support for additional Android device categories, and selected platform features. Those program rates are scheduled to become available in the initial markets and Australia on September 30. For consumers, the immediate effect will depend on whether developers adopt alternative payments and pass any savings on through lower prices. For developers, however, June 30 begins a more flexible but considerably more complicated Play Store economy in which distribution, billing, install dates, revenue thresholds, and program participation can each affect Google’s final cut. Google is also separately developing a Registered App Stores program designed to simplify the installation of qualifying third-party stores. That initiative is expected to arrive with a major Android release later in 2026 and will launch outside the U.S. first. Google says the rest of the world will receive the changes by September 30, 2027, although billing rates for markets outside the US, UK, and EEA have not yet been announced.
    • The official Funny Pictures thread

      By PsYcHoKiLLa · Posted

    • 1TB Samsung T9 and Samsung 9100 PRO SSDs are now selling at great prices

      By morpheus6969 · Posted

      38% off a super insane price is still an INSANE price.
    • 1TB Samsung T9 and Samsung 9100 PRO SSDs are now selling at great prices

      By Fiza Ali · Posted

      1TB Samsung T9 and Samsung 9100 PRO SSDs are now selling at great prices by Fiza Ali Amazon is now offering the 1TB variant of Samsung T9 and Samsung 9100 PRO SSD at great prices with limited-time 38% and 39% discounts, respectively, so you may want to check them out if you have been looking to upgrade your storage solution. The Samsung T9 connects via a USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 (20Gbps) interface and delivers sequential read speeds of up to 2,000MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 1,950MB/s, making it suitable for transferring large files, backing up data, and handling high-resolution media content. When it comes to the security features, the SSD includes AES 256-bit hardware encryption to help protect sensitive data. Designed for portability, the drive is reportedly resistant to drops from heights of up to 3 metres. Furthermore, it operates within a temperature range of 0°C to 60°C and can be stored at temperatures between -40°C and 85°C. Samsung Magician Software is included for drive management, firmware updates, performance optimisation, and health monitoring. Finally, the T9 is certified to multiple international standards, including CE, FCC, UL, UKCA, and RoHS 2 compliance, and is backed by a five-year limited warranty as well. 1TB Samsung T9 SSD: $179.99 (Amazon US) - 38% off The Samsung 9100 PRO uses the M.2 2280 form factor and connects through a PCIe 5.0 x4 interface with NVMe 2.0 support. Built with Samsung V-NAND TLC flash memory, an in-house controller, and 1GB of low-power DDR4X cache memory, the 9100 PRO is engineered for high-performance computing and gaming workloads. Furthermore, the SSD delivers sequential read speeds of up to 14,700MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 13,300MB/s. Random performance is rated at up to 1,850,000 IOPS for reads and up to 2,600,000 IOPS for writes, depending on system hardware and configuration. The drive supports TRIM, S.M.A.R.T monitoring, automatic garbage collection, and device sleep mode to help maintain performance and efficiency over time. In terms of security features, it includes AES 256-bit encryption, TCG Opal support, and IEEE 1667 compliance. The 9100 PRO operates within a temperature range of 0°C to 70°C, is rated for 1.5 million hours MTBF, and can reportedly withstand shocks of up to 1,500G for 0.5 milliseconds. Finally, Samsung Magician Software is also included for firmware updates, performance monitoring, drive management, and optimisation. 1TB Samsung 9100 PRO SSD: $206.99 (Amazon US) - 39% off Alternatively, you can also check out other SSD deals here. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!