• 0

Who actually uses Antivirus?


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
also, people who don't run an AV are likely to increase the prevalence of botnet's and/or virus - how do you know you're clean if you don't have an AV, hmmm?

Scary how people who run AV (that misses a lot of viruses) think they are secure by just having that running and have the nerve to babble their mantra "you don't have AV, you stupid"

How do you know you aren't infected when probably only thing that can prevent an infection is that lousy AV?

  • 0
It's a sad thing to read about people in this thread thinking they can outsmart every virus writer out there because they somehow think they have a best practices methodology down to a science.

I agree with this 100%.

On one occasion I did a full reinstall of Windows. Before hooking up the internet I had installed my AV software. As I was downloading AV updates, without opening up a web browser, or doing anything else internet related, my AV software sent up alerts as I was downloading new virus definitions. I was completely disgusted. So disgusted in fact, that I didn't bother "cleaning" up the mess, and did a fresh Windows install again. That time around my luck had improved.

  • 0
Scary how people who run AV (that misses a lot of viruses) think they are secure by just having that running and have the nerve to babble their mantra "you don't have AV, you stupid"

How do you know you aren't infected when probably only thing that can prevent an infection is that lousy AV?

I'm sure I don't need to even bother typing a witty put down to that.

  • 0
I never use anti virus at all, I dont feel it's necessary. I mean if you know what your doing and what your downloading I think your safe.

Some claim that they dun use a AV but i personally feel its necessat these days for peace of mind.

I too am vigilant but sometimes they do somehow pass through and the AV Catches it.

IMHO, its worth something like Nod32 to have something with lil impact on system performance then to not have anything at all.

  • 0

I used to use AVG free edition and Ad-Aware on my laptop and desktop. They just made me feel safe knowing that I at least had something to protect me. When my parents got a new computer, the first thing I did was install AVG free, Ad-Aware, and Windows Defender. But, ever since I switched to Linux and Mac, I haven't worried about it. :laugh:

QFT. I'm a computer tech at Circuit City and 90% of the work I do is removing viruses/spyware from computers, with at least 50% of those being completely unprotected. The amount of infection is amazing, and it's hilarious when we get the ones that thought they had some sort of method down to keep malware out.

I'm willing to say that the people who bring their computers to big box stores like that don't know much about them in the first place. On Neowin, that's the opposite - I'm sure people know what they're doing here ;)

  • 0
On Neowin, that's the opposite - I'm sure people know what they're doing here ;)

Based on the number of people who claim they don't use an AV, you are clearly mistaken. :no: I deal with IT professionals for a living and I don't know one - or any knowledgeable user for that matter - who would even turn on his system without it being completely protected (and obviously that includes the use of a good Anti Virus utility). No offense intended to anyone here - just stating a fact.

  • 0
I'm willing to say that the people who bring their computers to big box stores like that don't know much about them in the first place. On Neowin, that's the opposite - I'm sure people know what they're doing here ;)

The quote below is on the front page of Neowin, and if this can and DOES happen to people like Trend then the odds of something happening to some punk user who thinks that they know better that the collective wisdom, representing de facto standards in terms of PC protection, then what can you say to the assertion that people here know what they are talking about?

Of the more than 20,000 web pages affected by a massive internet attack which started earlier this week, security vendor Trend Micro's site was among the victims, embarassing as it may be. Infected sites attempt to install password-stealing programs with a special affinity for online video games onto viewers' computers. Mike Sweeny, a Trend Micro spokesman confirmed that the company's site had been hacked Thursday: "A portion of our site -- some pages were attacked," he said. "We took the pages down overnight Tuesday night -- and took corrective action." Although researchers are still puzzled as to how the attacks took place, the use of Microsoft's Active Server Page (ASP) technology seems to be a common trend among infected sites.
  • 0
AVG Anti-virus, as well as bi-daily scans from BitDefender.

AVG antivirus is terrible. Better than nothing but not by much.

If you want to try a better free alternative, I recommend to clients Avira Antivir Personal.

To all you people who don't use an AV or Firewall, keep it up. Us technicians don't mind the extra work.

I run NOD32 on X64 with AVG-AS. Surf with Firefox and the NoScript plugin, behind a hardened firewall doing NAT, SPI, MAC Filtering....etc

  • 0

been using Symantec Corporate Edition with Windows Defender for years, and am happy too. on the other hand though, i rarely get infected. last time i got, was bron.tok off a friend's PC through my USB drive... it's just proactive measures

  • 0

A lot of people are bringing up the exploit attack vector (browser bugs, protocol bugs, etc.). To be affected by them, you must either be using unpatched software or the exploit is yet to be patched. In the latter case, antivirus software probably won't do anything for you since the virus probably won't have a recognized signature either.

Here are some drawbacks of antivirus programs:

- they negatively impact system performance (though how much is debatable)

- they give a false sense of security (they're hardly perfect)

In the end, if antivirus software is the the last thing stopping a virus from installing itself on your system, then it's really just a band-aid solution. I think it's better to know how to avoid getting them in the first place, and know how to detect and remove them if it does happen.

Most people should of course by using antivirus software because they often don't keep their systems updated and they are far too curious about "britneyspearsnude.jpg.scr", but that doesn't mean everyone should.

  • 0
Here are some drawbacks of antivirus programs:

- they negatively impact system performance (though how much is debatable)

- they give a false sense of security (they're hardly perfect)

In the end, if antivirus software is the the last thing stopping a virus from installing itself on your system, then it's really just a band-aid solution. I think it's better to know how to avoid getting them in the first place, and know how to detect and remove them if it does happen.

Most people should of course by using antivirus software because they often don't keep their systems updated and they are far too curious about "britneyspearsnude.jpg.scr", but that doesn't mean everyone should.

Absolute nonsense.

First, nobody - and I mean NOBODY is more diligent about keeping his system "updated" than I am - and there is NO WAY I'd ever even turn on a system if wasn't running a top notch AV with current definitions (I use Kaspersky on all my systems, by the way). Second, every program you run draws upon system resources. So following your logic if you don't want anything to impair performance, perhaps it's best to just not install anything other than the OS. If you are using an AV and you feel it slows down your system noticeably, switch to a different product. For 20 years I was on the Norton / Symantec bandwagon, but their products became so "bloated" I eventually moved away. But not use an AV at all? That's for people who don't know better but think they do! And a false sense of security? Sorry - that's not even worth a comment.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!