Recommended Posts

...

Apple's statistics were fudged because Safari calls the OnLoad event (reporting it's finished) before the images and stylesheets have been loaded and incorporated into the document (before it's actually finished). I have provided a barchart below that shows the difference between Safari and Other browsers in when they report that they're finished (notice the asterisk).

...

It's debatable if it's the wrong thing to do, since Safari calls it once the DOM (and JS and CSS, I think) is fully loaded. And that's all that JS needs to run properly.

I prefer the Safari way of doing it myself, And other browsers offer methods of doing the same thing.

Edit: But yeah, relying on a test that disadvantages other browsers is great for Marketing, but people will pick up on it.

I tell you what, I have been an Opera user for a looong time. I don't like Firefox because I find it slow and bloated and a memory hog. I have been playing with this Safari and I like it. It definitely opens pages fast. Faster than IE7 no doubt and it even starts instantly when I click on its icon. It hasn't crashed on me yet. I did download the latest Nightly build of Webkit and replaced all files on its folder with it and will continue to update it as they update. This browser has a lot of potential and if Apple gets serious about it, they can beat Mozilla at their game easily.

There are still a few pages that don't display correctly... heck even youtube.com's homepage.. it's missing a frame or what ever it is in the top right corner.. small petty thing but still.. I'm using Vista x64 and Love... LOVE safari..

So what's the verdict:

Is Safari for Windows worth it yes or no?

No i tried it out ages ago because of those benchmarks they showed, but it was unstable, something about the navigation really annoyed me and it was slower than opera and firefox. Maybe this was just my own personal experience (and a few of my friends) but i thought it was awful.

No i tried it out ages ago because of those benchmarks they showed, but it was unstable, something about the navigation really annoyed me and it was slower than opera and firefox. Maybe this was just my own personal experience (and a few of my friends) but i thought it was awful.

+1. Exact replica of what I was going to post.

No i tried it out ages ago because of those benchmarks they showed, but it was unstable, something about the navigation really annoyed me and it was slower than opera and firefox. Maybe this was just my own personal experience (and a few of my friends) but i thought it was awful.
+1. Exact replica of what I was going to post.

Then maybe you guys should try the newer version. :p

At first I thought Safari (webkit nightly) was the fastest browsing I've ever experienced. Then I started going to the same sites and comparing to the FF3 nightly... and they seem almost the same. Guess it was just placebo.

I was pretty amazed at the Safari memory usage as well... until I noticed it actually pushes a lot of the memory to virtual memory. Right now, Safari is using 34MB of real memory, but 302 MB of virtual memory (only one tab at the moment).

Nonetheless, overall, good improvements from 3.0.

With 20 tabs open in two windows (12 in one, 8 in the other) with sites like myspace and youtube, Safari is using around 417MB real memory with virtual memory around 1.55GB on my system and about 7% CPU.

post-61366-1206205883_thumb.png

I'm very impressed with Safari 3.1 for Windows + Webkit Nightly its soo fast and snappy. The only problem I have is I can't scroll side to side with my trackpad, only up and down. I wouldn't mind an Adblock Plugin too :D

Ad Muncher works wonderfully with it, as with every other browser.

But yes the WebKit Nightly is very fast. I like the way it renders.

I installed it, and discovered some interesting .dlls ... like "coregraphics.dll", and "corefoundation.dll". I wonder if Apple builds Safari, and simply recompiles it for Windows, using an emulation/API translation layer or something, like WINE. Hmmm...

What I do find funny, in a sad kind of way, is how far Apple takes the OS X look to Windows - the dialog boxes that spit out from the title (Who thought up that UI oddity I'll never know - I find it annoying and distracting), all the gel buttons, the scroll bars, the font smoothing - it's almost like a mini- OS X experience (shudder) inside Windows. What would be really weird is if they start loading a title bar at the top of the desktop...

Safari doesn't like my computers. It crashes when I try to go into Preferences and it crashes when I try to go to the Acid3 test.

I like the idea of using it, but I'll have to do some troubleshooting to track down why it doesn't like either of my computers and everyone else's seems fine.

I'll try it on another fresh install of Window before I start installing things to try to track down what other background program I have that might be killing Safari.

I'm wondering if my issue is related to the original issue I had with the first betas of Safari, but I'll have to try to track it down so I can see.

the dialog boxes that spit out from the title (Who thought up that UI oddity I'll never know - I find it annoying and distracting)

Sheets are intended to keep the dialogue with the window it belongs to. That means the dialogue doesn't get lost and it declutters the screen.

Is there a way to bypass Safari's font rendering? Everything is so blurry on my laptop, on all of the font settings.

There used to be, either they've changed how you activate it, or taken it out (possibly due to bugs)

But hey, g's are properly rounded now, so I can't complain.

Edit: Turns out it still works, unless the web page uses the Lucida Grande font (Safrari comes with it's own version, and does it's own font smoothing on that version). http://chucker.mystfans.com/2007/12/24/web...e-support.entry shows how to do it.

Edited by The_Decryptor
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Marshall Major V Bluetooth headphones are now up to 47% off on Amazon by Ivan Jenic The Marshall Major V in Midnight Blue is currently $89.99 on Amazon, down from $169.99. That's 47% off and $80 saved on a pair of wireless on-ear headphones from one of the most recognizable names in audio. The Major V is Marshall's take on a long-lasting everyday headphone. The headphones deliver 100+ hours of wireless playtime, which puts them in a completely different category from most Bluetooth headphones that hover around 30-40 hours. You’re charging this thing once a week at most, and with wireless charging supported, you don’t have to worry about additional cables. Marshall promises its signature sound profile, with strong bass, smooth mids, and clear highs. There’s a customizable M-button, which you can set to quickly access Spotify Tap, your EQ settings, or a voice assistant. The design is foldable and lightweight at 186 grams, so it’s easy to pack for travel. And finally, the faux leather finish gives the Major V a sleek, premium look. At $89.99, the Major V Midnight Blue is a genuinely strong buy for anyone who wants a reliable daily headphone without paying premium prices. It’s also worth mentioning that the Cream and Brown variants are also discounted to $89.99, though from a lower original price of $99.99. Marshall Major V Midnight Blue - $89.99 | 47% off on Amazon This Amazon deal is US-specific and not available in other regions unless specified. This is a first-party seller link (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you also purchase from a first-party seller link only. If you don't like it or want to look at more options, check out the previous deals that we have covered, OR you can also visit Amazon US deals page. Get Prime (SNAP), Prime Video, Audible Plus or Kindle / Music Unlimited. Free for 30 days. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • +1 on XVI. I still use it. 
    • Age 16, old enough to get a full-time job, your own bank account, a passport, get married, even join the military and go to war. But talking to your friends on the internet? Oh hell no!
    • I remember when all games had demos; it was a normal thing, not a limited time promotion.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      Cosminus earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Year In
      ThatGuyOnline earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      483
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      185
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      122
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      neufuse
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!