24% Internet Users Can Not Find Google


Recommended Posts

24% Can?t Find Google -- Jordan McCollum

This week, usability guru Jakob Nielsen asks: ?How difficult is it to perform a search on Google??

No, really. How hard is it? We know the search box in the upper right hand corner of your screen can get there. We know that Google.com in the address bar can get there. But, sadly, Nielsen?s study indicated that at least 24% of Internet users don?t know that. It hurts me just to type it.

A quarter of Internet users said they wanted to search Google for something, but when placed in front of a computer, couldn?t figure it out. ?Instead, they either completely failed to get to any search engine or ended up running their query on a different search engine ? usually whatever type-in field happened to be at hand.?

Nielsen breaks this mind-boggling stat down for us:

On the one hand, 76% is a high success rate. On the other hand, getting to Google is a very simple task. It?s not even a true task ? that is, it?s not something users want to accomplish for its own sake or something we?d pose as an assignment in user testing. Getting a Google search box is the first step in searching the Web, which is only the first step in doing something real (such as, in one of our test tasks, to find ?a strong vacuum cleaner that is easy to use, can pick up pet hair, and costs under $300″).

Also, for this round of research we?re deliberately recruiting above-average users, so the success rate across all Internet users is probably lower than our finding.

Suddenly, The Onion?s article a few months back about ?TheGoogle.com? doesn?t look quite so funny:

All you have to do to turn the website on is put the little blinking line thing in the cyberspace window at the top of the screen, type ?thegoogle.com,? and press ?return??although it will also recognize http.wwwthegoogle.com, google.aol, and ?THEGOOGLE? typed into a Word document.?

Maybe there?s a real need for remedial Internet?

Nielsen?s overall point was to remind us all that our average user, and the web audience at large, doesn?t understand the Internet the way we do. Unfortunately, I think the net effect of his findings will be lowered self-esteem among SEMs and a generalized funk to last over the next several days. (Exacerbated, of course, by your alma mater losing in the first round of the NCAAs. Again. Come on, I know I?m not the only one. I know you Drake fans are mad, too.)

http:For people claiming that this test was performed with idiots they describe how the users were chosen here:ed with idiots they describe how the users were chosen here:

Plus here is the original test page:[/b]r-skills.html

Plus here is the original test page:

http://www.useit.com/alertbox/designer-user-differences.html

Edited by Suren
Also, for this round of research we?re deliberately recruiting above-average users, so the success rate across all Internet users is probably lower than our finding.
Ah I just love stats with no context at all, 64% of them turn out to be inaccurate.

If you had actually read the article, you would have seen that sentence. Context: the test subjects were chosen from a group of above-average internet users. Now you may ask what is defined by "above-average" and that is certainly a question to be taken into consideration, but the general consensus appears to be that an above-average user is one who uses the Internet more than once a week. There's your context. Next time, read the article and, as always, Google it with any questions.

My mother has to type www.google.pt in the address/location bar.

I've only heard one person say "the google" that's my networking teacher, she's Chinese and doesn't speak English very well but I have seen lots of people type google into their browser's start page (AOL, Yahoo, Altavista).

In Portuguese: a Google | o Google.

"A Google" is feminine, coming from "A (companhia/empresa[company/enterprise]) Google".

"O Google" is masculine, coming from "O (s?tio web[website]) Google".

I definitely believe many people cannot find Google. Look at this:

My dad bought our first computer back in the mid 90's and ever since then I've used it and he's used it. Almost 15 years. And to THIS day he still cannot work around basic functions. He knows what Google is (he doesn't know how to use it very well) and he can type (though very slow, one letter at a time) and he can save files (I set it up for him so it saves to the desktop because he doesn't know what folders are, or what the desktop is, etc..)

And after these 15 years, he still asks me almost every time he gets on on how to perform these actions. Is he ever going to learn? I don't think so. I think just because he's one of those people.

I definitely believe many people cannot find Google. Look at this:

My dad bought our first computer back in the mid 90's and ever since then I've used it and he's used it. Almost 15 years. And to THIS day he still cannot work around basic functions. He knows what Google is (he doesn't know how to use it very well) and he can type (though very slow, one letter at a time) and he can save files (I set it up for him so it saves to the desktop because he doesn't know what folders are, or what the desktop is, etc..)

And after these 15 years, he still asks me almost every time he gets on on how to perform these actions. Is he ever going to learn? I don't think so. I think just because he's one of those people.

Oh no, hes's one of them! -zombie points and screams-

If you had actually read the article, you would have seen that sentence. Context: the test subjects were chosen from a group of above-average internet users. Now you may ask what is defined by "above-average" and that is certainly a question to be taken into consideration, but the general consensus appears to be that an above-average user is one who uses the Internet more than once a week. There's your context. Next time, read the article and, as always, Google it with any questions.

No I saw that. Simply saying "Above average users" doesn't cut it. Above what average? Time spent on-line, difficulty of tasks performed, etc. Also how is this average defined. I couldn't give a monkeys what the "consensus" of this is. It isn't defined in that article.

Who are these people? What nationality, age, sex, etc. These things make a big difference.

This whole thing is just to generate a statistic to gain publicity. 100% of people with "above average" intelligence know that.

24% Can?t Find Google -- Jordan McCollum

This week, usability guru Jakob Nielsen asks: ?How difficult is it to perform a search on Google??

No, really. How hard is it? We know the search box in the upper right hand corner of your screen can get there. We know that Google.com in the address bar can get there. But, sadly, Nielsen?s study indicated that at least 24% of Internet users don?t know that. It hurts me just to type it.

A quarter of Internet users said they wanted to search Google for something, but when placed in front of a computer, couldn?t figure it out. ?Instead, they either completely failed to get to any search engine or ended up running their query on a different search engine ? usually whatever type-in field happened to be at hand.?

Nielsen breaks this mind-boggling stat down for us:

On the one hand, 76% is a high success rate. On the other hand, getting to Google is a very simple task. It?s not even a true task ? that is, it?s not something users want to accomplish for its own sake or something we?d pose as an assignment in user testing. Getting a Google search box is the first step in searching the Web, which is only the first step in doing something real (such as, in one of our test tasks, to find ?a strong vacuum cleaner that is easy to use, can pick up pet hair, and costs under $300″).

Also, for this round of research we?re deliberately recruiting above-average users, so the success rate across all Internet users is probably lower than our finding.

Suddenly, The Onion?s article a few months back about ?TheGoogle.com? doesn?t look quite so funny:

All you have to do to turn the website on is put the little blinking line thing in the cyberspace window at the top of the screen, type ?thegoogle.com,? and press ?return??although it will also recognize http.wwwthegoogle.com, google.aol, and ?THEGOOGLE? typed into a Word document.?

Maybe there?s a real need for remedial Internet?

Nielsen?s overall point was to remind us all that our average user, and the web audience at large, doesn?t understand the Internet the way we do. Unfortunately, I think the net effect of his findings will be lowered self-esteem among SEMs and a generalized funk to last over the next several days. (Exacerbated, of course, by your alma mater losing in the first round of the NCAAs. Again. Come on, I know I?m not the only one. I know you Drake fans are mad, too.)

http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/03/24...ind-google.html

that 24% of the people need to sell there pc and move back in to the cave imho they will be the majority of people that get bashed with a virus and effect others

A lot of people don't see the difference between Google, the internet, the web, a web browser, their home page, and the address bar, even after using the internet for years. It's troubling.

For instance, if you give them the address of a site, they'll type the address in Google, and of course Google will return a link to the site which they will happily click on. But all clicking on the link does is type the address in the address bar and hit enter...

Next, they will be completely lost if you change their home page to something other than what they used to have, often Google.com or MSN.

A lot of people don't see the difference between Google, the internet, the web, a web browser, and the address bar, even after using the internet for years. It's troubling.

I would tend to agree with you; this is the same cross-section of people who think that their operating system is Word, Microsoft Office is the same as Windows (Windows contains the program Word, or they are simply the same thing). They also refer to their desktop background still as their screensaver. Explorer is what they surf the Web with, and the Internet has no connection with E-mail.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Millions of users to benefit from Windows 11's new performance boost on Adobe Photoshop by Sayan Sen Despite the advent of AI-generated imagery, Adobe's Photoshop remains one of the most popular tools on this planet. Adobe does not have a publicly reported total user count but it's probably not wrong to assume there are millions. As of 2025, Adobe Creative Cloud has had approximately 41 million paid subscribers, many of whom likely use Photoshop. In addition, more than 166,000 companies worldwide are apparently also using the app. These figures are according to a very recent report by SQ Magazine. Out of them, it is fair to assume that many are probably running Windows. As such, there is good news for these users as Microsoft has announced Photoshop is getting a big 20% performance boost on x86-64 (AMD64) systems and a 13% bump-up on Arm devices. This is definitely great news for them as many have complained about the slow performance and general sluggishness of Photoshop on Windows 11 ever since the advent of the latter back in 2021. If you are wondering how Microsoft managed to do this, the answer lies in a combination of compiler-level optimizations and a technology called Sample Profile Guided Optimization (SPGO). According to Microsoft, Adobe worked closely with the company’s Visual C++ team and adopted the latest MSVC toolchain enhancements together with SPGO to squeeze more performance out of Photoshop’s CPU-bound workloads. Unlike traditional Profile Guided Optimization (PGO), which requires developers to create special instrumented builds and run lengthy training workloads, SPGO gathers performance data directly from optimized release binaries. This means Adobe could collect real-world usage information which gives a major advantage to this technique, as companies could leverage data collected from actual customer workloads rather than only relying on synthetic benchmark runs. In theory, this should allow optimizations to better reflect how users interact with software in the real world. Thanks to this, there are improvements to code layout, function inlining, hot-and-cold code separation, and other low-level tweaks that help processors execute instructions more efficiently. Essentially the compiler is better able to identify “hot” code paths, those which are most frequently executed, and optimize them accordingly.
    • "The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months¨ I'd prefer to see the lowest price in over a year
    • Glad these prices are starting to come down, but that is still crazy. I bought the 2TB 9100 Pro (slightly more expensive version with PCIe 5.0) last year for $240.
    • The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months by Sayan Sen Yesterday, we covered a really good deal wherein you can get a 4TB TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 NVMe PCIe Gen4 SSD for a low price of just $400 with a special discount coupon. That's just $100 per TB, making it a very good offer during these hard times. The deal is still live, so you can check it out in its dedicated article here if you do not want to miss out. Meanwhile, if you don't have that kind of budget but still wish to buy an SSD for a good price, the 2TB variant of the TeamGroup SSD at $280 its lowest price in over three months. Meanwhile, those seeking 2TB but faster performance can check out Samsung's 990 PRO, which has hit the lowest price also in the last quarter or so, as it's on sale for $370 (purchase links under the specs table down below). Thus, you want a faster drive, get the 990 Pro, or you want more capacity, grab the TeamGroup 4TB linked in the first para. The 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $500. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The tech specs are given below: Specification TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 2TB Samsung 990 PRO 2TB Interface PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe 1.4 PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 Form Factor M.2 2280 M.2 2280 Controller InnoGrit Controller Samsung In-house Controller NAND Flash 3D TLC 3D TLC DRAM Cache None (HMB supported) 2GB LPDDR4 Sequential Read (Max) 5,000 MB/s 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write (Max) 4,500 MB/s 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4K) Up to 600,000 IOPS Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4K) Up to 700,000 IOPS Up to 1,550,000 IOPS TBW (Endurance) 1,300 TBW 1,200 TBW MTBF 3,000,000 hours 1,500,000 hours Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C 0°C to 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C to 85°C -40°C to 85°C Shock Resistance 1,500G / 0.5ms 1,500G / 0.5ms Heatsink Patented Graphene Heat Spreader No Get them at the links below: Samsung 990 PRO SSD 2TB (MZ-V9P2T0B/AM): $369.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 2TB SSD (TM8FFE002T0C129): $279.99 (Sold by TeamGroup, Shipped by Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • If you can't spell a simple word that 2nd graders learn, your entire argument is suspect.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!