TrendMicro AV Incompatibility with VISTA 64bit


Recommended Posts

trend%20micro%20error.bmp

Alright here is the deal. I go into the Security Center and turn ?ON? my UAC. When I try and do a scan of my PC for viruses this is what pops up. Bottom line, when having a 64bit VISTA OS and using TrendMicro AV you MUST have the UAC ?OFF? in order to scan your system.

Surely, there must be someone else out there in cyber land using VISTA 64bit using TrendMicro AV that can back me up on this. And if this person is successfully scanning their PC with TrendMicro AV on VISTA 64bit, how did you do it?

Windows Vista Home Premium

64-bit Operating System

I.E. 7 (32-bit and 64-bit)

Gateway FX510S

Intel® Pentium? D 950 CPU 3.40GHz

800 MHz FSB, 2x2MB cache non-HT EM64T

Intel (Watsonville 2) 975x Motherboard

BIOS WT97510J.15A.2039.2006.0825.0358

600-Watt power supply

4093 MB RAM

NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GS Graphics Card

(Sound)

Yamaha RX-V361 AV Receiver

JBL Cinema Sound Speakers CS480

Sigma Tel High Definition Auto CODEC (for 64bit Windows)

Driver Version 6.10.5405.0

Edited by Lexonex
For Microsoft Windows Vista, you must temporarily disable the User Account Control (UAC) option for Vista. UAC can prevent access to your computer?s files when Trend Micro Internet Security runs a scan. Refer to How to turn off the UAC function of Windows Vista.

http://esupport.trendmicro.com/support/vie...p;id=EN-1036165

I have been using 64 Bit Vista Ultimate since it was available and there was an issue with SP1 and Trend Micro Internet Security but an update to the problem corrected it. I have the UAC turned on and have no problems at all initiating a scan or anything else with Internet Security. So this may be true for some users but not all. I am using program version 16.10.1079 with engine version 8.500.1002.

trend%20micro%20error.bmp

Alright here is the deal. I go into the Security Center and turn ?ON? my UAC. When I try and do a scan of my PC for viruses this is what pops up. Bottom line, when having a 64bit VISTA OS and using TrendMicro AV you MUST have the UAC ?OFF? in order to scan your system.

Surely, there must be someone else out there in cyber land using VISTA 64bit using TrendMicro AV that can back me up on this. And if this person is successfully scanning their PC with TrendMicro AV on VISTA 64bit, how did you do it?

Windows Vista Home Premium

64-bit Operating System

I.E. 7 (32-bit and 64-bit)

Gateway FX510S

Intel? Pentium? D 950 CPU 3.40GHz

800 MHz FSB, 2x2MB cache non-HT EM64T

Intel (Watsonville 2) 975x Motherboard

BIOS WT97510J.15A.2039.2006.0825.0358

600-Watt power supply

4093 MB RAM

NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GS Graphics Card

(Sound)

Yamaha RX-V361 AV Receiver

JBL Cinema Sound Speakers CS480

Sigma Tel High Definition Auto CODEC (for 64bit Windows)

Driver Version 6.10.5405.0

I'm running TrendMicro Internet Security 2008

Program Version: 16.10.1079

Engine Version: 8.500.1002

Pattern Version: 5.181.50

Perhaps if and when my Windows Automatic Update provides me with the

Vista SP1 Update, I too will be able to scan for viruses with the UAC "ON"

AND HOPEFULLY I won't lose my sound............

Does the virus scanner run elevated? If not, right-click on it and choose "run as administrator" to see if that fixes the problem.

Or get a better virus scanner. AVG is free, and there used to be a deal to get eTrust for free as well.

Dear Lexonex,

Hello there! A pleasant day to you! My name is John from Consumer Escalation Team and I will be assisting you on this issue. To keep our records up-to-date, it is very important to RESPOND to this e-mail.

I have carefully read your email and have understood your concern.

Regarding Turning-off User Account Cotrol of WIndows Vista. This feature of Windows Vista is the same as the Suspicious Software Alarm System of Trend Micro Internet Security 2007. Turning-it off really does not harm your computer since you have this kind of feature working in your Trend Micro program. It even allows you not to have that annoying pop-up each time you install or open other programs.

Right-now we don't have any information yet if there will be a patch for that problem since it's really about WIndows Vista's permissions on the programs running in your computer. It's like Trend Micro not being allowed by Windows Vista to work normally. And for the feature to run, it's either we turn-off User Account Control or set some exceptions for other programs in User Account Control which right-now; WIndows' Vista does not give an option. If ever a patch should be created for this problem, it should be a patch from Microsoft so they can allow valid programs to run normally when User Account Control is on.

But we are not closing our options and are still testing if there is a way that the whole Trend Micro program as a whole can be permitted by WIndows Vista to run normally.

I hope I have answered your inquiries clearly.

I will patiently wait for your reply.

Please let me know if I can close this case already.

VERY IMPORTANT: In order for me to have a history of our correspondence, please do not delete the subject and the contents of this email.

Hope this proves useful and have a nice day

Best Regards,

Consumer Support Team

TrendLabs HQ, Trend Micro Incorporated Apr 12 2007, 04:12 AM

Murdering a pretty big security component of Windows (Letting it handle ILs) sounds like a very counterproductive thing for a piece of software that is supposed to increase your security to do. I can't say I'd feel very comfortable using a piece of 'security' software that forced me to do that.

Dear Lexonex,

Hello there! A pleasant day to you! My name is John from Consumer Escalation Team and I will be assisting you on this issue.

<snipped>

Regarding Turning-off User Account Cotrol of WIndows Vista. This feature of Windows Vista is the same as the Suspicious Software Alarm System of Trend Micro Internet Security 2007. Turning-it off really does not harm your computer since you have this kind of feature working in your Trend Micro program. It even allows you not to have that annoying pop-up each time you install or open other programs.

"John from Consumer Escalation" is either incompetent or clueless. UAC is **nothing** like their suspicious software alarm.

If that's the kind of support escalation, you should run... not walk... far away from this company.

trend isint as good as they used to and turning uac off is crazy as it helps protect you and alert you if something tries anything strange,use tweak uac to keep uac on but turn the prompts off.

I can see how the confusion may occur: whenever someone is presented with the ?Windows needs your permission to continue? message, it creates the impression that UAC is looking after the user, and protects the vital system settings from being destroyed or corrupted. The user is probably thinking, ?If a virus or spyware gets into my system and attempts to do something dangerous, UAC will alert me, riWrong.ong.

There is only one single ?moment of truth? when it comes to malware getting unlimited access to your system, and it occurs when you attempt to run a program you have downloaded from an unknown web site:

UAC-unknown-publisher.png

Vista warns you about it no matter whether UAC is in the quiet modit warns you even if the UAC is turned offed off, and even if you don?t run Vista at all: a similar message is shown by Windows XP with the latest service pack installed on it. What many users don?t realize is that if they allow the program to run just once with the full administrative privileges, it becomes the ?point of no return?: from that moment on the software is free to do whatever it wants to the computer and no UAC messages will be displayed anymore about that particular software or any changes it makeeven if UAC is fully enabled fully enabled. The software can quietly install a keyboard hook to intercept your passwords, it can get full access to your files and documents (even if you keep them encrypted with the EFS system or Bit Locker), it can install itself to autostart automatically with full administrative rights every time you log on to Vista UAC will NOT tell you anything about any of the bad things such software can do.ftware can do.

So what is the point of the ?Windows needs your permission to continue? messages then, if they don?t protect you from the They are there to protect you from yourselfct you from yourself. They are there to alert you that you are about to make some change that may have more or less significant effect on the system. They are like those ?Are you sure you really want to delete this file? messages, to keep you from inadvertently deleting a file by hitting the Del key accidentally (although even such messages are not necessary if you have the Recycle Bin set up to keep the deleted files without actually deleting them from the hard disk).

Is it dangerous to use the ?quiet? mode of UAC then? It?s only dangerous if you consider yourself as one of the potential damaging factors and want to get an extra warning when you are about to do something potentially dangerous. (Yes, ignorance is always dangerous, not just when it comes to computers). However, if you are an experienced user and have some understanding of how to manage your Windows settings properly, you can safely use the quiet mode of UAC.

http://www.tweak-uac.com/

I will contine to have UAC in the "OFF" mode....I've never had a problem of any malware/viruses/trojans/spyware whatever in the year I've been using TrendMicro.......Also, run CCleaner v2.05.555 (free) every month or two....

http://www.ccleaner.com/

Edited by Lexonex

if you're truly having this problem with UAC. it really does make more sense for you to simply change to different antivirus software. disabling UAC in order to run your antivirus decreases not increases your security.

if you have some crazy illogical problem with UAC then that's a whole other story. so which one of those is it?

No, no no?now listen. I?m not having any trouble with UAC. I think it is an annoyance and if you had read the above post, the UAC is not capable of protecting you from yourself.

When Vista first came out I sent away for the 64 bit version (arrived via separate disc) and installed it. That was at least one year ago. My AV at the time was McAfee and THEY WERE NO HELP BECAUSE THEY WERE NOT 64 BIT COMPATIBLE and would not give me a refund on my multiple year subscription. Norton (at the time) did not have anything 64 bit compatible either.

TrendMicro came through for me. I like it. Yes I can run TrendMicro AV in the background catching/blocking malware/viruses/spyware etc. with the UAC in the ?ON? mode or the ?OFF? mode. BUT, when you are ready for a full system/PC scan it will not work UNLESS you turn ?OFF? the UAC. So, I choose to keep it off permanently as opposed of going back and forth, on and off, just to do a scan. Again, if you had read the above post the UAC really does NOT PROTECT you. Your AV does. My opinion

Listen, I'm a home user. Admin. My PC. No one else touches it...........The ONLY user account is mine........

I'm hoping the VISTA SP1 update MAY address this......I'll report in a couple of weeks if/when I receive the SP1 through Windows Automatic Updates........

New AV? I just paid for TrendMicro Internet Security 2008......Got at least 1 year to go...........

Let me change that...I hope the SP1 DOES NOT address it...Based on my entire year of not having ANY problems running with the UAC in the "OFF" mode.....Regardless of what reputable brand of AV I had, I WOULD CONTINUE TO OPERATE WITH THE UAC IN THE "OFF" MODE....It is a useless, silly pop-up......

Edited by Lexonex

it doesn't matter that your the only person that uses your account. by disabling UAC all programs run with the highest privilege level so they can do anything they want. i doesn't matter that they aren't malicious they will still have unintentional flaws which hackers could exploit to gain access to your system. this is whats happens in xp. with vista with UAC on this flaws cannot affect crucial system components because the exploited software will not have access to these files. do you see? thats why you should always have it on.

it doesn't matter that your the only person that uses your account. by disabling UAC all programs run with the highest privilege level so they can do anything they want. i doesn't matter that they aren't malicious they will still have unintentional flaws which hackers could exploit to gain access to your system. this is whats happens in xp. with vista with UAC on this flaws cannot affect crucial system components because the exploited software will not have access to these files. do you see? thats why you should always have it on.

Hey, if you click continue it has full access anyways so it can do what it want.

But i see your point, if im just say.... browsing the web and a UAC Popup comes up for no reason i would click 'Cancel' as it proberly is some virus attempting to do things.

Oh and.. why pay for an AV - theres plenty of free ones for advanced users - If your advanced enough to turn UAC off then im surely your not dumb to get so many viruses and rootkits into your pc.

AVG Free is great for me and yes i use UAC on too, always.. its only a 1 time popup anyways.

it doesn't matter that your the only person that uses your account. by disabling UAC all programs run with the highest privilege level so they can do anything they want. i doesn't matter that they aren't malicious they will still have unintentional flaws which hackers could exploit to gain access to your system. this is whats happens in xp. with vista with UAC on this flaws cannot affect crucial system components because the exploited software will not have access to these files. do you see? thats why you should always have it on.

Okay, I never claimed to be an expert. I'm better off running VISTA with the UAC in the "ON" mode. You say so. Many others say so. I GUESS what I can do is run it and when I'm ready to do a TrendMicro system/pc scan simply turn off the UAC long enough to do a scan and after completion of scan turn it back on............Therefore, retaining the "benefits" of the UAC......Sound right?

UAC%20ON.bmp

Edited by Lexonex

-- What is User Account Control (UAC) --

UAC makes it so programs that don't need full administrative privileges don't have them to protect against unknown bugs in the programs.

It is similar to the way things are handled on UNIX/Linux and OS X.

-- Examples of how it protects --

1. Internet Surfing with programs like Internet Explorer.

If a new security hole is found that allows bad programs to load when just loading a web page, UAC prevents that bad program from complete control over the computer.

In this case since Internet Explorer runs under the Low Integrity Level that UAC provides then that bad program can only do a small number of things like mess up the IE cache folder. Your OS install, programs and data will still be safe on the hard drive.

Unfortunately it does still allow read access to your drive as explained in FAQ #7.

2. Programs that accidentally corrupt OS and program files.

For example say you have an alternative file manager and you have a folder like C:\Documents\Program Files you want to delete, if that program had a bug where it then tried to delete C:\Program Files instead, that would be prevented by UAC.

That is a little unlikely but bad data loss bugs to happen.

-- UAC FAQ --

1. There are way to many prompts, they are annoying.

True. In part because UAC was added to an OS where designing for least privilege was not a big concern for a while. As Windows develops and more programs are designed with UAC in mind there should be less prompts for normal things.

Update: This is already happening with Service Pack 1. When renaming a folder or file in a protected location the prompts have gone from 4 to 1.

2. I don't need it, I have a firewall.

A firewall won't stop things like web pages exploiting security holes in Internet Explorer.

3. I don't need it, I have antivirus/antispyware (hereon referred to as antimalware) software.

Most antimalware programs detect things using a database of known bad things.

If a bad program gets to your machine before your local database is updated they won't be found.

4. I have UAC off and haven't had any malware problems.

Just because you don't have problems with it off, doesn't mean it's useless. It's another layer of protection that is good to have as listed above.

5. I like to randomly download things and install them.

I guess UAC won't really help here though antimalware software won't help much either with installing random things.

6. I'm a power user. I download various things that can be trusted and I tweak OS settings all the time. The prompts are annoying.

In this case you can disable the prompts by opening gpedit.msc and turning them off.

You will still have some protection from things like program bugs but any bad program that decides to elevate will be able to without prompts.

7. Are there any problems with UAC?

Yes. Here are some:

A. If the purpose of a bad program is to read secure data you have that can be freely accessed by your user account without additional passwords then it can still copy that data.

Note: This is a problem without UAC too.

B. A bad program with running with the Medium Integrity Level (the default level) can still erase all your document files you have write/delete access to.

Note: This is a problem without UAC too.

The advantage with UAC here is while you still have to restore the those files from a backup, you don't have to reinstall your OS and programs too like you would otherwise.

C+. There are more problems then those. I'll have to research online a bit more to figure out what they are and a way to find to write them out.

Note: Even with it's flaws, it should still be better with UAC then without it. (How to Geek Forum)

That is a much better description of UAC than the first one you posted. UAC is there to protect you after an application has been exploited. Think of it as a different kind of firewall, one sitting between your programs and the OS (and other users of the machine). It's there so that if IE, Firefox, Outlook, Thunderbird, AIM, etc get exploited by a remote code execution vulnerability, that exploit is limited in what it can do. It can still do bad things if the application doesn't run in Low IL (as IE and some other Windows components do), but not nearly as bad as if UAC wasn't there.

trendmicro.jpg

Thank you for your email. A Service Request has been sent to a Support Agent.

Your E-Mail Address : [email protected]

CASE SENT : Sun Mar 23 11:22:26 PST 2008

First Name : Lexonex

Last Name :

Location : USA

Product : Trend Micro Internet Security

Product Version : 2008

Serial Number :

Operating System : Windows Vista Home Premium

Pattern File Number :

Internet Connection : DSL (incorrect. shoud be BroadBand)

Problem Description : Running Vista Home Premium 64 bit and have purchased and am using TrendMicro Internet Secuirty 2008. Why must I ALWAYS turn off Vista's UAC when I want to have TM scan my system/PC? Why has this issue NOT been addressed? Surely, there should be a solution by now (I have used TM AV for over a year and unable to "Scan" with the Vista's UAC in the "ON" mode).

Thanks.

Dear Valued Customer,

Thank you for your email. A Service Request has been created to address your concerns.

Here are the details:

Service Request Number: 1-135465882

Accepted Time: 3/23/2008 7:25:49 PM [(GMT) Greenwich Mean Time : Dublin, Edinburgh, Lisbon, London]

Expected Response: (on or before) 3/24/2008 7:25:52 PM [(GMT) Greenwich Mean Time : Dublin, Edinburgh, Lisbon, London]

Edited by Lexonex
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8, Flip 8, Z Fold Wide: Everything you need to know The ONLY thing I need to know is the price, which I know will be way higher than I (and most people) are willing to pay for a phone... so basically nothing here I need to know. PS: Nice job getting that Apple reference to a non-existent and unrevealed product as "competition" in there. Cheque is in the mail.
    • Well I really think the repasting helped if your higher clocks have returned, maybe the next thing to look at is if there is a problem with your case airflow? I guess this because your 3080 has returned to optimal state, but is still staying too warm, which might suggest it was thermal throttling before you repasted, of which the only logical conclusion could be outside factors.
    • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8, Flip 8, Z Fold Wide: Everything you need to know by Hamid Ganji Galaxy Z Fold 7 - Image via Samsung The next generation of Samsung foldables is set to be unveiled next month at the second Unpacked event of the year. Samsung’s 2026 foldables are not expected to offer significant upgrades over their predecessors, with the Korean firm instead focusing on design refinements and conventional upgrades such as faster processors and better cameras. However, Samsung is reportedly planning to unveil an all-new passport-style foldable this year to rival Apple’s first foldable iPhone, which is expected to debut this September. Here’s a roundup of everything we know about Samsung’s upcoming foldable devices ahead of their official debut. When can we expect Samsung’s new foldables? The Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Z Flip 7 series were unveiled in July, and Samsung is expected to maintain this timeframe in 2026. Based on previous reports from Korean sources, Samsung will hold its Unpacked event on July 22 in London, UK, to pull back the curtain on the Galaxy Z Fold 8 series. The devices are also expected to hit the shelves a few weeks after launch. However, Samsung has yet to announce an official date. A new naming scheme? One of the most interesting changes we might see this year is a new naming scheme for Samsung’s latest foldables. SamMobile reported that since Samsung is expected to unveil three foldables this year, it has adopted a new naming strategy to simplify product identification for customers. Accordingly, the standard Galaxy Z Fold 8 will reportedly be called the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and will serve as the direct successor to last year’s Galaxy Z Fold 7. The “Ultra” suffix suggests the phone could feature higher-end specifications, such as additional rear camera modules. Samsung’s new passport-style foldable is expected to carry the Galaxy Z Fold 8 name without any suffix. This model is reportedly equipped with two rear cameras. No major changes are expected for the Flip model. Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Z Flip 8 anticipated specs Rumors over the past few months suggest Samsung is preparing several upgrades for its upcoming foldables, although the devices may continue to rely on larger batteries and faster charging speeds rather than dramatic design changes. The primary focus this year is expected to be the Galaxy Z Fold 8 and its wide-screen design. Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra official CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines Here are the anticipated specifications for the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra based on previous leaks: 6.5-inch outer display and 8-inch inner display, 120Hz refresh rate, and 2,600 nits peak brightness Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor, paired with 12GB or 16GB of RAM and 256GB, 512GB, or 1TB of storage 4.1mm thickness when unfolded and a weight of 210g 200MP main camera, 50MP ultrawide camera, 10MP or 12MP telephoto camera, 10MP cover camera, and 10MP selfie camera 5,000mAh battery with 45W wired charging Android 17 and One UI 9 As for the Galaxy Z Flip 8, the device is not expected to be a major departure from its predecessor, although it could become slightly slimmer. Expected specifications include: Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 or Exynos 2600 processor 12GB of RAM with 256GB and 512GB storage options 6.9-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X inner dispaly and 4.1-inch Super AMOLED outer dispaly 50MP main camera, 12MP ultrawide camera, and 10MP selfie camera 4,300mAh battery with 25W wired charging Android 17 and One UI 9 Samsung’s foldables are also expected to launch with Gemini Intelligence, Google’s AI suite for automating tasks in Android ecosystem. Moreover, given current memory and component costs, some Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Z Flip 8 variants could see a price hike. Galaxy Z Fold 8 adopts a wide-screen design The centerpiece of the upcoming Unpacked event could be the Galaxy Z Fold 8, previously rumored as the Galaxy Z Fold Wide. This model adopts a passport-style form factor and is expected to compete directly with Apple’s iPhone Fold. Galaxy Z Fold 8 official CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines Here’s what to expect: 7.6-inch primary OLED display and 5.4-inch cover display, 120Hz refresh rate, 2,600 nits peak brightness, and 4:3 aspect ratio Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor, 12GB or 16GB of RAM, and 256GB, 512GB, or 1TB storage options 4,800mAh battery with 45W wired charging 50MP main camera, 50MP ultrawide camera, and 10MP selfie camera Android 17 and One UI 9 The three new foldable phones are unlikely to be the only devices unveiled at Samsung’s Unpacked event. The company is also expected to introduce the Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 and the Galaxy Watch 9 series.
    • Thanks
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      505
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      141
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      89
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!