Recommended Posts

Or they could remove them from IE :p Would be a much better option imo. Let Mozilla have the tabtards, and MS can keep the rest :p

Tabs make a lot more sense in a web browser, though. An argument I often hear against them is that the taskbar is all you need for tabbing. I disagree. What makes tabbed browsing useful is the action of opening a new tab in the background. It let's me open several links from one page into background tabs, and then process each of them without going back to the original page. If I were going to open new windows, I would need a way to open a new window but not set focus to it. And I think it would make the ordering much more confusing.

Tabs in a web browser just work very well for most people's browsing habits.

I don't think they'd be useful at all in the shell, though. How often are you browsing / searching several locations simultaneously? You don't have the latency problem of web pages, so there's no need to "pre-load" the folders you're going to want to look at the way you might do with web links. And with a tabbed view, you'd had a harder time drag-and-dropping anything between windows.

I just don't think it would be valuable. In fact, based on my experience with SmartFTP's tabs, I think I'd find it frustrating.

I use Total Commander with two file panes (and those panes also supporting tabs in addition) and find it very useful to minimize the number of windows to keep open while also not having to use that long folder tree. There are other fun things one can do with the idea too, like saving and restoring tab preferences as favorites. Other ideas could be shortcut keys to copy/move/extract/compress selected files/folders from one tab to another (as defined by the user) so you wouldn't even have to use the mouse, potentially with major efficiency gains for the more experienced users, while still not impacting how novice users are used to things much.

While the feature wouldn't be for everyone, those who used it well could now just end up using one or two explorer windows, even when doing heavy file management. I think it's a good idea for flexibility, having used tabbed file windows myself. It's a bit like tabs in browsers. Not everyone use them, but those who do may be much more efficient with them.

One could ask oneself why MS hasn't done this before if it would be of use to people, but third party explorer replacement software supporting tabs are quite popular anyway and many using such software would far prefer tabs compared to the Windows Explorer method of doing things.

How often are you browsing / searching several locations simultaneously?

I'd actually say that browsing several locations at once is one of the reasons why tabbed browsing in Explorer doesn't make sense.

When you're browsing multiple locations, you generally want to be able to see both at the same time, and perform operations like moving/copying between them. Adding tabs just complicates that process.

Tabs make a lot more sense in a web browser, though. An argument I often hear against them is that the taskbar is all you need for tabbing. I disagree. What makes tabbed browsing useful is the action of opening a new tab in the background. It let's me open several links from one page into background tabs, and then process each of them without going back to the original page. If I were going to open new windows, I would need a way to open a new window but not set focus to it. And I think it would make the ordering much more confusing.

Tabs in a web browser just work very well for most people's browsing habits.

I don't think they'd be useful at all in the shell, though. How often are you browsing / searching several locations simultaneously? You don't have the latency problem of web pages, so there's no need to "pre-load" the folders you're going to want to look at the way you might do with web links. And with a tabbed view, you'd had a harder time drag-and-dropping anything between windows.

I just don't think it would be valuable. In fact, based on my experience with SmartFTP's tabs, I think I'd find it frustrating.

Another user of QTTask here - I don't know what I would do without it. For my job, I'm constantly copying stuff all over the place - QTTask saves your tabs, so all I have to do is open a single Explorer window, and presto! I have all my locations saved, including a number of internal ftp servers. It makes it really convenient when copying a bunch of files all the time in 7-8 different locations.

Let's see... Right now, I have 16 Explorer tabs open. That would be a nightmare to navigate without tabs.

You should go to the dev team and make the suggestion immediatly,also i recommend to keep them reminded about the features you want,the more you inform them,higher the probability that it comes in windows 7.

I've been suggesting a "Reset default service option" for a while now,i hope they implement it in the next version.

i'm also with Brandon on this one. tabs make sense when you have LOTS of documents that don't interact a lot with each other... if you need interaction, then windows are best because you can show them all on the screen (Flip3D or Expos?) and drop then:))

hence... i don't think it'd be useful in a file browser.

Another user of QTTask here - I don't know what I would do without it. For my job, I'm constantly copying stuff all over the place - QTTask saves your tabs, so all I have to do is open a single Explorer window, and presto! I have all my locations saved, including a number of internal ftp servers. It makes it really convenient when copying a bunch of files all the time in 7-8 different locations.

Let's see... Right now, I have 16 Explorer tabs open. That would be a nightmare to navigate without tabs.

Couldn't you just put those locations into the "Favorite Links" bar in the nav pane on the left side of the Explorer window?

I once made a suggestion that any document-type windows be natively allowed by Windows to be grouped together by a tabbed interface. For instance if you have a bunch of Notepad windows shown in a taskbar group, you would be able to right click and select 'Group by tabs'

That would be virtually impossible to implement properly for the OS. It'd have to intrude a great deal into the non-client area of the window.

Any app is capable of implementing such a thing itself without too much, though.

i'm also with Brandon on this one. tabs make sense when you have LOTS of documents that don't interact a lot with each other... if you need interaction, then windows are best because you can show them all on the screen (Flip3D or Expos?) and drop then:))

hence... i don't think it'd be useful in a file browser.

The same argument applies in a Web browser (as opposed to a file browser).

Make it optional as it is even in Firefox (just because it supports tabs doesn't mean you have to use them) or IE.

I use Vista and IE7, which supports browser tabs; however, when I am aware I will be opening multiple related browser tabs (in essence, building a tab *group*, which will be an IE8 feature), I'll open a new browser window instead, and then open subsidiary related tabs. That way, each browser window will be separated by subject (only tabs that are directly related will share the same browser window).

The same sort of tactic would work with a file browser that supports tabs (such as the ancient Norton Desktop, back in the days of Windows 3.x).

I spoke about tab groups being supported in IE 8; however, I went back to IE 7 due to incompatibilities between IE 8 and the Rhapsody music service (which I use, and use heavily) and other browser-based sites and services.

That would be virtually impossible to implement properly for the OS. It'd have to intrude a great deal into the non-client area of the window.

Any app is capable of implementing such a thing itself without too much, though.

You mean intrude into the client area?

It wouldn't have to use the client area, and applications could also self-handle it, if they wanted.

I'm not saying that its the best solution, but there is something to say for not making each application rebuild the same functionality

Edited by brianshapiro
You mean intrude into the client area?

It wouldn't have to use the client area, and applications could also self-handle it, if they wanted.

I'm not saying that its the best solution, but there is something to say for not making each application rebuild the same functionality

Yeah. That's what I meant.

Typically an app will have a menu bar above the tabs, and in some cases, even draw a little above that (See: Word). I don't see how you could do anything to put tabs in an app that wouldn't look like crap and cause problems.

  • 1 year later...
i'm also with Brandon on this one. tabs make sense when you have LOTS of documents that don't interact a lot with each other... if you need interaction, then windows are best because you can show them all on the screen (Flip3D or Expos?) and drop then:))

hence... i don't think it'd be useful in a file browser.

I use tabs all the time in Dolphin in KDE 4 and I find it very useful. I think it would be useful in Windows as well. To get the same function in Windows I have to use a third party solution. Of course, at work I access a lot of documents and I don't at home. Still, I find it useful from time to time.

the same way you would do it now ? open two windows of windows explorer, maximize both, to drag&drop from one to the other, drag the file to task bar (the item on the taskbar of the other window), wait until the focus is on the other window and drop it

the same could work with tabs

although it'd be a bit unpractical :p

i have an idea... how about dragging and dropping it right onto the tab itself?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Visual Studio finally gets long-awaited feature that developers will love by Usama Jawad Visual Studio Code is Microsoft's popular, lightweight, open-source code editor, it is actually Visual Studio that is the company's flagship integrated development environment (IDE). Although the IDE already offers a boatload of useful features for developers, Microsoft has finally introduced a long-requested capability that will be loved by many. While developers have already been able to create Git pull requests (PRs) directly within Visual Studio for the past couple of years, it had not been possible to review a PR without switching to the browser, until now. Microsoft revealed in December 2025 that it is working on UX that enables developers to do just that, and fast-forward to June 2026, and Visual Studio finally has native capabilities to open and inspect a PR, discuss feedback, and wrap up the review, all without switching to the browser. This integration works for both GitHub and Azure DevOps (including on-prem). Developers have access to multiple surfaces to open a PR, including Git Repository, Git Changes, and the Git menu in Visual Studio. Once you open a PR, all the important details will be immediately visible to you, from where you can navigate to various levels of granularity and branch states, depending on the reviews that you are engaged in. As you would expect, you also get a diff view that enables you to see code changes inline or side-by-side in a separate panel. You can also review commit-by-commit. Additionally, this UX fosters collaboration as you can leave comments, reply to threads, and resolve conversations easily. Naturally, you can also leverage Copilot to apply a code suggestion to fix a potential issue. When you are done, you have the ability to approve, complete, and merge the PR. This is a pretty major feature as it has been requested heavily for the past few years. You can try it out in Visual Studio 2026 version 18.7, made available here recently. Microsoft plans to enhance this experience further in future releases with comment filtering, a timeline of PR activity, and more.
    • This AdGuard Family lifetime deal is still only $15.97 by Steven Parker Today's highlighted Neowin Deal comes via our Apps + Software section, where you can get a lifetime subscription and save 90% on a lifetime AdGuard Family Plan. AdGuard is a unique program that has all the necessary features for what they claim to be "the best web experience." The software combines the an advanced ad blocker, a privacy protection module, and a parental control tool—all working in one app. This software deals with annoying ads, hides your data from a multitude of trackers, protects you from malware attacks, and even lets you restrict your kids from accessing inappropriate content. Install AdGuard and see the internet as it was supposed to be: clean and safe. Get rid of annoying banners, pop-ups & video ads once and for all Hide your data from the multitude of trackers & activity analyzers that swarm the web Avoid fraudulent and phishing website and malware attacks Protect your kids online by restricting them from accessing inappropriate & adult content Good to know Family Plan Length of access: lifetime This plan is only available to new users Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Max number of devices: 9 Access options: desktop & mobile Software version: AdGuard Family Updates included A lifetime subscription of AdGuard Family Plan normally costs $169.99, but this deal can be yours for just $15.97, that's a saving of $157.02. For full terms, specifications, and license info please click the link below. Get this AdGuard Family lifetime deal for just $15.97 (was $169.99) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. As an online publication, Neowin too relies on ads for operating costs and, if you use an ad blocker, we'd appreciate being whitelisted. In addition, we have an ad-free subscription for $28 a year, which is another way to show support! Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. Why we post these deals We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. So for those that keep moaning and complaining, be thankful we're still online for you to even do that. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
    • the MCT currently downloads 26200.8653, so not completely up to date.
    • Around 68% of developers are now using AI to generate code during development, and some experts are saying that a single developer using AI tools can now do the work of an entire team of 4 to 5 engineers.  According to Figma's State of the Designer 2026 report, 72% of designers now use generative AI in their workflows and 91% say it improves the quality of their work, not just their speed.  But does this mean web developers and designers are becoming less relevant, or are they simply evolving into a different kind of role? Would love to hear from developers and designers here has AI made your job easier, or do you feel threatened by how fast these tools are improving
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Timaximus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Timaximus earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      FBSPL went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      179
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      160
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!