Microsoft CEO jokes about Yahoo bid, Search users

By Hum
in Back Page News

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

Hum

Posted
Posted

SEATTLE (Reuters) - Microsoft Corp Chief Executive Steve Ballmer may be experiencing a case of bidder's remorse after making an unsolicited $42.3 billion offer to buy Yahoo Inc.

Speaking to a group of nearly 2,000 Microsoft enthusiasts at a technology conference in Seattle, Ballmer asked how many people use Yahoo as their primary Web search engine.

Only a handful of arms went up -- fewer than for Microsoft's Windows Live search. The overwhelming majority raised their hands for Google Inc, which Microsoft is seeking to challenge as an online advertising powerhouse.

After the tepid response for Yahoo's search, Ballmer said jokingly: "Wow! We offered 31 bucks a share."

Yahoo and Microsoft, which rank No. 2 and 3 in Web search respectively, are at a stand-off. Microsoft has said its $31 a share offer is fair, while Yahoo has said the cash-and-stock offer significantly undervalues the company.

source

Veteran

toadeater

Posted
Posted
It's a surprise that this jerk isn't driving the company into ground since he's been alone at the helm.

He isn't? He is. The legacy of his stupidity is only beginning to manifest itself. It's not only Ballmer that's the problem, it's whoever is managing Live. All they do is mindlessly copy Google, such as Live News being the latest example. Microsoft isn't doing anything to offer an alternative or superior product, it offers clones with extra eye candy and proprietary Microsoft crap (e.g. Silverlight) tacked on FOR NO BENEFIT TO USERS.

That is the root of the problem. Ballmer and his gang of thugs aren't concerned about what users want, all they're concerned about is Microsoft stock. If they gave a damn, they'd stop copying Google and Apple and expanding into markets where they offer NO BENEFIT, and concentrated solely on the few products they have that people are stuck with: Windows and Office. Ballmer seems to think the MS OS-Office suite monopoly cannot be defeated, but if MS continues to make any more Vista-like products, if Windows 7 sucks as much as Vista, Ballmer is going to get a very rude awakening by 2010 from Apple, Linux, Google, and VMWare.

And maybe even Yahoo, if MS fails in crushing them.

You know, it's not even MS's monopoly that bothers me. What bothers me is that MS tries to kill off superior products and replace them with it's own Windows flag-branded garbage. When MS can't compete, it buys the competition, or uses it's monopoly to destroy them. What's the benefit to users from all these inferior MS knockoffs that Ballmer is pushing?

Grand Master

Slimy

Posted
Posted
He isn't? He is. The legacy of his stupidity is only beginning to manifest itself. It's not only Ballmer that's the problem, it's whoever is managing Live. All they do is mindlessly copy Google, such as Live News being the latest example. Microsoft isn't doing anything to offer an alternative or superior product, it offers clones with extra eye candy and proprietary Microsoft crap (e.g. Silverlight) tacked on FOR NO BENEFIT TO USERS.

That is the root of the problem. Ballmer and his gang of thugs aren't concerned about what users want, all they're concerned about is Microsoft stock. If they gave a damn, they'd stop copying Google and Apple and expanding into markets where they offer NO BENEFIT, and concentrated solely on the few products they have that people are stuck with: Windows and Office. Ballmer seems to think the MS OS-Office suite monopoly cannot be defeated, but if MS continues to make any more Vista-like products, if Windows 7 sucks as much as Vista, Ballmer is going to get a very rude awakening by 2010 from Apple, Linux, Google, and VMWare.

And maybe even Yahoo, if MS fails in crushing them.

You know, it's not even MS's monopoly that bothers me. What bothers me is that MS tries to kill off superior products and replace them with it's own Windows flag-branded garbage. When MS can't compete, it buys the competition, or uses it's monopoly to destroy them. What's the benefit to users from all these inferior MS knockoffs that Ballmer is pushing?

That has to be the funniest rant I've ever read. You obviously know very little about what Microsoft is doing. But don't listen to me, I'm a Microsoft newsposter, so I'm biased anyway ;)

Grand Master

AltecXP

Posted
Posted

I dunno, I switched from Vista to OSX...its a nice scene change, But I honestly cant say I have any less problems.

Hell after the new Safari 3.1.1(osx) update the machine locked up shutting down.

Grand Master

GrimReeper

Posted
Posted
He isn't? He is. The legacy of his stupidity is only beginning to manifest itself. It's not only Ballmer that's the problem, it's whoever is managing Live. All they do is mindlessly copy Google, such as Live News being the latest example. Microsoft isn't doing anything to offer an alternative or superior product, it offers clones with extra eye candy and proprietary Microsoft crap (e.g. Silverlight) tacked on FOR NO BENEFIT TO USERS.

That is the root of the problem. Ballmer and his gang of thugs aren't concerned about what users want, all they're concerned about is Microsoft stock. If they gave a damn, they'd stop copying Google and Apple and expanding into markets where they offer NO BENEFIT, and concentrated solely on the few products they have that people are stuck with: Windows and Office. Ballmer seems to think the MS OS-Office suite monopoly cannot be defeated, but if MS continues to make any more Vista-like products, if Windows 7 sucks as much as Vista, Ballmer is going to get a very rude awakening by 2010 from Apple, Linux, Google, and VMWare.

And maybe even Yahoo, if MS fails in crushing them.

You know, it's not even MS's monopoly that bothers me. What bothers me is that MS tries to kill off superior products and replace them with it's own Windows flag-branded garbage. When MS can't compete, it buys the competition, or uses it's monopoly to destroy them. What's the benefit to users from all these inferior MS knockoffs that Ballmer is pushing?

+1

Experienced

oceanmotion

Posted
Posted

Instead of saying Ballmer is a lunatic, why not explain why, I really interested in how he is any worse or better than Bill Gates at running Microsoft other than coming off as a mad man.

On another note, I really hate how lots of Microsoft services have different menu bars. Live services and MSN are suppose to different I know but even their services don't go together in any appealing way. Go to Live Search, then look at Live maps, Live Spaces, MSN, Hotmail. They are all over the place.

Grand Master

PaulCabby

Posted
Posted
Ballmer seems to think the MS OS-Office suite monopoly cannot be defeated, but if MS continues to make any more Vista-like products, if Windows 7 sucks as much as Vista, Ballmer is going to get a very rude awakening by 2010 from Apple, Linux, Google, and VMWare.

Vista is bad?

Experienced

C_Guy

Posted
Posted
iWonder what MS would be like if Jobs took the helm. :whistle:

It would be on the verge of bankruptcy before a more successful company cuts them a cheque. Then they would ridicule that company and then hypocritically accuse them of stealing ideas.

Community Regular

Azmodan

Posted
Posted (edited)
God bless Steve Jobs and Jonathan Ives.

iWonder what MS would be like if Jobs took the helm. :whistle:

Why people think Apple is the biggest threat to Microsoft?

Has anyone actually seen Balmer throwing chairs when the iPhone got released? He just laughed!

Let's see you do better.

I doubt someone can throw chairs further. Your point is valid, and I'm 100% with you.

That's nice since they aren't one.

Windows is not a monopoly? Holy gee, everyone type rm -rf / !

Edited by Azmodan
Grand Master

BajiRav

Posted
Posted
Riiiight, except Steve Jobs wasn't with Apple during that time. Apple's return to success only started after Jobs returned. Congratulations on not knowing what you're talking about though.

I think you need to read some instead.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.