Games performance: Vista x64 SP1 vs XP x64 SP2


Recommended Posts

@chAos972

Ok, I'm just reporting what people are complaining about : drivers support is more painful with vista 64.

The fact is that with vista (32 bits) I got a problem with the onboard sound device (soundmax) , which didn't worked properly with the default driver ... What I've done is hack the inf file from the driver of a more recent motherboard (Asus ...), install that driver, and then the sound was even better than before under XP :laugh: In short what I'm saying with this example, is that without bypassing the "driver signing" , I wouldn't have be able to enjoy proper sound. Now , "people" and geeky articles are saying that driver signing can't be bypassed with vista 64; and that's what worry me the most. I've never verified this, but I'll certainly give Vista x64 a try the next time I'll upgrade my comp.

@lord_xenos

Everyone's saying it's not Ms's fault ... I don't agree. There must be a reason if so many companies refuse or can't deliver proper

drivers for vista ... After all, it's up to MS to provide incentives for all these companies to develop such drivers, and to make this job as easier as possible. If not enough hardwares are properly supported by Vista, then Vista is nothing.

I have an Asus motherboard with SoundMax on it and have had no issues on Vista on either 32 or 64. I've never been stopped from installing any driver because of driver signing.

I'm running Windows Vista Ultimate x64 and I've noticed some performance gains in games like Call of Duty 4 and Crysis. However, I have lost performance in games like Team Fortress 2 and Half-Life 2. Anyway, I think driver support for 64-bit operating systems is becoming more mainstream. I bought my computer back in November-07 and I had no trouble finding all the 64-bit drivers I need.

Team Fortress performance loss isn't that big of a deal... I am glad to see you had gains in COD 4 and Crysis though.

@Aeden

So, in other words, unless you've got a CrossFire setup...XP drivers seem to keep pace (if not outpace, most of the time) with Vista performance. The Catalyst drivers shine with CrossFire & Vista, however, giving around 5-10 frames more per second.

I didn't pay attention to this crossfire & SLI things ... seems that Vista 64 is a bit less a attractive now...

@hagjohn

I have an Asus motherboard with SoundMax on it and have had no issues on Vista on either 32 or 64. I've never been stopped from installing any driver because of driver signing.

this is because your motherboard is much recent than mine

I have a P4C800-E deluxe ...

But I realize I've made a mistake in my "bashing" against Asus :blushing:

The driver I used to "fix" my sound problems was intended for XP only too ... (from motherboard P5P800).

I think this is more of comparison of drivers and compability rather then the OS' performance.

Ahh that is an os's performance. Its make NO diference whose at fault for what, all that should matter to the end user is bottom line performance and right now XP x86 delivers it in spades, actually across the board not only in gaming.

Also why are you trying so vehemently to defend some corporations product? Do they pay you? No. Do they know you exist? No. We get it, you like Vista, ok now let other people share their experiences and opinions. Stop trying to blame all of Vista's problems on user error, if it truly was a good os its user error would be low.

Ahh that is an os's performance. Its make NO diference whose at fault for what, all that should matter to the end user is bottom line performance and right now XP x86 delivers it in spades, actually across the board not only in gaming.

Also why are you trying so vehemently to defend some corporations product? Do they pay you? No. Do they know you exist? No. We get it, you like Vista, ok now let other people share their experiences and opinions. Stop trying to blame all of Vista's problems on user error, if it truly was a good os its user error would be low.

Wow talk about misunderstanding. I don't think you read all my posts correctly. I have clearly stated that companys have not given their fair share of effort to produce quality drivers. In no way have I accused end users for anything. No crap XP owns all in performance. If you didn't notice before, I'll say it again, Microsoft is at fault for many things but I don't think they are at fault for the lack of drivers - even though that is becoming less and less true. I'm not going to go off topic and discuss anything more than that. So what if I like Vista; I also like XP, for different reasons. Of course to the end user all that matters is if it works or not. I'm terribly sorry for expressing my opinion. I am not preventing anyone from expressing theirs.

I find that hard to believe, right this moment im installing XP on my desktop because after using Vista for 2 weeks it still takes double the time for the games to load.

As far as frames per second, i don't know, it might be me but all the games felt smoother in XP, also Vista has a horrible tendency to read the HDD a hell of a lot more when im inside games, keep in mind that i already disabled prefetch, indexing and search services...

Double the times for games to load??? something is wrong there, there is no difference in loading times on any of my games (Or FPS for that matter) when I switched from XP (32 bit) to vista (64 bit). CS:S loads almost instantly, COD4 loads levels insanely fast I have had no problems at all.

I'm running Windows Vista Ultimate x64 and I've noticed some performance gains in games like Call of Duty 4 and Crysis. However, I have lost performance in games like Team Fortress 2 and Half-Life 2. Anyway, I think driver support for 64-bit operating systems is becoming more mainstream. I bought my computer back in November-07 and I had no trouble finding all the 64-bit drivers I need.

Performance-wise, I don't notice that much of a loss in Team Fortress 2 on Vista versus XP. (Except the game likes to crash when exiting in Vista.)

What I noticed with my copy of Vista Business x86, with my GeForce 8800 GT and Audigy 2 ZS: after I did something sound events stutter, music playback stutters a bit, sound in Source-based games stutter as well (even worse with ALchemy), and graphics tend to flicker a little bit. I'll probably try installing Business x64. Really my main holdback is the sound card, and I'm not really in the position to replace a freaking sound card at the moment. It still works great with XP x86.

Last note: almost the major components of my computer date from New Years Eve 2007. Except the sound card.

You can disable vista's driver signing thing, but I'm not sure if you can do it on a permanent basis (you just hit F8 and have an option there). I thought that you could install unsigned drivers just fine on vista, and that only those that needed to run in kernel mode or something like that were the ones that needed the signing.

I have to run RivaTuner if I need to game. Otherwise my GPU will go up in smoke. For Vista x86 I can set RivaTuner to start without prompting for UAC. On Vista x64 I'd have to do that, plus disable driver checking every single time I boot the PC.

Performance-wise, I don't notice that much of a loss in Team Fortress 2 on Vista versus XP. (Except the game likes to crash when exiting in Vista.)

What I noticed with my copy of Vista Business x86, with my GeForce 8800 GT and Audigy 2 ZS: after I did something sound events stutter, music playback stutters a bit, sound in Source-based games stutter as well (even worse with ALchemy), and graphics tend to flicker a little bit. I'll probably try installing Business x64. Really my main holdback is the sound card, and I'm not really in the position to replace a freaking sound card at the moment. It still works great with XP x86.

Last note: almost the major components of my computer date from New Years Eve 2007. Except the sound card.

I have to run RivaTuner if I need to game. Otherwise my GPU will go up in smoke. For Vista x86 I can set RivaTuner to start without prompting for UAC. On Vista x64 I'd have to do that, plus disable driver checking every single time I boot the PC.

How did you set rivatuner not to prompt?

I obviously can't (and won't) comment on behalf of others, but personally, I think those synthetic benchmarks are FUD. Try it out for yourself and see how good or bad "X" game runs on "Y" videocard in "Z" machine.

after I did something sound events stutter, music playback stutters a bit, sound in Source-based games stutter as well (even worse with ALchemy), and graphics tend to flicker a little bit. I'll probably try installing Business x64. Really my main holdback is the sound card, and I'm not really in the position to replace a freaking sound card at the moment.

Did you manage to fix the stuttering? I'm getting almost the same problem on different hardware and without a creative sound-card. I've tried using the latest beta and WHQL 64 bit drivers but neither seem to make any difference. I'm getting severe sound stuttering in TFC2 and CS:Source. Havent been able to test any other games.

I'm beginning to think the issue might be Vista SP1...

Anyone have any ideas of what I can try to fix this? The only thing I remember doing is downloading the free trackmania game, it crash on opening and then TFC doesn't want to work :p

Did you manage to fix the stuttering? I'm getting almost the same problem on different hardware and without a creative sound-card. I've tried using the latest beta and WHQL 64 bit drivers but neither seem to make any difference. I'm getting severe sound stuttering in TFC2 and CS:Source. Havent been able to test any other games.

I'm beginning to think the issue might be Vista SP1...

Anyone have any ideas of what I can try to fix this? The only thing I remember doing is downloading the free trackmania game, it crash on opening and then TFC doesn't want to work :p

I tried reinstalling Vista Business SP1 x64, but I'm reverting back to x86 one last time. Bit of a pain in the ass to maintain both 32 and 64 applications: for instances, separate sets of codecs for both 32 and 64 bit players.

On the plus side, installation of the Creative drivers was surprisingly speedy on x64. Performance was generally good; games were fine.

Really I have no idea what causes all this stuttering. Last time the wave of nonstop sound stuttering came after uninstalling NOD32...

Performance-wise, I don't notice that much of a loss in Team Fortress 2 on Vista versus XP. (Except the game likes to crash when exiting in Vista.)

What I noticed with my copy of Vista Business x86, with my GeForce 8800 GT and Audigy 2 ZS: after I did something sound events stutter, music playback stutters a bit, sound in Source-based games stutter as well (even worse with ALchemy), and graphics tend to flicker a little bit. I'll probably try installing Business x64. Really my main holdback is the sound card, and I'm not really in the position to replace a freaking sound card at the moment. It still works great with XP x86.

Now that I think of it, I don't think I lost any performance in Team Fortress 2. Though I do have that annoying crash whenever I exit the game. I know I lost performance in Half-Life 2 for sure. I lose 50fps simply by turning the flashlight on in Episode 2. Heck, Half-Life 2 runs so poorly that I had to run it 32-bit. It's odd because the game defaulted to 64-bit mode and it was really buggy. Valve claimed the game would run better on a 64-bit processor. Haha.

Anyway, I have a Sound Blaster X-Fi Platinum and it works fine on Vista Ultimate x64 with ALchemy (X-Fi edition). I also have no issues with my video card (ATI HD 2900 XT) at all.

I tried reinstalling Vista Business SP1 x64, but I'm reverting back to x86 one last time. Bit of a pain in the ass to maintain both 32 and 64 applications: for instances, separate sets of codecs for both 32 and 64 bit players.

On the plus side, installation of the Creative drivers was surprisingly speedy on x64. Performance was generally good; games were fine.

Really I have no idea what causes all this stuttering. Last time the wave of nonstop sound stuttering came after uninstalling NOD32...

My problem seems now to have disappeared but I'm not entirely sure why. I'm running the 169.25 WHQL drivers from nvidia. I also tried disabling services on vista that I don't think I need (used speedyvista to do this). The one thing I noticed was that the stuttering was worst when vista decided it wanted to do something and started churning the HDD. God knows what vista is up to...

I'm also on RAID0. Don't know if anyone else is. I don't run NOD or any AV so I can't compare that, but on x64 my TF2 seems to be running smoothly, for now...

since upgrading to 8GB of ram and a Q6600, even not overclocked, games such as COD4 and Frontlines: FOW and World in Conflict all load signifigantly faster, especially Frontlines w hich used to take forever before, but is insanely fast now....dont know what some of you are talking about....vista x64 sp1 rocks.

So basically, this confirms there's no reason to "upgrade" to Vista. It confirms that Vista requires more resources to accomplish the equivalent task on XP. It also confirms you need 64 Bit Vista because of the increased RAM usage, while XP only needs 2GB for gaming and doesn't need to be 64 bit.

I'm sure Vista will improve again with Vista SP2, but how long is that going to take? With Windows 7 on the horizon, Vista is a dead end. It's as dead as XP, only it stinks worse. :laugh:

So basically, this confirms there's no reason to "upgrade" to Vista. It confirms that Vista requires more resources to accomplish the equivalent task on XP. It also confirms you need 64 Bit Vista because of the increased RAM usage, while XP only needs 2GB for gaming and doesn't need to be 64 bit.

I'm sure Vista will improve again with Vista SP2, but how long is that going to take? With Windows 7 on the horizon, Vista is a dead end. It's as dead as XP, only it stinks worse. :laugh:

I really do not see how this confirms that vista requires more resources when it comes out on top...And it certainly does not confirm you need 64 bit vista because of increased ram usage because that does not make any sense at all. And x64 actually increases RAM usage...I fail to see how you can reach these conclusions.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
    • Apple Watch Series 11 GPS just crashed to 30% off in this fast-moving Prime Day deal by Karthik Mudaliar The Apple Watch Series 11 is available for $279, down from its $399 list price, saving buyers $120, or 30%. Amazon labels the offer as selling fast, so the current price may not remain available for long. This GPS model features a 42mm aluminum case, an Always-On Retina LTPO3 OLED display capable of reaching up to 2,000 nits, and an Ion-X glass surface with improved scratch resistance. Apple rates Series 11 for up to 24 hours of normal use or up to 38 hours in Low Power Mode, with fast charging providing up to eight hours of use from a 15-minute charge. Health and fitness tools include sleep scoring, temperature sensing, ECG support, heart-rate alerts, workout tracking, sleep apnea notifications, and hypertension notifications, where available. The watch also carries IP6X dust resistance and 50-meter water resistance. This configuration is best suited to iPhone owners who want comprehensive health tracking, notifications, contactless payments, and workout data without stepping up to a larger or cellular-equipped model. The smaller case should also appeal to buyers who prefer a lighter watch, while the S/M band fits wrists measuring 130mm to 180mm. With the current generation now significantly below its usual retail price, this is a strong time to replace an aging Apple Watch or buy a first model without compromising on Apple’s newest health and display features. Grab the discounted Apple Watch Series 11 (sold and shipped by Amazon) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • The laptop in the bedroom is an Acer with i7-10510U CPU. Acer's website states they will not be upgrading it so I had little choice other than disable secure boot. I know next to nothing on these matters so hopefully it will be fine.
    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      460
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!