The Magic behind MagicJack free phone calls


Recommended Posts

MagicJack, the USB-based VoIP service from telco vet Dan Borislow, intrigued us from the moment we first read about it in a column by Herb Greenberg. In search of more details, we were finally able to track down Borislow Monday for a brief demo and some inside info, in advance of the product?s ?formal? intro either later this month or early next.

Some quick tidbits: The company?s business plan revolves not so much around the USB gizmo but instead around a robust nationwide network that Borislow says is also a certified CLEC; the company has interconnect agreements with all the larger carriers, meaning it?s not about to be shut down like some other value-cost calling operations; and as part of its initial marketing push, MagicJack plans to give away a free phone number (of which it says it has millions) to the first wave of customers who plop down $29.95 or $39.95, a price that includes a full year of unlimited calling to the U.S., Canada and parts of Europe.

post-37120-1208831622.jpg

If we mess up on any details here, we will blame the noisy atmosphere, since our ?interview? took place amidst wayward forklifts and booth-building crews during the exhibit-floor setup day at Spring 2007 VON in San Jose. While it?s possible that we are the willing victims in a measured slow-leak marketing campaign, any operation that claims to have spent two years building a nationwide network of Internet gateways (with 31 session border controllers, a number Borislow is quite proud of), and has spent the exhaustive and expensive time certifying itself as a competitive local exchange carrier isn?t some Web 2.0 play.

The consumer side of MagicJack goes like this: Users will plug the USB end of the ?jack? into their Internet-connected computer, and will plug a phone into the other end of the device. The device then boots a softphone onto the screen (in 28 seconds, in our impromptu test); you then can pick up the phone and start dialing. The MagicJack will cost $39.99 for a jack with a memory chip (for the softphone), or $29.99 for one without memory (you can alternatively download the client and keep it on your PC). Yearly subscriptions thereafter will cost $19.99, Borislow has said.

The business side of MagicJack, as best as we can tell, comes from the subscription plans as well as interconnect fees paid to MagicJack?s CLEC partner company (apparently called YMax Communications Corp.) whenever a MagicJack phone number is called. More details ? such as additional features embedded into the product, like voicemail, conference calling, and a direct-to-Google search link ? will be revealed at the ?official? announcement, whenver that is. (At the current leak rate, Borislow might not have much left to tell, other than ?some big marketing plan? that he kept to himself Monday.)

Borislow, who claims to have provided most of MagicJack?s $17 million in funding from his own pockets, thinks there is a huge market for value-priced VoIP-based telephony, even though others like Vonage and Skype are revenue-challenged right now. ?There?s a lot of people with fixed costs of $700 a year for phone service who may now be able to buy a case of beer a week instead,? Borislow said, putting a thirsty twist on MagicJack?s purported savings. College students or teens who already have laptops and Internet connectivity are also target customers, he said.

On the networking side, Borislow is quick to diagram the MagicJack/YMax advantage, which he says comes from building a network that covers ?80 percent of the U.S. population? with its gateways and SBCs. By connecting most of a call?s distance over the Internet between its own gear, Borislow says MagicJack will have far superior call quality to other VoIP providers (or even PSTN calls routed over IP) , who must traverse multiple equipment types and transports that can introduce latency and degrade calls.

(Look for MagicJack in the SJ Labs booth at VON, since MagicJack acquired the softphone-technology firm as part of its inception.)

source

I just ordered a MagicJack, plus the 2 year access.

It's a free 1-month trial, before your card is charged.

The actual price is $39.95 plus 6.95 shipping = $46.90.

I'm spending $66.85 [2.79 per month] for 2 years of 'free' long distance -- I hope it's worth it. ;)

I've had a MJ for almost a year now. I love it, in fact I got 3 of my friends to get one also!

I JUST changed my number to a local number actually the other day, a very easy to remember one to boot. Very happy about that. I highly, highly recommend the MagicJack to anyone and everyone I know that has broadband and that lives in the US or Canada and wants awesome quality VoIP/broadband phone service for like hardly any money :D

^ Cool -- I'll give ya a call. :D

And according to the TV ad, anyone not in the USA/Canada, can buy one, and then call our countries for free.

If i payed ?5 more per month in the Uk, for the deal i have, i could call anywhere in the US and most European destinations for free already. I pay ?45 for free evening and weekend calls to UK landlines, Sky 8 meg Broadband and Sky TV, which works great. If i was to pay ?5 more i would get completely free calls all of the time to the UK, US and some European destinations.

Wait, so it's pay this nominal fee and call unlimited? Free calls?

Is it only free calls to other people who have MJ? So it's like Skype?

Damn, so many questions. ;)

Details at the web site:

http://www.magicjack.com/

The one question I have, what about incoming calls ?

Is it 'free' for people calling you ? Or do they need MagicJack too ? :unsure:

Video says you can receive, but ...

Do you have to be at your computer when you do it, or be hooked up to the net?

I don't get this things, cause they are all just glorified chat programs. Ventrilo is free for an 8man server, Team-Speak, WLM Voice Chat, Skype . . .

Why do I have to pay for it, when I do it for free all the time

If I'm offtrack, please place me on the rails.

^ Cool -- I'll give ya a call. :D

And according to the TV ad, anyone not in the USA/Canada, can buy one, and then call our countries for free.

I dunno Hum, that's a scary thought! :D

Wait, so it's pay this nominal fee and call unlimited? Free calls?

Is it only free calls to other people who have MJ? So it's like Skype?

Damn, so many questions. ;)

You can call ANYONE, ANYWHERE in the US or Canada for free, totally unlimited with MagicJack. Just plug it into a USB port, activate it and away you go. You can either use the softphone they have on the PC itself to make calls (using a good headset mind you) or you can hook up any landline phone to the MJ and use it like a regular phone device.

Details at the web site:

http://www.magicjack.com/

The one question I have, what about incoming calls ?

Is it 'free' for people calling you ? Or do they need MagicJack too ? :unsure:

Video says you can receive, but ...

No, people who call you pay whatever they normally pay for making a call. If it's another MJ user then yes it would be a free call, but then again any call made with MJ is technically "free" as it were.

Do you have to be at your computer when you do it, or be hooked up to the net?

I don't get this things, cause they are all just glorified chat programs. Ventrilo is free for an 8man server, Team-Speak, WLM Voice Chat, Skype . . .

Why do I have to pay for it, when I do it for free all the time

If I'm offtrack, please place me on the rails.

No you don't need to be at the PC all the time, but it does have to be hooked up to the net and be on all the time if you want to make or receive calls. This is NOT a glorified chat program like Skype or Ventrilo. It's a real VoIP system.

If the MJ is hooked up to a normal phone, then you can walk around your house as you normally do and use the phone whenever you want. It's a bit different than say a Vent server or Skype. While Skype can allow you to call a regular phone, the quality leaves something to be desired normally (alot actually). MJ is perfect quality voice, I'd say better than normal phone service lines actually. Though sometimes the audio can be a tad low, but that's probably due to my headset on my PC more than anything.

I've had one for a month now.

It's working great, aside from when I ran it off my USB Hub (it would restart on occasion or drop calls, so don't run it off a hub unless you have to!). Plugged it into my computer's USB and it's been happy as a clam. The call quality is great, and I'm pretty happy with it now.

Anyone who's thinking about getting one -- do it. It's worth the money.

Question...

Does it work with a Mac?

OK, another Question...

Does it hook up to USB because of Software on the PC, or just because it needs USB to be powered?

If it is just because of the power, in theory would it work if plugged into the USB port of a PS3??

Does it work with a Mac?

Yep. It works on Intel Macs.

Does it hook up to USB because of Software on the PC, or just because it needs USB to be powered?

It has its' own software that it loads each time. No need to install anything. As for USB, that's HOW it works. Plug it in and go.

Yep. It works on Intel Macs.

It has its' own software that it loads each time. No need to install anything. As for USB, that's HOW it works. Plug it in and go.

Kick ass, and more Kick ass.

Thanks for the responses.

Hum, where did you order the one with the two year contract? Straight from the website itself?

What about Australia :-(

Only US and Canada.

Im guessing that if you have a buddy(s) in the US or Canada that you call a lot can they get a MagicJack for you and send it to you and you can save on calls to the two countries as long as you pay them since its in their name and billed to them. Just thinking in the air....

So after you purchase it and set it up, will it give assign you a phone number or what?

Do I have to keep a program running on my computer in order for it to work? Does the adapter work like a U3 device?

Does it use up a lot of bandwith? I don't exactly have the fastest connection around...

EDIT: Found the answer to the bandwith question, 80kbps. :)

Edited by Ruiz

Didn't read the full article...we played with one of these at CES this year

When we talked to 'the creator', he said what they *hope* will drive most of the money is it being ad based use on the computer, but you dont *have* to use the computer side client, and I think most people won't either :p But he did stress their whole network they created to support this, which helped lower their costs since they traveled on their network most of the time, instead of always over other companies lines which they would have to pay a fee for

2184503067_1536981532_b.jpg

Kick ass, and more Kick ass.

Thanks for the responses.

Hum, where did you order the one with the two year contract? Straight from the website itself?

When you go to check out at the website, and enter your ordering info/card, it will offer you a bunch of options.

It started to confuse me a bit. :blink:

I opted to pay for 2nd year, for $19.95.

The e-mail I got from MagicJack called this a 'Gold Plan'.

sounds like a really neat idea.

you get yourself a laptop with broadband, then you got a nice little cell phone. interesting

:rofl: Bring a laptop with a wireless card, plug in a normal home phone into magic jack, sit at a table and talk on it :D People would probably get a laugh <.<

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • On the topic of being locked out of a service. Recently two different friends of mine got locked out of their Google accounts. Both were hack attempts and one of them is waiting 30 days before he can get back in. He had backup codes and MFA but not a passkey. It was a browser token hack. Anyhow he has to wait 30 days for the dispute or whatever to end. The other person only had a password and is screwed losing all of the email, docs and years of photos. Google won’t help her at all. Her fault because she had no backup/recovery setup. Enable passkeys if possible. Also do NOT use browser based password managers. If using a cloud service make sure it is one you can fully sync to one of your devices so you can back it up. Like a PC or Mac with some backup drive plugged into it. Google is the worst to use IMHO. You can’t sync your photos at all. You have to use the “Take Out” service which is manual and takes days. That service strips the meta data from your photos. Also Google Docs synced to a device are useless without a Google accounts. MS Office/Libre Office is not going to open a link to a Google doc to a dead account.
    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!