8 million by Oct 1st 2008 & Win!


Can we do it?  

958 members have voted

  1. 1. 8 million posts by Oct 1st 2008

    • No Chance!
      173
    • Yep, no problem
      785


Recommended Posts

I have to agree. But making this thread in the first place without closing it has basically said, he come over here Spammers! Come on now don't be shy...

Exactly, people just don't understand it.

Oh, by the way, the Kleenex stock went up two points after I started my "+x".

+124

I have to agree. But making this thread in the first place without closing it has basically said...

Hey calling all Spammers! Come on now don't be shy... No, I won't bite..

It was fun with the images, and even having the mods join in was fun, but posting +### is just stupid. It is only going to lead them to close this down.

have you forgotten that all your posts are logged? must be one hell of a stock

It was fun with the images, and even having the mods join in was fun, but posting +### is just stupid. It is only going to lead them to close this down

Yeah, because pictures are so much better :rolleyes:

This thread is kept open because we are pretty much allowed to spam, go for the 8 Million posts. So if it's a lame picture or my saying "+" something, we're still going for 8 Million. There was no rules set for how we got there.

+125

Yeah, because pictures are so much better :rolleyes:

This thread is kept open because we are pretty much allowed to spam, go for the 8 Million posts. So if it's a lame picture or my saying "+" something, we're still going for 8 Million. There was no rules set for how we got there.

+125

I have asked for the rules to be clarified so all will be revealed soon when a mod gets here :)

Yeah, because pictures are so much better :rolleyes:

This thread is kept open because we are pretty much allowed to spam, go for the 8 Million posts. So if it's a lame picture or my saying "+" something, we're still going for 8 Million. There was no rules set for how we got there.

+125

I'm with Sethos on this. Whether it's a text post or an image, especially images that have been double posted, triple posted and quite possibly quadruple posted, it's really no different.

Afternoon Sir, how are you :)

+123

Pretty good, bored. You?

just.... ignore him...

Bah! be nice haha.

Good Afternoon welcome to count up with your host Sethos, todays prizes included a tin of spam specially signed by the host himself.

Indeed. I shall try.

We have been trying to amuse each other with FUNNY or at least remotely interesting pictures, not just random pictures of crap, and +1, 2, 3 posts.

It actually hurts going through the new posts.

We have been trying to amuse each other with FUNNY or at least remotely interesting pictures, not just random pictures of crap, and +1, 2, 3 posts.

It actually hurts going through the new posts.

istockphoto_1535790_i_agree.jpg

Now you see that funny and original if you could do that for every post I would be finding it interesting.

Now you see, I'm not here to amuse or make my posts interesting to anyone.

I'm here to help reach the goal of 8 Million posts by the 1st, to celebrate Neowin.

+130

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • If you don't care to read what I said, then you prove my point. Maybe written media is beyond your attention span. Titles are not summaries my friend.
    • Nobody asked... in fact, I said "I don't care about political leanings"  
    • TLDR. Here is a far better title (just a basic example): Windows 11 26H2 to allow disabling Web search results
    • Restore will get my vote, only if to see if things are any different, doubt it though but Labour and Conservatives too out of touch and same thing over and over and over…, Lib Dem who?
    • There is nothing wrong with this title. You have completely missed the plot when it comes to "clickbait." The issue was never that a title tries to entice you to click, that is how titles have worked for over 100 years. The issue is when the title subverts expectations, getting you to click expecting something that isn't there. The classic clickbait example is "Boyfriend caught cheating, what happens next will shock you," then what happened next is the girlfriend was upset...which is probably the least shocking outcome imaginable. If sounds like what you want is for the titles to be a collection of 10-word summaries that you can skim, get the just of the story, and only click if you want more details. That is not, never has been, and never will be what titles are. You can go all the way back to print newspapers during the great depression and see the same thing. The newspaper was locked in a vending machine, all you can see is the headline, you choose to put in 5¢ to buy the paper and read the rest if you want. Those headlines were written in a way to sell the paper, not just to provide a summery. Here are two actual headlines from that time, "Wall Street Lays an Egg," or "Stocks Hit Bottom?" Maybe you'd say something like "it was wrong then and it's still wrong now." Okay, fine opinion to have, but it isn't like Neowin is doing something unjurnalistic, they are just following the age-old standards for written media.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      525
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      199
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      94
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      neufuse
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!