Windows Vista SP1 outperforms Windows XP SP2 in file copy


Recommended Posts

I used sp2 xp on my machine and then installed sp3 and found improved boot time and improved file copy times.

I reinstalled to ensure i wasnt imagining it and it did indeed improve the performance.

Sssh ;) Microsoft spies amongst us don't like to hear this sort of feedback. All hail Vista. Hail Vista.

So I guess the "Runs better.." and "Your working is now faster and.." slogans they always show during the installation aren't real after all? Darn and I thought every Windows was supposed to be better than the previous one.

They have those slogans on XP aswell, remember upgrading from 98 to XP? Which was faster back then? 98 by a mile.

This is one person's test and for me, this test is absolutely absurd. I use Windows Vista SP1 and XP SP2 on my notebook and XP is blazingly faster than Vista (on the exact same machine - which has an Intel Core 2 Duo and 4GB of RAM (using the x64 version of Vista and the 32-bit version of XP) when it comes to file copying.

I like Vista, don't get me wrong, but file copying is one thing that Vista still does extremely poorly. I'm still recommending people to use XP. That's me, based on my own experience.

XP3 doesn't have any performance fixes... It is a collection of security fixes/hotfixes ect.. If you install sp3 and think it's so much faster, there is other factors causing the speed increase or it's a placebo. They didn't make any file copying changes in sp3.

Huh? XP SP3 is just a collection of security fixes. There are no changes to the OS's functionality or performance. Vista SP1 contains a bunch of performance improvements handled by the Windows development team. No Windows developers worked on XP SP3, it's just a "sustained engineering" project that accumulates the hotfixes created to address specific issues (mainly security, occassionally major bugs hit by corporations).

It makes no difference if you compare XP using SP2 or SP3.

+1 SP3 is irrelevant to this test.

Those who think Vista runs faster, you are forgetting that having 2 GBs more of ram and an os that uses all four cores in a Q6600 does not mean Vista is faster on the software side than an XP whose limit is 3 GBs ram and only uses a single core for os related services.

It is for this very reason, along with the increased demands by the animated UI, that XP is much faster on older systems and possibly a little slower on newer systems.

Those who think Vista runs faster, you are forgetting that having 2 GBs more of ram and an os that uses all four cores in a Q6600 does not mean Vista is faster on the software side than an XP whose limit is 3 GBs ram and only uses a single core for os related services.

It is for this very reason, along with the increased demands by the animated UI, that XP is much faster on older systems and possibly a little slower on newer systems.

Okay, I got lost here. You can run XP on a machine with a dual core or above with 2 GB of RAM or more, and there are hotfixes out there that allow XP to utilize more than one core. I've run both XP and Vista on my machine and Vista is the far snappier one. I just installed Vista Home Basic SP1 on an old computer with an AMD Athlon XP 2400+ with 768 MB of RAM, and Vista runs better than XP even on that old machine.

ps .. entire benchmark isn't valid I think ..

- He states himself .. Windows Server 2008 support SMB v2 as does Vista. This provides sometimes up to 4000x file copy performance...

- Depending on configuration .. the server balances the transfer for all clients but also priorities. Certain OSes / clients get higher speeds assigned.

- The latency (ping) test is crap. Doesn't do anything. In Vista the ICMP (ping) protocol get priority over the LAN connector.

- The virtual LAN NIC drivers differ in vista <> xp.

If anything .. this is a SMB v2 demo.

Those who think Vista runs faster, you are forgetting that having 2 GBs more of ram and an os that uses all four cores in a Q6600 does not mean Vista is faster on the software side than an XP whose limit is 3 GBs ram and only uses a single core for os related services.

It is for this very reason, along with the increased demands by the animated UI, that XP is much faster on older systems and possibly a little slower on newer systems.

You can turn off aero. And the argument can be made that since xp does not take full of advantage of some of these things, technically on these machines on the software side vista is faster and more optimized. If you have an older pc I would run xp on it, but there is no reason not to run vista on a new modern machine with a lot of ram and a dual core.

Got a new Core 2 PC. I'm going to try Vista again. Let's see if it makes any difference. :happy:

If it's prebuilt, uninstall the crap that came bundled with it, and let it index the hard drive.

Ok Guys. I'm about to start my Vista Ultimate install soon.

I'm not a jerk by design, I don't want to hate Vista just because it seems to be the popular thing to do. I wasn't overwhelmed with joy with Vista on my older hardware; I wanted to get a new PC for a while. It's here now and I've got a paid OEM of Vista Ultimate with it.

So, it's honesty time now. Let me start by showing this:

post-251981-1210411789.png

I didn't know what to expect after my initial run in with Vista on an older single core PC, that's some years old now.

It's time for me to eat my words, that's some impressive copy speed.

Is it as fast as Windows XP? Yes, it seemed to be. The whole copy process was very quick.

Now I have to restart my PC. A dozen Windows Updates just installed.

Final Word: Vista Ultimate SP1. Doesn't suck, as long as the PC is a Dual Core System with a good amount of RAM (Mine has 4GB ~ 3.25GB Usable). Viva Vista.

You can turn off aero. And the argument can be made that since xp does not take full of advantage of some of these things, technically on these machines on the software side vista is faster and more optimized. If you have an older pc I would run xp on it, but there is no reason not to run vista on a new modern machine with a lot of ram and a dual core.

Due to the nature in which multi processor systems require specific support to take advantage of all the hardware, it's not exactly a comparable situation. Purely for software efficiency, XP is far superior. There is a reason Vista requires more than 1 GB ram while XP can run happily on 512.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Same Internet Archive seemed to grab the new version https://web.archive.org/web/20...d/Setup_MakeMKV_v1.18.4.exe
    • Windows 11 KB5094126, KB5093998 bugging out Office apps but it may not be Microsoft's fault by Sayan Sen Microsoft last week released Windows 11 KB5094126 and KB5093998 as the latest Patch Tuesday updates. Following that the company also published the accompanying dynamic updates under KB5094149, KB5095971, and KB5094156. Although the tech giant did not acknowledge any major problems, some users online reported various issues ranging from OneDrive and Dropbox access problems, BitLocker recovery lockouts, to blue screens and BSODs. You can read about them in this dedicated piece. While there is still no confirmation about those problems from Microsoft the company has admitted to another bug which we did not report on. The tech giant has confirmed it has received reports of an issue in which certain third-party applications may be unable to launch Microsoft Office apps or open Office documents after installing the Patch Tuesday. This affects both Windows 11 as well as Windows 10. The company says the problem impacts a subset of applications that rely on OLE (Object Linking and Embedding) automation to communicate with Microsoft Office programs. According to Microsoft, affected scenarios involve third-party software attempting to open Office applications or documents from within their own interface. In such cases, the Office program may fail to launch altogether, or the requested document may not open. Oddly there may not be any error message, which probably makes the issue difficult to diagnose. The bug affects several Office products, including Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Access, and other apps in the Microsoft Office suite when they are launched through the affected software. These include tax and accounting software such as CCH Engagement and Workpaper Manager, dental practice management solutions like Dentrix and Softdent, as well as the popular research and reference management tool Zotero. Microsoft adds that other applications using similar Office integration methods could also experience the same problematic behavior. To understand the issue it is important to look at OLE, the Microsoft technology involved. OLE allows different applications to work together and share data, while its Automation feature lets one program control another. Thus this enables third-party software to launch Microsoft Office apps, open documents, and perform tasks automatically without requiring users to switch between programs. Because many accounting, healthcare, research, and business applications rely on OLE automation to interact with Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and other Office apps, any disruption can break those workflows. As a result, affected software may be unable to open Office documents or launch Office applications even though the programs themselves continue to work normally. At the moment the company has not provided a permanent fix though it has confirmed that engineers are actively working on a resolution, which will be delivered through a future Windows update. As such additional details will be shared once more information becomes available. In the meantime, Microsoft recommends a simple workaround for affected users whic is to open the Office application or document directly rather than launching it through the third-party program. For enterprise customers and organizations managing larger deployments, Microsoft says an additional mitigation is available. Admins experiencing the problem on their managed devices are advised to contact Microsoft Support for business to obtain and apply the workaround.
    • It saddens me when cars are such dull colours now. Mine is bright metallic blue and I absolutely adore it for standing out in contrast to that depressing backdrop of traffic.
    • Sparkle 2.20.0 by Razvan Serea Sparkle is a free, open-source Windows optimization tool designed to make your PC faster, cleaner, and more private. With Sparkle, you can easily debloat Windows by removing unnecessary apps and services, disable Microsoft tracking to enhance privacy, and apply performance tweaks to boost speed. Its cleaner removes junk and temporary files, while every change is safe and fully reversible. Sparkle also features a modern, user-friendly interface with automatic updates, making system maintenance simple. Explore over 39 tweaks, from disabling telemetry and hibernation to optimizing network and game settings, all aimed at customizing and enhancing your Windows experience. Sparkle supports Windows 10 and 11. Sparkle 2.20.0 changelog: Debloat Tweak has animated border New homepage loading UI New Tweak Modal (Markdown Supported) Refactored GPU Detection Added Tests with vitest Added foobar2000 to apps Added Localsend to apps Updated Modal Styles Added styles for disabled inputs Added Animated Border to debloat-windows tweak Bumped dependencies Refactor System info logic for speed Tweak info modals now support Markdown Added Clear System info cache to settings Redesigned Home Page Loading UI Changed Some Icons around the app Download: Sparkle 2.20.0 | Portable | ~100.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Sparkle Website | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • lol it was a typo, fixed! haha imagine an actual 4TB Gen4 NVMe for $40 in 2026
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Conversation Starter
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      517
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      184
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      106
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!