Recommended Posts

Offtopic: on CoD4, on the level where you're in the missile base, trying to get to the launch control center, you know how you go through a hall with a bunch of enemies on the sides, and then through another hall, around some crates, and down stairs?

Then there's a part with another tunnel, but the way forward is blocked, so you have to go to the side? I can't get past there. Which way should I be going (left, right, where else?)?

The TV station... That was a bitch to beat. I kept getting killed.

Ok, From the begining just after you reppled down the launch silo. Get out of the bathroom and head north down the hall towards your objective marker(Lots of bad guys so kill them). locate the stairs and Head down stairs (You should see a big russian emblem on the wall while going down stairs). Once you reach the bottom of the stairs you should be facing SE towards your next objective marker. Around you should be a hallway with crates. Down the hall should be a blast door slowly opening. Now on both left and right side of the hall should be a doors with a circular room. Thats the way I went and thats what was easy from me. Just take your time and once you get there place the C4 Charges on the door and blow it up. And on the other side is the control room with mulitple enemies on behind the computers and on the balcony. Kill them and you should have spare time to disable the launch.

Try and practice on easy that way your familiar with your surroundings, where the enemies will be (Although they randomize each time you play the lvl). That way when you do it on Veteran you will do it alot faster

Thanks Michael, that was exactly one of the articles I was talking about. If you find any more of them please post, it would definetly save me some time today. I'm graduating tomorrow, so I am just a bit busy today!

To Gangsta:

Kotaku.com.

I have to go take a shower (just got back from track practice), but I will take a closer look on there when I get done.

Ok... Another WWII era again. LAME!

And I guess it looks like its gonna be developed by Treyarch. LAME x10 trillion quaddroople billion!!!!!!!!!!

Ill wait to play COD when its COD6.

Seems like Infinity Ward and Treyarch alternate.... BOOO!

Source

As long IW do it, I don't care in witch theater they do it. As long it's NOT the future.

Dont think they will... Looks like Treyarch will do it.

But if treyarch does decide to develope Call Of Duty 5... They better not make it to where you can pick your class. That was thee gayest thing I ever seen on COD3

I bet they said the same thing with CoD3, and we ended up with a certain part of WWII.

Personally, I'd love to see it done BF2142-style! You can go as crazy as you want when you set a game in the future, so let them go nuts!

Maybe, but I don't know. I think a futuristic setting would be great. They could bring up new game concepts. Also, they wouldn't be restricted with today's military arsenal.

That's even worse :s

How so? You don't think it would be awesome to take out a tank with a particle beam cannon? :laugh:

As long IW do it, I don't care in witch theater they do it. As long it's NOT the future.

What's with all the "future" hate? It can't be that bad. I don't think Infinity Ward, or whichever company develops CoD5, will go all out in a futuristic shooter. I doubt they'd add things like phasers and walking tripod vehicles (War of the Worlds, anyone?).

Please god not WWII.

I didn't like any of the older Call of Duty games, but CoD4 I love.

And that it is apparently coming out on Ps3, Xbox360, PC, DS, Ps2 and Wii.

Sounds like its going to be a disaster that they have been developing the game for so many platforms, games developed for so many, well, all of them out but the PsP, are usually film franchise games, and they are always generally crap.

I would love for this to not turn out crap, but I get this feeling its going to.

And the general population who bought the game that aren't the ones who dig in deep and know the different devlopers are probably going to buy CoD5 thinking it will be as good if not better than CoD4.

Just hope it is.

I personally don't really care where the game takes place as long as theres multiplayer vehicles. :laugh:

I completely disagree with you (no offense). There are several reasons why COD 4 is currently beating Halo 3 on XBL's Most Played (Online) list each week, one of them being no vehicles. I won't get into it because it just causes so much frustration for me. :p

Hopefully there will be no vehicles, they tend to ruin games and take away focus from the actual 'FPS' section of the game.

Adding an option to enable vehicles, then you end up separating people from those who like and dislike vehicles - Then you need to sort through servers and have to server jump constantly when the host

decides he want vehicles or not. Just leave 'em out and focus on what the game actually is, a First Person Shooter.

Hopefully there will be no vehicles, they tend to ruin games and take away focus from the actual 'FPS' section of the game.

Adding an option to enable vehicles, then you end up separating people from those who like and dislike vehicles - Then you need to sort through servers and have to server jump constantly when the host

decides he want vehicles or not. Just leave 'em out and focus on what the game actually is, a First Person Shooter.

Thanks Michael, you saved me a lot of outrage, that almost sums most of my thoughts up. :D

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • So its a museum of AI prompts? Boring
    • This one baffles me...so they are creating a museum based around the Ship of Theseus? A museum is supposed to preserve things. It doesn't really work if the conversation goes, "I gazed upon Starry Night the other day, the colours were beautiful!" "Yeah...I didn't expect Godzilla to show up, though." Create a building devoted to displaying AI work, fine. The rainforest idea sounds interesting and I would consider visiting if they pay me a few bucks. But don't call it a museum...
    • >defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool It is not. It is the inhuman artist replacement. The human writing the prompt is the employer/manager requesting the work product of the artist -- a supervisory/descriptive job that doesn't carry with it any rights to the copyright of that work product at all. And since AI is not human itself, it can't gain copyright for anything it is asked to regurgitate or hallucinate, so it can't transfer that copyright to the employer/manager/human who asked for the output. This was all legally reaffirmed last year. So, no, while there are AI tools, AI slopware generation is NOT a "tool" in the legal definition of that word.
    • As long as i get to play GTA 6 before it ends 😂😂
    • Google is opening the world's first AI museum in Los Angeles by Ivan Jenic Image via: Google Ever since AI image generators went mainstream, the debate over whether AI-generated art is real art hasn't let up. Those who don’t consider AI to be art say that if a machine does the creating and anyone can prompt it, there’s no skill involved, and therefore no art is produced. The counter-argument is equally persistent, as defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool, and that every major technological breakthrough, like the camera or the computer, was met with the same skepticism before eventually being accepted as a legitimate creative medium. Google’s position in this debate is clear. Which is no surprise, as the company is investing billions in AI infrastructure. And now, in efforts to encourage people to use its AI even more, Google is opening Dataland on June 20, which it's calling the world's first AI arts museum. Located inside The Grand LA, a Frank Gehry-designed building in Los Angeles, the museum spans 25,000 square feet. The museum is built around a collaboration with media artist Refik Anadol, who has worked with Google since 2016. The inaugural exhibition is called Machine Dreams: Rainforest, and is powered by an AI model trained on “an extensive dataset of the natural world.” It generates 1.2 billion pixels of visuals in real time and reacts to visitors dynamically. The space also generates soundscapes, real-time emotion sensing, and algorithmically produced scents. Image via: Refik Anadol Studio / Google Google says that the museum is powered by its Gemini models, which run on Google Cloud. So, everything is generated inside one of Google’s AI data centers and is streamed to the museum. Alongside the museum opening, Google Arts & Culture is funding an AI Artist Residency, giving four artists $25,000 grants each, along with mentorship from Refik Anadol Studio and access to Google's machine learning tools. Their work will be shown at Dataland and on the Google Arts & Culture website later this year. Google’s AI museum will undoubtedly initiate a fired-up debate on social media, and we can’t wait to see the first reactions. Via: Smithsonian Magazine
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      570
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      178
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!