GTA IV: Not very impressed.


Recommended Posts

I'm on the 360 version

Thought you might be. It is sharper.

Personally don't think it takes anything away from the gameplay, its just a personal preference. I must admit when I first loaded it up on the PS3 (I had just been playing on the 360) I was quite taken back at the difference. The more I played the PS3 version the more I got used to it and like I said now prefer it. Just seems softer and more realistic. Its still a superb game on wither platform though and I still regularly go back to the 360 version to play on XBL with mates who don't own a PS3 (slowly changing and more and more are buying them, which is nice)

I didn't even notice the thread was in the Sony section.

I have seen the PS3 version in action and it does seem softer, but it looks way too dull when you reach bigger sized TVs - But on the other hand, the Xbox 360 version looks too blurry on smaller sized TVs.

My only complaint about GTA 4 are:

1. No taxi/ambulance missions :(

2. I liked the gym/eating thing which you had to do every couple of days.

3. No customising of cars :(

4. No burglary :(

5. Although the maps seem more detailed, there just feels like less to do. Not enough burger joints etc type of places.

6. Stuff disappearing if you turn around - I love causing traffic jams/gang fights but if you switch your view 180 degrees, loads of stuff doesn't persist :(

7. Cops are too easy to escape from - 4 stars was basically impossible to escape from but now it's p*ss easy if you know the alleyways to dodge down on a moped.

Actually, you can call up Roman with the Job tab and get some Taxi missions from him.

( Oh well, that's at least one point covered :laugh: )

but I wanna do it in a real yellow taxi! *shakes fist*

I'm not complaining too much though - GTAIV is still an amazing game. I'm just nostalgic.

Yes, i do agree on some points.

The Police chases i have a very mixed opinion about. On missions, when you need to escape the police or on the way to an objective you accidentally get the police after you, It's great you can lose 'em so fast. But when you wanna have a proper car chase, you need at least 3 or 4 stars before it even starts to get interesting.

All the burglary, car customizing and going to the gym was just a gimmick for me and while it did provide some diversity to the game without it being forced, i never used it.

The pop-up issues is not as bad, although what annoys me the most is, when you find a 'rare' car like the Turismo you feel like a kid in a candy store - 2 Seconds later, the game engine has spawned like 12 Turismos driving around every where. I kid you not, one day i stole a Corquette ( The Corvette Rip-off ), i saw 7 of them parked in one huge line at the side of the road ... This 'flaw' bothers me the most.

I also agree there's very little to do. Take for example clothing shops ... There's 3 of them combined?! One on the first island and 3-4 on the second, but they are just duplicates, so you have 3 different clothing shops overall.

I'm not fond of the whole social aspect either, taking people out and having them call at the most annoying times - Pretty funny feature for like an hour, then it kills everything.

But overall i still love the game, first day of release i had a 13 hour session, it is really addictive.

As far as the police chases, it's funny that it's ripped straight from Scarface.

I do kinda miss the burglary missions, but would those fit with Niko's character? He's a killer, not a thief.

I do agree that with all that there is supposed to be to do, the maps don't have more going on.

Although the HUD could get kind of crowded.

<3 Brucie.

The only thing that I don't like in GTA HIV - and in San Andreas and Vice City for that matter - is the crappy camera not following the car. If you do a 180 you end up staring at your bonnet. I want the camera to be a bit tighter. Maybe there could be an option to vary the amount the camera follows to allow those that like the present system to continue.

i haven't actually bought it yet, but i've played it a handful of times. from what i've seen the only negatives on the game are yeah it gets really dark at times, but graphic wise i could careless. GTA has never been about graphics, its always been gameplay #1.

i plan to buy it very soon

are you guys playing the same game i am? I am playing on a 40inch samsung lcd, standard settings i've got for movies computer etc.. its great.

I'm playing it on xbox.

Only gripe i have is, my batteries on my controller run out too fast because this game sucks up so much time.

OK, maybe its me but I picked up a copy of GTA IV and well I have to say I'm a bit disappointed. So much so that I find it unplayable.

What's with all the anti-aliasing all over the place - everything looks blurry and it really hurts my eyes after a bit. The graphics aren't that hot either with jaggies and glitches. Shadows look like they've shaded with a pencil and walls inside buildings look flat with no interactivity.

Everything is so dark at times it's really hard to see what you're doing and you get the feeling your just fumbling to accomplish something. The camera viewpoint is also annoying.

Well I think the game is great. The graphics part (dark and blurring) is because of PS3 and the fact that the game is upsampled from 630p to 720p thus losing detail. Xbox 360 version looks a lot more detailed and sharper.

The gameplay itself is really very subjective. I've never played GTA before and I simply love this one.

I found this wayy to overhyped, its nowhere near as addictive as the older GTAs. The handling of most of the cars is terrible and the scenes you have to fight get boring. theres a lot of attention to detail though

i wouldnt say the game is anything special, definatley not worth the reviews it got

I didn't have much issues with the game overall. I had to adjust the brightness quite a bit before i could see everything on screen but after that everything was fine. I found the graphics to be very well done, although i think reviews overhyped them alittle. 9/10 would be about right.

There was a few pop-ins but not too many and i found this acceptable because of the game data constantly being read from disc.

I agree with MichaelBL, There was just limited clothing shops really. I would of liked 3 or 4 more different stores to shop around, not the same ones.

Also places to eat, there could of been more than Hot Dogs or Burgers or Nuts. Maybe Pizza or Fried Chicken?

Overall i did find the game enjoyable and they did remove a few things from SA which i guessed worked to there advantage.

I didn't have much issues with the game overall. I had to adjust the brightness quite a bit before i could see everything on screen but after that everything was fine. I found the graphics to be very well done, although i think reviews overhyped them alittle. 9/10 would be about right.

There was a few pop-ins but not too many and i found this acceptable because of the game data constantly being read from disc.

I agree with MichaelBL, There was just limited clothing shops really. I would of liked 3 or 4 more different stores to shop around, not the same ones.

Also places to eat, there could of been more than Hot Dogs or Burgers or Nuts. Maybe Pizza or Fried Chicken?

Overall i did find the game enjoyable and they did remove a few things from SA which i guessed worked to there advantage.

Couldn't have said it better myself.

The only thing that I don't like in GTA HIV - and in San Andreas and Vice City for that matter - is the crappy camera not following the car. If you do a 180 you end up staring at your bonnet. I want the camera to be a bit tighter. Maybe there could be an option to vary the amount the camera follows to allow those that like the present system to continue.

Yeah I agree, especially tight turns ect. You end up using the manual camera alot if your not a fan of the loose camera just to compensate. Would be nice if you could automate it.

I haven't seen it on the PS3, but it looks and plays great on my Xbox 360. So far I haven't found any major flaws, I think they've decided to put their efforts into the Story a lot more this time around. I love how they join everything together using the cell phone and Internet and radio. I've probably only completed around 30% of the game, so I'm hoping after beating it there will be more things that open up as I can see what some people are talking about should you not be just doing the missions.

It's still the best one they've made yet. The detail they've put into some things is impressive.

Well I think the game is great. The graphics part (dark and blurring) is because of PS3 and the fact that the game is upsampled from 630p to 720p thus losing detail. Xbox 360 version looks a lot more detailed and sharper.

Exactly, people who are using a larger screen and complaining of bad graphics have to take into consideration how it's upscaling something from a low resolution...

Not really the best example but...

1280 x 720 picture taken from IGN, downsized to 1120 x 630

630.jpg

That picture, stretched to 1920 x 1080

1080p.jpg

Might want to view them in their full sizes, lol.

OK, maybe its me but I picked up a copy of GTA IV and well I have to say I'm a bit disappointed. So much so that I find it unplayable.

What's with all the anti-aliasing all over the place - everything looks blurry and it really hurts my eyes after a bit. The graphics aren't that hot either with jaggies and glitches. Shadows look like they've shaded with a pencil and walls inside buildings look flat with no interactivity.

Everything is so dark at times it's really hard to see what you're doing and you get the feeling your just fumbling to accomplish something. The camera viewpoint is also annoying.

If you don't get to complete a particular mission, you have to start the whole section from the beginning. Its so frustrating at times. I literally cannot play this for longer than about 15 minutes before my eyes hurt and I get ****ed off.

Is it really just me or does anyone else feel the same? :blink:

I don't agree with you on the gameplay aspect, I think its typical GTA and much of the codebase is probably the same. The problem I have is with the Graphics. They are **** poor at best, honestly. I mean they have gone mental with the old HDR, which slows everything down too much. The shadows I completely agree on, they seriously suck. And they can be rather glitchy.

But my main concern with this game is the FPS. IT REALLY LAGS, this game achieves 30fps+ maybe 25% of the time. Go anywhere fast in a car, and the game lags that much your bound to crash because you don't have the FPS there to react quick enough.

If they turned HDR + Bloom off and got rid of the same thing for car headlights, I mean car headlights in the Day? That must be doing so many ridiculous calculations every frame to find what the HDR is bouncing off.

Framerate is unbelievbly crap for something that doesnt even get rendered at 720p. Good game non the less, but they really shouldn't shipped the product as it is.

I found this wayy to overhyped, its nowhere near as addictive as the older GTAs. The handling of most of the cars is terrible and the scenes you have to fight get boring. theres a lot of attention to detail though

i wouldnt say the game is anything special, definatley not worth the reviews it got

I agree. I'm trying to figure out what I'm going to trade it in for.

I miss the Diablo II days. 300 hours + logged.

The pop-up issues is not as bad, although what annoys me the most is, when you find a 'rare' car like the Turismo you feel like a kid in a candy store - 2 Seconds later, the game engine has spawned like 12 Turismos driving around every where.

People and cars still pop up from nowhere? Camera is still awful? Shooting controls are pathetic? There's some RC-car missions? Oh "#?%? and this got released in 2008, not 1988.

I just love how games are evolving so fast.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Glad these prices are starting to come down, but that is still crazy. I bought the 2TB 9100 Pro (slightly more expensive version with PCIe 5.0) last year for $240.
    • The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months by Sayan Sen Yesterday, we covered a really good deal wherein you can get a 4TB TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 NVMe PCIe Gen4 SSD for a low price of just $400 with a special discount coupon. That's just $100 per TB, making it a very good offer during these hard times. The deal is still live, so you can check it out in its dedicated article here if you do not want to miss out. Meanwhile, if you don't have that kind of budget but still wish to buy an SSD for a good price, the 2TB variant of the TeamGroup SSD at $280 its lowest price in over three months. Meanwhile, those seeking 2TB but faster performance can check out Samsung's 990 PRO, which has hit the lowest price also in the last quarter or so, as it's on sale for $370 (purchase links under the specs table down below). Thus, you want a faster drive, get the 990 Pro, or you want more capacity, grab the TeamGroup 4TB linked in the first para. The 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $500. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The tech specs are given below: Specification TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 2TB Samsung 990 PRO 2TB Interface PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe 1.4 PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 Form Factor M.2 2280 M.2 2280 Controller InnoGrit Controller Samsung In-house Controller NAND Flash 3D TLC 3D TLC DRAM Cache None (HMB supported) 2GB LPDDR4 Sequential Read (Max) 5,000 MB/s 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write (Max) 4,500 MB/s 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4K) Up to 600,000 IOPS Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4K) Up to 700,000 IOPS Up to 1,550,000 IOPS TBW (Endurance) 1,300 TBW 1,200 TBW MTBF 3,000,000 hours 1,500,000 hours Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C 0°C to 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C to 85°C -40°C to 85°C Shock Resistance 1,500G / 0.5ms 1,500G / 0.5ms Heatsink Patented Graphene Heat Spreader No Get them at the links below: Samsung 990 PRO SSD 2TB (MZ-V9P2T0B/AM): $369.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 2TB SSD (TM8FFE002T0C129): $279.99 (Sold by TeamGroup, Shipped by Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • If you can't spell a simple word that 2nd graders learn, your entire argument is suspect.
    • And here goes the "Won't someone think of the children" brigade. Get stuffed mate. This has NOTHING to do with making the internet safe. It's about tracking adults, spying on your online activity, and sending the boys around when they don't like something you post. Also, again, parliament have voted TWICE against this, and Starmer is going ahead anyway. THAT is anti-democratic bullsh**. They will use this law to track you, they will use this law to control you, and they will use this law to punish you if they don't like what you do, even if it's legal. And your data? Say bye bye to that. It'll be on the darkweb in weeks. I'm not some rando online. I've been an IT professional for 40 years, many of it in security. I know exactly what this means and what will happen to your data. I do not consent and I will not comply.
    • "...but it may not be Microsoft's fault" seems like a reasonable way to tease what is going on without leaving the user with a false impression that an update is the problem. A title isn't a summery, it is meant to entice the user to read the article. It should not contain a misleading premise; which this title does not. You could maybe complain that the first paragraph should have included that detail. The writing style popularized over 100 years ago in newspapers will cover the most important information as soon as possible with details and nuance added later; the idea being that with each new paragraph you have less of the reader's focus.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      520
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!