GTA IV: Not very impressed.


Recommended Posts

I'm on the 360 version

Thought you might be. It is sharper.

Personally don't think it takes anything away from the gameplay, its just a personal preference. I must admit when I first loaded it up on the PS3 (I had just been playing on the 360) I was quite taken back at the difference. The more I played the PS3 version the more I got used to it and like I said now prefer it. Just seems softer and more realistic. Its still a superb game on wither platform though and I still regularly go back to the 360 version to play on XBL with mates who don't own a PS3 (slowly changing and more and more are buying them, which is nice)

I didn't even notice the thread was in the Sony section.

I have seen the PS3 version in action and it does seem softer, but it looks way too dull when you reach bigger sized TVs - But on the other hand, the Xbox 360 version looks too blurry on smaller sized TVs.

My only complaint about GTA 4 are:

1. No taxi/ambulance missions :(

2. I liked the gym/eating thing which you had to do every couple of days.

3. No customising of cars :(

4. No burglary :(

5. Although the maps seem more detailed, there just feels like less to do. Not enough burger joints etc type of places.

6. Stuff disappearing if you turn around - I love causing traffic jams/gang fights but if you switch your view 180 degrees, loads of stuff doesn't persist :(

7. Cops are too easy to escape from - 4 stars was basically impossible to escape from but now it's p*ss easy if you know the alleyways to dodge down on a moped.

Actually, you can call up Roman with the Job tab and get some Taxi missions from him.

( Oh well, that's at least one point covered :laugh: )

but I wanna do it in a real yellow taxi! *shakes fist*

I'm not complaining too much though - GTAIV is still an amazing game. I'm just nostalgic.

Yes, i do agree on some points.

The Police chases i have a very mixed opinion about. On missions, when you need to escape the police or on the way to an objective you accidentally get the police after you, It's great you can lose 'em so fast. But when you wanna have a proper car chase, you need at least 3 or 4 stars before it even starts to get interesting.

All the burglary, car customizing and going to the gym was just a gimmick for me and while it did provide some diversity to the game without it being forced, i never used it.

The pop-up issues is not as bad, although what annoys me the most is, when you find a 'rare' car like the Turismo you feel like a kid in a candy store - 2 Seconds later, the game engine has spawned like 12 Turismos driving around every where. I kid you not, one day i stole a Corquette ( The Corvette Rip-off ), i saw 7 of them parked in one huge line at the side of the road ... This 'flaw' bothers me the most.

I also agree there's very little to do. Take for example clothing shops ... There's 3 of them combined?! One on the first island and 3-4 on the second, but they are just duplicates, so you have 3 different clothing shops overall.

I'm not fond of the whole social aspect either, taking people out and having them call at the most annoying times - Pretty funny feature for like an hour, then it kills everything.

But overall i still love the game, first day of release i had a 13 hour session, it is really addictive.

As far as the police chases, it's funny that it's ripped straight from Scarface.

I do kinda miss the burglary missions, but would those fit with Niko's character? He's a killer, not a thief.

I do agree that with all that there is supposed to be to do, the maps don't have more going on.

Although the HUD could get kind of crowded.

<3 Brucie.

The only thing that I don't like in GTA HIV - and in San Andreas and Vice City for that matter - is the crappy camera not following the car. If you do a 180 you end up staring at your bonnet. I want the camera to be a bit tighter. Maybe there could be an option to vary the amount the camera follows to allow those that like the present system to continue.

i haven't actually bought it yet, but i've played it a handful of times. from what i've seen the only negatives on the game are yeah it gets really dark at times, but graphic wise i could careless. GTA has never been about graphics, its always been gameplay #1.

i plan to buy it very soon

are you guys playing the same game i am? I am playing on a 40inch samsung lcd, standard settings i've got for movies computer etc.. its great.

I'm playing it on xbox.

Only gripe i have is, my batteries on my controller run out too fast because this game sucks up so much time.

OK, maybe its me but I picked up a copy of GTA IV and well I have to say I'm a bit disappointed. So much so that I find it unplayable.

What's with all the anti-aliasing all over the place - everything looks blurry and it really hurts my eyes after a bit. The graphics aren't that hot either with jaggies and glitches. Shadows look like they've shaded with a pencil and walls inside buildings look flat with no interactivity.

Everything is so dark at times it's really hard to see what you're doing and you get the feeling your just fumbling to accomplish something. The camera viewpoint is also annoying.

Well I think the game is great. The graphics part (dark and blurring) is because of PS3 and the fact that the game is upsampled from 630p to 720p thus losing detail. Xbox 360 version looks a lot more detailed and sharper.

The gameplay itself is really very subjective. I've never played GTA before and I simply love this one.

I found this wayy to overhyped, its nowhere near as addictive as the older GTAs. The handling of most of the cars is terrible and the scenes you have to fight get boring. theres a lot of attention to detail though

i wouldnt say the game is anything special, definatley not worth the reviews it got

I didn't have much issues with the game overall. I had to adjust the brightness quite a bit before i could see everything on screen but after that everything was fine. I found the graphics to be very well done, although i think reviews overhyped them alittle. 9/10 would be about right.

There was a few pop-ins but not too many and i found this acceptable because of the game data constantly being read from disc.

I agree with MichaelBL, There was just limited clothing shops really. I would of liked 3 or 4 more different stores to shop around, not the same ones.

Also places to eat, there could of been more than Hot Dogs or Burgers or Nuts. Maybe Pizza or Fried Chicken?

Overall i did find the game enjoyable and they did remove a few things from SA which i guessed worked to there advantage.

I didn't have much issues with the game overall. I had to adjust the brightness quite a bit before i could see everything on screen but after that everything was fine. I found the graphics to be very well done, although i think reviews overhyped them alittle. 9/10 would be about right.

There was a few pop-ins but not too many and i found this acceptable because of the game data constantly being read from disc.

I agree with MichaelBL, There was just limited clothing shops really. I would of liked 3 or 4 more different stores to shop around, not the same ones.

Also places to eat, there could of been more than Hot Dogs or Burgers or Nuts. Maybe Pizza or Fried Chicken?

Overall i did find the game enjoyable and they did remove a few things from SA which i guessed worked to there advantage.

Couldn't have said it better myself.

The only thing that I don't like in GTA HIV - and in San Andreas and Vice City for that matter - is the crappy camera not following the car. If you do a 180 you end up staring at your bonnet. I want the camera to be a bit tighter. Maybe there could be an option to vary the amount the camera follows to allow those that like the present system to continue.

Yeah I agree, especially tight turns ect. You end up using the manual camera alot if your not a fan of the loose camera just to compensate. Would be nice if you could automate it.

I haven't seen it on the PS3, but it looks and plays great on my Xbox 360. So far I haven't found any major flaws, I think they've decided to put their efforts into the Story a lot more this time around. I love how they join everything together using the cell phone and Internet and radio. I've probably only completed around 30% of the game, so I'm hoping after beating it there will be more things that open up as I can see what some people are talking about should you not be just doing the missions.

It's still the best one they've made yet. The detail they've put into some things is impressive.

Well I think the game is great. The graphics part (dark and blurring) is because of PS3 and the fact that the game is upsampled from 630p to 720p thus losing detail. Xbox 360 version looks a lot more detailed and sharper.

Exactly, people who are using a larger screen and complaining of bad graphics have to take into consideration how it's upscaling something from a low resolution...

Not really the best example but...

1280 x 720 picture taken from IGN, downsized to 1120 x 630

630.jpg

That picture, stretched to 1920 x 1080

1080p.jpg

Might want to view them in their full sizes, lol.

OK, maybe its me but I picked up a copy of GTA IV and well I have to say I'm a bit disappointed. So much so that I find it unplayable.

What's with all the anti-aliasing all over the place - everything looks blurry and it really hurts my eyes after a bit. The graphics aren't that hot either with jaggies and glitches. Shadows look like they've shaded with a pencil and walls inside buildings look flat with no interactivity.

Everything is so dark at times it's really hard to see what you're doing and you get the feeling your just fumbling to accomplish something. The camera viewpoint is also annoying.

If you don't get to complete a particular mission, you have to start the whole section from the beginning. Its so frustrating at times. I literally cannot play this for longer than about 15 minutes before my eyes hurt and I get ****ed off.

Is it really just me or does anyone else feel the same? :blink:

I don't agree with you on the gameplay aspect, I think its typical GTA and much of the codebase is probably the same. The problem I have is with the Graphics. They are **** poor at best, honestly. I mean they have gone mental with the old HDR, which slows everything down too much. The shadows I completely agree on, they seriously suck. And they can be rather glitchy.

But my main concern with this game is the FPS. IT REALLY LAGS, this game achieves 30fps+ maybe 25% of the time. Go anywhere fast in a car, and the game lags that much your bound to crash because you don't have the FPS there to react quick enough.

If they turned HDR + Bloom off and got rid of the same thing for car headlights, I mean car headlights in the Day? That must be doing so many ridiculous calculations every frame to find what the HDR is bouncing off.

Framerate is unbelievbly crap for something that doesnt even get rendered at 720p. Good game non the less, but they really shouldn't shipped the product as it is.

I found this wayy to overhyped, its nowhere near as addictive as the older GTAs. The handling of most of the cars is terrible and the scenes you have to fight get boring. theres a lot of attention to detail though

i wouldnt say the game is anything special, definatley not worth the reviews it got

I agree. I'm trying to figure out what I'm going to trade it in for.

I miss the Diablo II days. 300 hours + logged.

The pop-up issues is not as bad, although what annoys me the most is, when you find a 'rare' car like the Turismo you feel like a kid in a candy store - 2 Seconds later, the game engine has spawned like 12 Turismos driving around every where.

People and cars still pop up from nowhere? Camera is still awful? Shooting controls are pathetic? There's some RC-car missions? Oh "#?%? and this got released in 2008, not 1988.

I just love how games are evolving so fast.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Now comes with a money back guarantee instead of a replacement! Hah
    • Rufus 4.15.2391 Beta by Razvan Serea Rufus is a small utility that helps format and create bootable USB flash drives, such as USB keys/pendrives, memory sticks, etc. Despite its small size, Rufus provides everything you need! Oh, and Rufus is fast. For instance it's about twice as fast as UNetbootin, Universal USB Installer or Windows 7 USB download tool, on the creation of a Windows 7 USB installation drive from an ISO (with honorable mention to WiNToBootic for managing to keep up). It is also marginally faster on the creation of Linux bootable USBs from ISOs. A non-exhaustive list of Rufus supported ISOs is available here. It can be especially useful for cases where: you need to create USB installation media from bootable ISOs (Windows, Linux, UEFI, etc.) you need to work on a system that doesn't have an OS installed you need to flash a BIOS or other firmware from DOS you want to run a low-level utility Rufus 4.15.2391 Beta changelog: Improve the guards for using the "silent" option Improve the ability to cancel during write retries Fix unrestricted XML entity expansion and integer overflow in ezxml parser (courtesy of @esadowski4) [GHSA-55r2-34wg-8mv9] Fix "silent" Windows installation failing at 75% in most cases [#2960] Fix a crash during boot when using UEFI:NTFS on Snapdragon X based ARM64 platforms [#2934] Fix the first WUE option always being checked by default [#2965] Fix an infinite loop when using Windows ISOs that contain multiple WIMs Fix "Enable runtime UEFI media validation" checkbox not always being properly enabled Other WUE improvements/fixes for OneDrive removal and username validation (with thanks to @christian8641) [#2984, #2991] Download: Rufus 4.15 Beta | 1.9 MB (Open Source) Links: Rufus Home Page | Project Page @GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Media Player Classic - Home Cinema 2.7.3 by Razvan Serea Media Player Classic - Home Cinema (MPC-HC) is a free and open-source video and audio player for Windows. MPC-HC is based on the original Guliverkli project (which is no longer maintained) and contains many additional features and bug fixes. As the continuation of the original Media Player Classic, MPC-HC isn’t flashy but it works with nearly any media format. MPC-HC uses DXVA technology to pass decoding operations to your modern video card, enhancing your viewing experience. And MPC-HC supports both physical and software DVDs with menus, chapter navigation, and subtitles. Overview of features A lot of people seem to be unaware of some of the awesome features that have been added to MPC-HC in the past years. Here is a list of useful options and features that everyone should know about: Dark interface Menu > View > Dark Theme When using dark theme it is also possible to change the height of the seekbar and size of the toolbar buttons. Options > Advanced Video preview on the seekbar Options > Tweaks > Show preview on seek bar Adjust playback speed Menu > Play > Playback rate The buttons in the player that control playback rate take a 2x step by default. This can be customized to smaller values (like 10%): Options > Playback > Speed step Adjusting playback speed works best with the internal audio renderer. This also has automatic pitch correction. Options > Playback > Output > Audio Renderer MPC-HC can remember playback position, so you can resume from that point later Options > Player > History You can quickly seek through a video with Ctrl + Mouse Scrollwheel. You can jump to next/previous file in a folder by pressing PageUp/PageDown. You can perform automatic actions at end of file. For example to go to next file or close player. Options > Playback > After Playback (permanent setting) Menu > Play > After Playback (for current file only) A-B repeat - You can loop a segment of a video. Press [ and ] to set start and stop markers. You can rotate/flip/mirror/stretch/zoom the video Menu > View > Pan&Scan This is also easily done with hotkeys (see below). There are lots of keyboard hotkeys and mouse actions to control the player. They can be customized as well. Options > Player > Keys Tip: there is a search box above the table. You can stream videos directly from Youtube and many other video websites You can stream videos directly from Youtube and many other video websites Put yt-dlp.exe or youtube-dl.exe in the MPC-HC installation folder. Then you can open website URLs in the player: Menu > File > Open File/URL You can even download those videos: Menu > File > Save a copy Tip: to be able to download in best quality with yt-dlp/youtube-dl, it is recommended to also put ffmpeg.exe in the MPC-HC folder. Several YDL configuration options are found here: Options > Advanced This includes an option to specify the location of the .exe in case you don't want to put it in MPC-HC folder. Play HDR video This requires using madVR or MPC Video Renderer. After installation these renderers can be selected here: Options > Playback > Output Ability to search for and download subtitles, either automatically or manually (press D): Options > Subtitles > Misc Besides all these (new) features, there have also been many bugfixes and internal improvements in the player in the past years that give better performance and stability. It also has updated internal codecs. Support was added for CUE sheets, WebVTT subtitles, etc. Media Player Classic - Home Cinema 2.7.3 changelog: Updated LAV Filters to version 0.82 Updated MPC Video Renderer to version 0.10.4.2550 Updated MPC Audio Renderer A few crash fixes, bug fixes and small improvements. Download: MPC-HC 2.7.3 (x64) | Standalone | ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Download: MPC-HC 2.7.3 (x86) | Standalone Links: MPC-HC Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft will finally let you sign in to Edge with a Google account by Usama Jawad As things currently stand, Microsoft Edge only allows you to sign in to the browser with a Microsoft Account (MSA). This allows you to sync your browser settings and other data across other devices, as long as you sign in with the same account. However, Microsoft is now modifying this mechanism in a way that will likely please many users. In an update to its Microsoft 365 Roadmap, Microsoft has indicated that it will soon let users sign into Edge using a Google account from the profile menu and the Edge sign-in screen. This will be in addition to the MSA login option, and it opens up new doors for people who prefer using Edge, but cannot be bothered to configure a Microsoft account. This brings several advantages such as the ability to sync your data across devices using just a Google account. It may even facilitate flexible single sign-on (SSO) experiences where you can quickly login to websites and services through a single Google account that is presented as the preferred sign-in option. Up until now, Microsoft allowed customers to indirectly use a Google account, by configuring a Google account as a Microsoft account, or by setting up a one-way sync option between Edge and Chrome. This is a rather interesting development, especially considering that Google Chrome still limits you to a Google account sign-in, but it will be interesting to see if the company reciprocates Microsoft's gesture in the future. This is not the only recent instance in which Microsoft has extended a handshake to Google via Edge. In April 2026, it began tracking the development of a work search banner for Google Search queries, just like the one present in Edge. However, if we go back almost seven years, to January 2020, Microsoft had emphasized that it had no plans to "integrate Google services into Microsoft Edge by default", in response to people requesting Google sign-in services on Edge. Fast-forward to today, and Microsoft is planning to release this feature in July 2026, with IT admins having the option to control its availability on Windows and macOS through the NonMicrosoftAccountSignInEnabled policy.
    • If they ever come out and say the AI is no longer accessible to the gen pop people aren't going to know how to tie their own shoelaces.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Vincian earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      89
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!