GTA IV: Not very impressed.


Recommended Posts

Few games exist on the scale that GTA IV does, there is a huge ton of detail, there is a lot going on all the time and it does all of this with pretty minimal loading time.

For me GTA has its flaws - the graphics aren't perfect, the controls can be a bit fiddly and I spend of as much time controlling the camera as I do controlling the character (though I do this to make it seem more like a movie than a game), but these points aren't enough to change the 10/10 rating I'd give it.

A lot of people bang on about the minimal loading times. Well, from my point of view, they have done a good job but its easy to achieve this. All they do is load the most used textures, sounds, models, and then whilst keeping an eye on whats being rendered in another thread, find out what needs loading, put that in another thread, ect.

Its easy to do with 3 CPU's and cleverish programming.

You're not the only one that isn't impressed by GTAIV. To me, it's same old same old. The graphics are sub-par, framerate drops still occur (and I'm talking major drops), and the game is too repetitive.

Only gets a 6/10 from me.

6/10, that's extremely harsh. And repetitive?? It's one of the less repetitive games out there.

This is the first GTA game that I actually played, and it has been a lot of fun so far. I'm only like 12% into the game, but still it is very enjoyable. Hell the radio stations alone make the game.

I don't think the graphics are great, but meh it's not like that matters that much. Look at the monkey island series, they are still great games till now.

Let me point out that GTA 4 is the first game in the series to have Realism like graphics while GTA 3 to SA was not in that state the graphics of the last version of the game were always low low quality stuff so don't complain about the graphics since it is a hug leap forward in the series for the graphics part oh and about Car handling in the game also remember they have a real physics engine in this that equate for Mass and gravity and all the little things that happen in real life so the driving should be weird at first

well im roughly 40percent through the game now and overall the game is getting quite a bit better the further you get into it cause at first i was a little disappointed in the games graphics and camera angles etc but after i got used to the game more it's quite a bit better now although i wont be able to get FULL enjoyment out of the game til i get the PC version cause of the mouses superior aiming etc.

plus another thing thats making it better is the characters are getting much more interesting the further you get into it vs when you first start which are just 'ok'ish.

but the game does tend to get a little to much praise but at least it's not anywhere as overrated as the Halo series that stuff is extremely overrated!

but one things for sure, ill like Mafia 2 much more than GTA4. cause even though GTA4 will appeal to more people, Mafia just has better gameplay if you ask me as i like it's weapons feel and it's characters are more interesting cause it feels like mob movies like The Godfather/Road To Perdition etc etc.

overall i would say (so far) i would give GTA4 a 8-9/10... cause it's still easily better than vast majority of games out there as most games aint even worth playing.... but like i say im looking forward to Mafia 2 (on PC) much more than GTA4 in general cause it's characters are more interesting and sophisticated and it feels like a mob movie which in general im a big fan of mob movies.

the game is perfect, i would dare any of you do some clever programming and get an insane amount of detail at a playable frame rate , of course, you can pick at it and bitch like a smart critic, but even critics admit the innevitable ... while gta is not the best, for the time being i would say it is close, in 10 years ... maybe not ... but who cares ......

@ flyingroof... DAMN!, it appears i underestimated how bad the previous GTA games graphics where LOL

but overall though i think the graphics on GTA4 turned out a little worse than i expected from screenshots i seen vs actually seeing the game but then again im running a standard def tv so im sure thats playing a role in the graphics.... main thing i could notice is character physics as those act alot better when getting hit and people's reactions etc in general in GTA4 vs prior GTA's.

A lot of people bang on about the minimal loading times. Well, from my point of view, they have done a good job but its easy to achieve this. All they do is load the most used textures, sounds, models, and then whilst keeping an eye on whats being rendered in another thread, find out what needs loading, put that in another thread, ect.

Its easy to do with 3 CPU's and cleverish programming.

Easy in theory, doing stuff like this adds another layer of complexity to the engine. That's why you spend so much time in front of loading screens for a ton of other, considerably less complicated games.

'nuff said laugh.gif

I assume that picture is from the PS3 because the Xbox 360 is jagged as hell. I said they weren't perfect, they are however very very good.

Easy in theory, doing stuff like this adds another layer of complexity to the engine. That's why you spend so much time in front of loading screens for a ton of other, considerably less complicated games.

I assume that picture is from the PS3 because the Xbox 360 is jagged as hell. I said they weren't perfect, they are however very very good.

both screenshots are XBOX/XBOX 360 versions

Sony Bravia 32" 720p/also tried 1080i

Up close things look fine, things in the distance are jagged as can be. Not usually a problem, when driving fast however it can be hard to make out what is coming.

Also I wasn't bad mouthing the game; it?s the best game I've played. But I'm not going to define the graphics as perfect when they're clearly not.

Also the shadows sometimes look terrible, like they've been dithered like crazy.

Jaggies too visible?

What tv?

How many inches?

SD, HD or FULL HD? :p

Samsung M87

37"

1080p (Full HD)

I think the jaggies are too visible..

You make me laugh, seriously, I don't own a console but looking at the comparable screenshots the game clearly looks loads better on the 360.

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?show...#entry589392393

I have no idea how anybody can argue it looks better on the PS3 ffs.

42" Pioneer Plasma HD-Ready and the game looks extremely smooth.

EDIT: I agree on the shadows though, they are horrible, most noticeable in daylight.

BINGO - Plasmas

They make everything look beautiful :s

Is yours even native 720p/1080p?

Most arent - and it still looks great..

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This sounds like underneath the nice marketing spin, either someone at Adobe got tired of their lazy devs and asked Microsoft to train them to help sort Adobe's old spaghetti code to make it go faster, or Microsoft wanted Adobe's crap to run better on Windows to make it look better against Apple, so they offered to intervene. Either way, GOOD.
    • My favorite file manager for Windows 11 finally gets a long-requested feature by Taras Buria Files is among the best File Explorer alternatives for Windows 10 and 11. This free app is packed with all sorts of features and conveniences, but there is one crucial feature that is still missing—Tree View. Fortunately, the latest update in the Preview channel finally delivers it. With version 4.1.4, which is now available for download in the Preview channel, developers implemented Tree View, a new mode that displays folders in an expandable hierarchy. Windows 11's stock File Explorer always had this feature, but it was nowhere to be found in Files until now. Starting with the latest preview update, you can expand each drive and its nested folders without leaving the current location and then open the folder you need in the main view. To try Tree View in Files, update the app to the latest preview version, then click the small arrow next to a drive to expand its content. The developers say they are rolling out Tree View in Preview first to gather feedback from users and improve the feature before bringing it to all in the stable channel. In addition to Tree View, Files 4.1.14 improves the Windows Fonts folder. You can now preview each font directly in Files with no need to open the built-in font viewer. For now, these two features are only available in the Preview channel. For those using the stable release, developers recently released version 4.1.3, with improvements for the built-in tag system, on-demand folder size calculation, and plenty of various fixes. You can check out the full release notes here. You can download Files from the Microsoft Store (paid version) or its official website (free).
    • Who is paying for this 30x scale-up? Its sounds expensive.
    • Millions of users to benefit from Windows 11's new performance boost on Adobe Photoshop by Sayan Sen Despite the advent of AI-generated imagery, Adobe's Photoshop remains one of the most popular tools on this planet. Adobe does not have a publicly reported total user count but it's probably not wrong to assume there are millions. As of 2025, Adobe Creative Cloud has had approximately 41 million paid subscribers, many of whom likely use Photoshop. In addition, more than 166,000 companies worldwide are apparently also using the app. These figures are according to a very recent report by SQ Magazine. Out of them, it is fair to assume that many are probably running Windows. As such, there is good news for these users as Microsoft has announced Photoshop is getting a big 20% performance boost on x86-64 (AMD64) systems and a 13% bump-up on Arm devices. This is definitely great news for them as many have complained about the slow performance and general sluggishness of Photoshop on Windows 11 ever since the advent of the latter back in 2021. If you are wondering how Microsoft managed to do this, the answer lies in a combination of compiler-level optimizations and a technology called Sample Profile Guided Optimization (SPGO). According to Microsoft, Adobe worked closely with the company’s Visual C++ team and adopted the latest MSVC toolchain enhancements together with SPGO to squeeze more performance out of Photoshop’s CPU-bound workloads. Unlike traditional Profile Guided Optimization (PGO), which requires developers to create special instrumented builds and run lengthy training workloads, SPGO gathers performance data directly from optimized release binaries. This means Adobe could collect real-world usage information which gives a major advantage to this technique, as companies could leverage data collected from actual customer workloads rather than only relying on synthetic benchmark runs. In theory, this should allow optimizations to better reflect how users interact with software in the real world. Thanks to this, there are improvements to code layout, function inlining, hot-and-cold code separation, and other low-level tweaks that help processors execute instructions more efficiently. Essentially the compiler is better able to identify “hot” code paths, those which are most frequently executed, and optimize them accordingly.
    • "The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months¨ I'd prefer to see the lowest price in over a year
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      521
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!