Stardock's relationship with Neowin and its criticizers


Recommended Posts

I knew that Stardock owned part of Neowin, but it never bothered me (why should it?), and only had 1 minor run in with Frogboy.

I don't have a problem with their products (or involvement with Neowin), but only use Object Dock at the moment. I have used Windowblinds for a few years but currently don't.

A lot of companies need help from others, and Neowin is obviously no different.

Keep up the good work I say.

The 03 incident was http://www.news.com/2100-1025-991624.html

As for Stardock, I was very wary of this at the beginning before the discussions etc as I was worried that Stardock would want to push their products and force un-necessary advertising. I was dead against this along with some other senior staff members. However to my surprise they absolutely have not. We have the same amount of Stardock related news now as we used to before the investment. Brads involvement and investment has allowed us to grow the site and keep it stable and always online (Y)

The only time you will see Brad ever get upset at a member on neowin is when said member attacks stardock products with nothing to back up there bitching or they set out to bash stardock at every chance they get. This would **** you off as well if you took something you made at home back in the day and turned it into something that it is today. The guy is talented business man as well as developer. The bitchers only wish they were even 1% as good at business as this man is. He has helped neowin in more ways then any of you know and I am thankful for his support.

...

As for Stardock, I was very wary of this at the beginning before the discussions etc as I was worried that Stardock would want to push their products and force un-necessary advertising. I was dead against this along with some other senior staff members. However to my surprise they absolutely have not.

...

Agreed. I have noticed no change in Stardock items in the news and what-not. Their products are very much at the core of what a significant group of Neowin members enjoy doing: customizing their Windows installs. Of course there will be a lot of interest (and news) about their product. It does seem that a small but vociferous portion of the community here has some sort of hatred, and the feel compelled to spread that crap when ever an opportunity arises. (N) I guess there are Apple-haters, Linux-haters, Sony-haters and such. This is just another sub-group of negative members: Stardock haters. None of them promote a positive community.

I personally don't care who is backing the site as long as it stays as good as it is. From what I can see the investment was very good for Neowin, it gave the community the stability it needed (it was annoying to be bouncing from different hosting service)

I have to say, having been a reader of Neowin long before I signed up, the quality of the website, it's infrastructure (i.e. servers), and it's user base is far better than when I started reading news here. It's disappointing that people give Brad Wardell and/or Stardock a hard time for no good reason. I can't say I'm a huge fan of Stardock's products, but I don't giving them grief about it, and I certainly recognize the vast number of people who are interested in Windows customization, of which Stardock is a (the) leading developer of software in that category.

I think it's safe to say that without Stardock lending a helping hand when they did, Neowin would not exist as it does today.

The only problem I have with brad/stardock is the loss of the Poweruser.tv Podcast. :p

I loved it so, and even got a mentioned a few times. :(

But alas, it died, and seems the Neowin Newscast has gone the same way, why do the Podcasts I love die! :cry:

But besides that, what is the problem with Stardock?

If it helps, and has helped the community since 2005 then I'm all for it.

Its not like they have put their advertising everywhere or are constantly spamming there own products on Neowin.

I havent had any dealings with the guy personally, but if what you say is true, then i can understand people being upset by him :s

I don't have any problems with someone getting a little hot. If said person however wields a ban stick, things might however get uneasy. If it already has or not, who knows. Administration always pretends happy sunshine time when approached about topics like this. Maybe someone else had to take a fall tho, the day markjensen got told to shut up and get lost, we'll never know.

No, no, no... My story is just one single incident. I haven't had any other problems at all, so I don't see a pattern of one.

I haven't said that it was more than some bad words once in a lifetime. But I've kept running into his antics in the comment sections of the frontpage (apparently the subforums he and I use don't intersect, I guess that's better for the status of my account) more often than I'd expect for someone with a ban hammer and this site's rather strict set of rules. Regular members would catch warnings like a car insects on the highway in the middle of a hot summer for spreading vitriol in the same way. Trust me, I know.

It does seem that a small but vociferous portion of the community here has some sort of hatred, and the feel compelled to spread that crap when ever an opportunity arises.

You call it hate, others call it "calling someone out". I don't know what sort of PMs have been flying around to cause the creation of this thread, but now that it's there, people may as well be allowed to air some grievances.

Hi guys!

Here's a brief history of how things came to be.

I've been part of Neowin since about the beginning (2001). Within a few months of being active, Steve asked me if I'd like to be part of the staff as a moderator. Eventually, I became a news moderator for the site.

When I became part of the staff, I became familiar with the challenges and issues that Neowin faced. Neowin's popularity continued to grow and grow but the site wasn't really in a position to support its own success. One lawsuit or a few months of non-payment from advertisers or any number of other things and that would have been the end. Steve and Marcel were volunteering their spare time on the site which obviously took away from their free time.

After talking about it at length, we came up with a solution. Neowin LLC. So in 2005, we created Neowin LLC with Stardock being a minority owner of it. Stardock would provide investment capital and access to its infrastructure so that Steve could work full time on the site, have its own servers, control its own hosting destiny, have access to legal and accounting help, and be able to host events and pay for staff to attend various events.

In the 3+ years since we've done this, Neowin's popularity has continued to grow and overall it's been a great success.

Now, some people on the site don't like me. There are many different reasons for this. Probably the biggest reason is that I don't like like a CEO is expected to. If you took the content of my posts and made them by someone else, they wouldn't likely be a big deal. But because they're from me, they tend to get more scrutiny.

For instance, I'll get into discussions on cars, politics, OS wars, gadgets, skinning, gaming, you name it. I give opinions on those topics. Some people, naturally, don't agree with those opinions. And a few of them come to not like me for those opinions. And they project those opinions onto Stardock as a whole.

Thus, when a news item is made or whatever, those people will start trolling the topics.

Check out: https://www.neowin.net/news/software/08/05/...pes-20#comments for a typical example.

Moreover, there will be a tendancy for some people to selectively target anything with me or Stardock for criticism. In turn, I will tend to be defensive about it. I try to avoid it but sometimes you'll see trolling that is so over the top that it's hard not to respond. In turn, this will make some people who know who I am become critics as well and so the negative feedback loop continues to the point that no matter how legitimate the news item is, you'll have people targeting it for trolling simply because the source is either me or has something to do with Stardock.

Overall, though, it's been a tremendous success. Staff morale is much higher. We're able to get a lot more done. And the community as a whole has grown.

Cheers!

...

Brad, I certainly appreciate that fact that you post in the OTHER forums as well other than ONLY in the Stardock related forums.

Maybe a lot of the members expected a "hostile takeover" type of situation when you acquired 40% of Neowin.

Brad, I certainly appreciate that fact that you post in the OTHER forums as well other than ONLY in the Stardock related forums.

Maybe a lot of the members expected a "hostile takeover" type of situation when you acquired 40% of Neowin.

I think that's a big part of it. In the old days, when there'd be a Stardock news post, no one cared. But then, AFTER (starting 3 years ago), every time there was a Stardock news post, a portion of those wanting to "fight the man" felt compelled to get in there and stick it to us.

So even though the number of Stardock postings per month has declined since 2005, when a Stardock posting comes up, there are those who think it's part of some corporate take over and want to get in there and zing it. :)

Hi guys!

Here's a brief history of how things came to be...

As I stated before, I didn't know much about this situation (hatred towards Stardock, dislike of you Frogboy, Neowin being 40% owned by Stardock, etc). However, after reading the Neowin Software article, which you linked to. I understand your's and other's points of views completely now.

That article was HORRIBLE to read because of it's negativity. The negative comments weren't even constructive. E.g. "another useless prodcut from Stardock". Ahem, how can they say that? Have they never seen WindowBlinds, ObjectDock, etc!? I use ObjectDock and think it is amazingly useful. I'm sure the same people who said that would not say that Apple's dock on their Mac OS X is useless would they!? Well ObjectDock functions the same (if not better - skins, more features, etc), it's just for Windows, which makes it much more useful, than useless!

I'm sorry to go into detail here, but after reading the link Brad posted, please can somebody tell me why they dislike him for commenting back in the manner he reportedly does? Their comments are uncalled for, jealous and immature. If somebody was insulting something you created yourself and became very successful in it - it is your pride and joy - then surely you'd be defensive about it when people are just trolling!?

I would just like to say to Frogboy/Brad: Thank you very much for the wonderful software you have provided for me and others, I hope you don't take the negative trolling into account - they're just jealous! Also, thank you for the amazing job you have done since investing in Neowin. Without you this community would not be as good as it is today :)

Edited by cJr.

I've also noticed a lot of negatively in regard to Stardock recently too, which has annoyed me. It was a great idea of initiate a thread on this issues. Also, to be honest, I thought it was well known fact that Stardock partly owned Neowin. But then again, I haven't seen Neowin before state this outright on the forum.

I've been here for quite some time and haven't really noticed much of anything about Stardock. So if there was something going on, it went over my head.

Most I ever read is about the memory hoggin' from Windowblinds. But I don't use it so I could care less. But I firmly believe the if a company makes bad software, it should be spoken that the software is bad, and why.

However, almost all front page stories are filled with useless comments. Most times heavily critisizing the poster of the article, which I think is out of hand. I say, just be glad we get any news the way things have been going.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 by Razvan Serea NetSpeedTray is a lightweight, open-source Windows network monitor that shows live upload and download speeds directly on the Taskbar. Designed for efficiency, it quietly sits in the system tray, conserving CPU and battery with dynamic updates. It blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11, adapts to light/dark themes, and auto-positions to avoid overlaps. Features include accurate interface detection, customizable display, optional mini-graph, color coding, granular font and unit control, detailed per-interface history graphs, safe data management, and easy CSV export—bringing the network monitoring Windows forgot. NetSpeedTray key features: Lightweight & Efficient Runs quietly in your system tray without consuming resources. Features a "Dynamic Update Rate" that lowers refresh frequency when the network is idle to save CPU and battery life. Native Look & Feel Blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11 UI. Smart detection for light and dark taskbar themes ensures text is always visible. Intelligent & Adaptive Positioning Automatically finds empty space next to your system tray and shifts to make room for new icons, preventing overlaps. Seamless OS Integration Behaves like a native Windows component. Hides instantly with auto-hiding taskbar Hides when a fullscreen app is active Smart Network Monitoring Accurate by Default: Auto mode identifies your main internet connection and ignores noise from VPNs or virtual adapters. Easy Interface Selection: Switch effortlessly between Auto, All, or Selected network interfaces via intuitive radio buttons. Total Visual Customization Free Move Mode: Unlock and place the widget anywhere on your screen. Optional Mini-Graph: Real-time graph of recent network activity with adjustable opacity. Color Coding: Customize colors and speed thresholds to quickly see network status. Granular Display Control Text & Font: Adjust font family, size, weight, and alignment. Units: Automatic (B/s, KB/s, MB/s) or fixed Mbps display. Precision: Set decimal places and always show them for uniform appearance. Detailed & Intelligent History Graph Smart Scale: Logarithmic scale shows low-level traffic and large spikes clearly. Per-Interface Filtering: View speed history for specific adapters (Wi-Fi, Ethernet, VPN). Safe & Efficient Data Management: Adjustable retention, automatic cleanup, optimized database. Easy Data Export: Export raw data to .csv or save high-quality graphs for reports. NetSpeedTray v1.3.3: The Updater Fix A stabilization release that repairs a critical regression in v1.3.2: the app shipped without OpenSSL, which silently broke every HTTPS request — including the built-in update checker (the "Could not check for updates" error many of you hit). This release restores it, hardens the build so it can't happen again, and fixes a startup crash plus four other reported bugs. Changes: Fixed update checking — Resolved a critical issue that prevented the app from checking for updates ("Could not check for updates"). Fixed startup crash with Auto-Cycling — The app no longer crashes on launch after enabling Cycle display mode. Fixed incorrect network speeds on 10GbE adapters — Multi-gigabit network cards now display speeds correctly instead of being stuck at 0. Improved color coding — Default color is shown when idle, and color/threshold changes now apply immediately without restarting. Fullscreen visibility fix — The widget now correctly stays visible over fullscreen apps when Keep Visible is enabled. Improved AMD Ryzen temperature detection — More reliable CPU temperature monitoring for Ryzen processors. Cleaner upgrades — Installer now removes outdated application files during upgrades, preventing DLL/version conflicts while preserving user settings. Improved stability — Fixed potential DLL loading issues by excluding critical OpenSSL and NumPy components from UPX compression. Better settings window — Scrollbars removed and layout improved for a cleaner experience. Localization improvements — Updated translations and completed missing UI text across all supported languages. More reliable releases — Added regression tests covering recent critical fixes, bringing the test suite to 196 passing tests. [full release notes] Download: NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 | 87.9 MB (Open Source) Download: NetSpeedTray Portable | 101.0 MB View: NetSpeedTray Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      471
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      217
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!