Stardock's relationship with Neowin and its criticizers


Recommended Posts

3 posts in 5 years? Your opinion doesn't count!!!!

:p j/k Thanks for setting the record straight, sometimes I really wonder about some of the responses I see here lol

I kept reading his name as the-Jaffa :D

3 posts in 5 years? Your opinion doesn't count!!!!

:p j/k Thanks for setting the record straight, sometimes I really wonder about some of the responses I see here lol

3 posts in 5 years? :huh: He joined May 2005. Talk about math.

Its just facts. Yes, no one holds 51%, but if I were Neowin, I sure as hell wouldn't have let someone hold majority rights out of three investors. Anyone with more than an 8th grade education would know that.

Has it helped? Of course. No one's denying that. It just has the potential to be a major issue down the road.

Has it helped? Of course. No one's denying that. It just has the potential to be a major issue down the road.

I guess they're confident there won't be any major issues. At least there hasn't been any that we all know about for 3 years now.

I love both groups so this isn't a big deal. Haven't even noticed a difference.

Correct. That's just an egotistical excuse.

What many people don't realize is that Stardock has the singular MAJORITY share in Neowin. Steve has 30%, Redmak has 30%, and Stardock has 40%. Steve and Redmak may both together have 60%, but in essence, they are two shareholders...not one.

As much spin as has been put on this, that's the fact. Steve and Redmak sold off their control, and one of these days, it will bite them back.

Tinfoil hat? ;p

Edited by Danrarbc
What does LLC in Neowin LLC stand for by the way.

LLC = Limited Liability Company. In the US it means the owners have a limited amount of debt liability for the company they own. (Company goes bankrupt, owners don't automatically follow.) If you took economics in school it was probably referred to as an S-Corporation.

LLC = Limited Liability Company. In the US it means the owners have a limited amount of debt liability for the company they own. (Company goes bankrupt, owners don't automatically follow.) If you took economics in school it was probably referred to as an S-Corporation.

In Canada it would be the same as "Limited".

i.e. Shell Canada Limited.

(I mention this because the person asking was from Vancouver)

  • 2 weeks later...

I'm not a fan of Stardock, and don't own any of their products, but I do have to say that Neowin is much better now than in the earlier days. I would sumise that it was a very thought out and necessary business decision to be done. Stardock could and would be smart to utilise this community as I have seen to improve their products and get ideas to attract new user's and expand on the user base they have now.

Just my two cents...

Well, I always knowtist a "close" relationship between Stardock and Neowin, Stardock software being prominently displayed on the front page and Stardock having the official podcast of Neowin for a while(btw, when will you guys bring that back, that was a great podcast). I don't necessarily have a problem with this arrangement ("you gotta do what ya gotta do") or with FrogBoy (never really seen him around the forums), but it would have been nice to have let the members know about this arrangement earlier.

Ohh.. Brad = Frogboy.. I had no idea who you were all talking about :rofl:

Frogboy is cool.. and I don't think we have ever quoted one another in topics or anything related, except the time he was on X-Play.

I'm kind of confused why this topic was made... but i'm sure the story goes deeper then what is being said in the replies

don't care for stardock, no opinions on the company, however frogboy may get overly defensive when members bash his company and it's products (even if it is unfounded). is that an issue? maybe.

as for neowin; still looking good after this long. keep it up!

I think that Neowin is much better today than what it was in 2001/2002. And if it's all thanks to Stardock and Brad, well, I'm happy.

The only thing is, if someone do have a "valid" not trolling opinion about a Stardock software, that person should have the right to express himself. It's not because Neowin lives because of Stardock that all opinions about Stardock product should be good and rosy.

Another thing, it probably helps to be the Admin and being able to share strong opinions without getting a warning.... Most of us don't have that chance, all mods/admin should keep that in mind.

Keep up the good work.

I'm just curious as to if it would constitute a conflict of interests, when a company with a past history of paying people to post on forums now has a controlling share in an extremely well-respected tech website and forum. I suppose it could be just considered another aspect of marketing, albeit an underhanded one, but it would certainly make me suspect of anyone with a "positive" opinion of their products on a site such as this.

Not many of us had even known the difference, other than it's been obvious the past few years that Neowin and Stardock have a close relationship. Those of you that have been around as long as I have really know the difference in the reliability of the technical side of the site though. For a few years there, it was constant problems. The site has been running really smoothly since this arrangement was made, so I can only look at this as a good thing. Who knows if we would still even be here today without Stardock stepping up. You've got to think Neobond and company would have got fed up with all the problems eventually. Just be thankful that we now have a well run, problem free site and that the impact of Stardock's involvement has been minimal.

I'm just curious as to if it would constitute a conflict of interests, when a company with a past history of paying people to post on forums now has a controlling share in an extremely well-respected tech website and forum. I suppose it could be just considered another aspect of marketing, albeit an underhanded one, but it would certainly make me suspect of anyone with a "positive" opinion of their products on a site such as this.

In case you don't know about this: Read this 2006 news article on Neowin. (though take things you read from Consumerist with a grain of salt; they love blowing things out of proportion)

This claim was shot down in posts 10.4 and 10.5 so I'm not entirely sure what the company AEG had to do with Stardock.

<----Hahahahha, I'm earlier than thou.

I've been here a long time, and I was on staff when Stardock got involved (I think) and I had no problem with it then, and no problem with it now. Brad is a cool guy, he makes awesome games, and runs a great company. Plus Neowin is supported, which is a plus since I love Neowin like all of you do (cept I love it more).

Though maybe Brad should consider changing his nick to FrogMAN...just a thought :D

<----Hahahahha, I'm earlier than thou. j/k, almost

I do not understand what the major issue is, Stardock/Frogboy has helped Neowin stay online and that is what matters most!!

:)

Many of the critical responses to software or anything related to the company in our news and forums are unfair and unfounded, there are a few things these members should note before adding little or nothing more than trolling to such posts on Neowin.

<snip>

Of all the negative comments ive seen, its to do with the products themselves, not Brad. I couldn't care less if he is part of Neowin or not. However, there was an issue where I felt he was making unfair and negative comments about someone simply because they didnt throw themselves at his feet over a new Windowblinds skin. Thats why I have the opinion I do. Not his affiliation with Neowin. And creating a thread about someone's feelings being hurt? A bit odd if you ask me.

I've got no problem with Stardock, no problem with Brad, and didn't know he got 40%. But that doesn't matter to me as long long as Neowin is as it is, a great website. Not super plastered with ads, no corporate feel, etc... Other websites feel tacky to me. Just keep up the good work guys.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 months later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!