Vista SP1 vs XP SP3 Gaming Performance: Vista wins again!


Recommended Posts

What Relativity says is right...but even so, and this is coming from a vista user/supporter, the difference is margninal.

However what I found whilst doing a random google search of Dx10 Vs. Dx9 gaming performance was that whilst the framerates for nVidia cards generally stay the same [for Ati there is a performance drop] the RAM usage is lower. The other advantage is the frame rates generally stay the same, even though the graphics [such as tone, HDR bloom etc] are noticibly better.

The test was done on crysis but there was a problem:

So where are the pretty DX10 Crysis graphics promised? They can be found in the “Very High” settings, but unfortunately those settings are not playable with today’s highest-end GPUs! When running DX10 Crysis you have the in-game settings of “Very High” that are available where these uber-settings are not available in DX9. Even with the most expensive $1200 Quad-SLI configuration we still weren’t able to scale Crysis to its highest DX10 settings and have an acceptable gameplay experience.

Now all we need is someone with 9800GX2s to test it for us =D

----

The sad thing is that when Windows 7 comes out, everyone here whos calling Vista rubbish will be praising it and calling it the greatest microsoft OS ever, and then will go on long rants as to why Windows 7 sucks...

Happenned with XP, happenned with Vista, and will keep happenning....

Edited by / -Razorfold
Lets face some facts. For those who hate Vista, no amount of colorful bars and numbers is going to convince them otherwise. They've swallowed too much FUD, and they are welcome to use whatever OS they prefer.

(Y)

Vista rocks! and with SP1 it's even better.

The sad thing is that when Windows 7 comes out, everyone here whos calling Vista rubbish will be praising it and calling it the greatest microsoft OS ever, and then will go on long rants as to why Windows 7 sucks...

I seriously doubt that or do you see anyone praising Windows Me? :laugh:

Vista wins? Where? I see basically equal graphs well within the margin of error.

Vista still hogs up memory as well.

The sad thing is that when Windows 7 comes out, everyone here whos calling Vista rubbish will be praising it and calling it the greatest microsoft OS ever, and then will go on long rants as to why Windows 7 sucks...

Happenned with XP, happenned with Vista, and will keep happenning....

The sad thing is you don't get it. When 98 came out people weren't praising 95, when 2000 came out people weren't praising 98. People like XP because it's a good os, not really hard to figure out!! Vista, not so good.

If Win7 is better than Vista and XP people will like it and move to it, if not than people will stick with XP again (or in your case and many who seem to love Vista unconditionally stick with it).

Edited by ANova

I really don't understand you... the general performance of Vista is similar to XP (even if it's a bit lower).

What matters the most is the productivity... you can do usual things in Vista a lot faster than in XP.

Yeah... you get 10+ more frames in games when using XP... so what?! Well... actually... if you're a hardcore gamer, that really matter indeed. But most of us just play games for fun... it doesn't matter a few less or more frames.

Those who hate Vista are those who stay all day long playing games and probably having the best (or close to) hardware available.

Grow up.

PS: I understand those playing in official game competitions and gaining money from them. But not the average Joe sitting at his desk and playing until he can't stay awake anymore.

I dont believe those figures are correct. I have always heard people getting better speeds under XP. I have never compared the 2 myself as I only have Vista.

I wouldnt change Vista for XP if given the choice though. As I am relatively happy with my setup ATM.

Strange, every other bench mark I read has XP sp2 and sp3 owning vista w\SP1...now one random benchmark comes along and all the vista users feel like they can justify their purchase? lol

if i posted every article showing XP>Vista there would be a thousand threads :laugh:

If I had a 3GHz double core cpu with 4gb of ram, I'd switch. But for now, I am staying with Windows XP. I dont play games anymore and the only thing I do is picture editing. I have tried Vista and it was too slow compared to XP, no graphs are going to convince me.

The sad thing is you don't get it. When 98 came out people weren't praising 95, when 2000 came out people weren't praising 98. People like XP because it's a good os, not really hard to figure out!! Vista, not so good.

Are you new? When 98, people were very much praising 95. when 2000 came out people hailed win98 as the greatest OS ever made and 2k was garbage. In fact, even when XP came out a year later this was still the case.

When XP came out, well actually until the day after Vista was released. XP was considered Microsoft's biggest failure by the ABMer community.

XP is only a good OS now that there's a new OS to irrationally complain about.

If Win7 is better than Vista and XP people will like it and move to it, if not than people will stick with XP again (or in your case and many who seem to love Vista unconditionally stick with it).

Windows 7 will be better than Vista, and Vista is better than XP. That being said, you can be straight sure that the same people that currently spread FUD about Vista will be back spreading the same (word for word) nonsense about 7.

Strange, every other bench mark I read has XP sp2 and sp3 owning vista w\SP1...now one random benchmark comes along and all the vista users feel like they can justify their purchase? lol

Even the early benchmarks were close, XP never "owed" Vista. More recent benchmarks have all been in line with the results posted here.

And FPS are hardly a great benchmark for the average computer user anyway.

Nice graphs. However, I did my own tests and Vista's performance was far worse than XP. And I'm not talking about 10-20 FPS differences, I'm talking about 60+ (depending on the game). While I don't "hate" Vista, I will not use it and period. If it works like on the above graphs for some people, then great, glad they find the OS good. :)

Yawn - more FUD from the Vista haters.

I have been using Vista *on* a 2004-era computer - with a 3GHz P4 with HT - since 2006 when Beta 2 came out .... and it performs faster than XP and is more responsive.

Yes I know it uses more memory, but so what? Memory is dirt cheap nowadays - you can get a gig for 30 bucks!

Yes I know it uses more memory, but so what? Memory is dirt cheap nowadays - you can get a gig for 30 bucks!

So you dont care if a program/OS** uses a lot of memory because you can buy more?

I think my Firefox is telling me to go to Newegg

**I know some programs like Photoshop or games are supposed to use a lot of memory. I dont refer to them.

Are you new? When 98, people were very much praising 95. when 2000 came out people hailed win98 as the greatest OS ever made and 2k was garbage. In fact, even when XP came out a year later this was still the case.

When XP came out, well actually until the day after Vista was released. XP was considered Microsoft's biggest failure by the ABMer community.

XP is only a good OS now that there's a new OS to irrationally complain about.

Maybe you're just searching for reasons to like Vista?

I don't like Microsoft in general and I was mostly indifferent to 95 and 98 but I have to give MS credit for doing a job well done for the most part on 2k and XP. I really couldn't care less if some think XP to be a failure (even though I think you're making up such a notion to furthur your baseless argument), I switched a few months after XP hit RTM and never regretted it. The stability improvements over 98 were worth it alone for me. The general consensus on the net seemed to be positive for XP as well, of course there will always be some people finding something to complain about.

Windows 7 will be better than Vista, and Vista is better than XP. That being said, you can be straight sure that the same people that currently spread FUD about Vista will be back spreading the same (word for word) nonsense about 7.

Contrary to what those MS branded goggles tell you everything that comes out of Microsoft isn't perfect. You know why Vista is getting so much bad press, because that's reality! Sure some people can be stubborn and anti-new things but when lots of people don't like it maybe, just maybe theres something to that. Come now Microsoft have admitted to themselves that they fell flat on Vista, you might as well move on by now too.

Even the early benchmarks were close, XP never "owed" Vista. More recent benchmarks have all been in line with the results posted here.

And FPS are hardly a great benchmark for the average computer user anyway.

You're grasping, only there aren't enough straws to support you.

I didn't buy 4000MB ram, to have 500 of em being using like in xp :)

Ah so you'd rather programs be inefficient and gobble up ram huh. Well guess what, if your os needs gigs of ram what happens when a program needs it as well? Buying more is like throwing wood (and your money) on the fire.

Edited by ANova
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft making much needed change to Windows 11, 10 Patch Tuesday security updates by Sayan Sen Recently, Microsoft delivered its latest Defender patches for Windows 11 ISOs. These definitions are released from time to time alongside the general security updates available during Patch Tuesday. Speaking of Defender, the company has now announced another important change that affects how security updates are delivered to enterprise devices running Windows. According to a recent announcement, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint's endpoint detection and response (EDR) updates will no longer be bundled with the monthly Windows security updates or Patch Tuesdays. Instead the company is shifting delivery of these updates to Microsoft Update, bringing EDR servicing in line with several other Microsoft Defender components. If you recall, Microsoft last year moved PowerShell updates to Microsoft Update (MU) as well since it provides automatic updates for Microsoft products and services. Thus the move is intended to allow Microsoft to deliver EDR improvements and security enhancements independently of the OS's regular monthly update cycle; this should enable faster deployment of protection updates without requiring organizations to wait for the next Patch release. For those unfamiliar, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint's EDR capabilities are designed to help organizations detect, investigate, and respond to advanced threats across managed devices. Keeping these components updated is critical for maintaining protection against evolving attack techniques. The rollout has already began for Windows 10 devices in late May 2026 (last month) and Microsoft says it will gradually expand support to Windows 11 and the remaining supported Windows versions over the coming months. The company expects deployment across Windows 10 and Windows 11 to be completed by fall 2026 or around Q3 of this year. Once the transition is complete, EDR updates will be delivered through Microsoft Update using KB5005292, provided the required prerequisite updates have already been installed. Microsoft is also introducing a new Defender Update Service as part of the change. Following installation of the first update, devices will automatically create a new directory located at %ProgramData%\Microsoft\Microsoft Defender\Defender Update. Microsoft notes that restarts may occasionally be necessary in case of "rare" failure scenarios. For most organizations, the tech giant says no action will be required as long as Microsoft Update is already permitted within their update management strategy. Admins who rely on manually deployed update packages, however, will need to adjust their processes to ensure the new Defender update package is included. Microsoft also recommends reviewing internal documentation and notifying helpdesk and security operations teams about the updated delivery mechanism to avoid confusion during the transition. As a prerequisite, the tech giant notes that systems must be running Sense version 10.8798.25857.1000 or later and have one of the following Windows updates (or later) installed: Win11 24H2 KB5062660 (2025-07 Cumulative Update Preview) Win11 23H2 KB5062663 (2025-07 Cumulative Update Preview) Win11 22H2 KB5062663 (2025-07 Cumulative Update Preview) Win10 22H2 KB5062649 (2025-07 Cumulative Update Preview) Win10 1809 KB5063877 (2025-08 Cumulative Update) Server 2019 KB5063877 (2025-08 Cumulative Update) Server 2022 KB5063880 (2025-08 Cumulative Update) Server 2025 KB5063878 (2025-08 Cumulative Update) As always, organizations should verify that their update policies align with the new servicing approach before the broader rollout reaches all supported Windows platforms later this year. In case of major problems, the EDR update can be rolled back to the inbox version stored in %ProgramFiles%\\Windows Defender Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) using: MpCmdRun.exe -RevertMde -Product Edr -ToVersion Inbox For those who have access to the Microsoft 365 Admin Center portal, you can view the message here under ID MC1381119.
    • My problem with these smart scopes is that IMO they're not really an entrance into astronomy, they're an entrance to looking at pretty(ish) pictures that you take by essentially pressing a button and letting the scope do the work. I still maintain that getting some binoculars or a solid dedicated telescope (which doesn't have to mean expensive) and actually spending time learning the night sky and using a telescope is a much better way to actually learn. But, granted, the learning curve is a bit steeper (as it tends to be).
    • I never played Crazy Taxi before, but this looks like a fun game!
    • The perception of Microsoft Edge is unfortunate as it's a world class browser. I'm not exaggerating when I say it's the best browser I've ever used with its feature set, speed, reliability and advanced security. Running the extension Ublock Origin is a must though to deal with advertising and trackers.
    • You can check out our latest 9070 GRE review with scores for the XT too, but these are on Windows: Gaming performance Productivity performance
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      248
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      73
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!