Ubuntu Muslim Edition 8.04


Recommended Posts

Shock horror. The Ubuntu Muslim Edition has been out for quite a while. So has the Christian Edition. What? It's been updated to Hardy Heron?

Surprise... surprise! SHIFT LINUX IS THE SAME.

The wonderful thing about Linux is that it is FREE. And the cool thing about Ubuntu is that it's child's play to tweak it and come up with your own distro. I myself have made no less than TEN variants that suit the needs of me and my family and friends. It is SO easy, and FREE, and LEGAL.

I don't know if badcat was after 'shocking us all' about Muslims, but whether or not he was, it's wrong to take the fact that there is a Muslim version of Ubuntu as somehow worthy of pricking us till we bleed. If the majority of Neowin (proud Windows-users, whom I respect) could see into my head at how simple it is to make your own 'themed' distro of Linux, and how liberating the ability to do that actually is, you'd all be hardcore switchers right now, right here. :D

I disagree, while I do use Linux for my servers - I dont want to use it for my personal computer.

I really dont care how easy it is to theme it as Windows can be themed too.

Sure I can't strip everything possibly hardcore out of it but I can use XPLite/Vlite.

Ridiculous statement imho

On topic though: I dont have an issue with a Ubuntu Muslim Edition, I just find it quite funny how the religions each have their own distro. :p

...

People in the UbuntuME formus seem happy about it, that looks like reson enough to keep on making it. This could get more people to try Linux. +ZAnwar said it best:

...

If it brings more people to linux, then great.

But it's the duplication of effort and fragmentation that annoys me (in general, I can't see the need to make new distros with such a small amount of changes that you can count them on one hand)

If it brings more people to linux, then great.

But it's the duplication of effort and fragmentation that annoys me (in general, I can't see the need to make new distros with such a small amount of changes that you can count them on one hand)

Why not - isn't that one of the very Unique Selling Points of Linux?

Cheers though, as it may just bring me to the Linux side. I would have probably never used a distro before due to not knowing how to customize, etc. This just makes it a bit easier.

If a crappy GDM theme and a Qu'ran reader is the make or break difference for a Muslim to use Linux, then that's a sad affair!

--edit: Also, can't wait for Ubuntu Jolly Jihad.

NEWSFLASH!

The (pr)Ubuntu, (procrastinator's version) has had it's release date postponed AGAIN!

That suits me because I'm still not ready yet to make the switch. Maybe next month, perhaps.

Actually, I really couldn't give a **** one way or the other so I'd probably just go for ApUbuntu, the Apathete's version, (if I could be bothered).

Well can we have an Atheists version then?

I've got to be special somehow!

There will be an agnostic version, a lesbian version a homosexual man version a neuter version.

Who cares if there is an Islamic version, do you want a Jewish version of the Q'oran and a Muslim version of the Torah?

They are just beliefs, nothing more or nothing less.

If a crappy GDM theme and a Qu'ran reader is the make or break difference for a Muslim to use Linux, then that's a sad affair!

--edit: Also, can't wait for Ubuntu Jolly Jihad.

So far Linux gives me nothing that Windows can't. It probably gives less. No harm in trying something new.

To each their own, I guess.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      576
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!