C&C Red Alert 3: Hell March Trailer


Recommended Posts

Squads? Yeah, I suppose it's just a way of making it look like more units are on screen at once, but sadly EA's implementation of it isn't all that great.

I hope they get rid of "outposts" and builder units (like generals/warcraft) completely, they're just not C&C. And ffs, remove fog of war already and stick with shroud >_<

why when it would take 5 or 6 jumpjet infantry to take one out in a few seconds?

A few seconds? Lets be realistic here, it'd take a good minute or two for those jumpjet guys to take it out. Now IFV's (especially elite ones) are another matter altogether....

why when it would take 5 or 6 jumpjet infantry to take one out in a few seconds?

I don't know what difficult... wait hold on scratch that.. a few seconds? Come on!

A few seconds? Lets be realistic here, it'd take a good minute or two for those jumpjet guys to take it out. Now IFV's (especially elite ones) are another matter altogether....

And yes...

A Kirov possibly the slowest moving unit in any video game ever but a few of them with a few support tanks below and I would have any base in minutes... I kid you not :p

When the Hellmarch music startet, I smiled . Looks awesome!

The original did look cartoony - but this one looks more so that what i remember. The water / crashing / explosions looks great - but did you see the roads?!!! Seriously! Bit too cartoony than I'd have hoped for really....

It doesn't look cartoony at all. Just colorfull. To few games do that now. It's getting boring. Just brown and grey.

"cartoony" games are still good. Teenagers always have a problem with games not looking adult enough. Their loss I guess.

Very very interesting look at the game, it just may have destroyed all my doubts about it, plus a rumored month of release...

Source: http://www.1up.com/do/previewPage?cId=3167874

Didn't the trailer say October anyway? It's been slated for October for a while now, at least (I remember that being flung around when they announced the beta test a few months back).

Either way, after reading that preview, I have to say - I'm not looking forward to it as much now. EA seems to have taken the quirkyness of RA2 and run with it. Except they've run about 200 light years too far and made it outright daft.

That's all well and good if the game is supposed to be funny, a genuine comedic joy (Portal? Sam & Max?), but it's a STRATEGY game, it's hard not to take that seriously. Even RA2, as odd as it was, felt serious enough when it needed to be (and RA1 felt EXTREMELY serious, it's the most serious out of all the C&C's) but it looks as though EA is going for all out slapstick comedy here which I really don't want to see =\

Didn't the trailer say October anyway? It's been slated for October for a while now, at least (I remember that being flung around when they announced the beta test a few months back).

Either way, after reading that preview, I have to say - I'm not looking forward to it as much now. EA seems to have taken the quirkyness of RA2 and run with it. Except they've run about 200 light years too far and made it outright daft.

That's all well and good if the game is supposed to be funny, a genuine comedic joy (Portal? Sam & Max?), but it's a STRATEGY game, it's hard not to take that seriously. Even RA2, as odd as it was, felt serious enough when it needed to be (and RA1 felt EXTREMELY serious, it's the most serious out of all the C&C's) but it looks as though EA is going for all out slapstick comedy here which I really don't want to see =\

I see it the opposite way if they chose to go somewhat slapstick then they should just go all the way, I understand your worry about it not feeling serious but the whole feel of the game being about war will insure that at some point and through particular battles in the story mode it will feel serious I mean it's not like when you blow up a tank it releases sweets, you will still kill things and still face a challange that would make it feel serious...

And by the way I noticed some Generals and Zero Hour bashing?! ImEaN wAt ThE HeLl GuYs? :p

SOme of the units from that preview sound a little whacky but with the FMV, the good ol Soviet Union raging away, and the old CNC feel, defintely a game I will be getting, even if there are armoured bears being shot behind enemy lines in it :s

SOme of the units from that preview sound a little whacky but with the FMV, the good ol Soviet Union raging away, and the old CNC feel, defintely a game I will be getting, even if there are armoured bears being shot behind enemy lines in it :s

From what we have gathered they are just placeholder Red Alert 2 sounds...

And yeah parachuting bears is something I would not miss if it was cut before release :p

I just recently re-installed Yuri's Revenge and Generals Zero Hour even though by comparison Red Alert is much better then the Generals versions, Generals is not "poor" by no means and in my view is a very very good game in its own right!

But purely out of interest what did you think was wrong with it Kushan?

I just recently re-installed Yuri's Revenge and Generals Zero Hour even though by comparison Red Alert is much better then the Generals versions, Generals is not "poor" by no means and in my view is a very very good game in its own right!

But purely out of interest what did you think was wrong with it Kushan?

It wasn't so much that there was something WRONG with it, it's just that it was completely unlike any other C&C game ever made. Even Renegade was closer to C&C than generals was.

If you compare them side-by-side, Generals plays and acts more like Warcraft than C&C. That really bothered me because EA just used the name to get more sales (Not that I have anything against Warcraft, I actually really enjoyed Warcraft 3).

To make things worse, the influence of generals has spilled over into C&C3 - things like outposts and separate build queues (I know some people prefer it, but it's just turned the whole game into a rush fest), which ruined a lot of the appeal for me.

Maybe I'm just old fashioned, but I liked the C&C formula, I liked the way RA2 built upon and and made it a really fun game, then EA pretty much ditched it =\

It wasn't so much that there was something WRONG with it, it's just that it was completely unlike any other C&C game ever made. Even Renegade was closer to C&C than generals was.

If you compare them side-by-side, Generals plays and acts more like Warcraft than C&C. That really bothered me because EA just used the name to get more sales (Not that I have anything against Warcraft, I actually really enjoyed Warcraft 3).

To make things worse, the influence of generals has spilled over into C&C3 - things like outposts and separate build queues (I know some people prefer it, but it's just turned the whole game into a rush fest), which ruined a lot of the appeal for me.

Maybe I'm just old fashioned, but I liked the C&C formula, I liked the way RA2 built upon and and made it a really fun game, then EA pretty much ditched it =\

Ahh then I see why you have a problem with it, in fact it is very justified if in this case it does have an influence on Red Alert 3 the reason I never saw Generals as a problem like you did is because I treated it like it was another game or story line in the C&C universe and not anything like RA 2 in fact your right they do play drastically different and I can see why you would not want Generals influence on Red Alert 3 not sure I want that either as Red Alert needs to stay true to its feel and Generals game play always feels very very rushed...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Would you please fix your graphics. They are outdated and don't fit the article.
    • The Light of Life? We actually do glow till our Death, study finds by Sayan Sen Image by Rafael Rendon via Pexels A study by researchers at the University of Calgary has found that living organisms produce an extremely faint light known as ultraweak photon emission, and that this glow appears to drop significantly after death. The research was published in the Journal of Physical Chemistry in April 2025 and quickly drew widespread attention, leading to more than 200 news stories about the findings. Ultraweak photon emission (or UPE), sometimes called biophoton emission, refers to tiny amounts of light released by living cells as a result of normal biological activity. A photon is the basic particle of light, and researchers say every living system examined so far, including plants and animals, has been found to emit these photons. The glow is far too faint to be seen by the human eye. “I suppose it has a little to do with people being reminded of auras,” says Dr. Christoph Simon, PhD, one of the authors of the study and a professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy in the Faculty of Science. “It is a fact that living beings glow. It’s a very weak glow, but it’s there and visible with very sensitive cameras.” According to the study, the light involved is extremely weak, ranging from 10 to 1,000 photons per square centimetre per second across a spectral range of 200 to 1,000 nanometres. For comparison, a nanometre is one-billionth of a metre and is commonly used to measure wavelengths of light. Detecting emissions at such low levels requires highly specialized equipment. To study the phenomenon, researchers used electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) and charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras. These imaging systems are designed to detect extremely small amounts of light, including individual photons, while minimizing background noise. The technology allowed researchers to capture signals that would otherwise be impossible to observe. The team worked with the Human Health Therapeutics Research Centre at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) in Ottawa to examine photon emissions in mice. Researchers took two-hour exposure images of the animals before and after death and compared the results. “We saw that the level of light that they emit – this biophoton glow – is distinctly different between living and dead animals,” says Dr. Daniel Oblak, PhD, an associate professor in Physics and Astronomy and the corresponding author of the study. The images showed a clear decrease in photon emissions after death across the entire body of each mouse. According to the researchers, this provided direct evidence that living and dead tissue produce different levels of ultraweak photon emission. “It’s a very small amount and it’s, of course, very tricky to detect,” Oblak says. The study grew out of discussions between Simon, whose research interests include quantum biology, and Oblak, whose work focuses on detecting light for quantum communication experiments. Quantum biology is a field that explores whether processes described by quantum physics, which studies matter and energy at very small scales, may also play a role in living systems. “Since I work as a quantum physicist on light detection for quantum communication, I thought that experimentally we have a lot of the tools to be able to detect the light,” Oblak explains. The researchers also investigated UPE in plants and found that the light changed in response to stress. When plants were exposed to higher temperatures or physically injured, their photon emissions increased. Chemical treatments also affected the glow. Among the substances tested, the local anesthetic benzocaine produced the strongest emission response when applied to injured plant tissue. These findings suggest that ultraweak photon emission is closely linked to biochemical and metabolic activity inside living organisms. Metabolism refers to the chemical reactions that allow cells and organisms to stay alive and function. Because these reactions change when an organism experiences stress, injury or disease, researchers believe UPE may provide a way to monitor those changes. The researchers stress that the glow is a physical and biological phenomenon, not a metaphysical one. Oblak says more research is needed to understand exactly how the light is produced and what information it may reveal about the condition of living tissue. “We must understand what that is to figure out what’s happening,” he says. “If we can understand how that relates to certain influences on the body – stress, diseases – then that could be used as a diagnostic tool.” The researchers believe the technique could eventually help scientists study health and disease without invasive procedures. Because UPE can be measured without adding dyes, markers or labels, it may offer a way to monitor whether tissue is healthy, damaged or alive. In plants, it could help researchers better understand how organisms respond to injury, heat and other forms of stress. While the work is still in its early stages, the study demonstrates that ultraweak photon emission imaging can provide a non-invasive and label-free way to observe biological activity. Researchers say the approach could become a useful tool for studying vitality, stress responses and other important processes in both animals and plants. Source: University of Calgary, ACS publication This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Damn, I loved this show back in the day.  
    • Rufus 4.15.2393 Beta 2 by Razvan Serea Rufus is a small utility that helps format and create bootable USB flash drives, such as USB keys/pendrives, memory sticks, etc. Despite its small size, Rufus provides everything you need! Oh, and Rufus is fast. For instance it's about twice as fast as UNetbootin, Universal USB Installer or Windows 7 USB download tool, on the creation of a Windows 7 USB installation drive from an ISO (with honorable mention to WiNToBootic for managing to keep up). It is also marginally faster on the creation of Linux bootable USBs from ISOs. A non-exhaustive list of Rufus supported ISOs is available here. It can be especially useful for cases where: you need to create USB installation media from bootable ISOs (Windows, Linux, UEFI, etc.) you need to work on a system that doesn't have an OS installed you need to flash a BIOS or other firmware from DOS you want to run a low-level utility Rufus 4.15.2393 Beta 2 changelog: Add RISC-V 64 support to UEFI:NTFS Improve the guards for using the "silent" option Improve the ability to cancel during write retries Improve progress reporting for compressed image extraction Fix unrestricted XML entity expansion and integer overflow in ezxml parser (courtesy of @esadowski4) [GHSA-55r2-34wg-8mv9] Fix "silent" Windows installation failing at 75% in most cases [#2960] Fix a crash during boot when using UEFI:NTFS on Snapdragon X based ARM64 platforms [#2934] Fix the first WUE option always being checked by default [#2965] Fix an infinite loop when using Windows ISOs that contain multiple WIMs Fix "Enable runtime UEFI media validation" checkbox not always being properly enabled Other WUE improvements/fixes for OneDrive removal and username validation (with thanks to @christian8641) [#2984, #2991] Download: Rufus 4.15 Beta 2 | 1.9 MB (Open Source) Links: Rufus Home Page | Project Page @GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      515
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      83
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!