Recommended Posts

We need windows 7 since there are many features that Windows lacks at this moment,howvere Windows Vista is very good in my opinion.

For example:

- Virtual Workspaces

XP had that (not by default though, MS PowerToy). It was kinda odd it wasn't added into Vista though, considering there seem to be a demand for it...

Seeing how Windows 7 is about multi-touch, I don't see why not. It's good that technology of personal computing is moving forward, even if "Windows" is not as good as we hope.

Windows 7 is much more than just their implementation of multi-touch - or did you just get that from the videos of it? Try going to Microsoft's Channel9 pages and look for either "Windows 7" or "MinWin".

--ScottKin

P:S. I just hit the "1,234 Posts" Prize!!! :jump: :rofl:

MinWIn isnt part of Windows 7.

Win7 is stated to be:

UI tweaks in terms of performance

minor kernel tweaking/improvements

improvements to the UI in terms of speed and appearance/continuity

taking tools that are already there and improving them in speed or functionality

introducing new features(multi-touch)

All while while staying with the same recommended hardware as Vista.

Which oddly enough almost agrees with my thread of Win7 = Longhorn concept. Windows 7 is just another step towards making all the power/flexibility of the Longhorn concept a reality.

To be honest, now that XP is considered to be a fairly stable operating system, honestly, windows 7 isn't necessary for the common computing community. But, like everything else in the realm of technology, it never stops growing. I didn't say getting better. That has yet to be determined with Vista and the still-arising issues with it.

There will always be a next step with technology. Especially with software. And here's one good reason that's come to my attention.

When a software/hardware developer makes a product, they initially charge much more than the previous version or model on the shelf. Why? Well they give reasons like, it's got more features, economy has changed, blah blah blah. Fact of the matter is, back in the day win Win98 came out, it cost 90+ off of the shelf. When windows XP was thrown on the shelves, it started out around 200, in some places 150. Now you can find a copy for 100 bucks or less at wal-mart. When Windows 7 comes out, Vista will be downsized as well.

Yes, improving technology is a major factor, making things better; but these are companies, and they do need to make a profit. That's the design of capitalism, to make something bigger and better so you can charge more than before, or more than the other guy and get away with it.

WHAT STANDARD? There are 5 different icon styles for these 6 interfaces. 6 different layouts, and 2 completely different skins. And these are all standard MS applications!

post-162840-1212103453_thumb.jpg

That is the main problem with Windows Vista. GUI is totally inconsistent. Office 2007 is great except for Outlook 2007 which is totally unconsistent with the rest. Go figure...

What standard would that be exactly? There isn't even a unified look among Microsoft's own applications and the OS' default theme.

The Vista UX guidelines? Microsoft bends their own rules a fair bit, but I'm reasonably certain Apple has a guy studying them just so they can figure out newer and more annoying ways to break them.

IMO, everything should try to follow Explorer/WMP11/IE7's example when it makes sense to: A little extended glass....some nice looking buttons on it, that gradient bar thing (All three have the same bar, with different colors), 'Vistay' icons, etc.

The Vista UX guidelines? Microsoft bends their own rules a fair bit, but I'm reasonably certain Apple has a guy studying them just so they can figure out newer and more annoying ways to break them.

IMO, everything should try to follow Explorer/WMP11/IE7's example when it makes sense to: A little extended glass....some nice looking buttons on it, that gradient bar thing (All three have the same bar, with different colors), 'Vistay' icons, etc.

You don't need to "study" anything windows to break conformity. Just make anything that looks half way decent and you probably will break their UI design. You are complaining that Apple doesn't conform to Microsoft's guidelines and in the same post say they don't have any to begin with. What point are you trying to prove? At least Apple sticks to their own UI standards as well as most the people who develop interfaces for OSX.

And just so you know, Web 2.0 gloss isn't the answer for everything. It is an easy way to make things look "cool". What they need to do is start making their UI layouts and navigation hierarchies the same. Each part of windows has its own navigation structure, making every moment of Windows a learning experience. I still don't know everything about Windows after using it for most my life, but I learned OSX pretty thoroughly in about a month.

The Vista UX guidelines? Microsoft bends their own rules a fair bit, but I'm reasonably certain Apple has a guy studying them just so they can figure out newer and more annoying ways to break them.

I've heard it's the same guy that worked with the Microsoft Office 2007 UI, Windows Live Messenger UI and Windows-Vista-Should-Still-Have-Windows-3.1-styled-icons teams. Such a small world. ;)

Do we really need Windows 7 now? I think it would be better to release one big SP2 with new features, changes, fixes and patches.

I don't see why Vista should be replaced since UAC behavior, new features, patches and fixes can be pushed through SP2.

Windows 7 will be like what Windows XP was compared to Windows 2000. The other reason is probably to get rid of Vista just because of the bad image it has right now. Having new OS every 3 years is too much. I think that should be moved to every 5-7 years.

but then we have other people complain "where is my new windows :cry: "

so it is better just to have more windows versions sooner, so people have the option to SKIP an upgrade... or purchase it. Making both sides happy...

I don't see where you failed to see that

Vista was more than $200, at least the version that mattered. OSX is $200 for a 5 computer liscence, basically $40 per computer where Vista Ultimate is $400 for one PC. Paying $400 every two years is quite a bit for a mere OS.

Vista Ultimate OEM is 160usd. And OSX is 40usd? http://store.apple.com/us/product/MB427Z/A?mco=MTE3Mzg <- I guess apple must lie. If you have no idea how volume licensing works, please don't talk about it. Volume licensing means that you can buy 10 copies, with each copy being cheaper than buying 1 single copy.

Most people don't even need all the features in Ultimate so it is not the version that matters.. unless of course the home user will need bitlocker, and all the business/enterprise tools in Ultimate...

Home premium OEM is 100usd....sure if you want to buy the retail one go ahead and pay extra...I'm not stopping you, and nor is Microsoft.

You don't need to "study" anything windows to break conformity. Just make anything that looks half way decent and you probably will break their UI design. You are complaining that Apple doesn't conform to Microsoft's guidelines and in the same post say they don't have any to begin with. What point are you trying to prove? At least Apple sticks to their own UI standards as well as most the people who develop interfaces for OSX.

Vista looks pretty dam decent by itself. And so does office 2007 and IE7. Just because every programmer seems to think they need to make their own UI for windows [but apple developers don't seem to think that] doesn't make it Microsoft's fault, and nor is there a way to prevent it either.

Sure office 2007 has a different design, but it fits into Vista VERY NICELY and doesn't lag your computer to hell and act like a memory hog. Ie Itunes and Safari for windows. WMP decides that 40-100mb is like all it needs to play my music. Itunes decides that 250mb-400mb is what it needs...Safari compared to Opera/Firefox/Ie7 is the same.

If you realized with Vista your entire system doesn't go down when your graphics card driver stops working, it just recycles the process.
If only that were true, which (often), it isn't.

Really? It isn't true? How come I seem to have like a billion driver crashes thanks to nVidia's ****ty drivers and yet no bsods? The driver reloads fine, and the OS continues running?

You will not get a BSOD from a driver crash in Vista. End of story.

Edited by / -Razorfold
Vista Ultimate OEM is 160usd. And OSX is 40usd? http://store.apple.com/us/product/MB427Z/A?mco=MTE3Mzg <- I guess apple must lie. If you have no idea how volume licensing works, please don't talk about it. Volume licensing means that you can buy 10 copies, with each copy being cheaper than buying 1 single copy.

...

Apple OSX cost per computer (from the page you posted):

$129 - one PC

$99.50 - two PCs (use "family pack", sum cost of "family pack" is $199)

$66.33 - three PCs (again, use "family pack" )

$49.75 - four PCs ("family pack" )

$39.80 - five PCs (maximum that a "family pack" allows)

The poster you quoted should have stated "as low as $40 per PC". Instead you use the opportunity to feign ignorance on what he meant and bash him to shut up about "volume licensing". :no:

Apple OSX cost per computer (from the page you posted):

$129 - one PC

$99.50 - two PCs (use "family pack", sum cost of "family pack" is $199)

$66.33 - three PCs (again, use "family pack" )

$49.75 - four PCs ("family pack" )

$39.80 - five PCs (maximum that a "family pack" allows)

The poster you quoted should have stated "as low as $40 per PC". Instead you use the opportunity to feign ignorance on what he meant and bash him to shut up about "volume licensing". :no:

He compared a single license to a volume license.

So i compared a single license to a single license. Because if you want to compare two totally different pricing schemes it obviously shows you have no idea what you are talking about.

Sure the way I worded it came out wrong...but according to his logic I can get Vista Ultimate for 50usd each, and now I can complain that Mac OS X costs 129usd. Doesn't really make sense does it?

Edited by / -Razorfold

No, we don't need this thread. The old one has all the features that some users want and need so obviously this is just a waste of free time and imagination.

But wait, newer version will attract even more people whit features such are stupid poll, Vista vs. Linux discussion and much more. Stay tunned.

Whatever.

No, we don't need this thread. The old one has all the features that some users want and need so obviously this is just a waste of free time and imagination.

But wait, newer version will attract even more people whit features such are stupid poll, Vista vs. Linux discussion and much more. Stay tunned.

Whatever.

It's hard to cure a person's stupidity nowadays.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones by Paul Hill Waymo, the self-driving car maker owned by Alphabet – the parent company of Google –, has recalled some of its fifth-generation Automated Driving Systems (ADS). It did so after some of its cars drove through closed construction zones. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the affected vehicles were capable of driving through a closed freeway construction zone and continuing to drive at speed. The listing on the NHTSA website says that Waymo is currently developing a solution to fix this issue, but in the meantime, freeway driving is being restricted. Waymo will update its ADS software so that vehicles can detect when they can avoid entering construction zones. According to the Safety Recall Report, on April 20, 2026, Waymo’s Field Safety Committee began meetings reviewing an event from April 11, 2026, and five events from April 19, 2026, where Waymo’s autonomous vehicles didn’t recognize and drove past ramp closure signs into the pre-planned freeway construction zones. This took place in Phoenix, Arizona. Separately, on May 18, 2026, seven Waymo vehicles entered freeway lanes with active construction in the San Francisco Bay Area by driving between cones that were placed to show the lane was closed. On the back of both of these events, Waymo restricted freeway driving until it could address the issue. In June, Waymo’s Safety Board reviewed the issue and additional information related to ADS performances around construction zones; then, as a result, it decided to conduct a recall. This development is not good for Waymo as it adds to a growing list of technical hiccups its cars have experienced. Ultimately, it will lead to more scrutiny from lawmakers around the world who will be more cautious about letting autonomous vehicles on their roads without tighter regulation. For readers in areas where Waymo operates, does this news make you more wary about stepping into one of these vehicles?
    • I'm still on Windows 10 22H2 because I didn't want to deal with all the issues in Windows 11, so I waited almost a week before installing the latest Patch Tuesday update (KB5094127), I went ahead and did it, and it was a huge mistake—ever since then, my File Explorer has seen a performance drop of about 30% when transferring large files... Once again, Microsoft has outdone itself! This update cannot be uninstalled, either through the Control Panel (via Settings) or by accessing Advanced Startup Options. The only possible alternative would be to use system restore points, but I’d have to reinstall all app and driver updates (and there’s no guarantee it would work). Or there’s the “nuclear option” of a in-place repair without losing files or apps, but even then, all my customizations would be lost! Microsoft just can’t help but mess everything up! Way to go, Microsoft! But I still don’t want your c****y Windows 11!
    • Microsoft: Windows 11 could finally solve a major issue across AMD, Nvidia, and Intel GPUs by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has been trying to improve it, Windows 11 is definitely not flawless, as even today some issues are taking a year to publicly acknowledge. However, one area of trouble that may finally see much better results soon is graphics driver crashes. Work on graphics driver timeouts, also called Timeout and Detection Recovery (TDR), is not new as the latest WDDM 3.2 also has specific improvements regarding it. Windows Display Driver Model (WDDM) version 3.2 is supported on Windows 11 24H2 and 25H2. However, with the upcoming version 26H2, TDR crash diagnosis could go to the next level as Microsoft is introducing a new DirectX 12 API feature called "DirectX Dump Files". Similar to how system memory dump files work when a system crashes or freezes or encounters any such major issue, DirectX Dump Files (DDF) will essentially record a snapshot of the GPU execution right at the moment a graphics-related crash or hang or freeze occurs, so that developers can better understand and diagnoze these TDR and timeout detection errors. The dump will be available as a .dxdmp file for analysis and it will be a comprehensive dump file generated with detailed insights about the hardware, drivers, Windows, as well as the affected application. This should be another welcome change in this department. Earlier at GDC 2026, when the technology was first debuted, Microsoft had shared more details regarding it. The company had explained how DDF is designed to gather data from every layer of the graphics stack into a single file, eliminating the need for developers to manually correlate logs from multiple tools. As mentioned above, the dump can contain a lot of useful details like GPU hardware state information such as register values, shader program counters, page fault virtual addresses, shader memory data, and command buffers. Alongside that, it also captures DirectX runtime and kernel information, including D3D objects, pipeline state objects, device error data, adapter details, and CPU call stacks. Microsoft says the feature has been built around two primary use cases: retail device removals and local device removals. The former allows developers to collect crash information from end users' systems in the field, while the latter helps QA teams and developers investigate issues on test machines. Developers will also be able to include up to 2 MB of custom application data through new D3D12 APIs, providing additional context for troubleshooting. In addition, Microsoft is introducing three dump collection modes ranging from zero-overhead capture, which has no runtime performance impact on supported hardware, to higher-detail modes that collect more vendor-specific debugging data. On compatible Tier 2 hardware, zero-overhead dumps will be enabled by default, meaning developers may begin receiving useful crash diagnostics without making any code changes. The table below explains the three tiers: Tier Description NO_OVERHEAD Enables crash capture with no runtime cost and is suitable for broad deployment MEDIUM_OVERHEAD Provides a balance, capturing additional diagnostic data with moderate impact HIGH_OVERHEAD Collects the most detailed GPU and driver state available, enabling deeper investigation at the cost of higher runtime overhead In terms of availability, the company expects broader release to be around the fall of 2026, which should be right around the time when Windows 11 version 26H2 lands. Right now, DirectX Dump Files are available as a preview and currently, only AMD has the compatible AgilitySDK Developer Preview driver version 26.10.07.02. You can find the official announcement post here on Microsoft's website.
    • And with SO much better perf than the laggy mess that is Files.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      598
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      190
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      79
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      76
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!