Recommended Posts

Hi,

Does anybody here shoot stock photos and submit to microstock sites or even sell directly? how was your experience so far? I know SirEvan does, anyone else?

I'm asking because my applications in a couple large stock photo sites has been approved, I uploaded 3 images to both, and so far sold only one download (in a week) :D is that poor or what?

A great article on microstock: http://digital-photography-school.com/blog...ur-photography/

Thanks :)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/637976-stock-photography/
Share on other sites

It's not necessarily 25 cents, it's the minimal, they usually pay %30 of the sale price which is variable according to the chosen download dimensions, on average you can say it'll be $0.80 per download as a minimum. Still low, but if the photographer is new to the industry it's good to build some reputation or a reference, also if you're that good you can sell like 500-1000 download per month on 4-5 sites, not bad at all.

Hi Tantawi hows it going?

Ive just been approved at Alamy, i chose it becuase it was the only one that didnt need a copy of my ID which i didnt have at the time,.

Got 4 photos approved and need to start building up my catalogue, its going to take a long time before any worthwhile money comes in but at the moment im more concerned about getting the pictures out there for exposure (no pun intended!)

Anyone got any suggestions for other good sites?

Thanks

Hi Tantawi hows it going?

Ive just been approved at Alamy, i chose it becuase it was the only one that didnt need a copy of my ID which i didnt have at the time,.

Got 4 photos approved and need to start building up my catalogue, its going to take a long time before any worthwhile money comes in but at the moment im more concerned about getting the pictures out there for exposure (no pun intended!)

Anyone got any suggestions for other good sites?

Thanks

Great, good luck to you! :)

Here's another very popular site http://www.istockphoto.com, and it does not require an ID scan either.

Some people make $20k a month doing stock photo. It's really up to you; how good you are, how much you submit, and a bit of luck (getting exposure for your images on the site).

It's also great for those of us who can't find places to sell a single picture for $50. It's a place to get a good start.

Your right crazzy88 but those high end places, many of them do not allow you to join if you were part of another stock place. This is always discussed in photography forums. I was gonna itch and do the low end ones but decided to wait to make a portfolio to submit to the high end. It all depends on what the person wants.

You're just starting out; I've heard that you don't get much for a little bit. Let your library grow as well as the popularity of your images. I plan on getting into stock photo (dunno if I'm really good enough, to be honest) this summer.

Although I can't tell one end of a dslr from another, I really like the photos on your flickr: got "trees by the lake" as my desktop picture right now. Have self confidence and it will fall into place for you ;)

If your into making money, get into kids sports. I shot a High School state Track (running) meet, and so far have made $275 (including 2 small town newspaper photos for $20/photo). My strategy - underprice the "official" photographers by about 40-50%. They charge $8.25 for a 4x6, I charge $4.50.

I charge $5 for shipping, which covers my printing and actual shipping costs for 75% of my orders, and I only get docked a 18% fee from my host. So on a $45 order ($50 with shipping) I end up walking away with $40 in net profits, which isn't bad.

Over summer, I plan on going to a few little league / soccer games and talking with parents there. I went to one random game last year and ended up having two parents buy prints from me in which I made around $35 for an hour's time.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I grew up a Star Trek fan and never watched Star Wars movies. To this days I've not watched most Star Wras movies. As a result I rarely get these references, I have no idea what this post means. Given the popular reactions these get I have to accept I missed out.  
    • Spotify really have turned in to a butthole of a company. Assuming this isn't a bug then this is a low act for Premium users. Honestly, YT Premium which includes YT Music is a genuine alternative. In any event, the internet enshitification continues unabated...next up, the banning of VPN's.
    • This is why science is the only path to truth. It isn't rigid in its beliefs, rather it changes its views based on scientific discoveries.
    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      92
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!