Antivirus is 'completely wasted money': Cisco CSO


Recommended Posts

ZDNet Australia

Companies are wasting money on security processes ? such as applying patches and using antivirus software ? which just don't work, according to Cisco's chief security officer John Stewart.

Speaking at the AusCERT 2008 conference in the Gold Coast yesterday, Stewart said the malware industry is moving faster than the security industry, making it impossible for users to remain secure.

"If patching and antivirus is where I spend my money, and I'm still getting infected and I still have to clean up computers and I still need to reload them and still have to recover the user's data and I still have to reinstall it, the entire cost equation of that is a waste.

"It's completely wasted money," Stewart told delegates.

He said infections have become so common that most companies have learned to live with them.

/snip

I must agree to an extent.

It would be much more beneficial for companies to invest in something like DeepFreeze.

I think the best approach to these threats is hybrid solution. No one solution is 100% effective.

However, saying that Antivirus is a waste of money is a very brave and IMHO plain silly thing to say.

He's got a point, but saying it's a waste of money is stupid. I can agree that when a PC is infected, it is in most cases best to reinstall it. But antivirus programs also have an importan proactive role. It stops most viruses from infecting and spreading to other corporate computers etc.

i had a virus on my home laptop a little while back.. it somehow managed to get past norton 2008 with all the updates... i contacted norton and they told me i'd have to pay ?70for them to get rid of it...... i told them where to stuff it and just formatted lol...

its bad that because their system which is meant to prevent viruses failed, that they wanted to charge me so much money!

I have to disagree with the statement, although the context in with which it is made, is certainly true.

If i was spending money on Anti-Virus products and still getting infected then yes that would constitute a waste of money, but at the same time, how many issues has that Anti-Virus product protected against.

You have to ask yourself how the machines are being compromised, is it thorugh Malware installing from websites, is it because of an Operating System vulnerability.

Both of these can be countered, using Proxy Servers to filter out those websites that are known to host malicious code, and educate employees on a secure computing policy, secondly ensure that the operating system has the lastest security patches applied to it.

Of course no process is 100% secure, all we can ever do in this game, is to apply best practice and hope for the best.

LOL That's why I use ClamWin on Windows... That way I don't need to pay for virus scanners... As for other malware, I don't do anything that would cause me to get spyware, adware and such. I'm wary of JS, VBS and BAT files in Windows as well as readme HTML files containing JS, so I don't need to worry about those threats because I can dig through things to be sure that it is 100% safe. In fact, the only reason I have a virus scanner is because I use Frostwire from time to time. Otherwise, I don't have issues with torrenting Linux distros, and therefore I have no real need for a virus scanner.

Norton doesn't count as an AV.

Not in my opinion. There are far superior free Programs such as Avast, and AVG. A friend of mine has never used a AV program and he has never been infected. I just use Avast with the Standard Shield only.

:D Neither should McAfee. It's more like malware the way it takes up CPU cycles and resources.

IMHO It's (1)Avast (2)Kaspersky (3)NOD32.

I agree with that first part of your post, but that second part is flatout absurd!

Sould be (1)Kaspersky, (2)NOD32, (3) Avast

Said by Gary7

"Not in my opinion. There are far superior free Programs such as Avast, and AVG. A friend of mine has never used a AV program and he has never been infected. I just use Avast with the Standard Shield only."

How would your friend know if he's ever been infected or not, if he's never used an AV? Those kind of statements are also flat out absurd!

That it's still possible for viruses to corrupt your system doesn't mean that antivirus products are a waste of money, just as how locking the doors of your home won't prevent all robbery attempts but that doesn't mean locking the doors is a waste of time. It truly wouldn't surprise me if John Stewart lost his job because of his patently stupid remark.

Vista is so secure you won't even need to worry about security as Vista protects you well if you LET it and not change silly system settings.

I have not even installed an AV on permanent time since I see them as waste of time and money. I know I am not infected because I install an AV from time to time to check for viruses. At the moment I am setting up a USB stick system maintenance software that will check for viruses as well as cleaning up junk.

Avast is bad. Even though my friend had it installed he still got infected with a virii. When he switched to AVG, he found two worms and a trojan.

And the exact opposite can and has happened for other people. No AV will catch everything and this applies even more so to free solutions. You get what you pay for.

I've always seen people be infected no matter what AV program they are using, most of the time it comes down to user stupidity. I currently don't use an av program but scan online monthly and I have not had a virus in years.

@ Sharad I've never had a very good experience with AVG on many computers I have used it on it generally doesn't seem to detect nearly as much as Avast! and Avira do, and it gets false positives far too often for my liking. I definitely agree with VRam, no program catches everything, I always have to use a combination of programs or look for manual fixes or specialized programs when I have to clean someones infected computer (And they almost always have an active av running)

Edited by ViperAFK

I will agree partially with the idea that most antivirus programs are a waste of money (I go for the free ones, which can be just as effective), however, claiming that installing patches is ineffective is downright idiotic.

OTOH I'm utterly unimpressed with the state of all antivirus programs. Most of 'em these days are just a tad too paranoid, flagging completely inoffensive items as malware.

I agree with that first part of your post, but that second part is flatout absurd!

Sould be (1)Kaspersky, (2)NOD32, (3) Avast

Said by Gary7

"Not in my opinion. There are far superior free Programs such as Avast, and AVG. A friend of mine has never used a AV program and he has never been infected. I just use Avast with the Standard Shield only."

How would your friend know if he's ever been infected or not, if he's never used an AV? Those kind of statements are also flat out absurd!

No they are not absurd. I guess you have never heard of on-line scanning. Check it out most AV companies have one. That is how he would know!

Well, he is right about the Anti-virus industry not being able to keep up, since Viruses constantly appear, change and evolve.

The problem with his statement is, tons of people don't get infected with the latest and best virus attacks out there, but they pick up all the

trash littering the Internet. You have all these dodgy sites with tons of spyware/malware, you have dodgy files from P2P Software and and whatnot.

All this trash can still effective ruin your Computer and make you waste a lot of time trying to salvage everything, so I still believe a decent Virus scanner is a must to have.

Just too bad so many people tend to use these free alternatives which usually doesn't even find half of what a quality brand would - So they are lured into a false sense of security. The same with On-line scanners, they are pretty much useless in my book, since the most important aspect of Anti-Virus is the proactive defence - Stopping the virus before it enters your PC. As soon as a Virus or Infection has hit your PC, it usually takes a lot more than a simple Virus scan to remove it effectively.

I remember one of my friends always touted what a safe surfer he was, how he never have had a virus. We tried a few On-line scanners which found nothing, totally clean. So I installed a Trial version of NOD32 and it actually found 4 infections, where he was only able to get rid of 3 - We also found out, one of his frequently visited websites had a virus embedded in some flash ad, which he would never really know about if the software hadn't told him.

So he decided to reinstall Windows and start to use Anti-Virus software.

With a bit of knowledge and a decent Anti-virus, It's not wasted money, it can actually save you some time and worry.

Whilst he does have a point, it is a bold claim to make.

You have to think of where does most malware come from. It's from people accepting every single activex control they see, opening every file/running every executable they can get their hands on etc. Yep, people's stupidity. Don't do that, and there is a much much smaller chance you will get malware. Sure it doesn't mean you won't get any, just means the chances of you getting one is a lot less.

Programs like DeepFreeze help a lot too, though can be a pain sometimes but then thats the price of security nowdays.

One word: Linux

Too many companies use Windows for no good reason and it's sad that they don't have better advisers.

I love Linux as much as the next guy... Ok... Perhaps a bit more than the next guy. ;)

But to say that many companies use Windows for "no good reason" overlooks the darn "legacy apps" issue. Some apps (even obscure ones) require Windows to run (not Linux/wine).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Go for a Echo Dot or Pop instead. These Echo shows just advertise to you.
    • NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 by Razvan Serea NetSpeedTray is a lightweight, open-source Windows network monitor that shows live upload and download speeds directly on the Taskbar. Designed for efficiency, it quietly sits in the system tray, conserving CPU and battery with dynamic updates. It blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11, adapts to light/dark themes, and auto-positions to avoid overlaps. Features include accurate interface detection, customizable display, optional mini-graph, color coding, granular font and unit control, detailed per-interface history graphs, safe data management, and easy CSV export—bringing the network monitoring Windows forgot. NetSpeedTray key features: Lightweight & Efficient Runs quietly in your system tray without consuming resources. Features a "Dynamic Update Rate" that lowers refresh frequency when the network is idle to save CPU and battery life. Native Look & Feel Blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11 UI. Smart detection for light and dark taskbar themes ensures text is always visible. Intelligent & Adaptive Positioning Automatically finds empty space next to your system tray and shifts to make room for new icons, preventing overlaps. Seamless OS Integration Behaves like a native Windows component. Hides instantly with auto-hiding taskbar Hides when a fullscreen app is active Smart Network Monitoring Accurate by Default: Auto mode identifies your main internet connection and ignores noise from VPNs or virtual adapters. Easy Interface Selection: Switch effortlessly between Auto, All, or Selected network interfaces via intuitive radio buttons. Total Visual Customization Free Move Mode: Unlock and place the widget anywhere on your screen. Optional Mini-Graph: Real-time graph of recent network activity with adjustable opacity. Color Coding: Customize colors and speed thresholds to quickly see network status. Granular Display Control Text & Font: Adjust font family, size, weight, and alignment. Units: Automatic (B/s, KB/s, MB/s) or fixed Mbps display. Precision: Set decimal places and always show them for uniform appearance. Detailed & Intelligent History Graph Smart Scale: Logarithmic scale shows low-level traffic and large spikes clearly. Per-Interface Filtering: View speed history for specific adapters (Wi-Fi, Ethernet, VPN). Safe & Efficient Data Management: Adjustable retention, automatic cleanup, optimized database. Easy Data Export: Export raw data to .csv or save high-quality graphs for reports. NetSpeedTray v1.3.3: The Updater Fix A stabilization release that repairs a critical regression in v1.3.2: the app shipped without OpenSSL, which silently broke every HTTPS request — including the built-in update checker (the "Could not check for updates" error many of you hit). This release restores it, hardens the build so it can't happen again, and fixes a startup crash plus four other reported bugs. Changes: Fixed update checking — Resolved a critical issue that prevented the app from checking for updates ("Could not check for updates"). Fixed startup crash with Auto-Cycling — The app no longer crashes on launch after enabling Cycle display mode. Fixed incorrect network speeds on 10GbE adapters — Multi-gigabit network cards now display speeds correctly instead of being stuck at 0. Improved color coding — Default color is shown when idle, and color/threshold changes now apply immediately without restarting. Fullscreen visibility fix — The widget now correctly stays visible over fullscreen apps when Keep Visible is enabled. Improved AMD Ryzen temperature detection — More reliable CPU temperature monitoring for Ryzen processors. Cleaner upgrades — Installer now removes outdated application files during upgrades, preventing DLL/version conflicts while preserving user settings. Improved stability — Fixed potential DLL loading issues by excluding critical OpenSSL and NumPy components from UPX compression. Better settings window — Scrollbars removed and layout improved for a cleaner experience. Localization improvements — Updated translations and completed missing UI text across all supported languages. More reliable releases — Added regression tests covering recent critical fixes, bringing the test suite to 196 passing tests. [full release notes] Download: NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 | 87.9 MB (Open Source) Download: NetSpeedTray Portable | 101.0 MB View: NetSpeedTray Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      474
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      220
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!