Antivirus is 'completely wasted money': Cisco CSO


Recommended Posts

I would go as far as to say they day of the virus is dead.

First what would you consider a virus. Would you consider …..

Having a popup next to your clock saying “Your are infected”, a virus?

How about when rouge applications get installed onto your computer out of know where, is that a virus?.

When I think of a virus I think of something that spreads. Like netsky. Those types of “Viruses” are easy to clean because all the infected files share the same netsky string. Even if that string changes, the antivirus just has to be updated to detect the new string.

Now days I would say viruses are no longer an issue. They have since been replaced by adware,spyware,malware and trogins.

I would seriously say that they should no longer becalled “Antiviruses” they should be called “Antimalware / Antispyware / antiadware/”

These days instead of 1 file multiplying its self a few thousand times on your computer, is gone. You now have infections that hook in so deep into your computer you can never be safe unless you reformat.

I would go as far as to say they day of the virus is dead.

First what would you consider a virus. Would you consider …..

Having a popup next to your clock saying “Your are infected”, a virus?

How about when rouge applications get installed onto your computer out of know where, is that a virus?.

When I think of a virus I think of something that spreads. Like netsky. Those types of “Viruses” are easy to clean because all the infected files share the same netsky string. Even if that string changes, the antivirus just has to be updated to detect the new string.

Now days I would say viruses are no longer an issue. They have since been replaced by adware,spyware,malware and trogins.

I would seriously say that they should no longer becalled “Antiviruses” they should be called “Antimalware / Antispyware / antiadware/”

These days instead of 1 file multiplying its self a few thousand times on your computer, is gone. You now have infections that hook in so deep into your computer you can never be safe unless you reformat.

Yeah the Majority of computers I have cleaned lately have Rogue applications. Fake reg cleaners and spyware apps seem the most common, and a lot of them are infected with some variation of the Vundo trojan and a lot of other random malware/trojans. You cannot use any single app to remove infections like that, the infection roots itself into the system and keeps coming back. I have also seen a couple root kit infections of late, now those are a BITCH to get rid of, my dad got one and I just ended up formatting it. I agree if you get one of these nasty deep rooted infections often the only way you can truly get rid of it is a format. That is why I advocate always backing up your data because you never know what can happen.

Vista is so secure you won't even need to worry about security as Vista protects you well if you LET it and not change silly system settings.

I have not even installed an AV on permanent time since I see them as waste of time and money. I know I am not infected because I install an AV from time to time to check for viruses. At the moment I am setting up a USB stick system maintenance software that will check for viruses as well as cleaning up junk.

No operating system, not even Vista, will protect you from a virus that only needs user-level access to your system.

There is absolutely no reason why a malware author would need administrative access to any machine in order to use it to DDoS a website, or send spam, etc. regardless of whether they're running Vista, OSX, or Linux. (Actually, now that I think about it, wouldn't the fact that application installs are considerably more often done without administrative privileges on OSes other than Windows actually put more executable files at risk for infection?)

Giving that running code administrative access will let it really get deeply entrenched in your system, harder to remove, and let it do more to your computer, however, which it is true that Vista does protect against.

Completely wasted money? I definitely would agree to that, especially since those users who exercise common sense (don't open questionable attachments) will most likely not end up being infected. However, I still find Spybot is a necessity for Windows users in order to avoid getting spyware, which can be installed without any user's knowledge.

Completely wasted money? I definitely would agree to that, especially since those users who exercise common sense (don't open questionable attachments) will most likely not end up being infected. However, I still find Spybot is a necessity for Windows users in order to avoid getting spyware, which can be installed without any user's knowledge.

Most existing spyware can't be installed without administrative privileges.

On that note, I haven't had the need to run Spybot or any similar tools on either my machine since I upgraded to Vista, or on my family's Vista PC.

XP, on the other hand.... *shiver*

Guess what guys, I have no AV or firewall nor have I for the better of three years and I have never been infected with anything. How do I know? No pop ups, no odd processes running, no odd services, no weird activity either in functionality or network traffic; just a fast and clean running computer.

What's my secret? Opera, disabled IE and a hardware firewall.

Yep, I totally agree. A/V's are a waste of time and money

They won't pick up everything, and spyware's more of a problem nowadays. I've never run one on my main pc, and havent had any viruses. Maxthon, hardware firewall, knowledge and my eyes - thats what keeps me safe.

I keep an A/V on my business laptop (NOD32 ftw), just to "be sure".

I agree with that first part of your post, but that second part is flatout absurd!

Sould be (1)Kaspersky, (2)NOD32, (3) Avast

avast isn't anywhere near the top, which is populated by all paid solutions. and we really don't know whether kaspersky or eset is better, they're both excellent products.

I'm wondering if the latest 'security suites' sold by antivirus, antimalware and antispam companies do it by fear mongering users into thinking without their protection, hackers will flick this magic switch to turn on their computers while they sleep and steal all their data. :rolleyes:

Free antivirus tools are okay for the occasional time you visit a trusted site and it gets exploited by a new virus. Happened before on Neowin. But then there's the email checker (can't it be accomplished through regular on-the-fly file checkers in free AVs?), network checker, web checker, P2P app checker, system immunizer, application hash verifier, spyware checker - in another word, pay up an annual fee of $50+ to make up for the laziness of users. Oh and add a constant 10-30% use of CPU and system resources.

Protection like that is useful for commonly hit targets: popular sites and servers come to mind. For regular users*, why bother? Quit being so damn paranoid.

The day when antivirus vendors quit hiring people to write viruses, people actually do research and be educated (not buy into every advice from every 'you MUST install our solution to stay safe!') or when Windows falls into a minority marketshare is when this money grabbing madness will stop.

*except if you use cracks and download illegal software. =)

the problem is...that viruses/worms/trojans like their biological counterparts are evolving too fast.....worse when they use stealthy tech like Root kits to hide themselves...

It's a Cat and Mouse game... We all hope the mouse is chasing the Cat in this scenario. ;) we always want to be ahead of the viruses with definitions/signatures before they come knocking at your door (browser etc).

Just too bad so many people tend to use these free alternatives which usually doesn't even find half of what a quality brand would

I dont know you got that info from but freeware security programs can be very effective.

Avira and avast are very capable antivirus for example. Theres also programs like Threatfire.

avast isn't anywhere near the top

Have you seen the latest av-comparatives.org?

which is populated by all paid solutions.

Avira has a free version and its on top.

While I agree that antivirus programs aren't the catch-all solution, I don't see how they are a waste of money. They are behind the times maybe, but they at least can prevent against known threats. Saying they are a waste is tantamount to saying that doctors are a waste because bacteria and viruses are evolving and we will just get sick again, so why bother getting well now? Just doesn't make sense to me.

No, Antivirus is not a waste of money (Unless your paying for one)...

Stupid employees is a waste money.. They download stuff and don't even checked if their USB thumbdrives have viruses before plugging it in on a corporate computer..

I never had virus problems.. AVG kills them all...

Guess what guys, I have no AV or firewall nor have I for the better of three years and I have never been infected with anything. How do I know? No pop ups, no odd processes running, no odd services, no weird activity either in functionality or network traffic; just a fast and clean running computer.

What's my secret? Opera, disabled IE and a hardware firewall.

Awesome...if you're the only one who ever gets to use that particular PC.

...or the sites you trust don't get hacked so they're running something that exploits, say, a buffer overrun in your browser that pushes some code on your machine.

I mean, yeah, maybe it won't run for long before you notice it, but a virus doesn't need to run for long to do some damage. And once a box is compromised...

Edited by _dandy_
Linux + virtualization.

Yes, thanks for correcting :D.

Or Mac OS X or any other non-Microsoft system out there, right? :p

While OS X doesn't suffer from the obvious malware problems that Windows does (not saying that Microsoft is sloppy) it isn't really cheap compared to Linux, if you know what I mean ;).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Amazon Prime Day 2026: Best Dolby soundbar deals from Sony, Samsung, JBL, Polk, and more by Sayan Sen Yesterday we covered the JBL BAR 800 which is a 5.1.2 Dolby Atmos/Vision soundbar. The unit is on sale for its lowest ever price of just $800 making it a solid offer. However, there are many more options to choose from and in this article, we have made a compilation of the best deals including from Sony, Polk, Yamaha, Denon, Samsung and more. Sony's BAR models are currently at their lowest prices which makes them solid offerings. The company's BRAVIA Theatre Bar lineup is designed to suit different home cinema needs. The Bar 5 is an entry-level 3.1-channel soundbar with a wireless subwoofer, supporting Dolby Atmos®, DTS:X, S-Force PRO Front Surround, and Vertical Surround Engine for immersive audio with clear dialogue. The Bar 6 upgrades to a 3.1.2-channel configuration by adding dedicated up-firing speakers for more convincing overhead Atmos effects while retaining the wireless subwoofer. At the premium end, the Bar 7, Bar 8, and flagship Bar 9 are single-soundbar solutions featuring Sony’s 360 Spatial Sound Mapping technology, which creates phantom speakers for a wider surround field. Bar 7 includes nine speaker units, Bar 8 increases this to eleven, and Bar 9 offers thirteen speaker driver units promising the most expansive soundstage and acoustic performance. All models should integrate seamlessly with compatible BRAVIA TVs and support the BRAVIA Connect app for setup and control. Get them at the links below: Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 9 Soundbar (HT-A9000): $998.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $1498) Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 8 Soundbar (HT-A9000): $798.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $998) Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 7 Soundbar (HT-A7100): $618.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $768) Sony BRAVIA Theater System 6: $548.00 | Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 6: $448.00 Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 5 (HT-B500): $278.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $348) Sony HT-S400 2.1 soundbar: $198.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $248) Aside from those, we also have more discounts including from Samsung, Polk Audio, and more: Samsung Q-Series Soundbar HW-QS90H 7.1.2: $797.99 (Amazon US) (Was: $998) Polk Audio Signa S4: $336.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $449) Hisense AX3120Q: $229.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $259) Check out more soundbar deals that you may like at this link. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!