Antivirus is 'completely wasted money': Cisco CSO


Recommended Posts

I would go as far as to say they day of the virus is dead.

First what would you consider a virus. Would you consider …..

Having a popup next to your clock saying “Your are infected”, a virus?

How about when rouge applications get installed onto your computer out of know where, is that a virus?.

When I think of a virus I think of something that spreads. Like netsky. Those types of “Viruses” are easy to clean because all the infected files share the same netsky string. Even if that string changes, the antivirus just has to be updated to detect the new string.

Now days I would say viruses are no longer an issue. They have since been replaced by adware,spyware,malware and trogins.

I would seriously say that they should no longer becalled “Antiviruses” they should be called “Antimalware / Antispyware / antiadware/”

These days instead of 1 file multiplying its self a few thousand times on your computer, is gone. You now have infections that hook in so deep into your computer you can never be safe unless you reformat.

I would go as far as to say they day of the virus is dead.

First what would you consider a virus. Would you consider …..

Having a popup next to your clock saying “Your are infected”, a virus?

How about when rouge applications get installed onto your computer out of know where, is that a virus?.

When I think of a virus I think of something that spreads. Like netsky. Those types of “Viruses” are easy to clean because all the infected files share the same netsky string. Even if that string changes, the antivirus just has to be updated to detect the new string.

Now days I would say viruses are no longer an issue. They have since been replaced by adware,spyware,malware and trogins.

I would seriously say that they should no longer becalled “Antiviruses” they should be called “Antimalware / Antispyware / antiadware/”

These days instead of 1 file multiplying its self a few thousand times on your computer, is gone. You now have infections that hook in so deep into your computer you can never be safe unless you reformat.

Yeah the Majority of computers I have cleaned lately have Rogue applications. Fake reg cleaners and spyware apps seem the most common, and a lot of them are infected with some variation of the Vundo trojan and a lot of other random malware/trojans. You cannot use any single app to remove infections like that, the infection roots itself into the system and keeps coming back. I have also seen a couple root kit infections of late, now those are a BITCH to get rid of, my dad got one and I just ended up formatting it. I agree if you get one of these nasty deep rooted infections often the only way you can truly get rid of it is a format. That is why I advocate always backing up your data because you never know what can happen.

Vista is so secure you won't even need to worry about security as Vista protects you well if you LET it and not change silly system settings.

I have not even installed an AV on permanent time since I see them as waste of time and money. I know I am not infected because I install an AV from time to time to check for viruses. At the moment I am setting up a USB stick system maintenance software that will check for viruses as well as cleaning up junk.

No operating system, not even Vista, will protect you from a virus that only needs user-level access to your system.

There is absolutely no reason why a malware author would need administrative access to any machine in order to use it to DDoS a website, or send spam, etc. regardless of whether they're running Vista, OSX, or Linux. (Actually, now that I think about it, wouldn't the fact that application installs are considerably more often done without administrative privileges on OSes other than Windows actually put more executable files at risk for infection?)

Giving that running code administrative access will let it really get deeply entrenched in your system, harder to remove, and let it do more to your computer, however, which it is true that Vista does protect against.

Completely wasted money? I definitely would agree to that, especially since those users who exercise common sense (don't open questionable attachments) will most likely not end up being infected. However, I still find Spybot is a necessity for Windows users in order to avoid getting spyware, which can be installed without any user's knowledge.

Completely wasted money? I definitely would agree to that, especially since those users who exercise common sense (don't open questionable attachments) will most likely not end up being infected. However, I still find Spybot is a necessity for Windows users in order to avoid getting spyware, which can be installed without any user's knowledge.

Most existing spyware can't be installed without administrative privileges.

On that note, I haven't had the need to run Spybot or any similar tools on either my machine since I upgraded to Vista, or on my family's Vista PC.

XP, on the other hand.... *shiver*

Guess what guys, I have no AV or firewall nor have I for the better of three years and I have never been infected with anything. How do I know? No pop ups, no odd processes running, no odd services, no weird activity either in functionality or network traffic; just a fast and clean running computer.

What's my secret? Opera, disabled IE and a hardware firewall.

Yep, I totally agree. A/V's are a waste of time and money

They won't pick up everything, and spyware's more of a problem nowadays. I've never run one on my main pc, and havent had any viruses. Maxthon, hardware firewall, knowledge and my eyes - thats what keeps me safe.

I keep an A/V on my business laptop (NOD32 ftw), just to "be sure".

I agree with that first part of your post, but that second part is flatout absurd!

Sould be (1)Kaspersky, (2)NOD32, (3) Avast

avast isn't anywhere near the top, which is populated by all paid solutions. and we really don't know whether kaspersky or eset is better, they're both excellent products.

I'm wondering if the latest 'security suites' sold by antivirus, antimalware and antispam companies do it by fear mongering users into thinking without their protection, hackers will flick this magic switch to turn on their computers while they sleep and steal all their data. :rolleyes:

Free antivirus tools are okay for the occasional time you visit a trusted site and it gets exploited by a new virus. Happened before on Neowin. But then there's the email checker (can't it be accomplished through regular on-the-fly file checkers in free AVs?), network checker, web checker, P2P app checker, system immunizer, application hash verifier, spyware checker - in another word, pay up an annual fee of $50+ to make up for the laziness of users. Oh and add a constant 10-30% use of CPU and system resources.

Protection like that is useful for commonly hit targets: popular sites and servers come to mind. For regular users*, why bother? Quit being so damn paranoid.

The day when antivirus vendors quit hiring people to write viruses, people actually do research and be educated (not buy into every advice from every 'you MUST install our solution to stay safe!') or when Windows falls into a minority marketshare is when this money grabbing madness will stop.

*except if you use cracks and download illegal software. =)

the problem is...that viruses/worms/trojans like their biological counterparts are evolving too fast.....worse when they use stealthy tech like Root kits to hide themselves...

It's a Cat and Mouse game... We all hope the mouse is chasing the Cat in this scenario. ;) we always want to be ahead of the viruses with definitions/signatures before they come knocking at your door (browser etc).

Just too bad so many people tend to use these free alternatives which usually doesn't even find half of what a quality brand would

I dont know you got that info from but freeware security programs can be very effective.

Avira and avast are very capable antivirus for example. Theres also programs like Threatfire.

avast isn't anywhere near the top

Have you seen the latest av-comparatives.org?

which is populated by all paid solutions.

Avira has a free version and its on top.

While I agree that antivirus programs aren't the catch-all solution, I don't see how they are a waste of money. They are behind the times maybe, but they at least can prevent against known threats. Saying they are a waste is tantamount to saying that doctors are a waste because bacteria and viruses are evolving and we will just get sick again, so why bother getting well now? Just doesn't make sense to me.

No, Antivirus is not a waste of money (Unless your paying for one)...

Stupid employees is a waste money.. They download stuff and don't even checked if their USB thumbdrives have viruses before plugging it in on a corporate computer..

I never had virus problems.. AVG kills them all...

Guess what guys, I have no AV or firewall nor have I for the better of three years and I have never been infected with anything. How do I know? No pop ups, no odd processes running, no odd services, no weird activity either in functionality or network traffic; just a fast and clean running computer.

What's my secret? Opera, disabled IE and a hardware firewall.

Awesome...if you're the only one who ever gets to use that particular PC.

...or the sites you trust don't get hacked so they're running something that exploits, say, a buffer overrun in your browser that pushes some code on your machine.

I mean, yeah, maybe it won't run for long before you notice it, but a virus doesn't need to run for long to do some damage. And once a box is compromised...

Edited by _dandy_
Linux + virtualization.

Yes, thanks for correcting :D.

Or Mac OS X or any other non-Microsoft system out there, right? :p

While OS X doesn't suffer from the obvious malware problems that Windows does (not saying that Microsoft is sloppy) it isn't really cheap compared to Linux, if you know what I mean ;).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Ford execs say they made a mistake when they replaced human engineers with AI by David Uzondu Ford recently announced that over the last three years, it's had to rehire about 350 "gray beard" engineers to mentor younger staff and reprogram diagnostic systems and AI tools that were failing to meet up to quality expectations. The company's VP of vehicle hardware engineering, Charles **** said that leaders overlooked the deep experience of veterans who survived many product cycles. **** admitted that simply replacing them with AI was a huge mistake, and that while AI is "a fantastic tool," it remains "only as good as the information you use to train it." The rehired engineers now run mandatory meetings to troubleshoot vehicles and reprogram automated engineering software and AI tools to prevent glitches before production. These technical specialists hunt for failure points before parts ever reach the plant floor, helping prevent the massive recalls and defects that previously cost the company billions as it aims to cut one billion dollars in expenses this year. In last year's JD Power Quality Survey, an annual study that measures the quality of a car during the first three months of ownership, Ford finished 10th among mainstream brands and scored below the industry average. But this year, JD Power ranked the automaker as the top mainstream brand, placing it above the likes of Toyota Motor Corp. and Honda Motor Co. Ford attributed this massive improvement directly to the expertise of these returned engineers. Ford's realization that AI cannot magically design and test quality vehicles without senior human oversight is just the tip of the iceberg. When Careerminds looked at companies that conducted AI-driven layoffs, researchers found out that 35.6% of those companies had to rehire more than half of the employees they previously fired. Another 32.7% had to rehire between 25% and 50% of them. In 2024, Sebastian Siemiatkowski, CEO of Klarna, proudly announced that its new chatbot was doing the work of 700 full-time customer service agents. As a result, the fintech company froze hiring and cut hundreds of positions. But by mid 2025, and into 2026, Klarna was scrambling to recruit human agents again because customer satisfaction had plummeted. It turns out, while AI is very good at answering basic questions like how to check an account balance, when faced with complex customer issues that require nuance, the thing usually resorts to the unhelpful, robotic corporate jargon we all know and love.
    • Free AI in IDEs is shifting to paid models Or you know, you could just learn to actually design and code apps, use frameworks to handle the repetitive parts and not use AI at all - and voila... free for life!
    • In a sane world US antitrust laws wouldn't even allow these companies to be in the position to be subjected to EU directives. As you say, better than oligarch nothing.
    • Apple reportedly has a second-generation iPhone Fold planned for 2027 Good grief, Apple hasn't even released a first folding phone and the Apple faithful is already obsessing over the sequel? Seriously people, go out and touch grass... because this level of obsession is borderline stalkery/neurotic.
    • I checked on the IPs associated with every login and they're all mine... And whenever I get a new prompt, there is no activity to show for it. 
  • Recent Achievements

    • Enthusiast
      Xonos went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      405
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      169
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      129
    4. 4
      neufuse
      69
    5. 5
      Xenon
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!