Antivirus is 'completely wasted money': Cisco CSO


Recommended Posts

I would go as far as to say they day of the virus is dead.

First what would you consider a virus. Would you consider …..

Having a popup next to your clock saying “Your are infected”, a virus?

How about when rouge applications get installed onto your computer out of know where, is that a virus?.

When I think of a virus I think of something that spreads. Like netsky. Those types of “Viruses” are easy to clean because all the infected files share the same netsky string. Even if that string changes, the antivirus just has to be updated to detect the new string.

Now days I would say viruses are no longer an issue. They have since been replaced by adware,spyware,malware and trogins.

I would seriously say that they should no longer becalled “Antiviruses” they should be called “Antimalware / Antispyware / antiadware/”

These days instead of 1 file multiplying its self a few thousand times on your computer, is gone. You now have infections that hook in so deep into your computer you can never be safe unless you reformat.

I would go as far as to say they day of the virus is dead.

First what would you consider a virus. Would you consider …..

Having a popup next to your clock saying “Your are infected”, a virus?

How about when rouge applications get installed onto your computer out of know where, is that a virus?.

When I think of a virus I think of something that spreads. Like netsky. Those types of “Viruses” are easy to clean because all the infected files share the same netsky string. Even if that string changes, the antivirus just has to be updated to detect the new string.

Now days I would say viruses are no longer an issue. They have since been replaced by adware,spyware,malware and trogins.

I would seriously say that they should no longer becalled “Antiviruses” they should be called “Antimalware / Antispyware / antiadware/”

These days instead of 1 file multiplying its self a few thousand times on your computer, is gone. You now have infections that hook in so deep into your computer you can never be safe unless you reformat.

Yeah the Majority of computers I have cleaned lately have Rogue applications. Fake reg cleaners and spyware apps seem the most common, and a lot of them are infected with some variation of the Vundo trojan and a lot of other random malware/trojans. You cannot use any single app to remove infections like that, the infection roots itself into the system and keeps coming back. I have also seen a couple root kit infections of late, now those are a BITCH to get rid of, my dad got one and I just ended up formatting it. I agree if you get one of these nasty deep rooted infections often the only way you can truly get rid of it is a format. That is why I advocate always backing up your data because you never know what can happen.

Vista is so secure you won't even need to worry about security as Vista protects you well if you LET it and not change silly system settings.

I have not even installed an AV on permanent time since I see them as waste of time and money. I know I am not infected because I install an AV from time to time to check for viruses. At the moment I am setting up a USB stick system maintenance software that will check for viruses as well as cleaning up junk.

No operating system, not even Vista, will protect you from a virus that only needs user-level access to your system.

There is absolutely no reason why a malware author would need administrative access to any machine in order to use it to DDoS a website, or send spam, etc. regardless of whether they're running Vista, OSX, or Linux. (Actually, now that I think about it, wouldn't the fact that application installs are considerably more often done without administrative privileges on OSes other than Windows actually put more executable files at risk for infection?)

Giving that running code administrative access will let it really get deeply entrenched in your system, harder to remove, and let it do more to your computer, however, which it is true that Vista does protect against.

Completely wasted money? I definitely would agree to that, especially since those users who exercise common sense (don't open questionable attachments) will most likely not end up being infected. However, I still find Spybot is a necessity for Windows users in order to avoid getting spyware, which can be installed without any user's knowledge.

Completely wasted money? I definitely would agree to that, especially since those users who exercise common sense (don't open questionable attachments) will most likely not end up being infected. However, I still find Spybot is a necessity for Windows users in order to avoid getting spyware, which can be installed without any user's knowledge.

Most existing spyware can't be installed without administrative privileges.

On that note, I haven't had the need to run Spybot or any similar tools on either my machine since I upgraded to Vista, or on my family's Vista PC.

XP, on the other hand.... *shiver*

Guess what guys, I have no AV or firewall nor have I for the better of three years and I have never been infected with anything. How do I know? No pop ups, no odd processes running, no odd services, no weird activity either in functionality or network traffic; just a fast and clean running computer.

What's my secret? Opera, disabled IE and a hardware firewall.

Yep, I totally agree. A/V's are a waste of time and money

They won't pick up everything, and spyware's more of a problem nowadays. I've never run one on my main pc, and havent had any viruses. Maxthon, hardware firewall, knowledge and my eyes - thats what keeps me safe.

I keep an A/V on my business laptop (NOD32 ftw), just to "be sure".

I agree with that first part of your post, but that second part is flatout absurd!

Sould be (1)Kaspersky, (2)NOD32, (3) Avast

avast isn't anywhere near the top, which is populated by all paid solutions. and we really don't know whether kaspersky or eset is better, they're both excellent products.

I'm wondering if the latest 'security suites' sold by antivirus, antimalware and antispam companies do it by fear mongering users into thinking without their protection, hackers will flick this magic switch to turn on their computers while they sleep and steal all their data. :rolleyes:

Free antivirus tools are okay for the occasional time you visit a trusted site and it gets exploited by a new virus. Happened before on Neowin. But then there's the email checker (can't it be accomplished through regular on-the-fly file checkers in free AVs?), network checker, web checker, P2P app checker, system immunizer, application hash verifier, spyware checker - in another word, pay up an annual fee of $50+ to make up for the laziness of users. Oh and add a constant 10-30% use of CPU and system resources.

Protection like that is useful for commonly hit targets: popular sites and servers come to mind. For regular users*, why bother? Quit being so damn paranoid.

The day when antivirus vendors quit hiring people to write viruses, people actually do research and be educated (not buy into every advice from every 'you MUST install our solution to stay safe!') or when Windows falls into a minority marketshare is when this money grabbing madness will stop.

*except if you use cracks and download illegal software. =)

the problem is...that viruses/worms/trojans like their biological counterparts are evolving too fast.....worse when they use stealthy tech like Root kits to hide themselves...

It's a Cat and Mouse game... We all hope the mouse is chasing the Cat in this scenario. ;) we always want to be ahead of the viruses with definitions/signatures before they come knocking at your door (browser etc).

Just too bad so many people tend to use these free alternatives which usually doesn't even find half of what a quality brand would

I dont know you got that info from but freeware security programs can be very effective.

Avira and avast are very capable antivirus for example. Theres also programs like Threatfire.

avast isn't anywhere near the top

Have you seen the latest av-comparatives.org?

which is populated by all paid solutions.

Avira has a free version and its on top.

While I agree that antivirus programs aren't the catch-all solution, I don't see how they are a waste of money. They are behind the times maybe, but they at least can prevent against known threats. Saying they are a waste is tantamount to saying that doctors are a waste because bacteria and viruses are evolving and we will just get sick again, so why bother getting well now? Just doesn't make sense to me.

No, Antivirus is not a waste of money (Unless your paying for one)...

Stupid employees is a waste money.. They download stuff and don't even checked if their USB thumbdrives have viruses before plugging it in on a corporate computer..

I never had virus problems.. AVG kills them all...

Guess what guys, I have no AV or firewall nor have I for the better of three years and I have never been infected with anything. How do I know? No pop ups, no odd processes running, no odd services, no weird activity either in functionality or network traffic; just a fast and clean running computer.

What's my secret? Opera, disabled IE and a hardware firewall.

Awesome...if you're the only one who ever gets to use that particular PC.

...or the sites you trust don't get hacked so they're running something that exploits, say, a buffer overrun in your browser that pushes some code on your machine.

I mean, yeah, maybe it won't run for long before you notice it, but a virus doesn't need to run for long to do some damage. And once a box is compromised...

Edited by _dandy_
Linux + virtualization.

Yes, thanks for correcting :D.

Or Mac OS X or any other non-Microsoft system out there, right? :p

While OS X doesn't suffer from the obvious malware problems that Windows does (not saying that Microsoft is sloppy) it isn't really cheap compared to Linux, if you know what I mean ;).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 by Razvan Serea NetSpeedTray is a lightweight, open-source Windows network monitor that shows live upload and download speeds directly on the Taskbar. Designed for efficiency, it quietly sits in the system tray, conserving CPU and battery with dynamic updates. It blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11, adapts to light/dark themes, and auto-positions to avoid overlaps. Features include accurate interface detection, customizable display, optional mini-graph, color coding, granular font and unit control, detailed per-interface history graphs, safe data management, and easy CSV export—bringing the network monitoring Windows forgot. NetSpeedTray key features: Lightweight & Efficient Runs quietly in your system tray without consuming resources. Features a "Dynamic Update Rate" that lowers refresh frequency when the network is idle to save CPU and battery life. Native Look & Feel Blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11 UI. Smart detection for light and dark taskbar themes ensures text is always visible. Intelligent & Adaptive Positioning Automatically finds empty space next to your system tray and shifts to make room for new icons, preventing overlaps. Seamless OS Integration Behaves like a native Windows component. Hides instantly with auto-hiding taskbar Hides when a fullscreen app is active Smart Network Monitoring Accurate by Default: Auto mode identifies your main internet connection and ignores noise from VPNs or virtual adapters. Easy Interface Selection: Switch effortlessly between Auto, All, or Selected network interfaces via intuitive radio buttons. Total Visual Customization Free Move Mode: Unlock and place the widget anywhere on your screen. Optional Mini-Graph: Real-time graph of recent network activity with adjustable opacity. Color Coding: Customize colors and speed thresholds to quickly see network status. Granular Display Control Text & Font: Adjust font family, size, weight, and alignment. Units: Automatic (B/s, KB/s, MB/s) or fixed Mbps display. Precision: Set decimal places and always show them for uniform appearance. Detailed & Intelligent History Graph Smart Scale: Logarithmic scale shows low-level traffic and large spikes clearly. Per-Interface Filtering: View speed history for specific adapters (Wi-Fi, Ethernet, VPN). Safe & Efficient Data Management: Adjustable retention, automatic cleanup, optimized database. Easy Data Export: Export raw data to .csv or save high-quality graphs for reports. NetSpeedTray v1.3.3: The Updater Fix A stabilization release that repairs a critical regression in v1.3.2: the app shipped without OpenSSL, which silently broke every HTTPS request — including the built-in update checker (the "Could not check for updates" error many of you hit). This release restores it, hardens the build so it can't happen again, and fixes a startup crash plus four other reported bugs. Changes: Fixed update checking — Resolved a critical issue that prevented the app from checking for updates ("Could not check for updates"). Fixed startup crash with Auto-Cycling — The app no longer crashes on launch after enabling Cycle display mode. Fixed incorrect network speeds on 10GbE adapters — Multi-gigabit network cards now display speeds correctly instead of being stuck at 0. Improved color coding — Default color is shown when idle, and color/threshold changes now apply immediately without restarting. Fullscreen visibility fix — The widget now correctly stays visible over fullscreen apps when Keep Visible is enabled. Improved AMD Ryzen temperature detection — More reliable CPU temperature monitoring for Ryzen processors. Cleaner upgrades — Installer now removes outdated application files during upgrades, preventing DLL/version conflicts while preserving user settings. Improved stability — Fixed potential DLL loading issues by excluding critical OpenSSL and NumPy components from UPX compression. Better settings window — Scrollbars removed and layout improved for a cleaner experience. Localization improvements — Updated translations and completed missing UI text across all supported languages. More reliable releases — Added regression tests covering recent critical fixes, bringing the test suite to 196 passing tests. [full release notes] Download: NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 | 87.9 MB (Open Source) Download: NetSpeedTray Portable | 101.0 MB View: NetSpeedTray Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
    • Putin was behind Farage/Brexit and behind Trump/MAGA. Different idiot lying beasts, same fascist master. Same screwed up results for both nations.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      217
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      154
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!