Israel 'has 150 nuclear weapons'


Recommended Posts

Seriously doubt that if Iran had nukes, they would use them. Seriously doubt it.

I don't. Hell he even claimed that the Holocaust was a lie.

The reason of a nuke in the middle east is whoever has it, pretty much secures their future. If say Lebanon got the nuke before Israel, it makes Lebanon more powerful and Israel can't do much about it. Not that it means if Israel attacks, lebanon would drop a nuke on them. It works the same way if Israel got a nuke. It's a deterant, and thats pretty much it.

Though there are some people who would use the nuke if they ever got their hands on it, and I think that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is one of them.

Here we go again with the "I'm sure Iran or extremist terrorist groups would use nukes".

These guys are nuts, but not entirely stupid.

Just imagine the chain of events that would follow the moment after the launch of a nuclear warhead aimed at a city, any city regardless if it's on Jews or Muslims or Caucasians, you name it and there will be a price to pay. It certainly won't go unnoticed and whoever fired it better be ready to get his ass kicked because I don't think the world (America) would respond very cordially, especially if Israel would get hit.

If someone does decide to launch a nuke, it still won't break into a nuclear war because we all know what that would lead, totally nothing except ****ing us over.

Here we go again with the "I'm sure Iran or extremist terrorist groups would use nukes".

These guys are nuts, but not entirely stupid.

Just imagine the chain of events that would follow the moment after the launch of a nuclear warhead aimed at a city, any city regardless if it's on Jews or Muslims or Caucasians, you name it and there will be a price to pay. It certainly won't go unnoticed and whoever fired it better be ready to get his ass kicked because I don't think the world (America) would respond very cordially, especially if Israel would get hit.

If someone does decide to launch a nuke, it still won't break into a nuclear war because we all know what that would lead, totally nothing except ****ing us over.

Well if say terrorist groups cared what the worlds thinks, they wouldn't exist now would they? If they can get on a bus/plane, into a shopping mall etc etc and kill innocent people, you think they give a crap about what the world thinks if they launch a nuke?

Also, there was a time when building a nuke required knowledge not many people possessed. Let alone the parts. Today building a nuke is like putting together your computer, the tools are commonplace, the knowledge is readily available etc. Only difficult thing it requires is to get your hands on some uranium/plutonium.

When you say that a person is a Fruitcake what does that means?

Means they're mad/insane etc though I've also seen it used to mean gay.

to those asking, all atomic bombs are nuclear bombs. But not all nuclear bombs are atomic bombs. Some nuclear bombs are hydrogen bombs.

There are two types of nukes:

The atomic bomb (A-bomb), which generates energy by nuclear fission.

The hydrogen bomb (H-bomb), which generates energy by nuclear fusion. Much more powerful than the A-bomb.

Anyway I can see the USA going to war because the weapons Israelis have can be used for mass destructions ( because the ones in the USA obviously can't :rolleyes: )

You on crack? :|

USA and Israel would prob never go to war with each other...

Yeah cause of the holy land and what not... Just wait till oil prices soar a bit more :p

Edit: I remember reading a book on freaky-maybe-true world domination stories, on how the "holy land" aka jerusalem, Israel, controlled all the major governments in the world... Wait I forgot my tin foil hat :p

Then I think you mean Saudi Arabia ;)

Nope, Seriously, wait till oil prices soar a bit more, the USA will start drilling down your backyard... Any way, we're drifting...

On topic: Big deal, nuke smuck, Whats the purpose of having so many nukes stored E-nuke-penis? if 20 maybe less would cause global chaos.

There are real violations going on in places in Burma. where the Military Junta prevented medical and food aid when 100,000 died from hurricane. not to mention Tibet,China... thats just in my neighborhood. Then you got Darfur, African conflicts, Zimbabwe....,, Terrorists.

anything to detract the real issue of terrorism

You people put the whole continent of Africa in it's conflict because of Africa's mineral resources. You turn their people against each other, further divide them and take what doesn't belong to you for yourselfs.

Make no mistake that any argument or comeback against this truth you will only dig yourself a bigger hole amongst the other lies you have spoken.

I wander why no one asks Israel to open up for inspections from IAEA. Anyone else find it hypocritical that they and their allies complain about Iran not being open while ignoring that Israel has never allowed inspections?

There are real violations going on in places in Burma. where the Military Junta prevented medical and food aid when 100,000 died from hurricane. not to mention Tibet,China... thats just in my neighborhood. Then you got Darfur, African conflicts, Zimbabwe....,, Terrorists.

There have been documented cases where ambulances with pregnant women or ill people have been prevented to going past checkpoints and people dying as a result, but anyway, thats beyond the point.

Seriously doubt that if Iran had nukes, they would use them. Seriously doubt it.
Here we go again with the "I'm sure Iran or extremist terrorist groups would use nukes".

<snipped>

(Y)

Terrorists might do it since it would be (almost) impossible to put the blame on a country but Iran isn't stupid. They would be asking, heck begging, to be completely wiped out if they even dared to point a nuke at a western ally. The US was ready to nuke the Soviets when they wanted to put nukes in Cuba, Iran knows what the consequences would be, especially considering they are much less powerful then what the Soviets were.

What else would you expect from a peanut farmer?

:rolleyes: Can't respond to what he says, so attack him personally.

So what if he was a peanut farmer, he's gotten further then you ever will and contributed more then you ever will.

The World is full of selfish pricks, selfish countries, selfish governments and so on. No country should have nukes, what makes you think that, you can have nukes but not your neighbour! There is so much injustice in this pile of ****ty World. If you have the so called "rights" to have nukes for blah blah reasons than expect everyone around you and everywhere else to have them too. What ****es me off is the countries such as UK and USA complaining about Iran and other middle east having nukes and they will use it against us blah blah.

No country has any rights to tell another country what to do and how to do things. Its like hey I can have a car but my neighbour should not be allowed to have one! I wonder how all these western countries would feel if Iran e.g told them that they are not allowed to have nukes but Iran itself is..!

Anyway this thread is pointless, woow Israel has nukes, yeah would of been a woow if Iran was the only one to have them but that's not the case is it! So far in history we know only one country has used a nuke and no need for naming it.

One thing for sure that we know is that, who ever pulls the trigger (press the button) on those nukes first, we are pretty much wiped out.

Edited by M.F.D.K

You think Iran would use nuclear weapons if it has one?

In your dreams. No country... I mean NO country would use one against Israel or Russia or the US because if it did, then the country would cease to exist in a month. Its cities will be decimated without any forethought.

The Iranian government is not stupid in one way. They were elected to lead the country because of the ridiculous involvement of the US when Iran tried to nationalize its oil.

I love people refuse to look at the whole perspective from an unbiased perspective. It's like fanboys but on a political scale. Apple vs. Mac = Israel lobby vs. Iran/Middle Eastern lobby.

Would anyone EVER use nukes against Israel? Here is one reason why, it's a holy site for MANY reigions... would would they destroy their own holy land?

It's only a small area of land. The term "holy" is only added because it has sentimental value for religious people. Military leaders and presidents don't look at things emotionally.

Would anyone EVER use nukes against Israel? Here is one reason why, it's a holy site for MANY reigions... would would they destroy their own holy land?

Exactly. Imagine the reaction from the Muslim and Jewish community if a country blew up Al Aqsa mosque. The retaliation from the other governments would be the last of their worry.

It's only a small area of land. The term "holy" is only added because it has sentimental value for religious people. Military leaders and presidents don't look at things emotionally.

No, but they would consider the possible consequences of their actions, and blowing up something with such religious importance is asking for major trouble. In the case of Iran, nuking that area would be suicide.

No, but they would consider the possible consequences of their actions, and blowing up something with such religious importance is asking for major trouble. In the case of Iran, nuking that area would be suicide.

I was just clarifying that people don't like to mess around with Jereusalem and such places because too many people hold that land in high regard even though it's just a piece of land. When push comes to shove and someone is threatened or wants revenge then it wouldn't even matter if it's holy land or not.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • We now know when and how the Universe may truly end by Sayan Sen Image by Marek Pavlík via Pexels| Not representative A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. The research, published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, was conducted by Tye, Horace White Professor of Physics Emeritus at Cornell University. Using recent observations from major dark-energy surveys, Tye and his collaborators developed a cosmological model that predicts the universe could have a total lifespan of about 33 billion years. Since the universe is currently estimated to be 13.8 billion years old, the model places it near the midpoint of its existence. According to Cornell University's summary of the research, the study centers on the cosmological constant, a term introduced by Albert Einstein in his theory of general relativity. In modern cosmology, the cosmological constant is commonly used to describe the simplest form of dark energy, the unknown phenomenon believed to be driving the accelerating expansion of the universe. "For the last 20 years, people believed that the cosmological constant is positive, and the universe will expand forever," Tye said in a Cornell University news release. "The new data seem to indicate that the cosmological constant is negative, and that the universe will end in a big crunch." The study draws on data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), two major projects designed to investigate the nature of dark energy. According to Tye, recent observations suggest that dark energy may not behave exactly like a simple cosmological constant. To account for those observations, Tye and his collaborators proposed a model involving an extremely light hypothetical particle that evolves over time. In their calculations, this produces a negative cosmological constant and leads to a future collapse of the universe. The model predicts that cosmic expansion would continue for approximately another 11 billion years before reaching a maximum size, after which the universe would begin contracting and eventually collapse. Scientists have long debated how the universe might end. As explained in an article published in The Conversation by Stephen DiKerby of Michigan State University, several possibilities have been proposed. If dark energy remains constant and positive, the universe could continue expanding indefinitely, gradually becoming colder, darker and more diffuse in a scenario often called the "heat death" of the universe. Other theoretical possibilities include a Big Rip, in which cosmic expansion accelerates so dramatically that galaxies, stars and even atoms are torn apart, or a Big Crunch, in which expansion reverses and the universe collapses back into an extremely dense state. DiKerby notes that the Big Crunch idea itself is not new. What distinguishes Tye's work is that it attempts to use current observational data to estimate when such a collapse might occur and how it could unfold. Much of the universe's long-term evolution remains uncertain. According to current astrophysical understanding, stars will continue to form and die for billions of years. The Sun, for example, is about halfway through its expected lifespan. Galaxies are also expected to continue merging; the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies are projected to collide several billion years from now. At the same time, the nature of dark energy remains one of the biggest unanswered questions in cosmology. While observations indicate that the universe's expansion is accelerating, scientists still do not know what is causing that acceleration. Future observations may therefore alter current predictions about the cosmos's ultimate fate. Tye emphasized that additional evidence will be needed before firm conclusions can be drawn. DESI continues to collect data, while upcoming observations from missions and observatories including Euclid, SPHEREx and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory are expected to provide more precise measurements of dark energy. "People have said before that if the cosmological constant is negative, then the universe will collapse eventually. That's not new," Tye said. "However, here the model tells you when the universe collapses and how it collapses." For now, the study presents one possible future for the cosmos rather than a settled prediction. Whether the universe ultimately ends in a Big Crunch, expands forever, or follows another path entirely remains an open question that future observations will help answer. Source: Cornell University, The Conversation This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • If you look around on Amazon, some of these are available for $9
    • I’m still using an Xbox One S, so time for an upgrade to play this but as much as I hate Sony, I think I’ll get the ps5 pro
    • I bought this game. Played it for an hour, and then got a refund from Steam. Not a fun game at all.
    • Nothing Ear buds with active noise cancellation are at their lowest price ever with 51% off by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the Nothing Ear wireless earbuds at their lowest price ever with 51% off limited prime deal. The earbuds feature an 11mm dynamic drivers with a ceramic diaphragm, and support high-resolution audio codecs including AAC, SBC, LDAC, and LHDC 5.0. They support active noise cancellation of up to 45dB across a frequency range of up to 5000Hz, and include a smart ANC algorithm, adaptive noise cancellation, and a transparency mode that allows surrounding sounds to be heard when needed. Connectivity is provided via Bluetooth 5.3, with support for multiple profiles including HFP, A2DP, AVRCP, and others. The earbuds also support dual connection, allowing them to be paired with two devices at the same time. Additional features include IP54 water and dust resistance for the earbuds and IP55 for the charging case, in-ear detection, pinch controls, low-latency mode, Google Fast Pair, Microsoft Swift Pair, and a three-microphone system per earbud for clearer voice calls. The Nothing X app, available on Android and iOS, provides access to custom EQ settings, bass enhancement, personal sound profiles, ear tip fit testing, firmware updates, customisable controls, dual-device management, and a find-my-earbuds feature. In terms of battery performance, each earbud has a 46mAh battery and the charging case has a 500mAh capacity. With active noise cancellation (ANC) turned off, the earbuds should offer up to 8.5 hours of playback on a single charge and up to 40.5 hours in total with the charging case. With ANC enabled, playback should last up to 5.2 hours on the earbuds and up to 24 hours with the case. For calls, talk time should reach up to 5 hours on the earbuds and 23 hours with the case when ANC is off, while ANC on should provide up to 4 hours on the earbuds and 18 hours with the case. Finally, fast charging should deliver up to 10 hours of playback from 10 minutes of charging when ANC is disabled. Nothing Ear Wireless Earbuds Bluetooth: $73.15 (Amazon US) - 51% off Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      572
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      173
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      73
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!