Israel 'has 150 nuclear weapons'


Recommended Posts

Seriously doubt that if Iran had nukes, they would use them. Seriously doubt it.

I don't. Hell he even claimed that the Holocaust was a lie.

The reason of a nuke in the middle east is whoever has it, pretty much secures their future. If say Lebanon got the nuke before Israel, it makes Lebanon more powerful and Israel can't do much about it. Not that it means if Israel attacks, lebanon would drop a nuke on them. It works the same way if Israel got a nuke. It's a deterant, and thats pretty much it.

Though there are some people who would use the nuke if they ever got their hands on it, and I think that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is one of them.

Here we go again with the "I'm sure Iran or extremist terrorist groups would use nukes".

These guys are nuts, but not entirely stupid.

Just imagine the chain of events that would follow the moment after the launch of a nuclear warhead aimed at a city, any city regardless if it's on Jews or Muslims or Caucasians, you name it and there will be a price to pay. It certainly won't go unnoticed and whoever fired it better be ready to get his ass kicked because I don't think the world (America) would respond very cordially, especially if Israel would get hit.

If someone does decide to launch a nuke, it still won't break into a nuclear war because we all know what that would lead, totally nothing except ****ing us over.

Here we go again with the "I'm sure Iran or extremist terrorist groups would use nukes".

These guys are nuts, but not entirely stupid.

Just imagine the chain of events that would follow the moment after the launch of a nuclear warhead aimed at a city, any city regardless if it's on Jews or Muslims or Caucasians, you name it and there will be a price to pay. It certainly won't go unnoticed and whoever fired it better be ready to get his ass kicked because I don't think the world (America) would respond very cordially, especially if Israel would get hit.

If someone does decide to launch a nuke, it still won't break into a nuclear war because we all know what that would lead, totally nothing except ****ing us over.

Well if say terrorist groups cared what the worlds thinks, they wouldn't exist now would they? If they can get on a bus/plane, into a shopping mall etc etc and kill innocent people, you think they give a crap about what the world thinks if they launch a nuke?

Also, there was a time when building a nuke required knowledge not many people possessed. Let alone the parts. Today building a nuke is like putting together your computer, the tools are commonplace, the knowledge is readily available etc. Only difficult thing it requires is to get your hands on some uranium/plutonium.

When you say that a person is a Fruitcake what does that means?

Means they're mad/insane etc though I've also seen it used to mean gay.

to those asking, all atomic bombs are nuclear bombs. But not all nuclear bombs are atomic bombs. Some nuclear bombs are hydrogen bombs.

There are two types of nukes:

The atomic bomb (A-bomb), which generates energy by nuclear fission.

The hydrogen bomb (H-bomb), which generates energy by nuclear fusion. Much more powerful than the A-bomb.

Anyway I can see the USA going to war because the weapons Israelis have can be used for mass destructions ( because the ones in the USA obviously can't :rolleyes: )

You on crack? :|

USA and Israel would prob never go to war with each other...

Yeah cause of the holy land and what not... Just wait till oil prices soar a bit more :p

Edit: I remember reading a book on freaky-maybe-true world domination stories, on how the "holy land" aka jerusalem, Israel, controlled all the major governments in the world... Wait I forgot my tin foil hat :p

Then I think you mean Saudi Arabia ;)

Nope, Seriously, wait till oil prices soar a bit more, the USA will start drilling down your backyard... Any way, we're drifting...

On topic: Big deal, nuke smuck, Whats the purpose of having so many nukes stored E-nuke-penis? if 20 maybe less would cause global chaos.

There are real violations going on in places in Burma. where the Military Junta prevented medical and food aid when 100,000 died from hurricane. not to mention Tibet,China... thats just in my neighborhood. Then you got Darfur, African conflicts, Zimbabwe....,, Terrorists.

anything to detract the real issue of terrorism

You people put the whole continent of Africa in it's conflict because of Africa's mineral resources. You turn their people against each other, further divide them and take what doesn't belong to you for yourselfs.

Make no mistake that any argument or comeback against this truth you will only dig yourself a bigger hole amongst the other lies you have spoken.

I wander why no one asks Israel to open up for inspections from IAEA. Anyone else find it hypocritical that they and their allies complain about Iran not being open while ignoring that Israel has never allowed inspections?

There are real violations going on in places in Burma. where the Military Junta prevented medical and food aid when 100,000 died from hurricane. not to mention Tibet,China... thats just in my neighborhood. Then you got Darfur, African conflicts, Zimbabwe....,, Terrorists.

There have been documented cases where ambulances with pregnant women or ill people have been prevented to going past checkpoints and people dying as a result, but anyway, thats beyond the point.

Seriously doubt that if Iran had nukes, they would use them. Seriously doubt it.
Here we go again with the "I'm sure Iran or extremist terrorist groups would use nukes".

<snipped>

(Y)

Terrorists might do it since it would be (almost) impossible to put the blame on a country but Iran isn't stupid. They would be asking, heck begging, to be completely wiped out if they even dared to point a nuke at a western ally. The US was ready to nuke the Soviets when they wanted to put nukes in Cuba, Iran knows what the consequences would be, especially considering they are much less powerful then what the Soviets were.

What else would you expect from a peanut farmer?

:rolleyes: Can't respond to what he says, so attack him personally.

So what if he was a peanut farmer, he's gotten further then you ever will and contributed more then you ever will.

The World is full of selfish pricks, selfish countries, selfish governments and so on. No country should have nukes, what makes you think that, you can have nukes but not your neighbour! There is so much injustice in this pile of ****ty World. If you have the so called "rights" to have nukes for blah blah reasons than expect everyone around you and everywhere else to have them too. What ****es me off is the countries such as UK and USA complaining about Iran and other middle east having nukes and they will use it against us blah blah.

No country has any rights to tell another country what to do and how to do things. Its like hey I can have a car but my neighbour should not be allowed to have one! I wonder how all these western countries would feel if Iran e.g told them that they are not allowed to have nukes but Iran itself is..!

Anyway this thread is pointless, woow Israel has nukes, yeah would of been a woow if Iran was the only one to have them but that's not the case is it! So far in history we know only one country has used a nuke and no need for naming it.

One thing for sure that we know is that, who ever pulls the trigger (press the button) on those nukes first, we are pretty much wiped out.

Edited by M.F.D.K

You think Iran would use nuclear weapons if it has one?

In your dreams. No country... I mean NO country would use one against Israel or Russia or the US because if it did, then the country would cease to exist in a month. Its cities will be decimated without any forethought.

The Iranian government is not stupid in one way. They were elected to lead the country because of the ridiculous involvement of the US when Iran tried to nationalize its oil.

I love people refuse to look at the whole perspective from an unbiased perspective. It's like fanboys but on a political scale. Apple vs. Mac = Israel lobby vs. Iran/Middle Eastern lobby.

Would anyone EVER use nukes against Israel? Here is one reason why, it's a holy site for MANY reigions... would would they destroy their own holy land?

It's only a small area of land. The term "holy" is only added because it has sentimental value for religious people. Military leaders and presidents don't look at things emotionally.

Would anyone EVER use nukes against Israel? Here is one reason why, it's a holy site for MANY reigions... would would they destroy their own holy land?

Exactly. Imagine the reaction from the Muslim and Jewish community if a country blew up Al Aqsa mosque. The retaliation from the other governments would be the last of their worry.

It's only a small area of land. The term "holy" is only added because it has sentimental value for religious people. Military leaders and presidents don't look at things emotionally.

No, but they would consider the possible consequences of their actions, and blowing up something with such religious importance is asking for major trouble. In the case of Iran, nuking that area would be suicide.

No, but they would consider the possible consequences of their actions, and blowing up something with such religious importance is asking for major trouble. In the case of Iran, nuking that area would be suicide.

I was just clarifying that people don't like to mess around with Jereusalem and such places because too many people hold that land in high regard even though it's just a piece of land. When push comes to shove and someone is threatened or wants revenge then it wouldn't even matter if it's holy land or not.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!