Policy regarding OS X on non-Apple Hardware

By Marshalus
in Site Announcements

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

Marshalus Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted (edited)

Discussion of OS X on non-Apple hardware is allowed on Neowin. The amendment to the rules was conclusively made after much discussion among our staff. The primary reasoning behind this is a 1984 Federal Court ruling specifically makes it illegal for a company to force their users to install the OS on specific hardware. Which is ultimately the reason we're now allowing this discussion.

Note: Be aware though that Apple has a right to deny you support and service for OS X with a breach of the EULA. Neowin will not be held responsible in the event you void your warranty or support contracts.

Also please be mindful that Neowin still has a strong policy against warez of any kind and thus any discussion on illegally obtained copies of Mac OS X and such will be dealt with accordingly.

In order to differentiate new support threads in the forums, tagging your thread title with [OSx86] is now necessary.

Example: [OSx86] Can't get wireless card to be recognized

We do not intend to remove or amend warnings or other restrictions on accounts for previous violations of this rule because at the time the warning was placed on the account, these were the rules of Neowin.

Thank you for your understanding and patience.

Edited by Hurmoth
Grand Master

+Fahim S. MVC

Posted
  • MVC
Posted

hmm - not sure I agree with this. The EULA is contract and hence a binding agreement, so it is against the law to do this, to install it is circumvention. Just my opinion.

Grand Master

Mathachew Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

I think the big question would be, how do you discuss OSX on non-Apple hardware without it being warez? Aren't the OSX install discs setup with a mechanism to identify if the system is an Apple one? Bypassing this would violate the EULA, wouldn't it?

Call me crazy, but it seems that any method of getting OSX on non-Apple hardware would be illegal. I'm no expert on legal matters, so I admit I may not be considering something, but it seems that OSX running on non-Apple hardware and it being illegal are mutually inclusive.

Grand Master

Hurmoth

Posted
Posted
the change... why?

Simply put, "a 1984 U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision held that a software publisher can't require consumers to run an operating system on a specific type of hardware." The US Supreme Court has refused to hear the case, so at this point it is legal for anyone who owns a copy of OS X (Leopard) to install it on any other hardware. The only thing Apple can do is refuse you support. That's where we come in.

I think the big question would be, how do you discuss OSX on non-Apple hardware without it being warez?

The install, as far as I've read, requires some films to be altered, but that isn't illegal, only against the EULA with Apple.

Grand Master

giga Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

1. The Mac OS X EULA is an agreement between the end-user and Apple.

2. A violation of the EULA is not illegal, as it's not breaking any US laws.

Apple has a right to deny you support for running OS X not on one of their machines, but they can't literally "sue" you for it. There are no chips or anything to identify a computer as a Mac or non-Mac on the OS X disc--supposedly people have done vanilla installs through EFI emulation.

Again: Please be mindful that Neowin still has a strong policy against warez of any kind and thus any discussion on illegally obtained copies of Mac OS X and such will be dealt with accordingly.

That means any references or discussions on illegal ways of obtaining OS X will cost you. This is the same for any other commercial software such as Windows.

That being said, why doesnt OSx86 get its own section?

We're trying to simplify the forum. That's why we're asking everyone to use tags for osx86 threads.

Grand Master

markwolfe Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted
hmm - not sure I agree with this. The EULA is contract and hence a binding agreement, so it is against the law to do this, to install it is circumvention. Just my opinion.

I seriously agree with you on this, big time!

The reasons given for allowing EULA-violating discussion can also be equally applied to warezing Vista. After all, that agreement is between Microsoft and the end user.

Why is OSX86 "ok", and Vista copying "forbidden"?

Grand Master

Mathachew Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted
1. The Mac OS X EULA is an agreement between the end-user and Apple.

2. A violation of the EULA is not illegal, as it's not breaking any US laws.

Apple has a right to deny you support for running OS X not on one of their machines, but they can't literally "sue" you for it. There are no chips or anything to identify a computer as a Mac or non-Mac on the OS X disc--supposedly people have done vanilla installs through EFI emulation.

Again: Please be mindful that Neowin still has a strong policy against warez of any kind and thus any discussion on illegally obtained copies of Mac OS X and such will be dealt with accordingly.

That means any references or discussions on illegal ways of obtaining OS X will cost you. This is the same for any other commercial software such as Windows.

We're trying to simplify the forum. That's why we're asking everyone to use tags for osx86 threads.

Gotcha, I'm not against this, I just didn't fully see how this could coincide without warez activity occurring, but obviously I was wrong.

Grand Master

Hurmoth

Posted
Posted
Why is OSX86 "ok", and Vista copying "forbidden"?

Vista copying? OSX86 is "ok" as long as the user has a valid copy of OS X. If s/he doesn't, then it is warez. The same goes for Vista, as long as someone has a valid copy of Vista, then we support here.

The EULA is not a binding contract. The EULA is a contract only between you and the company, the worst they can do is sue the user and considering the 1984 case, Apple will lose.

Mentor

+Steve B Subscriber²

Posted
  • Subscriber²
Posted

Forgive the dense question but, can you go out and buy the Apple OS and install it without any issues in terms of compatibility? How would that work. I understand Apple may not grant me support but, I would be willing to give it a try if I know it will work.

Grand Master

giga Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted
I'm going to cry :'(

Why? Think positive--people will be a lot more open to OS X now and there are even examples above where they're now buying a mac because of their experience with it.

Forgive the dense question but, can you go out and buy the Apple OS and install it without any issues in terms of compatibility? How would that work. I understand Apple may not grant me support but, I would be willing to give it a try if I know it will work.

There are and always will be issues with compatibility on non-supported hardware. I'm not sure myself what works and doesn't since I don't run osx86.

Grand Master

+StevoFC MVC

Posted
  • MVC
Posted
Vista copying? OSX86 is "ok" as long as the user has a valid copy of OS X. If s/he doesn't, then it is warez. The same goes for Vista, as long as someone has a valid copy of Vista, then we support here.

But owning a valid copy of OS X and installing a hacked version of it on a pc are 2 totally different things.

How is it still valid if you change core files within the OS to get it installed?

Grand Master

MasterC

Posted
Posted

I have to say I disagree with this. I'm willing to say whoever has a Hackintosh has not obtained OS X legally, therefor any discussion of it would fall under the warez category. Like .fahim said, the EULA is a contract that you agree to, and breaking it would be against the law. Personally, I think this is a big step backwards. I'm curious as to what Cara has to say.

Oh and I'm with StevoFC on this. Thanks for telling people they need to put the [OSx86] tag on their post - it's going to be a big help in letting me know which threads to ignore. ;)

Grand Master

giga Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted
Didn't William get banned for linking to a screen with an icon of OSX on it? And now this? Seems a bit two faced.. Would like to know more..

Jesus guys:

Also please be mindful that Neowin still has a strong policy against warez of any kind and thus any discussion on illegally obtained copies of Mac OS X and such will be dealt with accordingly.

We don't publicly discuss bans anyhow.

Grand Master

markwolfe Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted
Vista copying? OSX86 is "ok" as long as the user has a valid copy of OS X. If s/he doesn't, then it is warez. The same goes for Vista, as long as someone has a valid copy of Vista, then we support here.

The EULA is not a binding contract. The EULA is a contract only between you and the company, the worst they can do is sue the user and considering the 1984 case, Apple will lose.

So, a user can violate the Apple EULA, as long as they bought one install media.

Likewise for Vista? If I purchase a boxed copy, I can freely violate the EULA on Neowin and install it on numerous PCs and get support?

Sounds crazy, if true!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Creative Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe review: your headphones will love it

      By Taliseian · Posted

      I'm not sure about that, but it at least "does" a version of 7.1 that this brand new card doesn't....
    • Floorp 12.15.2

      By Copernic · Posted

      Floorp 12.15.2 by Razvan Serea Floorp is a cutting-edge web browser that combines the trusted foundation of Mozilla's Firefox with a unique Japanese perspective, offering users an exceptional online experience. This open-source browser prioritizes privacy, customization, and security. Floorp is transparent, with no user tracking or data sharing, and it's completely open source. With a strict no-tracking policy and full transparency, your personal information remains private. As an open-source project, Floorp not only shares its source code but also its build environment, inviting users to contribute and build their unique versions. The regular updates, based on Firefox ESR, ensure that you always have the latest features and security enhancements. Floorp key features: Strong Tracking Protection: Floorp offers robust tracking protection, safeguarding users from malicious tracking and fingerprinting on the web. Flexible Layout: Customize Floorp's layout to your heart's content, including moving the tab bar, hiding the title bar, and more for a personalized browsing experience. Switchable Design: Choose from five distinct designs for the Floorp interface, and even switch between OS-specific designs for a unique look Regular Updates: Based on Firefox ESR, Floorp receives updates every four weeks, ensuring up-to-date security even before Firefox's releases. No User Tracking: Floorp prioritizes user privacy by abstaining from collecting personal information, tracking users, or selling user data, with no affiliations with advertising companies. Completely Open Source: The full source code for Floorp is open to the public, allowing transparency and enabling anyone to explore and build their own version. Dual Sidebar: Floorp features a versatile built-in sidebar for webpanels and browsing tools, making it perfect for multitasking and quick access to bookmarks, history, and websites. Flexible Toolbar & Tab Bar: Customize your browser with Tree Style Tabs, vertical tabs, and bookmark bar modifications, catering to both beginners and experts in customization. User-Centric Web Experience: Floorp prioritizes user privacy and collaboratively blocks harmful trackers. Floorp 12.15.2 changelog: fix: reset tab drag state on dragend to prevent position offset (#2488) by @Ryosuke-Asano in #2497 fix(workspaces): hide split view wrapper when all tabs are hidden by @Ryosuke-Asano in #2495 fix(split-view): prevent stuck pointer-events:none after drag on web content by @Ryosuke-Asano in #2492 feat(design): add Gecko 152 CSS variable aliases and Lepton compatibility layer by @Ryosuke-Asano in #2494 fix(workspaces): exitOnLastTabClose no longer quits Floorp when closing the last tab by @Ryosuke-Asano in #2498 Download: Floorp 64-bit | 95.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Floorp Website | Github Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2 to finally get one of the most requested features

      By WaltC · Posted

      I can barely recall getting web results from a file search... I must've turned it off long ago. 26H2 is Insider's Preview build 26300.8697, which I am running, atm. It is not available for people running the standard commercial builds of Windows--only for the beta test Insider's group. But anyway, as mentioned in the thread, this feature has been around for a long time...
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2 to finally get one of the most requested features

      By Fleet Command · Posted

      Speak for yourself. I saw it on Feedly, came here to read it, and did read it until the steps to activate. I skipped them to read the last paragraph. I knew it was probably not "the most requested feature", but knowing Neowin, I knew the article was going to talk about a feature nonetheless. I've seen Neowin in its best and worst.
    • I restored the default settings to Secure Boot. Big mistake

      By +Warwagon · Posted

      See if this article I wrote the other day works for you.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      185
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      84
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!