Recommended Posts

I would think it wouldn't be a problem as SDHC uses Fat32, which should have a limit of 32 gig. I'm not sure if the camera limits it further.

Honestly, I'd probably go for a higher class card so your pictures transfer faster to and from the card rather than getting a ginormous amount of space you'll probably never use. I shoot raw on my D80 and get 82 pics per 1gig. make that 32 gig and that's 2624 pictures. Will you ever use that in one outing?

I've actually used up 30 gbs on one outting, that was using all 2 and 4gb cards, i can actually get a 32gb for about 100 dollars. so cost wouldn't be an issue for me. I can get a 4gb for about 80 dollars at my local store.

I was also looking at a 16gb card, cause it seemed more cost effective ot me, to either get 32gb rather then a bunch of 4gbs or 8gbs.

I can also shoot up to 5000+ photos on one sitting. When I shoot I normally am not able to carry all my gear, so It was easier to just have one large card, then a bunch of small ones which I would end up losing on my treks through my town.

Normally 3 - 4 on average. But I usually do that once a month. Im usually out for about 5 - 6 hours and can easily polish that many off.

But back on topic.

So pretty much just stick with a bunch of smaller cards like at least a few 8gbs, instead of the 32gb?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It is silly there is no simple way to check whether this profile has been activated. CFRs are normal, but trying to even hide the fact if it's on / off seems silly, especially for something so user-facing. Surely Microsoft is "proud" of their engineering efforts on this one and ought to display it somwhere in the GUI.
    • Many Linux distros are not known for excellent battery life, so I'm not sure that is the best example. A more apt example may be Apple, but Apple's CPUs are simply far more efficient than Intel & AMD at single-threaded tasks like these, so "boosting" is not as power-hungry and less heat-inducing. Not to mention Apple will hardly engage P-cores for basic UI tasks; they use a pretty complicated QoS scheme to only activate P-cores for more serious workloads like HTML / JS execution or decompression or application launch. Microsoft is (smartly) doing it for launch, but also for UI tasks, which is the more nonsensical part: why ... do Windows 11's UIs need modern CPUs to boost? It should load so quickly that there's not even time for the CPU to boost.
    • I've not seen any controlled testing and, judging by Microsoft's mentality, within a year, they'll have added so much more bloat, it'll undo any perceptible latency benefit and we'll have boosted the CPU clocks for nothing.
    • It depends: heat soak is a thing. Initially on cold boot-up, the heatsinks & heatpipes are at ambient temp. After heatsinks & heatpipes warm up (through normal usage), they don't immediately cool to ambient temp when the load goes away. So their baseline is higher and the trigger point for fans is much less stress. Add a few more CPU spikes → it's too hot to stay at the same fan RPM → fans get triggered to start up up much sooner / get triggered to ramp much more quickly.
    • Can LibreOffice just shut up and worry about themselves and stop comparing themselves? Do we see Microsoft complaining about euro office?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!