ESET receives its 50th Virus Bulletin VB100 award


Recommended Posts

ESET Secures Record-Breaking 50th Virus Bulletin Award for Security Excellence

June 04, 2008

Detects 100 Percent of Viruses, Worms and Bots with Zero False Positives

San Diego, June 4, 2008 – ESET?, the leader in proactive threat protection, today announced it has captured a record 50th VB100 award from Virus Bulletin, a widely-respected independent comparative testing group. ESET is the first company to reach the 50-award milestone.

Virus Bulletin introduced its first VB100 award in 1998, and conducts several comparatives every year, rotating its platforms between Linux, Windows, Windows servers and Novell Netware. In order to display the VB100 logo, an antivirus product must meet two criteria: (1) Demonstrate it detects all "In-the-Wild" viruses during both on-demand and on-access scanning; and, (2) Generate no false positives when scanning a set of clean files. Since the inception of VB100 awards in 1998, ESET's antivirus products boast a success rate of over 96 percent — the industry's highest. Most antivirus vendors have success ratios in the 50 – 75 percent range.

"With excellent detection and no false positive issues, ESET has stormed its way to a record 50th VB100 award," said John Hawes of Virus Bulletin. "The ESET installation process proved fast and efficient, and the command line scanner was a joy to operate."

"No other company can claim 50 VB100 awards, and we are very pleased to be the first," said Anton Zajac, CEO of ESET, LLC. "I want to personally thank our employees, and notably the research and development teams that continue to produce security software's most proactive, precise, lightweight and fast product."

ESET File Security for Linux — the subject of this month's testing — is powered by ThreatSense? technology, an advanced heuristics engine that enables proactive detection of malware not covered by even the most frequently updated signature-based products. Unlike traditional approaches, ESET solutions decode and analyze executable code in real-time, using an emulated environment. By allowing malware to execute in a secure virtual world, ESET is able to clearly differentiate between benign files and even the most sophisticated and cleverly-disguised malware.

i don't get VB100...they give out 100% awards when it's painfully clear that not a single vendor is actually capable of 100%

Maybe read: VB100 Testing Procedure. See what you think.

I place a fair amount of trust in this test and it's a great award to earn.

I still refuse to pay for security software for my PC on top of Vista Ultimate's extreme price.

*shrug* so do the survey, you might get the software for free for a year. Or just go and use AVG or something, whatever.

What, do you want a medal or a certificate for not using security software?! :huh:

Great product, although all v3 release i have tried on server seem to cause network errors, have to use 2.7 on the server and latest 3 on the workstations.

I was using v3 on Server 2K8...didn't have any problems, but there was a separate version that needed to be used. I think it was called "business edition." It looks like I have the smart security rather than the anti-virus and it is version 3.0.642 (probably newer ones, but I don't take the time to upgrade each time a minor update hits.)

Great product, although all v3 release i have tried on server seem to cause network errors, have to use 2.7 on the server and latest 3 on the workstations.

We still install 2.7 all around. You need the new RA to manage 3.0 clients in an enterprise, and it has a totally different install and package procedure than 2.7 does.

As they always say, "The proof is in the pudding".

Considering I had to remove Kaspersky last night off a customer's pc to solve a problem, well. It speaks for itself :)

Go NOD! (Y)

I dumped KIS 2009 from my PC last night also.

Apparently the support forums at Kaspersky only care if you're there praising their product, if you need help, it automatically something 'you have done' and never the product. :ermm: Anyway, after internet slowdowns, rampant memory leaks and a BSOD - I waved goodbye to Kaspersky's product. What a shame. I think they rushed the latest product to the market before it was really ready.

(Y) ESET, mighty fine product.

(Y) ESET, mighty fine product.

Aren't you the one who said Avira was better than NOD32? Seems a strange about turn.

Scirwode

In detection - yes. In performance and because NOD32 is yet to throw up false positives, it's the best IMHO.

Yet you were so vehement that Avira was the best in terms of performance and detection. And by your words, NOD32 is the best overall. In truth, what I'm saying has little to no meaning, but I find it strange that you were calling someone a liar in one thread for saying NOD32 is the best when here you are saying the exact same thing. So you can understand why I find it astonishing for you to say something so different here when your other thread was a whole different kettle of fish altogether.

Regardless it doesn't really matter, as my loyalties are not to a company, but to how the product works for me. If it doesn't work, I move on to what's best, it's as simple as that.

Scirwode

I guess I'm fickle or picky. Not sure. Either way. I happily parted with my $ to get an ESET license for NOD32. ;)

If you feel it is the best for you, then good (Y) . Let's all just be happy with what we have and hope that it does the job that it sets out to do, can't everyone just be happy with that?

Scirwode

Edited by Scirwode
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google reportedly limited Meta's Gemini access over limited AI compute by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly limiting Meta's use of its Gemini AI models after Meta tried buying more computing capacity than even Google could supply. According to the Financial Times, Google told Meta in March that it could not provide the full Gemini capacity that Meta had requested. This shortfall even disrupted and delayed some of Meta's internal projects. Due to this, Meta even told its employees internally to use AI tokens more efficiently. Meta wasn't the only one to get hit by this sudden refusal by Google; even other customers were affected. But Meta was hit harder because of its unusually high demand for Google's models. The move from Google makes it evident that companies all over are in limited supply of both infrastructure and compute. Alphabet said in April that Google Cloud revenue grew 63% year-over-year to $20 billion in the first quarter, helped by enterprise AI infrastructure and AI solutions. In pursuit of more compute, Meta had earlier signed a multi-billion-dollar AWS agreement as well as a large AMD GPU deal for AI data centers. But the crunch would be short-lived as both Meta and Google have also ramped up infrastructure investments heavily. Meta said in November that it was committing more than $600 billion in the U.S. by 2028 for AI technology, infrastructure, and workforce expansion. In the first quarter of this year, Meta also raised its expected capital expenditure for 2026 to a range of $125 billion to $145 billion, citing higher component pricing and additional data center costs for future capacity. However, this doesn't make the company immune to the current dependence on outside suppliers. Meta has also spent many years promoting Llama as an open-weight alternative to closed models from Google, OpenAI, and Anthropic. But if the reported reliance on Google's Gemini models is severe enough for internal work to get impacted, then it looks like even frontier labs and Big Tech aren't fully self-sufficient. Source: Financial Times
    • I like to reminisce about the good old days, way back in autumn 2025 when building a gaming machine was fun and the drives were about $150 when you caught a deal. Yes duh, back in the day we had it gone. Then baby Skynet came along, hiding in AI datacenters demanding more processing power until it reached singularity. End of a not totally fictional story.
    • My experience in the past with older Windows 11 builds was not great on unsupported machines but I recently used Rufus to put the latest build on a older 5th Gen Core Thinkpad T that we upgraded with a SATA SSD and 8GB of RAM four years ago when hardware was reasonable and it seemed pretty fast and solid. Customer is very happy with the performance and will probably get four more years out of that venerable laptop that he loves so much. Another customer just retired his Dell Studio laptop from 2009 running Windows 10. It got an SSD over 10 years ago and did everything he needed it to for 17 years but he also retired last year and is happy doing everything on his iPad now.
    • Apple's newest AirTag 2 gets first big discount by Taras Buria In late January 2026, Apple introduced its second-generation AirTag trackers, bringing a refresh to the old model that has been on the market for half a decade. Now, you can get these new trackers at an all-time low price, thanks to the first big discount that brought the price down by 17% on Amazon. While the second-generation AirTag looks identical to its predecessor, it packs meaningful upgrades inside. The second-gen ultrawideband chip works 50% farther than the original AirTag, allowing you to detect lost items in a wider range. In addition, the second-generation AirTag features an upgraded Bluetooth chip for extended range and a significantly louder speaker (up to 50%) so that you can hear it better when locating a lost item. Note that the second-gen AirTag only works with iPhones and iPads that run iOS/iPadOS 26 and newer, so you need a compatible device to use the tracker. Like the original AirTag, the AirTag 2 is available in two packs: one and four pieces. Both are now available at a notable discount on Amazon, and you can purchase them using the links below. Apple AirTag 2 tracker - $24 | 17% off on Amazon Apple AirTag 2 tracker (four-pack) - $89 | 10% off on Amazon Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S.- specific and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I've been on Deezer for over a decade, but glad that Tidal joined them in fighting AI slop. Can't stand such takes as Spotify's: "Spotify's CEO recently pushed back against listeners who call AI music "slop," urging people to stop using the term and instead embrace the creative potential of AI music."
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      536
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      267
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!