Windows Picture and Fax Viewer

By HideAndGoatse
in Digital Camera Lab

 Share

Recommended Posts

Mentor

HideAndGoatse

Posted
Posted

I don't know about the rest of you, but what I've noticed is that many people just use the standard windows picture and fax viewer to open images just to look at them and such. It's quick and fast, doesn't really have to load anything when opening pictures, but I've noticed something with my dSLR photos. On photos that I've taken and consider good, when I open them in the windows viewer, they look blurry and horrible. To fix this I've found out if you click the "Actual Size" button, then click the "Best Fit" button (which basically puts it back to how it was) that it somehow makes the photo look as it should. I'm guessing when you go into actual size that something is registering the detail of the image so when you go back to the best fit it looks good, I don't know. I've started use the Nero viewer and some other ones and they don't have the same problem, they are just slower to use :p . Anyone know why this happens or how to make it just work the first time?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/643501-windows-picture-and-fax-viewer/
Share on other sites
Grand Master

spaceelf

Posted
Posted
I don't know about the rest of you, but what I've noticed is that many people just use the standard windows picture and fax viewer to open images just to look at them and such. It's quick and fast, doesn't really have to load anything when opening pictures, but I've noticed something with my dSLR photos. On photos that I've taken and consider good, when I open them in the windows viewer, they look blurry and horrible. To fix this I've found out if you click the "Actual Size" button, then click the "Best Fit" button (which basically puts it back to how it was) that it somehow makes the photo look as it should. I'm guessing when you go into actual size that something is registering the detail of the image so when you go back to the best fit it looks good, I don't know. I've started use the Nero viewer and some other ones and they don't have the same problem, they are just slower to use :p . Anyone know why this happens or how to make it just work the first time?

It might be easier to download something new than to try to figure that out, since it's probably a design issue.

Windows Live Photo Gallery for example being an update to the Photo Gallery that's in Windows Vista, but also available for XP.

http://get.live.com/photogallery/overview

I don't know if it qualifies as slower or not. I've never noticed any slowdowns. I do believe it's faster than the default Vista photo gallery app though.

Mentor

HideAndGoatse

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I just tried out live viewer. It seems to have close to the same speed when opening jpg's but I'm still seeing a slight blur. Maybe this is just me and my eyes being over critical, but it seems to still be there, not as bad as picture and fax viewer but still there.

*Edit* It is definitely still there, I did the actual size + best fit trick on picture and fax viewer, then opened the same photo in live viewer and if you alt-tab between the two you can see that the picture and fax viewer is more crisp and sharp after the trick is done.

Proficient

Yggdrasilly

Posted
Posted

I have to say that I've recently started using the Windows Live Photo Viewer over the default one in XP, and I like it a lot more. Not exactly sure why, probably the fact that it has the gallery built-in functions and such.

When I was using the default viewer in Vista, however, I noticed that whenever I opened a photo/image with it, the program gave it this sort of yellowish tone. Using the Windows Live version eliminated that, though.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Millions of users to benefit from Windows 11's new performance boost on Adobe Photoshop

      By thartist · Posted

      This sounds like underneath the nice marketing spin, either someone at Adobe got tired of their lazy devs and asked Microsoft to help them sort at least some of Adobe's ancestral spaghetti code to make it go faster, or Microsoft wanted Adobe's crap to run better on Windows to make it look better when compared to Apple, so they offered to intervene. Either way, GOOD.
    • My favorite file manager for Windows 11 finally gets a long-requested feature

      By TarasBuria · Posted

      My favorite file manager for Windows 11 finally gets a long-requested feature by Taras Buria Files is among the best File Explorer alternatives for Windows 10 and 11. This free app is packed with all sorts of features and conveniences, but there is one crucial feature that is still missing—Tree View. Fortunately, the latest update in the Preview channel finally delivers it. With version 4.1.4, which is now available for download in the Preview channel, developers implemented Tree View, a new mode that displays folders in an expandable hierarchy. Windows 11's stock File Explorer always had this feature, but it was nowhere to be found in Files until now. Starting with the latest preview update, you can expand each drive and its nested folders without leaving the current location and then open the folder you need in the main view. To try Tree View in Files, update the app to the latest preview version, then click the small arrow next to a drive to expand its content. The developers say they are rolling out Tree View in Preview first to gather feedback from users and improve the feature before bringing it to all in the stable channel. In addition to Tree View, Files 4.1.14 improves the Windows Fonts folder. You can now preview each font directly in Files with no need to open the built-in font viewer. For now, these two features are only available in the Preview channel. For those using the stable release, developers recently released version 4.1.3, with improvements for the built-in tag system, on-demand folder size calculation, and plenty of various fixes. You can check out the full release notes here. You can download Files from the Microsoft Store (paid version) or its official website (free).
    • Report: Microsoft to use AWS to help GitHub deal with a major surge in demand

      By +LightEco · Posted

      Who is paying for this 30x scale-up? Its sounds expensive.
    • Millions of users to benefit from Windows 11's new performance boost on Adobe Photoshop

      By hellowalkman · Posted

      Millions of users to benefit from Windows 11's new performance boost on Adobe Photoshop by Sayan Sen Despite the advent of AI-generated imagery, Adobe's Photoshop remains one of the most popular tools on this planet. Adobe does not have a publicly reported total user count but it's probably not wrong to assume there are millions. As of 2025, Adobe Creative Cloud has had approximately 41 million paid subscribers, many of whom likely use Photoshop. In addition, more than 166,000 companies worldwide are apparently also using the app. These figures are according to a very recent report by SQ Magazine. Out of them, it is fair to assume that many are probably running Windows. As such, there is good news for these users as Microsoft has announced Photoshop is getting a big 20% performance boost on x86-64 (AMD64) systems and a 13% bump-up on Arm devices. This is definitely great news for them as many have complained about the slow performance and general sluggishness of Photoshop on Windows 11 ever since the advent of the latter back in 2021. If you are wondering how Microsoft managed to do this, the answer lies in a combination of compiler-level optimizations and a technology called Sample Profile Guided Optimization (SPGO). According to Microsoft, Adobe worked closely with the company’s Visual C++ team and adopted the latest MSVC toolchain enhancements together with SPGO to squeeze more performance out of Photoshop’s CPU-bound workloads. Unlike traditional Profile Guided Optimization (PGO), which requires developers to create special instrumented builds and run lengthy training workloads, SPGO gathers performance data directly from optimized release binaries. This means Adobe could collect real-world usage information which gives a major advantage to this technique, as companies could leverage data collected from actual customer workloads rather than only relying on synthetic benchmark runs. In theory, this should allow optimizations to better reflect how users interact with software in the real world. Thanks to this, there are improvements to code layout, function inlining, hot-and-cold code separation, and other low-level tweaks that help processors execute instructions more efficiently. Essentially the compiler is better able to identify “hot” code paths, those which are most frequently executed, and optimize them accordingly.
    • The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months

      By fernan99 · Posted

      "The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months¨ I'd prefer to see the lowest price in over a year

  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      521
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!