The cake is a lie: IE team bakes a treat for Mozilla


Recommended Posts

I think this is an awesome thing to do. Kudos to Microsoft (Y)

+1 again. Firefox is becoming a serious rival to Internet Explorer, but they're not trying to force them out or spread vicious rumours or false information (Apple, anyone? :whistle: ). They congratulate them on their success. It was only the launch, but I think it can officially be deemed a success from day 1, thanks to the Download Day campaign. A very smart move.

I'd just like to offer my congratulations to Mozilla for Firefox 3. It's actually pretty good! It's also good for IE, as FF3 is gonna convince Microsoft to put some extra effort into IE8, so everyone's a winner! :D

.... It might be poisonous!

its-a-trap.jpg

In all seriousness, that's cool though. Microsoft shouldn't be waiting after the competition to improve its products. Sure that's more economical, or at least you might think and have all your guys focused on other projects but look at this now, Firefox is serious and Opera deserves more attention but not enough PR and Marketing stunts on their side.

Maybe it is like the road to the super bowl... where all teams play...then it is down to two... then the loser congratulates the winner. (Just Kidding)...I use them both... Mostly use Firefox except on pages like

http://freedocumentaries.org/index.php

Where Firefox playing long files seems to slow down.

Though I think IE would be like a Ford without a Chevy (the competition) Plus they probably feel that people deserve a choice.

that is just my 2 cents...

Plus they probably feel that people deserve a choice.

Agree with you there. Shame the EU doesn't. There's nothing wrong with bundling your own software with your own operating system. That's the point. Apple do this, and no one cares. Microsoft does it, ridiculous fine!

This whole cake thing has me wondering what Microsoft has in store for Mozilla. I reckon they'll try and work with them on the next IE/Firefox and create a new browser, like "Mozilla Explorer" (yes, it's a crap name). Either that, or they might take the easy way out, and just buy Mozilla! :D

Agree with you there. Shame the EU doesn't. There's nothing wrong with bundling your own software with your own operating system. That's the point. Apple do this, and no one cares. Microsoft does it, ridiculous fine!

This whole cake thing has me wondering what Microsoft has in store for Mozilla. I reckon they'll try and work with them on the next IE/Firefox and create a new browser, like "Mozilla Explorer" (yes, it's a crap name). Either that, or they might take the easy way out, and just buy Mozilla! :D

Behold.. MicroZilla Browser 1.0 :laugh:

http://home.snafu.de/tilman/mozilla/stomps.html

The Netscape/Mozilla and IE teams have been pranking each other and such for years, It's definitely a friendly rivalry.

Edit: Yeah, I can't see MS releasing a GPL'ed web browser.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I've been on Deezer for over a decade, but glad that Tidal joined them in fighting AI slop. Can't stand such takes as Spotify's: "Spotify's CEO recently pushed back against listeners who call AI music "slop," urging people to stop using the term and instead embrace the creative potential of AI music."
    • “Could” … in the IS the healthcare is run by insurance companies that make indecent profits denying basic treatments to people that are paying money for nothing. Besides, where are all the Trump epigones who were stating that the tariffs were going to paid by foreign companies and not the US citizens? …
    • Microsoft Teams gets smarter at spotting sneaky meeting bots by Usama Jawad Microsoft Teams is set to receive a couple of new features soon, including a dedicated Recap app and a rather controversial location tracking functionality. The Redmond tech giant has also explained how it has made online communication and collaboration a lot more performant this year. Now, the company has detailed more secure bot admission mechanisms, as first reported by us in March 2026, and now available in Teams. As the use of AI has expanded across enterprise environments, Microsoft has begun allowing users to integrate bots into their meetings for various tasks, such as note-taking. While this has a tangible productivity benefit for users, Microsoft has highlighted how misconfiguration has allowed bots to join meetings that they shouldn't. This has created security and privacy risks, which Microsoft is now combating using a new Teams admin policy that allows organizers to control how external bots access meetings. Admins can leverage a policy called Manage external bots and their access to meetings. The default configuration is "When detected, require approval before joining", which places detected bots in a lobby before they are explicitly admitted into the meeting. The other option disables the experience. Microsoft has also requested admins to only allow organizers and co-organizers to manage access to a meeting, so that other people don't randomly allow bots into meetings. Teams will now be able to leverage infrastructure signals to intelligently detect and distinguish between bots and humans. Microsoft will soon also trial a registration experience for independent software vendors (ISVs) to build a system that registers a bot with Microsoft, so it is marked as a "known" bot. Teams will also categorize bots as trusted and suspected threats so that organizers can quickly identify which bots they want to allow into a meeting. Additional safeguards to block accidental admission of a bot into a meeting include: No one-click Admit option for identified bots Confirmation prompts when admitting participants that include bots Warnings when organizers choose Admit all, and bots are included Microsoft has begun rolling out this experience, and it will be retiring the current CAPTCHA verification implementation. In the future, the company plans to roll out new capabilities like allow-lists, organization-wide policies, admin reports, audit logs, and more granular controls.
    • With the current hardware prices Microsoft should lift the restriction. Then if you have the correct TPM then allow you to use X feature, if you don't have the correct TPM then don't but still actually let you run windows. 11. With a disclaimer during install that X features would be unavailable.
    • It's good for recycling of course. But commence inflation of a second hand RAM bubble and price gouging on DDR 4 inventory in 3... 2... 1...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      538
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!