Black Apple Hardware / Accessories


Black versions of Apple Hardware / Accessories  

122 members have voted

  1. 1. Would you like to see more Black Versions of Apple's Hardware/Accessories?

    • Yes
      91
    • No
      31


Recommended Posts

  • 4 weeks later...
Emos? You are joking right? Electronics across the board are mainly black by default. Does that make every geek emo? :rolleyes:
Hell Yeah, A Black iMac, Black Mighty Mouse and Black Keyboard would do nicely :D

The only reason I paid for the most expensive MacBook was because it was Black... so is my wallpaper (as in the walls of my room), and so are all my clothes :D

Same reason I bought the Black MacBook too.

My clothes too :D

+1 on the clothes and black MacBook :p

nuff said :p

Ill stick with the white hardware :D

Fine, you get +3. But then I can point at the white Macbook and laugh at it for having inconsistent white colours between the case and the keyboard. I'm sorry but that's one of the sole reasons why I got black. The white paint job is fugly.

Fine, you get +3. But then I can point at the white Macbook and laugh at it for having inconsistent white colours between the case and the keyboard. I'm sorry but that's one of the sole reasons why I got black. The white paint job is fugly.

yeah I would get a black Macbook don't get me wrong. But whats best is that you buy the black one and everything else is white. Apple wins because emo's buy the blackbook and make them buy white accessories. Its pure genius!

:D

I think the Black MacBook looks the coolest but if I could I would get the MacBook Pro why don't they have a black aluminum version :[

For the current time, Apple views their Pro line as a very distinctive appearance line and doesn't want to dilute the brand recognition by adding colors.

When you see a Brushed Metal Notebook, 99% of the time it's a MacBook Pro and people have been trained to think that way. :)

My vote goes to a No on this one.

Apple prides itself on having a limited number of SKU's which make product selection easy for its customers. If Apple started adding Black Accessories then you'd also start seeing the desire to have Brushed Aluminum accessories or whatever color that is released in the future which could potentially triple the number of products that Apple would need to manufacture as well as provide stock for.

K.I.S.S. (Keep it stupidly simple)

So, Apple customers are too stupid to be allowed to pick out what colors they like..?

This is one reason why Apple PC's (yes PC's thats all they are.. dont be brainwashed by commercials on tv) will never become as mainstream as IBM based PC's... there is really little choice... if your a pro you have to have brushed metal! if your an amature here have cheap black or white plastic! thast all you get!

So, Apple customers are too stupid to be allowed to pick out what colors they like..?

Try re-reading what I posted, no where did I say that...

This is one reason why Apple PC's (yes PC's thats all they are.. dont be brainwashed by commercials on tv) will never become as mainstream as IBM based PC's... there is really little choice... if your a pro you have to have brushed metal! if your an amature here have cheap black or white plastic! thast all you get!

And if you buy a Dell (Until E-Series) you had cheap Plastic, or HP had Cheap Plastic, or Acer or a dozen others... The only manufacturer in the major arena that had a non-plastic enclosure standard is Lenovo with their Aluminum/Magnesium case... So I fail to see your argument's point there...

Try re-reading what I posted, no where did I say that...

You said Apple limits its product selection in order to make choices easy for their customer, including limiting the available colors, which is the basis for this discussion. So, paraphrasing here, Apple makes choices easy on customers, by not giving them any? Or is it that they believe their customers are incapable of making choices on their own, even in regards to color selection of peripherals? Call me crazy, but if I don't think someone has the capability to select colors on their own, either I don't think too highly of them, or I believe said individuals should be eating applesauce through a straw.

So which is it?

Try re-reading what I posted, no where did I say that...

And if you buy a Dell (Until E-Series) you had cheap Plastic, or HP had Cheap Plastic, or Acer or a dozen others... The only manufacturer in the major arena that had a non-plastic enclosure standard is Lenovo with their Aluminum/Magnesium case... So I fail to see your argument's point there...

Yet my HP workstation is made out of metal... that is my point! MacBook pro is a "workstation" quality system... so is the MacPro... I wasn't talking about just notebook computers here...

You have way more choices with it comes to designs on the Non-Mac based side... I don't know how you couldn't see that point? I can choose color, shape, size, weight... Apple it's here's 3 models of each type basically and here's the 3 options we give you to choose from hardware that is "compatable" with it... heck if i wanted something i could littearly throw around I could go to a panasonic toughbook... no mac replacement for that yet ;)

You said Apple limits its product selection in order to make choices easy for their customer, including limiting the available colors, which is the basis for this discussion. So, paraphrasing here, Apple makes choices easy on customers, by not giving them any? Or is it that they believe their customers are incapable of making choices on their own, even in regards to color selection of peripherals? Call me crazy, but if I don't think someone has the capability to select colors on their own, either I don't think too highly of them, or I believe said individuals should be eating applesauce through a straw.

So which is it?

Apple doesn't have to make the exact Mac everyone on the planet individually wants, they provide a specific lineup which hits major demographics and therefore keeping their production costs and component requirements down making the choice process more streamlined where a customer can chose the best machine for their use. :) This doesn't imply a customer is not capable of deciding, it simply says that Apple makes it a much more streamlined process by providing a carefully selected, branded, marketed, and designed product lineup. :)

Yet my HP workstation is made out of metal... that is my point! MacBook pro is a "workstation" quality system... so is the MacPro... I wasn't talking about just notebook computers here...

You have way more choices with it comes to designs on the Non-Mac based side... I don't know how you couldn't see that point? I can choose color, shape, size, weight... Apple it's here's 3 models of each type basically and here's the 3 options we give you to choose from hardware that is "compatable" with it...

I agree with you on the first point, 'Workstations' are a different aspect all together. :) Professional quality machines demand a higher level of material construction than your average consumer product. Mac Pro is a perfect example of a workstation vs desktop. :)

With the 3 Apple Notebook types you chose from Color (White/Black/Silver), size (13/15/17-inch), and weight...I don't know any machine that choses shape...that is a new one on me.

Once you've made the selection from Apple's base lineup you then customize it just like you would a Dell/Lenovo/HP... So that is where I don't see where you are coming from...

Your edit about the Toughbook...COMPLETELY different product line, until Dell entered the market with their rugged model no one else had a product like that. Apple does not have a product in that field, no.

Apple doesn't have to make the exact Mac everyone on the planet individually wants, they provide a specific lineup which hits major demographics and therefore keeping their production costs and component requirements down making the choice process more streamlined where a customer can chose the best machine for their use. :) This doesn't imply a customer is not capable of deciding, it simply says that Apple makes it a much more streamlined process by providing a carefully selected, branded, marketed, and designed product lineup. :)

I agree with you on the first point, 'Workstations' are a different aspect all together. :) Professional quality machines demand a higher level of material construction than your average consumer product. Mac Pro is a perfect example of a workstation vs desktop. :)

With the 3 Apple Notebook types you chose from Color (White/Black/Silver), size (13/15/17-inch), and weight...I don't know any machine that choses shape...that is a new one on me.

Once you've made the selection from Apple's base lineup you then customize it just like you would a Dell/Lenovo/HP... So that is where I don't see where you are coming from...

Your edit about the Toughbook...COMPLETELY different product line, until Dell entered the market with their rugged model no one else had a product like that. Apple does not have a product in that field, no.

Lots of companies had "Toughbooks" panasonic wasnt the first and them and Dell currently arnt the only ones making them... as for a little history... Motorola made them, Toshiba, Symbol makes them, Mobilis, lots of IHV's sell them right now...

as for apple only makes certain ones to streamline the production process... that is what is going to get them in trouble someday... their market gets too big they will be a "monopoly" on their own products

Lots of companies had "Toughbooks" panasonic wasnt the first and them and Dell currently arnt the only ones making them... as for a little history... Motorola made them, Toshiba, Symbol makes them, Mobilis, lots of IHV's sell them right now...

as for apple only makes certain ones to streamline the production process... that is what is going to get them in trouble someday... their market gets too big they will be a "monopoly" on their own products

I was only aware of Dell, Panasonic, and Toshiba public marketing 'Toughbook' style machines. :) I didn't know about the others, however, this is still a very specialized market that isn't a general consumer area. :)

Apple will adjust to the demands of the customer as the market-share continues to grow, I do not worry to much about becoming a Monopoly anytime soon so long as Dell is around! ;)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!