Recommended Posts

Windows Vista Media Center Feature Pack 2008

I hate how everything has such long names.

Does it need to have 2008?

Does it need to have Windows Vista?

You just wouldnt catch Apple releasing something with a ridiculously long name.

Why do Macboys keep on bashing normal naming conventions...

Let's break it down .. Windows Vista Media Center Feature Pack 2008...

Windows Vista Media Center... is the product for which it's for as Windows Media Center 2004 en 2005 are both still on the martket and supported.

Feature Pack... explains it a bundle update (easy to recognize by consumers)

2008.. explains it's the 2008 version.

In short this is easier for consumers. If you just say Media Center, people aren't sure if they get 2005 or Vista.

If you say Windows Vista Media Center, people still aren't sure if they are getting the new updates

With Windows Vista Media Center Feature Pack 2008, people are sure they get all the new stuff.

You could also call it Vista MCE FP 2008. It's like SP1 for Vista.. easier for people to recognize it has all the new updates and features.

  • 5 weeks later...

The ONLY new thing ATM is Internet TV, supported in a select region only. This feature pack will, once final, only be released through OEM's preinstalling it. A version obtainable for an already installed PC is currently unplanned.

The ONLY new thing ATM is Internet TV, supported in a select region only. This feature pack will, once final, only be released through OEM's preinstalling it. A version obtainable for an already installed PC is currently unplanned.

ITV has been in media center for over a year. The new things in this release revolve around improved guide and tuner support.

  • 1 month later...
The ONLY new thing ATM is Internet TV, supported in a select region only. This feature pack will, once final, only be released through OEM's preinstalling it. A version obtainable for an already installed PC is currently unplanned.

I reckon it's stupid MS did that, hopefully the OEMs will release it as (free) update for their customers who have already bought Media Centre PCs...but I'm not holding my breath on it though.

  • 2 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have a Motorola, one of the lower end ones, it works fine. It is possible to get rid of the Gemini app and also to disable googles assistant , but A.i is still apps. I try to avoid all LLM A.I, is i can, I use no Ai duck duck go.
    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      189
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!