How irked are Geniuses with a customised Mac?


Recommended Posts

I'm popping down to the Sydney Apple Store's Genius Bar with a software problem. But I've customised my Mac ? the Dock, the default wallpaper, the menu highlights, and the system icons. You know, the usual.

So if present them my MBP how it is, is the Genius going to look at me with that "you smartass" look and give me flack for it? The whole "you're not supposed to touch the System folder; you've brought this on yourself" lecture? Or should I just un-CandyBar everything before I go?

They are trained to look at Mac's that are setup 99% default.

I do agree that by messing with the system folder, you take responsibility for anything unforseen.

However, I do not agree with their attitude towards a customer.

In retail stores, you are trained to understand that 80% of computer problems are down to the user - and if they hear you've been messing with the system folder, this will come to mind automatically.

I'm popping down to the Sydney Apple Store's Genius Bar with a software problem. But I've customised my Mac ? the Dock, the default wallpaper, the menu highlights, and the system icons. You know, the usual.

So if present them my MBP how it is, is the Genius going to look at me with that "you smartass" look and give me flack for it? The whole "you're not supposed to touch the System folder; you've brought this on yourself" lecture? Or should I just un-CandyBar everything before I go?

Just so you know, there is no policy against it as long as you haven't modified anything system related, and if you do have system files changed the worst they will do is require a reinstall of the OS:):)

I've never had any problems with that in the past, normally they want to know where I got the icons I was using;);)

  • 4 weeks later...

In my experience, they don't care. I've changed most of the icons, and when I took my MacBook to the store, they didn't even mention it.

It was for a display problem (very bad colours. Couldn't see the blue strips in lists), which could be software (colour profile) or hardware (bad display). Never went there for a purely software problem. I'd just use Time Machine.

I would strip all customizations before you take it in. Chances are that will be the first thing they blame.

If it is a really obvious hardware problem then it may not matter. If it looks like a software issue then it may.

  • 1 month later...

When I took my iMac in for repair the tech questioned my customized dock. He said changing the files could cause the graphical artifacts I was seeing.

I told him he was full of @#$% and that changing a couple pngs wouldn't harm anything.

He then moved on to other causes. ;)

It was the GPU. Obviously.

Did you literally say that? :p

Yes. He was trying to blame an obvious GPU defect on a little bit of customization (Which meant he wouldn't have ok'd the repair).

Luckily both the artifacts and sudden black screen showed up while he was using it.

They aren't exactly geniuses if they believe actual system errors are caused by modifying the Dock and application/system icons, which are just .png images for the most part. Nearly everyone is using Candybar or a similar app these days, so unless people are just randomly going into the System folder and deleting icons, a customized Mac shouldn't cause any issues.

They aren't exactly geniuses if they believe actual system errors are caused by modifying the Dock and application/system icons, which are just .png images for the most part. Nearly everyone is using Candybar or a similar app these days, so unless people are just randomly going into the System folder and deleting icons, a customized Mac shouldn't cause any issues.

Exactly. I don't see what the whole issue is. A .PNG file that has worked fine for a while after modifying it, won't suddenly bring down the whole system.

Conversly, if you find the system stops working just after you've made a change, that's usually a good indication that something is wrong!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Was it too much to ask to show the icon in this article?
    • Frankly, I blame whoever is writing such articles. "A big improvement/update and/or new feature is now available to everyone! Also, use this unofficial tweak tool to enable it because it actually isn't available to you yet officially and might not in fact even be entirely ready or whatever, hence why it is perhaps not enabled for you*. But it's great and you should enable it!" I mean there's nothing wrong with sharing info about some feature you might need to enable via unofficial means, of course. It's just that these articles tend to essentially end up being two news pieces in one, and one of them tends to be a bit misleading. (*Yes, yes, the "it's a controlled rollout!" thing. Not a fan of that one either. The argument, not the actual rollout.)
    • Thank you. Will do. I read in the release notes that editor config might be at play here.
    • Actually, I think even Microsoft doesn't know how to control it
    • OpenAI is making Codex more useful in Chrome and the cloud by Pradeep Viswanathan OpenAI's Codex now has more than 5 million users, up nearly 4x from earlier this year. To further accelerate Codex's growth among developers, OpenAI today announced that it has agreed to acquire Ona, a company that builds secure cloud execution and orchestration technology for developers. Ona will enable developers to run Codex with persistent and controlled cloud infrastructure for long-running agentic workflows. Right now, most Codex execution happens locally on developers' laptops and PCs, and the agents work continuously for hours. Through Ona, OpenAI aims to make Codex agents keep working for days without being tied to a user’s local machine or an active session. This will be an important capability for enterprises that want to deploy AI agents in production while maintaining control over infrastructure, data, security boundaries, credential scope, logging, and review workflows. Like any acquisition, the deal is still subject to customary closing conditions, including regulatory approvals. Until the deal closes, OpenAI and Ona will continue to operate as separate companies. After closing, Ona’s team will join the Codex team to improve developer workflows. Alongside the Ona acquisition announcement, OpenAI today introduced a few Codex updates. Developers can now save Codex rate limit resets and use them later instead of losing them when they are not needed immediately. OpenAI is also adding a referral option where users can invite a friend to Codex and get a saved rate limit reset. OpenAI today also announced a developer mode for browser use in Chrome and the Codex in-app browser. With this mode, Codex can use the Chrome DevTools Protocol to debug web apps, inspect pages, and work more directly with browser-based development workflows. Developers can use this when they want Codex to profile JavaScript, inspect console output and network traffic, examine web page states including the DOM and applied styles, and more.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      186
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!