How irked are Geniuses with a customised Mac?


Recommended Posts

I'm popping down to the Sydney Apple Store's Genius Bar with a software problem. But I've customised my Mac ? the Dock, the default wallpaper, the menu highlights, and the system icons. You know, the usual.

So if present them my MBP how it is, is the Genius going to look at me with that "you smartass" look and give me flack for it? The whole "you're not supposed to touch the System folder; you've brought this on yourself" lecture? Or should I just un-CandyBar everything before I go?

They are trained to look at Mac's that are setup 99% default.

I do agree that by messing with the system folder, you take responsibility for anything unforseen.

However, I do not agree with their attitude towards a customer.

In retail stores, you are trained to understand that 80% of computer problems are down to the user - and if they hear you've been messing with the system folder, this will come to mind automatically.

I'm popping down to the Sydney Apple Store's Genius Bar with a software problem. But I've customised my Mac ? the Dock, the default wallpaper, the menu highlights, and the system icons. You know, the usual.

So if present them my MBP how it is, is the Genius going to look at me with that "you smartass" look and give me flack for it? The whole "you're not supposed to touch the System folder; you've brought this on yourself" lecture? Or should I just un-CandyBar everything before I go?

Just so you know, there is no policy against it as long as you haven't modified anything system related, and if you do have system files changed the worst they will do is require a reinstall of the OS:):)

I've never had any problems with that in the past, normally they want to know where I got the icons I was using;);)

  • 4 weeks later...

In my experience, they don't care. I've changed most of the icons, and when I took my MacBook to the store, they didn't even mention it.

It was for a display problem (very bad colours. Couldn't see the blue strips in lists), which could be software (colour profile) or hardware (bad display). Never went there for a purely software problem. I'd just use Time Machine.

I would strip all customizations before you take it in. Chances are that will be the first thing they blame.

If it is a really obvious hardware problem then it may not matter. If it looks like a software issue then it may.

  • 1 month later...

When I took my iMac in for repair the tech questioned my customized dock. He said changing the files could cause the graphical artifacts I was seeing.

I told him he was full of @#$% and that changing a couple pngs wouldn't harm anything.

He then moved on to other causes. ;)

It was the GPU. Obviously.

Did you literally say that? :p

Yes. He was trying to blame an obvious GPU defect on a little bit of customization (Which meant he wouldn't have ok'd the repair).

Luckily both the artifacts and sudden black screen showed up while he was using it.

They aren't exactly geniuses if they believe actual system errors are caused by modifying the Dock and application/system icons, which are just .png images for the most part. Nearly everyone is using Candybar or a similar app these days, so unless people are just randomly going into the System folder and deleting icons, a customized Mac shouldn't cause any issues.

They aren't exactly geniuses if they believe actual system errors are caused by modifying the Dock and application/system icons, which are just .png images for the most part. Nearly everyone is using Candybar or a similar app these days, so unless people are just randomly going into the System folder and deleting icons, a customized Mac shouldn't cause any issues.

Exactly. I don't see what the whole issue is. A .PNG file that has worked fine for a while after modifying it, won't suddenly bring down the whole system.

Conversly, if you find the system stops working just after you've made a change, that's usually a good indication that something is wrong!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      576
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      77
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!