Recommended Posts

Hi all!

I want to get in to digital photography - right now, I'm a bit of a newbie. I've been reading up on it, and I want to get an entry-level camera to help me understand it. I'm currently torn between a Canon Powershot G9 and Sony Alpha 200K.

On the one hand, I like the Canon's compact size. I like how it appears to be good for people entering the field, so as you learn about new techniques, you can experiment with manual exposure control. There are also rumors of a G10 coming at Photokina in August, which may help alleviate concerns about noise at higher ISO sensitivities and shooting speed, as well as the lens (some people want a 28mm lens, which as I understand it, has to do with providing a wider angle). I was planning to buy around mid-July, but I can hold off until August.

On the other hand, I like the idea of having a DSLR camera. As I become more experienced in the field, I can buy new lenses and experiment a bit more, and the larger sensor size will allow for better quality images. It's far more flexible than the Canon, but is also bulkier, and probably too complex until I know a bit more about it.

They both support RAW images, whose formats are supported by Mac OS (I'm on a Mac. Want to use Aperture), and both cost about the same (~?270). Both support SDHC cards. The Canon apparently supports Aperture tethering, but it's a bit problematic from what I've read, although that situation might have changed.

So, what do you guys think? Is the Canon a good starting point? Is the Sony too complex to learn from? Are the benefits of a DSLR over the G9 that much better that I can't afford to miss the chance?

Thanks,

Karl

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/645836-powershot-g9-or-alpha-200k/
Share on other sites

I experimented with both models today. I don't like the A200, for the simple reason that it has no LCD preview. Really, for a ?300 camera, it should do. Even if it's not as good as the fancy live preview system on the other models, it should have something. The G9 is a fantastic camera, the conversion lenses are great, and the small size means you can take that fantastic picture quality and control and shoot with it anywhere. Some of the pictures I've seen with the standard lens are amazing.

I've also had a look at the A300. It's ?100 more with an 18-70mm lens (I'm still getting my head around the impact of the focal length). That fancy live preview system is immensely cool. I love how it gives you such a good preview of the DOF. With the Canon, controlling that was a bit hit-and-miss. I got some good pictures eventually, but it took quite a lot of experimenting.

I'm still unsure where I should start with this. I'd like to get in to photography, so do I go full steam ahead and get an SLR? Or do I work my way in to it, first using something less complex, such as the G9? Which is best to learn from?

I experimented with both models today. I don't like the A200, for the simple reason that it has no LCD preview.

Believe me when I say this: you don't want LCD preview. The viewfinder is not only a straight view of what's coming through (instead of something that refreshes every few milliseconds, as in an LCD), but it uses no extra battery other than the HUD inside it. I was skeptical about my Canon Rebel XTi at first because it lacked a live preview, but I then realized that previewing is pointless when the viewfinder is fed through the lens anyway. On a regular camera, I could understand it, because the viewfinder goes through a different place than the lens, so there's a bit of a perspective change.

If you want to get into photography, you'll learn that Live View will become basically useless for most of your endeavors.

Viewfinders offer so much more that you'll plainly get tired of shooting through the LCD in any camera after some time of using an slr. Instead of seeing a picture through a poor LCD, you're actually seeing it "as it is" through the optical viewfinder--color, light, and focus are so much more accurate and fast.

While the A300 might have a nicer Live View system, they flawed the optical viewfinder with that design by making it even more smaller and darker.

There have been a lot of complaints with the G9's viewfinder - when I played with it, I saw that it doesn't cover the entire width that the sensor detects.

Also, simon360: you should check out the Sony's live preview. It's far better (smoother motion, better features) than any other camera I've seen.

That said, I probably will go with the G9. It has the potential to take some pretty amazing pictures. If you're interested, here's a thread with pictures taken from the G9 (http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=493680). Some of those are fantastic, especially for such a compact camera. The snake on page 2 is just epic.

I'm with simon360 here, I really wouldn't discount the A200 because of a lack of a Live View feature. I couldn't imagine using the LCD for composition now, the VF seems more natural. Equally, the pose you hold a camera in when viewing through the VF is more stable than the arms-reach of an LCD. If you did get the A200, you wouldn't have a bad word to say about using a VF within a couple of days. And it does give DSLRs absolutely epic battery life - Live View requires that both the LCD and the CCD/CMOS sensor be powered up, VF is a purely optical mechanism, and uses zero battery.

I would suggest the G9 pretty much only if you wanted a small compact camera, but I really really wouldn't suggest getting a G9 over a A200 because of Live View.

If you must get a dSLR with LCD preview I think Olympus has them in an affordable range. But I'm with everyone else, why would you want that?

Not very useful though. The only real substitute for it is in the A300 range which uses the second sensor. Even then though I wouldn't waste my money on something as trivial as Live View.

I'm with Giga on this.

I have an A200 on order, and after trying them in the store, the A300 really isn't worth it. I hate Live Preview on compact cameras, let alone on DSLRs.

Personally, I'd say get the A200 with a decent lens, rather than paying extra for Live Preview. Oh, and RE the first post, the A200 doesn't support SD as far as I know, it's either Compact Flash or Memory Stick Duo

Oops, sorry about the SD mistake. I wear glasses, so having an LCD viewfinder is quite important. The optical VFs do have some correction, but the LCDs are better.

Since I'm learning, I'll be experimenting quite a lot. I like the idea of getting a 16Gb SD-HC card, inside a great camera in a compact shell, and being able to take pictures wherever I am. And with an LCD VF, I can take a picture and get a large, instant preview. Before the moment's passed. With the A200, I'll have to keep on checking if the picture came out as I think it should've - switching between optical and LCD between shots.

I'm guessing you guys who don't like LCDs are quite experienced photographers - that is, when you take a picture, you've got a good feel for how it's come out. I'm going to have to be checking if the DoF is right, if the shutter speed is OK, and if the exposure is right. I imagine that I'll be experimenting a lot more than a more experienced photographer might. Once I get a feel for that, I can buy a DSLR and appreciate it more.

Since I'm learning, I'll be experimenting quite a lot. I like the idea of getting a 16Gb SD-HC card, inside a great camera in a compact shell, and being able to take pictures wherever I am. And with an LCD VF, I can take a picture and get a large, instant preview. Before the moment's passed. With the A200, I'll have to keep on checking if the picture came out as I think it should've - switching between optical and LCD between shots.

I'm guessing you guys who don't like LCDs are quite experienced photographers - that is, when you take a picture, you've got a good feel for how it's come out. I'm going to have to be checking if the DoF is right, if the shutter speed is OK, and if the exposure is right. I imagine that I'll be experimenting a lot more than a more experienced photographer might. Once I get a feel for that, I can buy a DSLR and appreciate it more.

Thing is though--an LCD preview won't give you an accurate "WYSIWYG" preview of your final image. The final image will almost always show a different portrayal of the light.

As for speed, the DSLR trumps anything with that as well. Focusing is a lot faster. Shutter lag is next to nothing. Turning the camera on and off is instant. And the preview is just like regular cameras--take a picture and you get an instant preview right on the back of the screen. If you want to capture something "in the moment", a DSLR is the way to go.

And while you can adjust exposure settings, it can be set to full auto as well--just like a P&S.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!