Firefox and Thunderbird phone home daily


Recommended Posts

http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=2143

Several of you have emailed me to let me know of a Firefox and Thunderbird feature that you might not be aware of - both applications phone home on a daily basis.

Here?s the info as posted on Reddit:

I found this out a few days after I decided to start using Thunderbird and created strict firewall rules as a precaution.

I noticed that Thunderbird would, for no reason at all, sometimes try to contact a server over SSL. I looked up the ip address 63.245.213.32 and found it belonged to Mozilla.

On researching the problem further I found that the cause of the connection is a feature that cannot be disabled from any menu, only the about:config configuration page.

Look up extensions.blocklist.enabled for more information. It?s present in Firefox also and is enabled even if all the options are disabled through the menus.

What this tells Mozilla each day:

- IP address

- What time you were using the product

- What exact version number you were using

- If you are using any of the plugins or addons sent in the disabled list

- Total number of active users of their software

Firefox = Spyware:D :D

Seriously please stop using the internet if you are worried. It probably "Phones Home" as the term is given to check for updates. Also to verify the sites you browse in the Phishing filter. The information given is actually a given. Please tell me a site that doesn't know your IP address when you visit it. As for the rest of the information it sends its hardly anything personal is it. But then again Firefox will be branded as spyware as some idiots out there *sighs*

Most of this is explained in their KB:

- IP address: Pretty obvious why this is sent along

- What time you were using the product: Not sure about this one, but seems harmless.

- What exact version number you were using: http://support.mozilla.com/fr/kb/Firefox+m...update_checking

- If you are using any of the plugins or addons sent in the disabled list: http://support.mozilla.com/fr/kb/Firefox+m...cklist_updating

- Total number of active users of their software: Not sure why they would need this, although it does seem harmless.

And the Captain Obvious of the Day Award goes to...

People who don't know the how their web bound software works and why it's necessary for some of them to phone home, and are concerned by that, should just get and stay offline. One would think that it's bloody obvious that checking for updates, be it manually or automatically, will involve phoning home.

i predict lots of "does it really matter" type replies... but if it was a microsoft app it would be like "omgz uninstall teh spywarez and sue micro$$$oft!1!111!!"

The reason for that is that Firefox is open-source whereas Microsoft programs are not. When one can look at the source code and find out exactly what information is being transmitted, it's easier to accept the behaviour because nothing is kept secret and, if it comes down to it, you can always just hack that part out of the source code and recompile. Compare this to the "black box" paradigm of Microsoft (and Adobe and Macromedia and Autodesk and Apple and Intuit and...) software and you need, at the minimum, a packet sniffer to figure out what's being sent, and sometimes cryptanalysis tools on top of that.

It's a matter of openness and transparency. Firefox has it. Microsoft products do not.

Firefox is open source anyway. If they are that concerned somebody could surely make a branch that removes the whole IP sending etc...

There are things like GhostFox, TorPark, etc.

I also am wondering about things like Debian Iceweasel or GNU IceCat that run on Linux and are based on Firefox. Oh, right... Those are updated via a package manager, a convenience that Windows doesn't have... They don't need to "phone home". :p

Funny how the person who posted this has an Internet Explorer 7 avatar. :laugh:

Actually doesn't Windows phone home to enable Windows Update to work? Is Windows Spyware? Ubuntu also 'phones home' to get updates, is it spyware.

Load of rubbish.

My guess is that they need to know the time of use of the product is probably to see the time from when the request was given for the updates and the time the either No Updates Available or that their is an update available. Possibly the addons in use is for the updates for them... not to mention if they have updates.

So... how else exactly is Firefox/Thunderbird supposed to check for updates without 'phoning home'??
Agreed. What are people doing that they're so afraid of this information being reported back to Mozilla?

They don't. And that's kind of the point (read: bitch) of some people?* If you had read the quote on the blog entry it says: It's present in Firefox also and is enabled even if all the options are disabled through the menus.

The user does not want to automatically check for updates for $app, $addon, $searchengine. The application respects that (unless there's some restriction on either side or something...).

If your application is dealing with updates and statistics (total number of active users? lolwut), then it should prompt a dialog during the installation and inform the user of its intentions and the information that will be sent to the company and how it will be sent, and then the users chooses whether or not to allow it.

The entry is hardly moronic. The author is just blogging about a situation that is actually happening (doubts?) on which people emailed (read: bitched) him about; quotes what they are saying; provides information on how to probably solve the situation and doesn't really give a crap about the whole deal and asks for your comment. Hardly controversy bait.

The OP forgot to quote the last part of the blog entry: Personally, I’m not too fussed about this feature, but I can understand why some folks are getting hot under the collar*. Thoughts?

Funny how the person who posted this has an Internet Explorer 7 avatar. :laugh:

Actually doesn't Windows phone home to enable Windows Update to work? Is Windows Spyware? Ubuntu also 'phones home' to get updates, is it spyware.

You have to blame Ballmer on this, obviously. :p

And if I'm not mistaken, doesn't Windows and Ubuntu only "phone home" with the permission of the user? Ubuntu probably has setup as default to perform daily checks on (recommended/security) updates and only notifies. I think that the statistical part (used in the popularity section of the Add/Remove Application)is by default turned off? Correct me if I'm wrong.

There's a good post about it in the original fire, it seems:

I see your point and I wholeheartedly agree. However, there is a difference, even if it's only an ethical one, between willingly sending non-confidential data for a necessary service (over HTTP or any remote service) and having a software sending without notifying you or letting you know in any way the same data to the mother land.

All that being said, this is absolutely not a good reason to dust off your tinfoil hats people.

- IP address

- What time you were using the product

- What exact version number you were using

- If you are using any of the plugins or addons sent in the disabled list

- Total number of active users of their software

Firefox downloads the list, then blocks them client side, it's easier than on the server than a back and forth "Is this ok?" "yes" "Is this ok?" "no" "Is this ok?" "yes"

Even if it does report back you're using a disabled extension, the only ones disabled at the moment are plugins that cause crashes, extensions that cause crashes, and that 3rd party language pack that had remnants of ads in it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • We now know when and how the Universe may truly end by Sayan Sen Image by Marek Pavlík via Pexels| Not representative A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. The research, published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, was conducted by Tye, Horace White Professor of Physics Emeritus at Cornell University. Using recent observations from major dark-energy surveys, Tye and his collaborators developed a cosmological model that predicts the universe could have a total lifespan of about 33 billion years. Since the universe is currently estimated to be 13.8 billion years old, the model places it near the midpoint of its existence. According to Cornell University's summary of the research, the study centers on the cosmological constant, a term introduced by Albert Einstein in his theory of general relativity. In modern cosmology, the cosmological constant is commonly used to describe the simplest form of dark energy, the unknown phenomenon believed to be driving the accelerating expansion of the universe. "For the last 20 years, people believed that the cosmological constant is positive, and the universe will expand forever," Tye said in a Cornell University news release. "The new data seem to indicate that the cosmological constant is negative, and that the universe will end in a big crunch." The study draws on data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), two major projects designed to investigate the nature of dark energy. According to Tye, recent observations suggest that dark energy may not behave exactly like a simple cosmological constant. To account for those observations, Tye and his collaborators proposed a model involving an extremely light hypothetical particle that evolves over time. In their calculations, this produces a negative cosmological constant and leads to a future collapse of the universe. The model predicts that cosmic expansion would continue for approximately another 11 billion years before reaching a maximum size, after which the universe would begin contracting and eventually collapse. Scientists have long debated how the universe might end. As explained in an article published in The Conversation by Stephen DiKerby of Michigan State University, several possibilities have been proposed. If dark energy remains constant and positive, the universe could continue expanding indefinitely, gradually becoming colder, darker and more diffuse in a scenario often called the "heat death" of the universe. Other theoretical possibilities include a Big Rip, in which cosmic expansion accelerates so dramatically that galaxies, stars and even atoms are torn apart, or a Big Crunch, in which expansion reverses and the universe collapses back into an extremely dense state. DiKerby notes that the Big Crunch idea itself is not new. What distinguishes Tye's work is that it attempts to use current observational data to estimate when such a collapse might occur and how it could unfold. Much of the universe's long-term evolution remains uncertain. According to current astrophysical understanding, stars will continue to form and die for billions of years. The Sun, for example, is about halfway through its expected lifespan. Galaxies are also expected to continue merging; the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies are projected to collide several billion years from now. At the same time, the nature of dark energy remains one of the biggest unanswered questions in cosmology. While observations indicate that the universe's expansion is accelerating, scientists still do not know what is causing that acceleration. Future observations may therefore alter current predictions about the cosmos's ultimate fate. Tye emphasized that additional evidence will be needed before firm conclusions can be drawn. DESI continues to collect data, while upcoming observations from missions and observatories including Euclid, SPHEREx and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory are expected to provide more precise measurements of dark energy. "People have said before that if the cosmological constant is negative, then the universe will collapse eventually. That's not new," Tye said. "However, here the model tells you when the universe collapses and how it collapses." For now, the study presents one possible future for the cosmos rather than a settled prediction. Whether the universe ultimately ends in a Big Crunch, expands forever, or follows another path entirely remains an open question that future observations will help answer. Source: Cornell University, The Conversation This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • If you look around on Amazon, some of these are available for $9
    • I’m still using an Xbox One S, so time for an upgrade to play this but as much as I hate Sony, I think I’ll get the ps5 pro
    • I bought this game. Played it for an hour, and then got a refund from Steam. Not a fun game at all.
    • Nothing Ear buds with active noise cancellation are at their lowest price ever with 51% off by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the Nothing Ear wireless earbuds at their lowest price ever with 51% off limited prime deal. The earbuds feature an 11mm dynamic drivers with a ceramic diaphragm, and support high-resolution audio codecs including AAC, SBC, LDAC, and LHDC 5.0. They support active noise cancellation of up to 45dB across a frequency range of up to 5000Hz, and include a smart ANC algorithm, adaptive noise cancellation, and a transparency mode that allows surrounding sounds to be heard when needed. Connectivity is provided via Bluetooth 5.3, with support for multiple profiles including HFP, A2DP, AVRCP, and others. The earbuds also support dual connection, allowing them to be paired with two devices at the same time. Additional features include IP54 water and dust resistance for the earbuds and IP55 for the charging case, in-ear detection, pinch controls, low-latency mode, Google Fast Pair, Microsoft Swift Pair, and a three-microphone system per earbud for clearer voice calls. The Nothing X app, available on Android and iOS, provides access to custom EQ settings, bass enhancement, personal sound profiles, ear tip fit testing, firmware updates, customisable controls, dual-device management, and a find-my-earbuds feature. In terms of battery performance, each earbud has a 46mAh battery and the charging case has a 500mAh capacity. With active noise cancellation (ANC) turned off, the earbuds should offer up to 8.5 hours of playback on a single charge and up to 40.5 hours in total with the charging case. With ANC enabled, playback should last up to 5.2 hours on the earbuds and up to 24 hours with the case. For calls, talk time should reach up to 5 hours on the earbuds and 23 hours with the case when ANC is off, while ANC on should provide up to 4 hours on the earbuds and 18 hours with the case. Finally, fast charging should deliver up to 10 hours of playback from 10 minutes of charging when ANC is disabled. Nothing Ear Wireless Earbuds Bluetooth: $73.15 (Amazon US) - 51% off Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      572
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      173
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      73
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!