Recommended Posts

This may sound weird but try the following.

Create a new user in Vista--

Sign into that user ... switch all eye candy off- Classic Look for Menu and OS- To where it looks like XP.

See if that helps... Just a thought. Worse case is that if it does not work... Just Remove the user and delete the files that it creates.

The new user was to possibly fix the download issue. I will have to do some more research for the download lockup issue... only other thing for the jittering issue is one of two things.. Check the monitor refresh rate-and hook it up to a regular PC monitor to see if the jittering is a bad LCD. I have heard of that. There should be a function to switch it from Laptop display to monitor.

The new user was to possibly fix the download issue. I will have to do some more research for the download lockup issue... only other thing for the jittering issue is one of two things.. Check the monitor refresh rate-and hook it up to a regular PC monitor to see if the jittering is a bad LCD. I have heard of that. There should be a function to switch it from Laptop display to monitor.

I've tried to change the refresh rate before because

when I see an bg/image with grey lines close together it flashes..

greylinesyi1.png

^blinks on my lcd.

It only has 60htz. o.o

refreshqv4.png

note: my computer also freezes/jitters when loading sites with a lot of images. =/

ty for all the help so far. :)

Can you download/run the Benchmarks in HDTune (http://www.hdtune.com/) and post up your results? I had similar problems that you're describing (locking up on downloads) on my sisters laptop and after running that benchmark noticed the HDD was only writing at 2MB/s, swapped the drive out and now it's fine.

Did you try connecting the laptop to a regular PC monitor?... I am thinking bad LCD for the jittering.

I will test that out later today for you.

Can you download/run the Benchmarks in HDTune (http://www.hdtune.com/) and post up your results? I had similar problems that you're describing (locking up on downloads) on my sisters laptop and after running that benchmark noticed the HDD was only writing at 2MB/s, swapped the drive out and now it's fine.

when I try to run the benchmark I get this alert.

hdscannn6.png

my hd was setup like this from the factory.

hdkp9.png

-have you tried your internet connection on a different computer?

-could you try the download with a download manager (like orbit,internet download manager etc.) and see if the problem persists?

-instead of saving have you tried to open the file directly ? does that also cause a stutter?

Ah, didn't know it wouldn't work on multiple partitions - does the read benchmark work?

yeh It will do the read benchmark. I will have to re-test it later when my computer starts messing up again. I recently

rebooted. >_> lol

readgh7.png

-have you tried your internet connection on a different computer?

-could you try the download with a download manager (like orbit,internet download manager etc.) and see if the problem persists?

-instead of saving have you tried to open the file directly ? does that also cause a stutter?

-yup, I currently have 3 other computers and xbox live running fine. =x lol

-I will have to test out the 2 other suggestions sometime today. Can you recommend a good download manager? x)

I will test that out later today for you.

when I try to run the benchmark I get this alert.

hdscannn6.png

my hd was setup like this from the factory.

hdkp9.png

I would try to rerun the test but sign in as the main administrator... It could be that you are using the limited user account. Or either that or create a shortcut to the program and right click choose run with different credentials... It is possible that you may need to be the main admin to run the test. Just a thought.

There should be something in the setup of the program to choose which drive. It is possible that it cannot write to the backup partition.(recovery).

just to add to the confusion of things just for my sake just how much actual DATA is sitting on your desktop only i ask this because a friend of mine had this same problem except on a desktop system it turned out he had some 16.67GB of data sitting on his desktop which was totaly filling up his video cards buffer and most of his system ram and pagefile he moved almost all of it but a bar a few shortcuts and that fixed his problem as everything on the desktop wether running or not uses up a portion of ram ergo the more you have the more ram you use till it spills into the pagefile

just to add to the confusion of things just for my sake just how much actual DATA is sitting on your desktop only i ask this because a friend of mine had this same problem except on a desktop system it turned out he had some 16.67GB of data sitting on his desktop which was totaly filling up his video cards buffer and most of his system ram and pagefile he moved almost all of it but a bar a few shortcuts and that fixed his problem as everything on the desktop wether running or not uses up a portion of ram ergo the more you have the more ram you use till it spills into the pagefile

I have roughly 15gb of music/videos sitting in folders located on my desktop. o.o I will move everything into the C:/ drive area and see

if it clears the problem. thanks Atlonite. ;)

btw, I've always downloaded everything to my desktops and never had any issues like this before. =/

I moved everything over to the C:/ drive and my computer is still freezing/jittering when downloading. ><

any other Ideas? :\

edit: I was able to run the file benchmark on hd tune.. I'm not sure if this will be of any assistance though.

image1ca2.jpg

Edited by Jigoku
Don't think this is the problem but have a look this is from another post.

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?show...amp;p=589534294

Possibly DMA mode is not enabled on the drive- Just another shot in the dark.

ok, I'm looking at the device controller properties now. How do I tell whether it's in DMA or PIO mode? thanks redvamp.

In Xp it is under the device manager- then look under the IDE ATA/ATAPI controllers under the Primary Controller- Right Click choose properties then the advanced tab- See if it says DMA there (on your it may Say SATA instead of ATA) But check there for the DMA mode.

In Xp it is under the device manager- then look under the IDE ATA/ATAPI controllers under the Primary Controller- Right Click choose properties then the advanced tab- See if it says DMA there (on your it may Say SATA instead of ATA) But check there for the DMA mode.

I checked all through the properties and couldn't find anything saying dma or pio.

image1rt4.png

It could be under the two that say IDE Channel- There should be an Advanced tab on one of them- Also look at the one that says Hard Drive- Vista may put it there.

Also on there check to see under Policies- Optimize for performance and write cache is enabled- That is the way my Xp is set but worth a try on your system.

If you read it - It says This setting improves disk performance , but a power outage or equipment failure might result in data loss or corruption.

You said-

My computer would even freeze before downloading.. o_o as soon as I click on a link and the " save now" dialog box appears it will freeze.

That may speed it up or worse case it will still do what it is doing.

Edited by redvamp128

You probably could go with the first check mark-- see if it improves-- sorry I may be in and out tonight it is supposed to storm here-... But I probably would not do the one that says Advanced performance...Unless the first check mark does well- You should not have to worry about the power outage since it is a laptop. Just make sure that you stay plugged in.

Try the first check mark see if it improves...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Turbo Pascal was my first real programming experience more than 30 years ago at university. I mostly taught myself from the included examples and help documentation, because the university only taught the basic syntax and philosophy of Pascal, without going deeply into Turbo Pascal’s advanced features. I still remember when I discovered that I could embed assembly language directly into Pascal code, call BIOS functions, manipulate screen memory, use mouse interrupts, and control peripherals from my programs. That opened huge doors for me. Programming back then felt really fun, direct, and close to the machine. What I loved about Pascal was its readability and the almost instant compile time. Turbo Pascal was an amazing environment, but unfortunately Turbo Pascal for Windows 3 did not feel like it fully carried that legacy forward. Later, Delphi got things back on the right track after the messy transition to TP for Windows. Sadly, Delphi suffered from years of uncertainty as it moved from Borland to CodeGear and then to Embarcadero. That instability made many developers lose confidence in it, even though Delphi itself remained a powerful and productive tool. I still work with Delphi from time to time, but I definitely miss the old days of Turbo Pascal.
    • I hope this encodes in to AV1 or AV2 as currently tiktok uses h265 and h264.
    • Qualcomm reportedly in talks to build custom video chips for TikTok parent ByteDance by Karthik Mudaliar Qualcomm is reportedly in advanced discussions to provide custom chip-design services to Chinese tech giant ByteDance, the same company behind TikTok. According to a report from Reuters, Qualcomm could be involved in designing custom silicon tailored for ByteDance's massive data-center workloads. If it goes through, the deal would make ByteDance one of Qualcomm's early anchor customers for its fastly growing custom chip-design division, For years, Qualcomm was the king of making smartphone processors and modems. The company has also been moving into the PC ecosystem and other formats such as on-device AI for Android XR headsets. However, this particular deal is about Qualcomm's custom Application-Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs). For a platform like TikTok, ByteDance needs hardware that can help it ingest, process, and serve billions of short-form videos daily. Generalised hardware is no longer the most cost-effective and efficient route, which is why ByteDance is trying to develop custom Video Processing Units (VPUs). VPUs designed specifically for ByteDance’s algorithmic needs could drastically reduce data-center power consumption and improve encoding speeds at an unprecedented scale. The underlying tech behind these processors is actually from Qualcomm's recent acquisition of AlphaWave Semi, a high-speed connectivity specialist company. By combining AlphaWave’s high-bandwidth IP with Qualcomm’s architectural expertise, the company could begin mass production by the end of 2026, if the talks go through. All this also comes at a time when U.S.-China tech relations have dwindled. Escalating trade frictions between Washington and Beijing have severely impacted the export of high-end AI chips from U.S. firms like Nvidia, AMD, and Lam Research. Yet, the Qualcomm-ByteDance discussions show that U.S. tech companies are still actively seeking growth avenues and are open to doing business with China, where regulators still permit. Reuters notes that the outcome of this deal could be uncertain, and ByteDance might also seek partners other than Qualcomm. via Reuters | Image via DepositPhotos.com
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      OHI Accounting earned a badge
      One Year In
    • First Post
      Almohandis earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      DaviKar went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      169
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      119
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      Xenon
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!