Jay-Z 1, Racism 0


Recommended Posts

Nobody wanted Jay-Z to perform at Glastonbury but he did it!

Original Story

Oasis' Noel Gallagher has said that he thinks the decision to book Jay-Z for a headline set at this year's Glastonbury festival was incorrect.

Speaking to BBC News, Gallagher said that deviating from the festival's tradition of booking guitar-based headliners was "wrong".

"If it ain't broke don't fix it," he said. "If you start to break it then people aren't going to go. I'm sorry, but Jay-Z? No chance.

"Glastonbury has a tradition of guitar music and even when they throw the odd curve ball in on a Sunday night you go 'Kylie Minogue?' I don't know about it. But I'm not having hip-hop at Glastonbury. It's wrong."

Noel Gallagher has also spoken about Oasis' UK live plans, responding to repeated rumours the band would play the O2 Arena in London.

NEW Story

He came, he saw, he conquered. Strolling onstage with a guitar for a tongue-in-cheek cover of Oasis' Wonderall, Jay-Z's headline set was shot through with style and humour. With no special guests he made the Pyramid stage bounce with a devastating greatest hits set that marked a defining moment for Glastonbury. Point proved.

Watch how they embrace him. This is a monumental event and it just shows that there is space for everyone musically. This is a big triumph for hip hop and a big loss for those little racist bastards!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/646141-jay-z-1-racism-0/
Share on other sites

how does this relate to racism at all ?

and why have rap artists at this kind of festuival anyway ? yeah sure there will be eople watching all the jay z fans that otherwise wouldn't havebeen at that festival, BUT wouldn't it be better to arrange another festival for those that like that music and not use it in a festval that allready has a different image. sure people can like multiple usic tpes and most do, though I'm not sure these are the styles many people like both off. .

I'll join on all the "hip-hop is a race?" comments... Hip-hop is a genre of music, and Jay-Z wasn't being criticized for being black at all.

Glastonbury is kind of a rock festival, its definitely not a hip-hop festival so why they decided to hire Jay-Z to headline is beyond me but there's always Reading and Download for proper rock festivals :D

I still don't think he shoulda been at Glasto, not because he's black, but cos it's not a Hip Hop festival, it's primarily aimed at guitar/rock style bands. He's lucky he didn't get the same treatment as fiddy with the bottle showers he received.

And like everyone else said, WTF with racism in the title, that has nothing to do with the topic @ all.

bull****. With all the conversations about Hip Hop on Neowin that turn into a conversation about race? You are telling me that this has nothing to do with race? Then why wouldnt he embrace Hip Hop, give me one good reason.

lol Have you listened to yourself? Think about it, why wouldn't Noel Gallagher like Hip-Hop. Hmmm, which is more likely do you think - he likes his 'rock' music to be pure rock music and is heavily influenced by an era where Hip-Hop hadn't even been thought about...

or....

He's a racist.

You know, it is possible to really hate a particular genre of music and not be a racist. I know that may sting your beliefs a little, but lots of us do it. I absolutely hate hip-hop too. But just to really cloud your bizarre world up a little, I'm travelling for hours on end on Thursday to go see my "black" friend! Imagine that eh? In fact, I can't wait to tell him how I met this nut on a forum who believed that just because Noel Gallagher disliked Jay-Z being at Glastonbury, he must be racist.

lol Have you listened to yourself? Think about it, why wouldn't Noel Gallagher like Hip-Hop. Hmmm, which is more likely do you think - he likes his 'rock' music to be pure rock music and is heavily influenced by an era where Hip-Hop hadn't even been thought about...

or....

He's a racist.

You know, it is possible to really hate a particular genre of music and not be a racist. I know that may sting your beliefs a little, but even I do it. I hate hip-hop too. But just to really cloud your bizarre world up a little, I'm travelling for hours on end on Thursday to go see my "black" friend! Imagine that eh?

I don't know that sounds racist coming from you but if you were black I would not have a problem :)

lol Have you listened to yourself? Think about it, why wouldn't Noel Gallagher like Hip-Hop. Hmmm, which is more likely do you think - he likes his 'rock' music to be pure rock music and is heavily influenced by an era where Hip-Hop hadn't even been thought about...

or....

He's a racist.

You know, it is possible to really hate a particular genre of music and not be a racist. I know that may sting your beliefs a little, but lots of us do it. I absolutely hate hip-hop too. But just to really cloud your bizarre world up a little, I'm travelling for hours on end on Thursday to go see my "black" friend! Imagine that eh? In fact, I can't wait to tell him how I met this nut on a forum who believed that just because Noel Gallagher disliked Jay-Z being at Glastonbury, he must be racist.

There are alot of music genre's I don't care for, blue grass is one. That does not mean I have to criticize it at every turn like most of you do. I would't call myself a rock fan or alternative for that matter but right now I am getting ready for church and I am ironing clothes listening to Sum 41, Maroon 5, Flyleaf, Blink 182, Green Day, even Colbie Caillat. There are a few gems in every genre of music but most people, you may be one of them, say they hate the music as a cover for your real feelings. ;)

I posted a article a few months back about Jay-Z teaming up with Apple to start a record company and my God, the responses. Here is a snippet from the source at Engadget:

post-111965-1214747038_thumb.jpg

That's not even the worst! There was another comment that said that the only way they would approve it is if Jay-Z was contractually obligated to call Steve Jobs "Massuh".

Simple as this, if you don't agree, no need to reply and just let this thread die. But the reality is, some people hate rap music because they hate black people. If this isn't you, then don't worry about it.

Edit: You being white and having a black friend doesn't mean a damn thing.

I think in response to this, Oasis should be nominated for a MOBO award, and if they aint, then it's cos they're all racists. I know the awards are for Music of Black Origin, but they should embrace white rockers

[/sarcasm]

Also C-Squarez, why are u constantly implying that if someone doesn't like rap/hip-hop, then they are racist? Why try create a problem that doesn't exist? It's a ridiculous assumption based on your theory that not liking rap = white & racist.

But the reality is, some people hate rap music because they hate black people. If this isn't you, then don't worry about it.

Some people hate rock music because they hate white people. See how I can do that?

Surely you're not generalizing that the people who didn't want Jay-Z there at Glastonbury didn't like his skin color?

Hey look, it's Bloc Party at Glastonbury!

1.jpg

That does not mean I have to criticize it at every turn like most of you do.

Eh? Are you on something that you shouldn't be? If not, have you considered going on it? As far as I can see, all in this thread have just asked how you managed to get from Noel Gallagher not liking Hip-Hop, to you believing that is an issue of racism.

If you're still posting today, based on posts made in the past, then well, there's not a lot anyone can do to help you there. That's your problem. I'm not qualified to be a psychologist...

Edit: You being white and having a black friend doesn't mean a damn thing.

I think it illustrates that I'd be a peculiar type of racist, at the very least, and that not everyone who doesn't care for hip-hop has a seething hatred for black people. Just remove the chip from your shoulder and you'll find the world is a much brighter place than you clearly think it is.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 by Razvan Serea Hasleo Disk Clone is a free and all-in-one disk cloning software for Windows 11/10/8/7/Vista and Windows Server that can help you migrate Windows OS to another disk, clone one disk to another disk or clone one partition to another location quickly and efficiently. Completely Free Windows Migration and Disk/Partition Cloning Software Migrate Windows from one disk to another without reinstalling Windows, apps. Clone one disk to another and makes the data on 2 disks are exactly the same. Clone a partition to another location without losing any data. Easily adjust the size and location of the destination partition. Convert MBR to GPT or convert GPT to MBR by cloning. Creation of Windows PE emergency disk. Extremely fast cloning speed and multi-language support. Supported OS: Windows Vista/Server 2008 or later, fully compatible with GPT and UEFI. Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 changelog: Fixed an issue that caused disk enumeration to fail Fixed an issue where WinPE created under Windows ARM64 26H1 did not work properly Download: Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 | 32.3 MB (Freeware) Link: Hasleo Disk Clone Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • This got me thinking, would you rather a self driving car prioritise protecting its passengers or everyone else? I'd choose the one that keeps me and my kids safest. At some point, these cars have to make those choices already, don't they? Wonder if we have a way to find out what way they lean.
    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      558
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      78
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!