Barclays Premier League 2008/09  

375 members have voted

  1. 1. Who will win the Barclays Premier League 2008/09?

    • Arsenal
      25
    • Aston Villa
      8
    • Chelsea
      15
    • Everton
      9
    • Liverpool
      22
    • Manchester City
      8
    • Manchester United
      55
    • Portsmouth
      0
    • Tottenham Hotspur
      2
    • Other
      5
  2. 2. Who be relegated from the Barclays Premier League 2008/09 (select 3)?

    • Blackburn Rovers
      15
    • Bolton Wanderers
      23
    • Fulham
      22
    • Hull City
      53
    • Middlesbrough
      26
    • Stoke City
      66
    • Sunderland
      31
    • West Bromwich Albian
      71
    • Wigan Athletic
      29
    • Other
      39
  3. 3. Who will be top scorer in the Barclays Premier League 2008/09?

    • Benjani
      3
    • Cesc Fabregas
      1
    • Cristiano Ronaldo
      37
    • Didier Drogba
      4
    • Emmanuel Adebayor
      8
    • Fernando Torres
      43
    • Frank Lampard
      8
    • Wayne Rooney
      12
    • Roque Santa Cruz
      0
    • Other
      33


Recommended Posts

On Tuesday afternoon, Arsenal Football Club released the following statement:

"Tomas Rosicky yesterday underwent routine revision surgery in Germany. The operation went as planned and Tomas will now spend at least a few weeks convalescing in Germany. Thereafter he will follow a tailored rehabilitation progamme devised by our medical team."

Everyone at Arsenal Football Club would like to wish Tomas the best of luck with his recovery.

Great night for us in Carling cup yesterday.. Simpson scored 2 clinical goals but the pick of the goals was the Vela one. I love this kid more than Bendtner. He reminds me of Bergkamp and Henry.. at such a young age he has amazing talent and potential.. he can dribble like henry and that goal was almost like what Bergkamp used to do. Amazing!

Sooo.. Spurs face Liverpool tonight.. Revenge night for Liverpool?? or maybe Rafa has bigger things on his mind than Carling Cup..

Great night for us in Carling cup yesterday.. Simpson scored 2 clinical goals but the pick of the goals was the Vela one. I love this kid more than Bendtner. He reminds me of Bergkamp and Henry.. at such a young age he has amazing talent and potential.. he can dribble like henry and that goal was almost like what Bergkamp used to do. Amazing!

Sooo.. Spurs face Liverpool tonight.. Revenge night for Liverpool?? or maybe Rafa has bigger things on his mind than Carling Cup..

i can't see any of the big guys for 'pool playing today. And that was a good game by the young gunners, they have a lot of talent coming up. Wasn't their average age on the field like 19 1/2 years? That's incredible.

Great night for us in Carling cup yesterday.. Simpson scored 2 clinical goals but the pick of the goals was the Vela one. I love this kid more than Bendtner. He reminds me of Bergkamp and Henry.. at such a young age he has amazing talent and potential.. he can dribble like henry and that goal was almost like what Bergkamp used to do. Amazing!

Sooo.. Spurs face Liverpool tonight.. Revenge night for Liverpool?? or maybe Rafa has bigger things on his mind than Carling Cup..

Vela is already everything Bendtner could and should be. I'm not much of a fan of young Nic.

Tottenham are playing nice football!

They are.

Worst performance by a Liverpool side I have seen for a while, just no effort at all by most of the players. Its only the League Cup, but the fringe players should at least be having a go.

Still, we have been 3-0 down at half time before and I think everyone knows what happened then ;)

Premier League takeover broker Keith Harris believes Liverpool could go into financial meltdown in January and might be forced to sell up.

Empics

Anfield: Might be in financial trouble

Harris, who has masterminded deals for Chelsea, Aston Villa, Hull City, West Ham United and Manchester City and is currently seeking buyers for Newcastle United and Everton, claims that the Reds could be severely affected by the global credit crunch.

Bickering Liverpool owners Tom Hicks and George Gillett have two months to pay back a reported ?350million worth of debt and with refinancing packages and new financial stakeholders getting harder and harder to find the Merseyside club might have to offload star players to pay off the debt.

The worse case scenario would be for the banks to consider repossessing the club if the payments cannot be met.

"The one that worries me is Liverpool," said Harris. "Liverpool's debt is due in January, with maybe a six-month extension."

"The two banks which are the principal lenders - the Royal Bank of Scotland and Wachovia - are two of those that have suffered. Whether they want to lend it again or not, they may not be able to."

Harris, chairman of Seymour Pierce investment bank and a former Football League chairman, has also admitted that Everton and Newcastle are no closer to finding a buyer.

"It has never been more difficult to find buyers," explained Harris.

"It's no longer a question of price negotiation - it's should we? People are wondering if now is the time to spend."

Los Angeles Galaxy owner Philip Anschutz was linked by a number of newspapers with a possible bid for Newcastle as part of a US consortia but the owner of AEG denied the reports on Wednesday.

"Neither AEG nor anyone affiliated with the organisation are in negotiations or are contemplating the purchase of Newcastle United Football Club," the billionaire said in a statement.

http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story?id...and&cc=5901

And wow i hope the mess with the owners get solved soon... If they wait until their loan is due bad things could happen to the team. I don't want to lose players.

:p Chelsea and Liverpool both crashed!!

I didnt watch the Chelsea game but I did happen to catch Spurs-Liverpool..

My observations:

1) Chelsea, Liverpool, Man Utd all played some players that are in their best 11 and still had problems.. (Man U won 1-0 from QPR on a penalty!! Chelsea got beaten Burnley of all teams.. and here i was upset about us losing to Stoke City..lol.. and Liverpool lost to Spurs.. AGAIN :p)

2) Spurs also played many of their best 11 BUT they wanted to play and win.. they wanted to prove something.. much like Arsenal :pacifier:

3) Seemed as if some Liverpool players were out there as a punishment for something.. there was no effort at all..

4) Seemed to me like Liverpool lacked motivation.. did Rafa really want to win this match? I don't know what he said to them before the game but it seemed they were out there just for the sake of being there and it looked like the manager didn't fire them up properly.

5) Arsenal has the best youngsters in the country

6) Arsenal has the best second lineup in the country :D

:p Chelsea and Liverpool both crashed!!

I didnt watch the Chelsea game but I did happen to catch Spurs-Liverpool..

My observations:

1) Chelsea, Liverpool, Man Utd all played some players that are in their best 11 and still had problems..

Agger and Torres are both coming back from long term injuries and were only played for match fitness.

But you are right about the players not looking arsed.

Heh heh, two wins in two weeks over 'pool.

Was not looking forward to this one last night, but what a game! Very good Spurs performance, despite some terrible 'keeping. That said, hope Gomes is ok, took a nasty knock there.

Run had to end somewhere :laugh:

MOTM Zamora - played excellently all game. They look a good, organised side, Fulham; battled hard, good work rate, very solid looking defence. Their (think he is Norwegian??) defender was excellent too.

I am not sure if there are many Villa supporters here, but I am sure everyone here will agree that Saturdays result has got our season back on track again! We has two really bad results prior to this. (The Newcastle performance was so bad it was embarrassing!) So all in all: A fantastic result. :D

good job boys... and kralik.. or any other gunner fans, explain to me what the hell is wrong with your team? Cause i don't get it.

Very definitely not a gooner, but the problem as I see it is pretty simple.

First things first they lack any kind of mettle in the middle. There is no Viera type player to take hold of the game by the scruff of the neck, win balls and physically control possession. Fiberglass may well be one of the best passers of the ball and best play-makers in the world, but will not play the physical, ball-winning game that is often required in the league. It is all very well being able to play pretty, entertaining football when you have possession, but if you have no one to break it down when you don't, you are looking for trouble.

The other big three have players who can play just as much 'pretty' football as Arsenal, but also have players who are better at mixing it up. Man Utd always play with a DM/solid CM and have Scholes, Hargreaves, Park and Fletcher who are all more physical than Fabrigas, backed up by two of the strongest most dominant centre-backs in the league in Rio and Vidic. Chelsea have Mikel, Lampard and Deco, backed up by Terry and Carvaliho, again a lot physically stronger than anything Arsnal have to offer. Liverpool are slightly weaker through the middle, but have Gerrard who performs a lot of the physical work. The rest of the successful teams in the league have their strong figures too: Barry, Bullard, Osman, Diarra, Ireland....all players that have a high work rate and strong physical presence, despite not being the prettiest footballers. As a Tottenham fan, we are in a similar boat to Arsenal, and this is one of the problems that has blighted us in the last year or so: the lack of a dominant player in the middle of the park. Zokora/Huddlestone + Jenas is not enough, just like Fibreglass and Denilson are not enough for the Goons.

Second of all, they really are missing a fit striker. On their day, Adebyor, Van Persie and debatably Eduardo are fantastic strikers who will score a lot of goals. However, they are also very much players who will not play to their peak week-in week-out, and are blighted by injuries. There is no Henry, backed up by Bergkamp. These are two of the best premierleague strikers ever and were Arsenals bread-and-butter. Without them, they have flair, but no one you can rely on to score that crucial goal. They are also missing a decent 'keeper. Almunia is useless, and does not even begin to compare to Chec, Rena or Van der Sar. Arsenal have never really replaced Seaman, their rock at the back, and even Lehman - who had his own problems - had a degree of solidarity, and certainly commanded his area better than Almunia.

There is also an argument that the pure arrogance of the Arsenal players leads to complacency. They think they can go to Stoke and wow them with their footballing skill, and send them running for cover. But it is simply not enough. Stoke have prided themselves on dogged performances, organisation and a real desire to scrap, and there is not one player in the Arsenal squad that can rise to this challenge, except perhaps - on his day - Toure, who has had injury problems of his own. The best example is in the game against Tottenham. Arsenal should have ran away with that one, and were 4-2 up with 5 mins to go. Then some show-boating by Cliche led to him losing possession and getting punished. Huddlestone and Modric then exploited the lack of a strong player in the middle of the park, winning a couple of balls in the air, leading to Lennons finish. It shouldn't have happened, and you can garentee Man UTD or Chelsea would not have dropped the ball on that one.

Wenger is without doubt an excellent manager. He can pick a player with talent, is excellent at developing youth and some of his signings have been second to non. However, looking forward, Arsenal fans should worry about his philosophy. Arsene seems so intent 'on playing football' that he forgets that other teams can play it too, and just because you can pass crisply along the ground, doesn't mean you won't get punished by a physically strong team from a set piece - alla Bolton or Stoke. On their day, Arsenal can beat any of the top sides in the world, play the silkiest football and be a great side to watch: they 'play football'. But Arsene seems so intent on playing skillful youth, that he neglects to consider the other side of the game. Arsenal got taught a lesson by Stoke and today by Villa, not because their players are less skillful, but because there is a physicality, a drive and a solidity to these teams that Arsenal simply don't have.

In Stoke's team there was only one player below 6ft. Villa have Barry, Reo-Coker and Laursen. Solid players to complement their attacking prowess of Agbonlahor and Ashley Young. Put simply, a balance needs to be struck between skill and finesse; and strength and physicality. Although Arsenal are the kings of pretty football, they simply cannot cope in a scrap, and that is their greatest problem. Arsenal are also left very open at times by their inability to be content with what they have. Sure, push for an extra goal, but when you are leading with little time on the clock, it is time to slow the play down, control possession and be selective about playing the ball forward. Manchester UTD are experts at this, and you rarely see them throwing away a lead of any variety. Arsenal are unable to do this, and this often leaves them open to concede late goals.

Edited by FaRSightxc2
good job boys... and kralik.. or any other gunner fans, explain to me what the hell is wrong with your team? Cause i don't get it.

I believe you happened to catch my following post last week..

No Arsenal fans writing here? Reason: We are all gutted at how bad we are playing and how it is getting worse every game. So we are watching the game and Arsenal is 2 goals down to Stoke of all teams.. and my friend (a Chelsea fan) asks me an evil grin.. "Who's Stoke playing against?" (As if he didn't know).. "Arsenal".. I said in a bearly audible voice.. "I think".. I couldn't bring myself to belief that it is really Arsenal.. 72% possesion, a man sent off for stupidity and lossing the game!? "Where is my Arsenal?" I said to myself.....

If you happened to miss it Rajpoot it's currently on page 27.. a sad story but true story that we were hoping to leave behind us after last week..

Very definitely not a gooner, but the problem as I see it is pretty simple..

Can't believe I'm agreeing with a Spurs fans abt Arsenal not cutting it AT THE MOMENT.. but spot on FaRSightxc2..

The problem is.. we need experienced and physically strong players, who can%

Edited by Kralik
Very definitely not a gooner, but the problem as I see it is pretty simple.

First things first they lack any kind of mettle in the middle. There is no Viera type player to take hold of the game by the scruff of the neck, win balls and physically control possession. Fiberglass may well be one of the best passers of the ball and best play-makers in the world, but will not play the physical, ball-winning game that is often required in the league. It is all very well being able to play pretty, entertaining football when you have possession, but if you have no one to break it down when you don't, you are looking for trouble.

The other big three have players who can play just as much 'pretty' football as Arsenal, but also have players who are better at mixing it up. Man Utd always play with a DM/solid CM and have Scholes, Hargreaves, Park and Fletcher who are all more physical than Fabrigas, backed up by two of the strongest most dominant centre-backs in the league in Rio and Vidic. Chelsea have Mikel, Lampard and Deco, backed up by Terry and Carvaliho, again a lot physically stronger than anything Arsnal have to offer. Liverpool are slightly weaker through the middle, but have Gerrard who performs a lot of the physical work. The rest of the successful teams in the league have their strong figures too: Barry, Bullard, Osman, Diarra, Ireland....all players that have a high work rate and strong physical presence, despite not being the prettiest footballers. As a Tottenham fan, we are in a similar boat to Arsenal, and this is one of the problems that has blighted us in the last year or so: the lack of a dominant player in the middle of the park. Zokora/Huddlestone + Jenas is not enough, just like Fibreglass and Denilson are not enough for the Goons.

Second of all, they really are missing a fit striker. On their day, Adebyor, Van Persie and debatably Eduardo are fantastic strikers who will score a lot of goals. However, they are also very much players who will not play to their peak week-in week-out, and are blighted by injuries. There is no Henry, backed up by Bergkamp. These are two of the best premierleague strikers ever and were Arsenals bread-and-butter. Without them, they have flair, but no one you can rely on to score that crucial goal. They are also missing a decent 'keeper. Almunia is useless, and does not even begin to compare to Chec, Rena or Van der Sar. Arsenal have never really replaced Seaman, their rock at the back, and even Lehman - who had his own problems - had a degree of solidarity, and certainly commanded his area better than Almunia.

There is also an argument that the pure arrogance of the Arsenal players leads to complacency. They think they can go to Stoke and wow them with their footballing skill, and send them running for cover. But it is simply not enough. Stoke have prided themselves on dogged performances, organisation and a real desire to scrap, and there is not one player in the Arsenal squad that can rise to this challenge, except perhaps - on his day - Toure, who has had injury problems of his own. The best example is in the game against Tottenham. Arsenal should have ran away with that one, and were 4-2 up with 5 mins to go. Then some show-boating by Cliche led to him losing possession and getting punished. Huddlestone and Modric then exploited the lack of a strong player in the middle of the park, winning a couple of balls in the air, leading to Lennons finish. It shouldn't have happened, and you can garentee Man UTD or Chelsea would not have dropped the ball on that one.

Wenger is without doubt an excellent manager. He can pick a player with talent, is excellent at developing youth and some of his signings have been second to non. However, looking forward, Arsenal fans should worry about his philosophy. Arsene seems so intent 'on playing football' that he forgets that other teams can play it too, and just because you can pass crisply along the ground, doesn't mean you won't get punished by a physically strong team from a set piece - alla Bolton or Stoke. On their day, Arsenal can beat any of the top sides in the world, play the silkiest football and be a great side to watch: they 'play football'. But Arsene seems so intent on playing skillful youth, that he neglects to consider the other side of the game. Arsenal got taught a lesson by Stoke and today by Villa, not because their players are less skillful, but because there is a physicality, a drive and a solidity to these teams that Arsenal simply don't have.

In Stoke's team there was only one player below 6ft. Villa have Barry, Reo-Coker and Laursen. Solid players to complement their attacking prowess of Agbonlahor and Ashley Young. Put simply, a balance needs to be struck between skill and finesse; and strength and physicality. Although Arsenal are the kings of pretty football, they simply cannot cope in a scrap, and that is their greatest problem. Arsenal are also left very open at times by their inability to be content with what they have. Sure, push for an extra goal, but when you are leading with little time on the clock, it is time to slow the play down, control possession and be selective about playing the ball forward. Manchester UTD are experts at this, and you rarely see them throwing away a lead of any variety. Arsenal are unable to do this, and this often leaves them open to concede late goals.

Yeah very true, Denilson is one of the best midfielders technically but him and Fabregas just don't work together in the middle of the park against physical teams, he's a creative player so he takes many touches on the ball and creates space for himself and others, however defensive wise he is useless. The teams mentality is also an issue.

However, like I've said many times to Arsenal fans: We will win the title this year, there's no doubt about it. And I say that with no hint of sarcasm.

Fellow gooners don't let your heads drop!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Last week I was investigating an issue with contacts and tried using the new Outlook. In the real (Classic) Outlook, you can easily go to any Outlook folder and present it in a Table View, then customize the columns to show/sort any field, which was exactly what I needed. But of course, the new Outlook doesn't have this feature at all. I gave up. Oh, and can we possibly stop claiming the new Outlook has PST support? What it really has is the ability to use the real Outlook in the background to pretend to have PST support. There is no PST support without the real Outlook installed.
    • Honestly just before Panos left it started to feel like MS just wasnt interested in them so they were being less innovative with them, and then when he DID leave for Amazon its kind of clear the direction is gone. It felt like Panos had both goals and drive, and a vision, but it felt like no matter what his title/department was the Surface devices never had the full interest of the rest of management and he was just pushing a bolder up a hill that MS was adding dirt to as he went.
    • A roguelike and a 4X strategy game are free to claim on the Epic Games Store by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The final leg of the Epic Games Store's mystery giveaways promotion just landed, and it brought along two more games to keep. Last week's Lonestar and Calico giveaways have now been replaced with copies of Rogue Waters and Songs of Conquest to claim for PC gamers. As always, the game is yours to add permanently to your Epic Games Store library within the next seven days. Diving into the games, Songs of Conquest is developed by Lavapotion. This is a turn-based 4X strategy experience that has players making tough decisions and participating in tactical combat while also managing their kingdom. "Songs of Conquest is a turn-based strategy game inspired by 90s classics. Lead powerful magicians called Wielders and venture to lands unknown," explains the developer. "Wage battles against armies that dare oppose you, hunt for powerful artifacts and expand your territory. The world is ripe for the taking – seize it." Meanwhile, Rogue Waters comes from developer Ice Code Games. This rogue-lite experience has you taking the role of Captain Cutter as he commands his ship and crew through procedurally generated encounters. You'll be recruiting and training crew, use sea creatures, and battle with other ships and pirates. "Set sail as Captain Cutter, a pirate caught in a deadly struggle for power and vengeance," adds the developer. "Navigate dangerous waters, unleash mythical sea creatures, and outwit enemies as you chase legendary treasure and confront dark secrets." The newly available Rogue Waters and Songs of Conquest giveaways on the Epic Games Store are set to run until June 11, giving PC gamers seven days to claim the latest offer. Once this closes out, a new freebie will take its place on the same day, which is slated to be Warhammer 40K Speed Freeks. Don't forget that mobile gamers can check out the Epic Game Store's weekly giveaways on Android and iOS to grab a freebie there as well.
    • Still using Classic Outlook? Microsoft highlights 15 reasons to switch to New Outlook by Usama Jawad As many of you may know, Microsoft has been trying to get customers to ditch Classic Outlook in favor of New Outlook for quite some time now. To that end, it has added numerous capabilities to the latter, including PST features, and it is working on several more, such as a unified inbox. However, customer response has been a bit lukewarm so far, with many considering the New Outlook to be "hot garbage". Now, Microsoft has highlighted 15 features that users can leverage in New Outlook in yet another attempt to get customers to migrate. Although not all of the 15 capabilities are exclusive to New Outlook, in fact, most of them are available in Classic Outlook as well. But Microsoft hopes that this combination of familiar and fresh features will be able to attract existing users as well as new ones. For ease of readability, we have summarized the 15 features below: Pin an email: This makes it easier to track important emails Snooze an email: You can temporarily snooze an email thread for a specific time frame until it becomes relevant again. This can be very useful in scenarios where you don't feel like actively following a thread or simply want to follow up on a later date Add multiple categories at the same time: You can assign multiple categories to an email through a single, simplified interface Sweep: As the name implies, you can define automated move processes on your inbox to declutter it, rather than cleaning it up manually Schedule send: Does exactly what it says on the tin, and can be useful when accommodating recipients in different timezones Simplified folder sharing: The sharing process has been simplified so permissions are automatically applied on parent folders Follow a meeting: This is an RSVP option that lets people know that you won't be able to join the meeting but would still like to access a recap Save calendar views: You can save different views for the calendar based on different workflows Improved meeting tracking: Organizers have more controls in viewing meeting responses, such as the ability to sort and download them. Typically useful when there is a large audience Meeting recap: The Outlook Calendar surfaces a meeting recap with recordings, transcripts, and shared files Filtered views: Allows you to declutter your Calendar so that it's easier to scan and schedule Change a recurring event: Users can modify future events of a series of meetings while preserving the configuration of previous ones Rename your email account: This labeling makes it easier to identify multiple accounts in Outlook Modern themes: Exactly what the name says, plus Dark Mode Keyboard shortcuts: This facilitates flexible user behavior as customers can choose between Outlook for Windows shortcuts, Outlook for the web, or turn them off completely There you have it. It's a decent list, but it remains to be seen if it will move the needle in a meaningful way for users who are attached to Classic Outlook. Again, a lot of the aforementioned features are already available in Outlook Classic, but for some, native functionality is not present, and people typically resort to workarounds. Microsoft will be hoping that it's primarily those capabilities that get people to finally switch.
    • Please I need help I been trying to find this secure boot on my ColorFul motherboard in the bios But i cant i turned off CSM everything watch every video i cant find it. BATTLE-AX B660M-HD DELUXE V20
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      478
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!