Recommended Posts

Let me get this straight... You actually like guys who look and act natural, and who are sweet and sensitive? That is quite a unique taste... Most girls only like those kind of guys in theory. When they actually get one, they either realize that it could be a serious relationship and get scared, or they start to feel bored and look for something new and challenging. Something manly, that is not easily 'tamed.'

You are right. They say they want the sensitive man, looks unimportant, etcetera. But they go for the handsome man who is not sensitive more often.

you are right. its many women like the ones you are describing. men too ofcource.

i think that everybody is attractive, in their one way. to be attractive is not allways about looks. it can be the way you talk. the way you walk. i dont know how to explain it...something that makes an explosion inside of you. everybody has their own taste.

but what happens when the beauty fades? because it doesnt last forever. but the personality will remain.

nah, looks doesnt matter at all. i want the person inside. i want a soulmate.

you are right. its many women like the ones you are describing. men too ofcource.

i think that everybody is attractive, in their one way. to be attractive is not allways about looks. it can be the way you talk. the way you walk. i dont know how to explain it...something that makes an explosion inside of you. everybody has their own taste.

but what happens when the beauty fades? because it doesnt last forever. but the personality will remain.

nah, looks doesnt matter at all. i want the person inside. i want a soulmate.

Don't we all lol

what is up with asians not shaving or trimming their pubes man ... i mean ... doesn;t it stink or get caught in something or hurts or dandruff or something? ...
That, in combination with the picture, have made me throw up ALMOST on my computer :|

Hahaha, I was trying to drink at the time, sadly didnt work out too well had to spit it out hahaha. Ahh good laugh.

In the morning around 8am I am have a clean no hair face but catch me around 3pm and out comes the stubble but around 8pm Folks just call me a WEREWOLF. I think for some ladies the stubble is a sign of the bad boy image.

Edited by redvamp128
I don't think so, lol... The article did a pretty good job of explaining the psychology behind stubble being attractive, and none of those musculine qualities are accentuated by being overweight. Though, to some men overweight women might appear healthier than thin ones for childbearing. It's all about finding a suitable mate.

I'm afraid I lack sources, but this comes from studies I learnt about in A level pyschology.. A waist hip ratio (waist/hip) of 0.7 was found to be most the most popular across many countries.

The preferred weight of women (i.e. what the average guy would like) was found to vary across cultures, heavily dependent on availability of food. So in countries like America where there is plenty, people preferred thinner women and in countries with very little food, they tended to prefer fatter women. Presumably it's all about health and fertility.

Let me get this straight... You actually like guys who look and act natural, and who are sweet and sensitive? That is quite a unique taste... Most girls only like those kind of guys in theory. When they actually get one, they either realize that it could be a serious relationship and get scared, or they start to feel bored and look for something new and challenging. Something manly, that is not easily 'tamed.'
You are right. They say they want the sensitive man, looks unimportant, etcetera. But they go for the handsome man who is not sensitive more often.

Ah you see, you say "girls" maybe you should look for older women. I had the same problem when I dated boys but then I found someone more mature. Or perhaps you just weren't right for each other...?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • https://www.tenforums.com/tuto...b-results-windows-10-a.html Check the comment dates. Some of them are as old as 2016.
    • I wonder how many are laid off for cost savings, and this being blamed on AI to make it sound less scary and bad, for a more positive "modern, with the times" spin for investors? Because Oracle is down 14% the past year. We're looking at a company struggling here. If AI would actually be working out so well for them that they can do massive layoffs, surely this would've been reflected the past year in their stock value?
    • AI is the beginning, wait until real robots replace more jobs, specifically jobs that require physical work.
    • AI is indeed eliminating jobs, and Oracle just proved it by Hamid Ganji There’s no question that AI has become the hottest trend in workplaces, and every company is trying to adopt AI-driven solutions across its operations. While some industry leaders repeatedly say AI won’t lead to massive layoffs, recent data suggest that AI is actually one of the main reasons some companies are reducing their workforce. According to Oracle’s annual regulatory filing, the company has laid off about 21,000 employees, or 13% of its workforce, amid increasing AI adoption. “The adoption and deployment of AI technologies across our operations have resulted, and may continue to result, in reductions to our workforce,” Oracle said in the filing. The software giant now has approximately 141,000 full-time employees, a notable decrease from 162,000 during the same period last year. Restructuring expenses, including severance payments, cost Oracle $1.84 billion in fiscal 2026. Additionally, around 49,000 Oracle employees were based in the U.S., while approximately 92,000 were employed internationally. Like many other companies, Oracle has fully embraced AI and concentrated much of its efforts on the technology. The company is also a key participant in the United States’ $500 billion Stargate Project, which aims to build multiple AI data centers across the country. When it comes to AI adoption and its impact on the workforce, opinions remain divided. NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang, whose company has been one of the biggest beneficiaries of the AI boom, recently said in an interview that attributing job cuts to AI is a “lazy” narrative. “The narrative that connects AI to job loss, for many of the CEOs that are doing it – it is just too lazy. AI has just arrived, how is it possible they're already losing jobs?” Huang said. However, statistics and recent reports tell a different story. According to Layoffs.fyi, 196 tech companies have laid off about 119,800 employees so far this year. Reducing staff and replacing roles with AI agents could become one of the most significant trends in the job market in the years ahead.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      97
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      89
    5. 5
      neufuse
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!