No Charges For Man Who Killed Burglars


Recommended Posts

This is murder of the 1st degree, he had prior intention and commited the act...

It was commited outside his house with shots to the back.

Anyone actually has doubt if these were americans citizens and not illegal immigrants the results would be diffrent?

I'm not sure whether 1st degree or manslaughter, or some other crime of murder variant, but he certainly should have been convicted of killing them, in my opinion.

And, yes, if these were two kids that were sons of a neighbor, I am pretty sure that the verdict would have been different. It would have pitted neighbor against neighbor, instead of US citizen bravely defending property from thieving immigrants. (N)

The 911 call is classic if you haven't listened to it. I definitely think the guy was going too far by going outside, but if he was correct in saying that they came onto his property and he felt threatened, then fire away. Thieves won't come around anytime soon if they know they are getting a shotgun slug that will send bodyparts flying for their troubles.

Keep in mind he can't do all the calm and cool thinking that everybody over the internet takes advantage of. Spur of the moment, adrenaline pumping, and not even a shred of doubt of what is going on right in front of you makes you act a bit differently than normal.

You would have a point... except for the whole 911 call where he states he is heading out specifically to shoot and kill them. :|

"They came in the front yard with me, man. I had no choice."

Actually, he did have a choice. He could have stayed in his house as advised by the 911 operator. He could have waited for police to get there and handle it. Not a hard concept. Breaking and entering doesn't mean your neighbor has the right to open fire and get away with it. Material things can be replaced. Lives can't.

I sure hope my neighbors AREN'T so mentally unstable as to think they should kill someone for walking away with material things. Anyone ever hear of this thing called insurance? But I guess for certain people on this board, they'd prefer homicidal neighbors that open fire at the first sign of trouble. To each their own I guess :rolleyes:

simple: was the man justified in killing these people?

1) if the robbers were leaving the neighbor's house and fleeing with the good, then NO. the trained 911 operator told him to stay inside the house! He should have stayed inside! no amount of things stolen is ever worth risking your life over! things can be replaced!

2) if the robbers were targetting his house next, then yes he was justified- because then the situation directly involves him.

he went out of his way to insert himself in that situation. calling 911 was all he was required to do as a good citizen and a good neighbour! \you need to leave this kind of stuff to the cops. Also when a highly trained 911 operator tells you to do something, YOU DO IT! they are not trying to put you in harms way!

and when he called back- it reminded me of my friend who use to work as a bouncer. what he would do when confronted outside the clubs by drunken people is, he would yell as loud as he could "hey man back off! i dont want to hurt you" then he would get in real close like he was hugging them and yell "hey get your hands off me!" and then he would proceed and kick the living crap out of them! why did he say all that? because when the cops showed up he had plenty of witnesses that heard him say that before the altercation.

sound familiar?

People are so quick to use guns over judgment. Now tell me who the real animals are?. I went out the other day and bought a gun because of the Supreme Court ruling. When asked why I was purchasing a gun, I pointed over at the other patrons of the store and said "That's why".

People are so quick to use guns over judgment. Now tell me who the real animals are?. I went out the other day and bought a gun because of the Supreme Court ruling. When asked why I was purchasing a gun, I pointed over at the other patrons of the store and said "That's why".

well since you are doing the same thing don't complain

Breaking and entering doesn't mean your neighbor has the right to open fire and get away with it.

actually, if you read the article, it does. you are allowed to defend your property and your neighbors property with deadly force in texas

"The message we're trying to send today is the criminal justice system works," Harris County District Attorney Kenneth Magidson told reporters at the courthouse
LOL this is the biggest BS i've heard this week. kids who pirate songs and movies are getting 30 years in jail, where murders are getting 15 with "good behavior"

i don't support being a vigilante. i think the guy should have stayed inside the house, but if he had any confidence that the police would show up and handle the situation then he wouldn't have gone outside to defend his house and himself

but don't even try to save face by saying the court system works. it's so f'd up it's not even funny

actually, if you read the article, it does. you are allowed to defend your property and your neighbors property with deadly force in texas

Actually, if you read the article you see it says "The use of deadly force is carefully limited in Texas law to certain circumstances", pretty much meaning aggravated robbery.

... but if he had any confidence that the police would show up and handle the situation then he wouldn't have gone outside to defend his house and himself
Except he didn't "go outside to defend his house and himself". He announced his intention was to kill.

I agree he went a little overboard in his actions, but at the same time I wouldn't object to someone like him being my neighbor. :yes:

Also, had they not been robbing from someones house they wouldn't have gotten shot and be dead now. ;)

He should've gotten some jail time for shooting them, but again had they not been stealing from someone they'd still be walking, talking, and breathing right now.

Death for robbery is harsh. But fear can be a very useful tool in preventing crime. If death was the penalty for robbery how many people do you think will try that ? Besides if somebody still tried it then they sure knew what was going to them so who's fault is it ?

I do not have a problem if a guy threatening got killed because of an act of self defense by a victim. In this case the man walked outside and put himself in danger while he could have very well stayed inside and been safe. Besides he announces his intentions before stepping out. Although his ultimate goal was right the way he went about achieving it was unfortunately incorrect.

In my opinion everyone should have a weapon that will very quickly disable a person but not kill them a la bear tranquilizer. Had the man used something like that the criminals would be alive and in jail and he would have safeguarded his neighbors belongings without getting in to trouble.

Edited by sweetsam
You would have a point... except for the whole 911 call where he states he is heading out specifically to shoot and kill them. :|

So what if some of the things he says don't match up or are a little bit extreme. I don't always make complete sense or say something I mean to say when my heart's racing so fast I feel like I ran a mile either. You're evaluating him without understanding him or his situation at all, which is exactly what I was originally talking about.

It's very easy to judge when you have no idea what it's like. He did what he felt was right, and that's all we can expect out of anybody. If this man went to prison it wouldn't be because he intentionally murdered somebody, it would be because he made the wrong choice. Which, surprisingly enough, is a very easy thing to do in the spur of the moment. I don't condemn people for that.

^^^ I didn't say that he didn't think it was right. Well, I am sure if you asked him (or any other sane person) they would say that it was NOT right to kill someone for robbery.

Yet that is what he said he was going to do.

So, now we have an accepted penalty of "death" for the crime of "robbery". I suppose no one ought to steal a candy bar from a local store, eh? ;)

At some point you have to agree that the punishment (two executions, one after the other) does not fit the crime (breaking & entering, theft).

Edited by markjensen
No burglar deserves death though!

Well, no innocent man deserves to have his house burgled by two selfish, unethical, untrustworthy, useless to society, PR**KS!!!

I think they got exactly what they deserved! Burglars cause misery to people daily! It's not just a case of having 'a couple of ya things nicked'. Some burglars steal sentimental property, some of them beat up the homeowners of which they are robbing (e.g. only today I saw in the paper this helpless, defenseless, pensioner got beaten badly by burglars! :angry:).

At the end of the day, if a person's possesions are stolen, it can cause a lot of grief & misery for that person. I'm sure you would be devastated if your laptop/PC/Mac & all your backups were stolen wouldn't you? Your music, pictures, videos, uni/school work, documents relating to your career, etc would be gone. No more! If that happened to me, I would want the people who did it to be extrememly hurt!

If I had to, for self defense, etc, then I would definately kill a person who is robbing my house, because they have no right to be there & it is my hardearned possesions been taken by some selfish ******!

It's ridiculous to suggest they don't deserve what they got for the misery they cause to others!

At some point you have to agree that the punishment (two executions, one after the other) does not fit the crime (breaking & entering, theft).

Again, I believe I must mention the misery & vast emotional pain (& sometimes physical pain) a robbery can cause to a person.

Some burglars will hurt their victims; others will take sentimental/valuable items which they have no right to do! The items are no theirs', why should they take them!?

Referring to your comment about 'taking a candy bar from a store'...: that is also very wrong & needs to be punished. How do you punish a crime like that? Yes, murder for something that small is very harsh (but tbh it he/she shouldn't be taking it in the first place, so they would deserve it), but prison for a fair amount of time should do the trick!

If you let people off, or give them a light punishment, they are never going to learn!

In my eyes, the burglars who were shot dead got exactly what they deserved for the misery & unnecessary pain they cause to others! Good riddance to them! They are obviously useless to society if they have to stoop so low as to emotionally torture innocent people!!!

Wow. I thought the tape I heard was a hoax. I heard this 911 call online.

Before people start talking about intent etc. if you had listened to the tape, you would know that he was scared for his life etc. He thought that the were coming for him next and didn't know whether they were armed.

I feel sorry for him and them.

On the one hand I think that burglars deserve what they get, and wish for laws like this in england, but on the other you have to pity those driven to crime.

Again, I believe I must mention the misery & vast emotional pain (& sometimes physical pain) a robbery can cause to a person.

Some burglars will hurt their victims; others will take sentimental/valuable items which they have no right to do! The items are no theirs', why should they take them!?

Referring to your comment about 'taking a candy bar from a store'...: that is also very wrong & needs to be punished. How do you punish a crime like that? Yes, murder for something that small is very harsh (but tbh it he/she shouldn't be taking it in the first place, so they would deserve it), but prison for a fair amount of time should do the trick!

If you let people off, or give them a light punishment, they are never going to learn!

In my eyes, the burglars who were shot dead got exactly what they deserved for the misery & unnecessary pain they cause to others! Good riddance to them! They are obviously useless to society if they have to stoop so low as to emotionally torture innocent people!!!

While harsh, you just effectively said you wouldn't object to the death penalty for stealing a 50 cent candy bar. Wow! Would you condone execution for speeding, copyright infringement or a host of other petty crime because, well, they shouldn't have done it in the first place? Im sure it would see a solid reduction in "crime", but at what cost to society and otherwise good people.

Im also not about to consider theft, sentimental items or not, emotional torture that warrants death. I can think of far worse ways to be "emotionally tortured".

Wow. I thought the tape I heard was a hoax. I heard this 911 call online.

Before people start talking about intent etc. if you had listened to the tape, you would know that he was scared for his life etc. He thought that the were coming for him next and didn't know whether they were armed.

I feel sorry for him and them.

On the one hand I think that burglars deserve what they get, and wish for laws like this in england, but on the other you have to pity those driven to crime.

I listened to the tape and i don't believe for a moment he sounded as if he was scared for his life. He said half a dozen times he was going to go outside with the intent to kill and sounded pretty calm about it to me.

While harsh, you just effectively said you wouldn't object to the death penalty for stealing a 50 cent candy bar. Wow! Would you condone execution for speeding, copyright infringement or a host of other petty crime because, well, they shouldn't have done it in the first place? Im sure it would see a solid reduction in "crime", but at what cost to society and otherwise good people.

Im also not about to consider theft, sentimental items or not, emotional torture that warrants death. I can think of far worse ways to be "emotionally tortured".

Yes, you're right. I did, in essence, condone the death penalty for somebody stealing a 50 cent candy bar... however, I also said, a petty theft like that should really only get a very long prison sentence because it is not really causing much misery to anyone. If a person got the death penalty (or got shot) for stealing a 50 cent candy bar, however, that wouldn't bother me, I wouldn't care & I would think that it serves them right, in a way, because they shouldn't steal, even something as little as that.

You said "...but at what cost to society and otherwise good people." Who are the "otherwise good people"? You cannot say burglars & anyone who does another hurtful crime (with intent) good people, can you? Anybody who steals anything in my mind is untrustworthy & evil. They are useless to society, Some person said they feel sorry for people who are "driven to crime & theft". No one is ever driven to crime & theft. It is their choice. If they cannot afford to buy something, then they should find ways, or, they should do what a lot of tramps/bums do & beg - it is better than stealing.

As you can tell, I feel very strongly about stealing & theft, as well as other hurtful crimes like rape, murder, pedophilia, GBH, etc. I'm worried that if somebody robbed my house, they could hurt me, or they could steal sentimental possessions, or they could steal my laptop & back-up hardrive - meaning all of the files & folders I have spent time accumulating & organizing will be gone for good... all my music, all my videos, all my pictures & all my university pictures. A person who does a dreadful crime like that deserves the death penalty in my eyes.

Prison is pointless as it is a waste of tax payers money & people get let out earlier than they should (with many re-offending). Prisons can also be very lenient. I know of one prisoner I was reading about who got a TV & everything. They shouldn't! If prison is that nice to them, they are more likely to re-offend. If anything, they should stay in thier stone cell with a stone toilet & a very uncomfortable bed. The fact that they have offended in that way once before, means they should get the death penalty. It serves them right! Get them off the face of this earth as they are useless to society & some of them have murdered/hurt innocent people.

You say what will the death penalty do to society? Well what does that mean? The only thing it can do is stop people wanting to commit hurtful crimes, can't it? It would be good to society. I mean, I only mean the death penalty should be used in cases where it is 100% proven that the criminal has done the crime -like in this case of robbery. If the homeowner had shot them so they were just injured before the police came, then you would know for sure it was them who did it.

Yes, you're right. I did, in essence, condone the death penalty for somebody stealing a 50 cent candy bar... however, I also said, a petty theft like that should really only get a very long prison sentence because it is not really causing much misery to anyone. If a person got the death penalty (or got shot) for stealing a 50 cent candy bar, however, that wouldn't bother me, I wouldn't care & I would think that it serves them right, in a way, because they shouldn't steal, even something as little as that.

Ok, let's play a little game I call The Value of Human Life.

A toddler grabs a 50 cent candy bar at the checkout line while mommy is getting the cash out of her wallet. That kid's life is worth something under $0.50 to you, right? Execution time.

Ok, what if it was a 5 cent mint. You know the ones they sell individually. Is that life worth something between a nickel and 50 cents? Or is it worth even less than a nickel?

I'm sure you would be devastated if your laptop/PC/Mac & all your backups were stolen wouldn't you? Your music, pictures, videos, uni/school work, documents relating to your career, etc would be gone. No more! If that happened to me, I would want the people who did it to be extrememly hurt!

Hurt, not killed. Besides, if your "precious" data was lost here's an idea to consider now: BACKUP. If my computer was ever stolen here's what I do. 1. Make an insurance claim. 2. Get a new computer. 3. Restore from backup.

That inconvenience and very small cost would make me absolutely angry but it doesn't give me any notion that it's worth taking anyone's life. It gives me the notion that I have to be responsible for the unknowns in life and take precautions.

Yes, you're right. I did, in essence, condone the death penalty for somebody stealing a 50 cent candy bar... however, I also said, a petty theft like that should really only get a very long prison sentence because it is not really causing much misery to anyone. If a person got the death penalty (or got shot) for stealing a 50 cent candy bar, however, that wouldn't bother me, I wouldn't care & I would think that it serves them right, in a way, because they shouldn't steal, even something as little as that.

You said "...but at what cost to society and otherwise good people." Who are the "otherwise good people"? You cannot say burglars & anyone who does another hurtful crime (with intent) good people, can you? Anybody who steals anything in my mind is untrustworthy & evil. They are useless to society, Some person said they feel sorry for people who are "driven to crime & theft". No one is ever driven to crime & theft. It is their choice. If they cannot afford to buy something, then they should find ways, or, they should do what a lot of tramps/bums do & beg - it is better than stealing.

As you can tell, I feel very strongly about stealing & theft, as well as other hurtful crimes like rape, murder, pedophilia, GBH, etc. I'm worried that if somebody robbed my house, they could hurt me, or they could steal sentimental possessions, or they could steal my laptop & back-up hardrive - meaning all of the files & folders I have spent time accumulating & organizing will be gone for good... all my music, all my videos, all my pictures & all my university pictures. A person who does a dreadful crime like that deserves the death penalty in my eyes.

Prison is pointless as it is a waste of tax payers money & people get let out earlier than they should (with many re-offending). Prisons can also be very lenient. I know of one prisoner I was reading about who got a TV & everything. They shouldn't! If prison is that nice to them, they are more likely to re-offend. If anything, they should stay in thier stone cell with a stone toilet & a very uncomfortable bed. The fact that they have offended in that way once before, means they should get the death penalty. It serves them right! Get them off the face of this earth as they are useless to society & some of them have murdered/hurt innocent people.

You say what will the death penalty do to society? Well what does that mean? The only thing it can do is stop people wanting to commit hurtful crimes, can't it? It would be good to society. I mean, I only mean the death penalty should be used in cases where it is 100% proven that the criminal has done the crime -like in this case of robbery. If the homeowner had shot them so they were just injured before the police came, then you would know for sure it was them who did it.

wow. :|

They would not be coming out of your neighbors house with sacks of stoeln items though would they?

There's a special disease of which I can't recall the name that forces people to steal items even when they don't need it. Kleptomania I guess.

What, then?

Anyway,I won't comment, I don't know what exactly happened. But if it was luck that they were burglars, and even worse, criminal ones, then the guy was definitely wrong.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 by Razvan Serea NetSpeedTray is a lightweight, open-source Windows network monitor that shows live upload and download speeds directly on the Taskbar. Designed for efficiency, it quietly sits in the system tray, conserving CPU and battery with dynamic updates. It blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11, adapts to light/dark themes, and auto-positions to avoid overlaps. Features include accurate interface detection, customizable display, optional mini-graph, color coding, granular font and unit control, detailed per-interface history graphs, safe data management, and easy CSV export—bringing the network monitoring Windows forgot. NetSpeedTray key features: Lightweight & Efficient Runs quietly in your system tray without consuming resources. Features a "Dynamic Update Rate" that lowers refresh frequency when the network is idle to save CPU and battery life. Native Look & Feel Blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11 UI. Smart detection for light and dark taskbar themes ensures text is always visible. Intelligent & Adaptive Positioning Automatically finds empty space next to your system tray and shifts to make room for new icons, preventing overlaps. Seamless OS Integration Behaves like a native Windows component. Hides instantly with auto-hiding taskbar Hides when a fullscreen app is active Smart Network Monitoring Accurate by Default: Auto mode identifies your main internet connection and ignores noise from VPNs or virtual adapters. Easy Interface Selection: Switch effortlessly between Auto, All, or Selected network interfaces via intuitive radio buttons. Total Visual Customization Free Move Mode: Unlock and place the widget anywhere on your screen. Optional Mini-Graph: Real-time graph of recent network activity with adjustable opacity. Color Coding: Customize colors and speed thresholds to quickly see network status. Granular Display Control Text & Font: Adjust font family, size, weight, and alignment. Units: Automatic (B/s, KB/s, MB/s) or fixed Mbps display. Precision: Set decimal places and always show them for uniform appearance. Detailed & Intelligent History Graph Smart Scale: Logarithmic scale shows low-level traffic and large spikes clearly. Per-Interface Filtering: View speed history for specific adapters (Wi-Fi, Ethernet, VPN). Safe & Efficient Data Management: Adjustable retention, automatic cleanup, optimized database. Easy Data Export: Export raw data to .csv or save high-quality graphs for reports. NetSpeedTray v1.3.3: The Updater Fix A stabilization release that repairs a critical regression in v1.3.2: the app shipped without OpenSSL, which silently broke every HTTPS request — including the built-in update checker (the "Could not check for updates" error many of you hit). This release restores it, hardens the build so it can't happen again, and fixes a startup crash plus four other reported bugs. Changes: Fixed update checking — Resolved a critical issue that prevented the app from checking for updates ("Could not check for updates"). Fixed startup crash with Auto-Cycling — The app no longer crashes on launch after enabling Cycle display mode. Fixed incorrect network speeds on 10GbE adapters — Multi-gigabit network cards now display speeds correctly instead of being stuck at 0. Improved color coding — Default color is shown when idle, and color/threshold changes now apply immediately without restarting. Fullscreen visibility fix — The widget now correctly stays visible over fullscreen apps when Keep Visible is enabled. Improved AMD Ryzen temperature detection — More reliable CPU temperature monitoring for Ryzen processors. Cleaner upgrades — Installer now removes outdated application files during upgrades, preventing DLL/version conflicts while preserving user settings. Improved stability — Fixed potential DLL loading issues by excluding critical OpenSSL and NumPy components from UPX compression. Better settings window — Scrollbars removed and layout improved for a cleaner experience. Localization improvements — Updated translations and completed missing UI text across all supported languages. More reliable releases — Added regression tests covering recent critical fixes, bringing the test suite to 196 passing tests. [full release notes] Download: NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 | 87.9 MB (Open Source) Download: NetSpeedTray Portable | 101.0 MB View: NetSpeedTray Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      471
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      217
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!